The response of macaque ganglion cells and human observers to heterochromatically modulated lights: the effect of stimulus size

Suppressive surrounds and contrast gain in magnocellular-pathway retinal ganglion cells of macaque

The modulation sensitivity of visual neurons can be influenced by remote stimuli which, when presented alone, cause no change in the ongoing discharge rate of the neuron. We show here that the extraclassical surrounds that underlie these effects are present in magnocellular-pathway (MC) but not in parvocellular-pathway (PC) retinal ganglion cells of the macaque. The response of MC cells to drifting gratings and flashing spots was halved by drifting or contrast-reversing gratings surrounding their receptive fields, but PC cell responses were unaffected. The suppression cannot have arisen from the classical receptive field, or been caused by scattered light, because it could be evoked by annuli that themselves caused little or no response from the cell, and is consistent with the action of a divisive suppressive mechanism. Suppression in MC cells was broadly tuned for spatial and temporal frequency and greater at high contrast. If perceptual phenomena with similar stimulus contexts, such as the "shift effect" and saccadic suppression, have a retinal component, then they reflect the activity of the MC pathway.

Spectrally opponent inputs to the human luminance pathway: slow +M and -L cone inputs revealed by intense long-wavelength adaptation

The nature of the inputs to achromatic luminance flicker perception was explored psychophysically by measuring middle- (M-) and long-wavelength-sensitive (L-) cone modulation sensitivities, M- and L-cone phase delays, and spectral sensitivities as a function of temporal frequency. Under intense long-wavelength adaptation, the existence of multiple luminance inputs was revealed by substantial frequency-dependent changes in all three types of measure. Fast (f) and slow (s) M-cone input signals of the same polarity (+sM and +fM) sum at low frequencies, but then destructively interfere near 16 Hz because of the delay between them. In contrast, fast and slow L-cone input signals of opposite polarity (-sL and +fL) cancel at low frequencies, but then constructively interfere near 16 Hz. Although these slow, spectrally opponent luminance inputs (+sM and -sL) would usually be characterized as chromatic, and the fast, non-opponent inputs (+fM and +fL) as achromatic, both contribute to flicker photometric nulls without producing visible colour variation. Although its output produces an achromatic percept, the luminance channel has slow, spectrally opponent inputs in addition to the expected non-opponent ones. Consequently, it is not possible in general to silence this channel with pairs of 'equiluminant' alternating stimuli, since stimuli equated for the non-opponent luminance mechanism (+fM and +fL) may still generate spectrally opponent signals (+sM and +sL).

Visual responses of ganglion cells of a New-World primate, the capuchin monkey, Cebus apella

1. The genetic basis of colour vision in New-World primates differs from that in humans and other Old-World primates. Most New-World primate species show a polymorphism; all males are dichromats and most females trichromats. 2. In the retina of Old-World primates such as the macaque, the physiological correlates of trichromacy are well established. Comparison of the retinae in New- and Old-World species may help constrain hypotheses as to the evolution of colour vision and the pathways associated with it. 3. Ganglion cell behaviour was recorded from trichromatic and dichromatic members of a New-World species (the capuchin monkey, Cebus apella) and compared with macaque data. Despite some differences in quantitative detail (such as a temporal response extended to higher frequencies), results from trichromatic animals strongly resembled those from the macaque. 4. In particular, cells of the parvocellular (PC) pathway showed characteristic frequency-dependent changes in responsivity to luminance and chromatic modulation, cells of the magnocellular (MC) pathway showed frequency-doubled responses to chromatic modulation, and the surround of MC cells received a chromatic input revealed on changing the phase of heterochromatically modulated lights. 5. Ganglion cells of dichromats were colour-blind versions of those of trichromats. 6. This strong physiological homology is consistent with a common origin of trichromacy in New- and Old-World monkeys; in the New-World primate the presence of two pigments in the middle-to-long wavelength range permits full expression of the retinal mechanisms of trichromatic vision.

Colour adaptation modifies the temporal properties of the long- and middle-wave cone signals in the human luminance mechanism

The human luminance mechanism (LUM) detects rapid flicker and motion, summating the neurally integrated L' and M' 'contrast' signals from the long- and middle-wave cones, respectively. We previously observed large temporal phase shifts between the L' and M' signals in LUM, which were maximal and of reversed sign on green versus orange background fields and which were accompanied by large variations in the relative L' and M' contrast weights. The effects were modelled with phasic magnocellar retinal ganglion cells. The changing L' versus M' contrast weights in the model predict that the temporal dynamics of the L' and M' luminance signals will differ on green and orange fields. This is assessed with several protocols. Motion thresholds for 1 cycle deg(-1) drifting gratings or static pulsed gratings on the orange field show that the M' signal is more temporally bandpass than the L' signal; this reverses on the green field. Strong motion due to the different dynamics of the L' and M' signals is even seen with a pair of L' and M' gratings pulsed simultaneously. Impulse response functions were measured with gratings pulsed spatially in phase or antiphase. The impulse response was clearly biphasic for the M' signal on the orange field and L' signal on the green field, while the other signals were more sustained. The impulse responses predicted the motion seen with gratings pulsed in spatial quadrature.

Temporal analysis of the topographic ERG: chromatic versus achromatic stimulation

The topographic electroretinogram evoked by multi-focal exchange of black and white or red and green stimuli was analysed into linear and non-linear Wiener kernels. The first-order (temporally linear) response showed a biphasic waveform which inverted as the luminance ratio of the exchanged colours passed through unity (established both psychophysically and photometrically). A short latency non-linearity which was dependant on luminance contrast was observed in both chromatic and achromatic ERG. However, in the chromatic second-order response, a long-latency non-linearity, foveally prominent, with a distinct skew in power towards the nasal retina, appeared around the isoluminant point, between the points of silent substitution for the L and M-cone types. Modelling of the second-order responses showed that over a wide range of luminance ratios, the chromatic ERG is well described by a linear combination of the achromatic (contrast-dependent) component and the response at isoluminance. The difference in second-order response between coloured and black and white stimulation, at the same luminance contrast, showed that the long-latency non-linearity is recorded when the red and green cone types are operating out of phase and peaks in amplitude at a green/red luminance ratio of 0.8. This interpretation was confirmed by the lack of the long-latency non-linearity in colour-anomalous subjects (whether deficient in the L or the M-cone type). A marked similarity exists between the properties of the long-latency non-linearity and the frequency-doubled response generated in the ganglion cells of the magnocellular pathway.

Colour adaptation modifies the long-wave versus middle-wave cone weights and temporal phases in human luminance (but not red-green) mechanism

1. The human luminance (LUM) mechanism detects rapid flicker and motion, responding to a linear sum of contrast signals, L' and M', from the long-wave (L) and middle-wave (M) cones. The red-green mechanism detects hue variations, responding to a linear difference of L' and M' contrast signals. 2. The two detection mechanisms were isolated to assess how chromatic adaptation affects summation of L' and M' signals in each mechanism. On coloured background (from blue to red), we measured, as a function of temporal frequency, both the relative temporal phase of the L' and M' signals producing optimal summation and the relative L' and M' contrast weights of the signals (at the optimal phase for summation). 3. Within the red-green mechanism at 6 Hz, the phase shift between the L' and M' signals was negligible on each coloured field, and the L' and M' contrast weights were equal and of opposite sign. 4. Relative phase shifts between the L' and M' signals in the LUM mechanism were markedly affected by adapting field colour. For stimuli of 1 cycle deg-1 and 9 Hz, the temporal phase shift was zero on a green-yellow field (approximately 570 nm). On an orange field, the L' signal lagged M' by as much as 70 deg phase while on a green field M' lagged L' by as much as 70 deg. The asymmetric phase shift about yellow adaptation reveals a spectrally opponent process which controls the phase shift. The phase shift occurs at an early site, for colour adaptation of the other eye had no effect, and the phase shift measured monocularly was identical for flicker and motion, thus occurring before the motion signal is extracted (this requires an extra delay). 5. The L' versus M' phase shift in the LUM mechanism was generally greatest at intermediate temporal frequencies (4-12 Hz) and was small at high frequencies (20-25 Hz). The phase shift was greatest at low spatial frequencies and strongly reduced at high spatial frequencies (5 cycle deg-1), indicating that the receptive field surround of neurones is important for the phase shift. 6. These temporal phase shifts were confirmed by measuring motion contrast thresholds for drifting L cone and M cone gratings summed in different spatial phases. Owing to the large phase shifts on green or orange fields, the L and M components were detected about equally well by the LUM mechanism (at 1 cycle deg-1 and 9 Hz) when summed spatially in phase or in antiphase. Antiphase summation is typically thought to produce an equiluminant red-green grating. 7. At low spatial frequency, the relative L' and M' contrast weights in the LUM mechanism (assessed at the optimal phase for summation) changed strongly with field colour and temporal frequency. 8. The phase shifts and changing contrast weights were modelled with phasic retinal ganglion cells, with chromatic adaptation strongly modifying the receptive field surround. The cells summate L' and M' in their centre, while the surround L' and M' signals are both antagonistic to the centre for approximately 570 nm yellow adaptation. Green or orange adaptation is assumed to modify the L and M surround inputs, causing them to be opponent with respect to each other, but with reversed polarity on the green versus orange field (to explain the chromatic reversal of the phase shift). Large changes in the relative L' and M' weights on green versus orange fields indicate the clear presence of the spectrally opponent surround even at 20 Hz. The spectrally opponent surround appears sluggish, with a long delay (approximately 20 ms) relative to the centre.