Temporal and spatial characteristics of visual suppression during voluntary saccadic eye movement

Vision During Saccadic Eye Movements

The perceptual consequences of eye movements are manifold: Each large saccade is accompanied by a drop of sensitivity to luminance-contrast, low-frequency stimuli, impacting both conscious vision and involuntary responses, including pupillary constrictions. They also produce transient distortions of space, time, and number, which cannot be attributed to the mere motion on the retinae. All these are signs that the visual system evokes active processes to predict and counteract the consequences of saccades. We propose that a key mechanism is the reorganization of spatiotemporal visual fields, which transiently increases the temporal and spatial uncertainty of visual representations just before and during saccades. On one hand, this accounts for the spatiotemporal distortions of visual perception; on the other hand, it implements a mechanism for fusing pre- and postsaccadic stimuli. This, together with the active suppression of motion signals, ensures the stability and continuity of our visual experience.

Mechanisms of Saccadic Suppression in Primate Cortical Area V4

Psychophysical studies have shown that subjects are often unaware of visual stimuli presented around the time of an eye movement. This saccadic suppression is thought to be a mechanism for maintaining perceptual stability. The brain might accomplish saccadic suppression by reducing the gain of visual responses to specific stimuli or by simply suppressing firing uniformly for all stimuli. Moreover, the suppression might be identical across the visual field or concentrated at specific points. To evaluate these possibilities, we recorded from individual neurons in cortical area V4 of nonhuman primates trained to execute saccadic eye movements. We found that both modes of suppression were evident in the visual responses of these neurons and that the two modes showed different spatial and temporal profiles: while gain changes started earlier and were more widely distributed across visual space, nonspecific suppression was found more often in the peripheral visual field, after the completion of the saccade. Peripheral suppression was also associated with increased noise correlations and stronger local field potential oscillations in the α frequency band. This pattern of results suggests that saccadic suppression shares some of the circuitry responsible for allocating voluntary attention.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

We explore our surroundings by looking at things, but each eye movement that we make causes an abrupt shift of the visual input. Why doesn't the world look like a film recorded on a shaky camera? The answer in part is a brain mechanism called saccadic suppression, which reduces the responses of visual neurons around the time of each eye movement. Here we reveal several new properties of the underlying mechanisms. First, the suppression operates differently in the central and peripheral visual fields. Second, it appears to be controlled by oscillations in the local field potentials at frequencies traditionally associated with attention. These results suggest that saccadic suppression shares the brain circuits responsible for actively ignoring irrelevant stimuli.

Analysis of a Stroboscopic Illusion of Motion

A visual illusion reported by D. M. MacKay occurs when a steady light is viewed against a surrounding intermittently-illuminated circle. The light appears to jump out of the circle when (1) saccadic eye movements are made to or from the stationary light and circle, and (2) when a subject visually tracks the moving light and circle. We measured the frequency of the illusion under condition (1), and under modified versions of condition (2) in which the circle was replaced by a vertical line to one side of the light or by two vertical lines at the same distance from the light on opposite sides. The effects of varying eye movement distances and rates of intermittent illumination on the frequency of the illusion are investigated. The normal deviate corresponding to the probability of occurrence of the illusion on a single illumination flash is found to be linearly related to ln( x/r), where x is the distance the light moves between flashes, and r is the radius of the background circle or the perpendicular distance of the line to the light. The illusion occurs because the changing position of the circle or line is not predicted during the interval between flashes, and the position of the light is perceived relative to the previous location of the circle or line.

Suppression and reversal of motion perception around the time of the saccade

We make fast, “saccadic” eye movements to capture finely resolved foveal snapshots of the world but these saccades cause motion artefacts. The artefacts go unnoticed, perhaps because the brain suppresses them through subcortical oculomotor signals feeding back into visual cortex. Opposing views, however, claim that passive mechanisms suffice: saccadic shearing forces might render the retina insensitive to the artefacts or post-saccadic snapshots might mask them before they enter consciousness. Crucially, only active suppression could explain perceptual changes that precede saccades but existing evidence for presaccadic misperception are ill-suited for addressing this issue: Previous studies have found misperceptions of space for objects briefly flashed before saccades, but perhaps only because observers confused the timing of flashes and saccades before they could be tested (“postdiction”), and presaccadic motion perception might have appeared to decline because motion stimuli persisted past eye movement onset. Here we addressed these concerns using briefly flashed two-frame animations (50 ms) to probe people’s motion sensitivity during and around saccades. We found that sensitivity declined before saccade onset, even when the probe appeared entirely outside the saccade, and this sensitivity decline was present for motion in every direction relative to saccade, ruling out problems with postdiction. Intriguingly, brief periods during the saccade produced negative sensitivity as if motion was reversed, arguably due to postsaccadic enhancement. These data suggest that motion perception is minimized during saccades through active suppression, complementing neurophysiological findings of colliculo-pulvinar projections that suppress the cortical middle temporal area around the time of the saccade.

A sensorimotor role for traveling waves in primate visual cortex

Traveling waves of neural activity are frequently observed to occur in concert with the presentation of a sensory stimulus or the execution of a movement. Although such waves have been studied for decades, little is known about their function. Here we show that traveling waves in the primate extrastriate visual cortex provide a means of integrating sensory and motor signals. Specifically, we describe a traveling wave of local field potential (LFP) activity in cortical area V4 of macaque monkeys that is triggered by the execution of saccadic eye movements. These waves sweep across the V4 retinotopic map, following a consistent path from the foveal to the peripheral representations of space; their amplitudes correlate with the direction and size of each saccade. Moreover, these waves are associated with a reorganization of the postsaccadic neuronal firing patterns, which follow a similar retinotopic progression, potentially prioritizing the processing of behaviorally relevant stimuli.

Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades

Laboratory tasks used to study vision and attention usually require steady fixation, while natural visual processing occurs during the brief pauses between successive saccades. We studied vision and attentional allocation during intersaccadic pauses as subjects made repetitive sequences of saccades. Displays contained six outline squares located along the perimeter of an imaginary circle (diam 4 degrees). Saccades were made in sequence to every other square. The visual task was to identify the orientation (2AFC) of a Gabor test stimulus that appeared briefly (91 ms) along with superimposed noise in one of the squares during a randomly selected intersaccadic pause. Gabor location was cued in advance and noise frames were presented in all squares. Contrast thresholds during intersaccadic pauses were as much as 2-3 times higher than during steady fixation with comparable cueing. Thresholds improved over time during the intersaccadic pause, and the lowest extrafoveal thresholds (statistically indistinguishable from those at the same locations during steady fixation) were found for the location that was to be the target of the next saccade in the sequence. These results show that vision during intersaccadic pauses varies over space and time due to changes in the distribution of attention, as well as to visual suppression that may be related to the execution of the saccades themselves. Generation of sequences of accurate saccades encouraged a strategy of attentional allocation in which resources were dedicated primarily to the goal of the next saccade, leaving little attention for processing objects at other locations.

Saccadic suppression of displacement: separate influences of saccade size and of target retinal eccentricity

The threshold for detection of displacements of visual objects is higher during voluntary saccades than it is during steady gaze ("saccadic suppression of displacement"; SSD). Relative contributions to SSD of extraretinal and retinal factors were investigated by measuring displacement thresholds in four experiments in which three observers judged whether a test flash, presented after a saccade or a period of fixation, was located to the left or right of a reference point viewed earlier. The experiments, involving saccades ranging from 4 to 12 deg in length, separated the effects of saccade size from the effects of retinal eccentricity of the reference point, and also separated the effects of retinal eccentricity of the test flash from both. The influences of the three are nearly linearly independent. Approximately 20% of the total influence on SSD derives from retinal influences of test flash and reference point; 80% is due to extraretinal influence associated with saccade size. A signal/noise model that accounted well for our previous on SSD (Li & Matin, 1990a,b) was extended to account for the present results. The model also provides a unified treatment of SSD and of the saccadic suppression of visibility (SSV).

Motion perception during saccades

Although the retinal image is displaced by each saccade performed we do not perceive the visual environment moving concordant with the saccades. In this study experiments were designed in which additional movement of most of the visual scene was applied during saccades. The subjects perceived the intrasaccadic movement after the saccade. The perceived speed of this movement was decreased and the threshold amplitude was increased compared to perception during fixation. The intrasaccadic movement perception was based on a novel aftereffect of motion perception. The velocity of retinal slip did not affect the threshold. If the retinal slip speed during saccades was temporally reduced by an intrasaccadic movement parallel to the saccade, the threshold amplitude was identical to the threshold amplitude obtained by intrasaccadic movement opposite to the saccade increasing retinal slip speed. Horizontal intrasaccadic movements were detected at lower thresholds than vertical movements independent of saccade direction. In addition, the thresholds were not effected by the saccade amplitude suggesting that neither speed, duration, nor direction of eye movement related retinal slip affects the amount of suppression. Our results suggest that saccadic suppression is related to delayed central processing of retinal information during saccades. This processing does not involve saccade parameters such as direction and amplitude.

Suppression of sensitivity to change in target disparity during vergence eye movements

It has been demonstrated recently in human psychophysical experiments that sensitivity to surround displacement is suppressed during convergence eye movements. To determine whether sensitivity to changes in target disparity is also reduced, responses to test disparities that were superimposed on standard 4 degrees step disparities were investigated. The test disparities consisted of brief (20 ms) positive and negative pulses as well as steps (in the range of +/- 0.6 degrees). A two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used in which the test disparity was presented in either the first or the second portion of a trial. The results showed that suppression of both test pulse and step disparities began before the start of the convergence movement and continued during the movement. Maximum suppression was about 0.50 to 0.85 log units and occurred between 150 ms before to 50 ms after convergence onset. The differences in sensitivity curves for pulse and step stimuli suggest the presence of different central and peripheral neural factors during vergence eye movements.

Saccadic suppression of displacement: influence of postsaccadic exposure duration and of saccadic stimulus elimination

The threshold for detection of stimulus displacement, which is normally raised in the presence of voluntary saccades relative to its value during steady fixation ("saccadic suppression of displacement"), decreases from 50x to 25x its value during steady fixation when the duration of the second display is experimentally increased from 33 to 461 msec; further increase of the duration of the second display has no additional effect. It might be expected that this improvement in sensitivity to displacement is a consequence of the elimination from perception of the visible smear corresponding to the saccadic stimulus by the action of metacontrast from the postsaccadic stimulus. That this is not so is shown by the fact that the improvement in displacement sensitivity with increased postsaccadic exposure duration is unaffected by experimental elimination of the retinal stimulus normally present during the saccade, even under conditions for which the saccadic stimulus is normally visible and appears smeared. The results demonstrate that the basis for saccadic suppression of displacement lies in the transient saccade-related modification of extraretinal eye position information.