Higher-harmonic adaptation and the detection of squarewave gratings

The role of lateral modulation in orientation-specific adaptation effect

Center-surround modulation in visual processing reflects a normalization process of contrast gain control in the responsive neurons. Prior adaptation to a clockwise (CW) tilted grating, for example, leads to the percept of counterclockwise tilt in a vertical grating, referred to as the tilt-aftereffect (TAE). We previously reported that the magnitude of the TAE is modulated by adding a same-orientation annular surround to an adapter, suggesting inhibitory lateral modulation. To further examine the property of this lateral modulation effect on the perception of a central target, we here used center-surround sinusoidal patterns as adapters and varied the adapter surround and center orientations independently. The target had the same spatial extent as the adapter center with no physical overlap with the adapter surround. Participants were asked to judge the target orientation as tilted either CW or counterclockwise from vertical after adaptation. Results showed that, when the surround orientation was held constant, the TAE magnitude was determined by the adapter center, peaking between 10° and 20° of tilt. More important, the adapter surround orientation modulated the adaptation effect such that the TAE magnitude first decreased and then increased as the surround orientation became increasingly more different from that of the center, suggesting that the surround modulation effect was indeed orientation specific. Our data can be accounted for by a divisive inhibition model, in which (1) the adaptation effect is represented by increasing the normalizing constant and (2) the surround modulation is captured by two multiplicative sensitivity parameters determined by the adapter surround orientation.

Interactions among spatial frequency and orientation channels adapted concurrently

Interactions between size and orientation-specific mechanisms in the human visual system were investigated using a sequential adaptation technique. Subjects adapted to a vertical, 4 c/deg high-contrast (0.7) sinewave grating that was interleaved at a rate of 0.5 Hz with another adapting grating differing either in (1) spatial frequency or (2) orientation. Before and after adaptation contrast thresholds were measured for a vertical 4 c/deg sinewave test grating. The resultant elevation in contrast threshold was plotted as a function of the (1) spatial frequency or (2) orientation differences between the first and second adapting gratings. Maximum threshold elevation was found when both adapting gratings shared the same spatial frequency and orientation. Minimum elevations were found when the second grating's spatial frequency or orientation differed by approx. 1.5 octaves or 45 deg, respectively. Beyond these values threshold elevations reapproached the baseline value measured in a control condition, where the 4.0 c/deg adapting grating was interleaved with a blank. The minimum threshold elevations were 0.2-0.3 log units below the baseline level. The results suggest the existence of inhibitory interactions between neural mechanisms tuned to the size and orientation of retinal images.