SV40 late promoter: contribution of the initiation site sequences to basal late promoter activity

Simian virus 40 T antigen activates the late promoter by modulating the activity of negative regulatory elements

Late promoter activity measured before viral DNA replication results from a complex involvement of negative and positive cis-acting elements located both in the enhancer and in the 21-bp repeats. GC motifs located within the 21-bp repeats act in cooperation with sequences overlapping the early TATA box to down-regulate the late promoter activity. Analysis of insertion mutants indicates that the late promoter might be negatively regulated at least partially by the early promoter machinery. The GTI motif located within the enhancer as well as the GC motifs lose the ability to down-regulate the late promoter in the presence of T antigen. Results obtained with tsA58 protein indicate that two different domains of T antigen are involved in the negative autoregulation of the early promoter activity and in the release of the down-regulation of the late promoter by the GC motifs.

Contribution of different GC-motifs to the control of simian virus 40 late promoter activity

During the course of lytic infection the 21-bp repeat region regulates differentially the late gene expression; a mutant deleted for this region expresses late genes either to a higher level in the absence of T antigen or to a lower level in the late phase of infection as compared to wild type (23). By analysing a series of clustered point mutations generated within the GC-motifs we show that i) mutations within motifs I and II stimulate late transcription two to three-fold, suggesting that competition for transcription machinery between early-early and late promoters is mediated by these two motifs, ii) after viral replication, simultaneous mutations within motifs IV, V and VI decrease to 23% the efficiency of late transcription, indicating that these motifs are elements of the late promoter. Moreover comparison of results presented in this paper with results published by Barrera-Saldana et al. strongly suggest that late-early and late promoters are regulated in a similar manner.