The cyclophosphamide, hexamethylmelamine, 5 fluorouracil (CHF) regimen in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer

Cytoreductive surgery for gynecologic malignancies--new standards of care

Studies on cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer have consistently shown a strong correlation between cytoreduction and survival, with the best survival observed in patients who have no visible residual disease after successful cytoreductive surgery. Recent data that intraperitoneal chemotherapy further improves survival after optimal cytoreduction adds to the potential benefit of such surgery. More recently, significant survival benefit from optimal cytoreduction has also been shown for patients with recurrent disease and for women with advanced endometrial carcinoma. The selection criteria for patients and critical aspects of the operative technique and timing of cytoreductive surgery are discussed.

Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma

Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories. Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early- or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach. Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery, bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also discussed.

Diagnosis and management of epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States. Although there has been a statistically significant improvement in 5-year survival, in 2005 more than 16,000 women were expected to die of this disease. To date, there is no reliable method to screen for ovarian cancer; therefore, the majority of cases are diagnosed with advanced disease. For early ovarian cancer, appropriate surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy for selected cases will result in survival rates of 90-95%. For advanced ovarian cancer, survival depends primarily on the success of the initial surgical procedure. Patients with complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease are often cured with adjuvant chemotherapy. There is growing evidence that these patients with microscopic residual disease are excellent candidates for intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and this mode of chemotherapy delivery may be their best opportunity for cure. Patients with optimal cytoreduction also may benefit from intraperitoneal chemotherapy, but cure is less likely. For patients with suboptimal cytoreduction, intravenous chemotherapy with a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the current standard therapy. Most of these patients will experience recurrence of the cancer, with small chance of cure. Salvage chemotherapy is important in ovarian cancer because many patients respond to several salvage regimens. Because of the high response rate of ovarian cancer, even after relapse, it is probably better to consider 10-year survival as the ideal end point. Finally, new biologic agents, in combination with traditional surgery and chemotherapy, may result in further improvement in survival for patients with ovarian cancer.

Predictive factors for irresectability in advanced ovarian cancer

Despite advances in surgical modalities and chemotherapeutic agents, the 5-year survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer is barely 40-50%. At the moment, optimally cytoreductive primary surgery is the best option for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Predictive factors of primary optimum reduction surgery have been described based on imaging studies and tumor markers and based on the premise to know a priori the weight and tumor volume, with promising results. A retrospective study was conducted based on the hypothesis that it is feasible to identify those patients not susceptible of undergoing optimum primary cytoreductive surgery. The variables associated with a lesser probability of success in this study are the presence of palpable abdominal tumor on physical examination, the presence of tumor in Douglas' cul-de-sac on vaginal exploration, the presence of ascites in any quantity, elevation of CA-125 above 1000 U/l, and the presence of pulmonary and liver metastases. The success rate for cytoreduction was 62% when none or one of these variables was present and 32% when two or more variables were present.

A population-based study of patterns of care for ovarian cancer: who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is not?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the fraction of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer and seen by a gynecologic oncologist and to compare outcomes with those patients and others who are not seen by a gynecologic oncologist.

METHODS

The statewide, population-based Utah Cancer Registry was used to identify 848 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1992 and 1998. Differences between selected characteristics of cases seen/not seen by gynecologic oncologists were assessed with chi2 tests, and survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing.

RESULTS

Of 848 incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in Utah residents during the period 1992-1998, 333 (39.3%) were seen by a gynecologic oncologist at some time during their cancer diagnosis and/or treatment. The percentage of ovarian cancer cases seen by a gynecologic oncologist varied with age: 35.6% of cases under 40 years of age at diagnosis were seen by a gynecologic oncologist, as were 54.5% of cases 40-59 years of age, 42.6% of cases 60-69 years, and 23.7% of women 70+ years of age (chi2 test, P < 0.01). The percentage of ovarian cancer cases seen by a gynecologic oncologists increased during the study period, from 33.0% in 1992-1993 to 47.5% in 1997-1998 (chi2 test for trend, P < 0.01). The vast majority of the state's population resides within a contiguous, four-county area near the only major city where gynecologic oncology care is available. Ovarian cancer cases that resided within that geographic area were generally more likely to have been seen by a gynecologic oncologist than those who lived in more rural regions of the state (42.7 and 27.1%, respectively; chi2 test, P < 0.01). For ovarian cancer cases diagnosed with local or regional stages of disease, there were no significant differences in survivorship between those treated or not treated by gynecologic oncologists. Among cases diagnosed with advanced disease, those cases seen by gynecologic oncologists had a significant survival advantage when compared to those that were not (median survival 26 and 15 months, respectively, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Gynecologic oncologists see less than half of ovarian cancer patients. Patients under 40 years of age, over 70 years of age, and in rural areas were significantly less likely to be seen by a gynecologic oncologist in their course of treatment. Patients with advanced disease experienced a significant survival advantage when a gynecologic oncologist was involved in their care.

A critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer

Due in most part to the abundant retrospective evidence suggesting that surgical cytoreduction is essential to the management of advanced ovarian cancer, most clinicians do not question its application. Irrespective, there are many who still doubt its value, given its unique role in ovarian cancer, in comparison to other solid tumors. While many papers have extolled the virtues of debulking surgery, few have taken the opposing view. This paper attempts to expose the weaknesses in the current available data regarding surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. By reviewing the retrospective data, the theoretical benefits of surgery, cellular kinetics, the fallacies of residual disease, interval debulking surgery, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a critique of debulking surgery is made. Issues surrounding perioperative morbidity and its impact on quality of life have not been adequately addressed. Despite the need for randomized trials of surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, they are unlikely to occur. The window of opportunity with respect to studying the questions on the optimal timing, degree of aggressiveness, and patient selection for surgery has likely passed. Biases and ethical issues based upon the data cited in this paper have and will continue to hamper our ability to fully elaborate the benefits of surgery with respect to survival and quality of life.

Surgical management of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer affects over 25,000 women each year in the United States. The performance of appropriate surgery for ovarian cancer is critical in directing further therapies and improving survival. Systematic surgical staging must be performed in patients who appear to have early stage ovarian cancer because a significant proportion of these women have occult metastases. A marked improvement in survival has been demonstrated in patients with bulky disease if all masses larger than 2 cm can be surgically removed. Despite the dramatic effect of surgery on the subsequent course of the disease, recent studies show that only a minority of women with ovarian cancer receive appropriate initial surgery. We review the evidence and rationale for systematic surgical treatment of ovarian cancer.

Current status of staging laparotomy in colorectal and ovarian cancer

Colon and rectal carcinomas. Accurate staging of colon and rectal carcinomas (CRCs) is vital to insure appropriate surgical and adjuvant therapy, and appropriate enrollment in and interpretation of adjuvant or neoadjuvant trials. Historically, CRC staging has relied on pathologic examination of surgical speciments. These newer techniques of endoscopic and intraoperative ultrasound, laparoscopy, and radioimmunoguided surgery may permit increased accuracy of staging by the surgeon. Cautious interpretation of investigations of these modalities is warranted, as studies include small numbers of patients and some of the work is preliminary. Despite this, we remain optimistic that as surgeons become more familiar with these techniques and as these modalities become more widely available, more accurate staging will facilitate optimal patient management in terms of complete resection of occult disease and appropriate adjuvant therapy. Ovarian carcinoma. The survival of patients with ovarian cancer has not appreciably changed in the past several decades. There are several reasons for this, some of which are related to the surgical procedures used to diagnose and treat these cancers. First, despite a great deal of literature that suggests an elevated CA-125 level in a postmenopausal woman with a pelvic mass is virtually diagnostic of ovarian carcinoma, an unexceptably large number of patients are still explored in community hospitals by a surgeon or obstetrician-gynecologist who is not prepared or adequately trained to perform the aggressive cytoreductive surgery that the patients require. Similarly, a large percentage of patients with "apparent" early ovarian cancer are not fully surgically staged at their initial surgery and often require reoperation to accurately define the extent of their disease, which will then determine the need for adjuvant therapy. Despite ongoing health care reforms, these patients should be referred to centers where the appropriate surgical procedure can be performed by an experienced gynecologic oncologist. Second-look laparotomy (SLL) has become more and more controversial, mainly because of a lack of effective second-line therapy, and should not be performed unless the patient fully understands its limitations and is willing preoperatively to participate in a subsequent trial based on the operative findings. Laparoscopy, both in the initial staging surgery and at reassessment laparotomy (SLL), is being re-evaluated but should be considered experimental until definitive trials determine its role.

Prognostic implications of residual tumour volume in stage III ovarian cancer patients undergoing adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy

Despite recent improvements, the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains unsatisfactory. In our patients who underwent radical debulking surgery, including systematic pelvic (and, additionally, in about one-third, para-aortic lymphadenectomy), the size of residual tumour volume prior to cytotoxic chemotherapy was the most critical single prognostic determinant. The value of complete tumour removal was reflected in the survival curves. Patients with no residual disease following debulking surgery who underwent complete adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significantly better survival than did women with residual tumour burdens (P less than 0.05). The actuarial 1-year survival rate in patients with no RD, RD less than 2 cm, and RD greater than 2 cm was 96%, 88%, and 83%, the 3-year survival rate was 78%, 56%, and 37%, and the 5-year survival rate was 78%, 40%, and 21%, respectively. Our results agree with previous studies. The data underline the need for aggressive debulking, including systematic lymphadenectomy and subsequent chemotherapy. The smaller the initial cell population the smaller the probability of drug-induced resistance. The greater the diameter of a tumour the greater the number of cells which remain in the G0 phase--and which are thus not susceptible to chemotherapeutic compounds.

The influence of cytoreductive surgery on progression-free interval and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer

In 1980, Dr George E. Moore published an editorial in Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics entitled 'Debunking debulking'. He included advanced ovarian cancer in his personal list of 'faulty' debulking procedures. Some of hist statements have merit. He contends that overly aggressive procedures that leave microscopic tumour cells that will soon grow and kill the patient are unindicated. He further points out that one cubic centimetre of tumour will contain approximately a billion cells. However, there are factors in ovarian cancer that should cause one to take exception to Dr Moore's statement. First, there is good evidence that the use of cisplatin-based multidrug chemotherapy may eradicate microscopic tumour deposits in a significant number of patients. Secondly, even multiple aggregates of tumour with a billion or more cancer cells can be eradicated in some cases, and in others can be reduced sufficiently to allow significant palliation. In evaluating the information which has been reviewed in this discussion of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, it is apparent that cytoreductive surgery is not only indicated, but mandated in many facets of the management of ovarian cancer. The following principles seem to be supported by the existing literature: 1. Current diagnostic techniques do not enable us to diagnose ovarian cancer while still confined to the ovary. Therefore, in the immediate future we will still encounter a large number of patients with advanced disease. 2. The number of complete clinical responses and the number of complete pathological responses (negative second-look surgical reassessments) are greatest in those patients who begin adjunctive therapy with minimal residual disease. 3. Median duration of survival is longer, and long-term survival more likely, in those patients giving complete clinical or complete pathological responses. 4. Some patients appear to benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery. However, at the present time, evidence of benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery appears to be limited to those patients who have responded to adjunctive therapy and are found to have residual disease at surgical reassessment. There is no good evidence to support secondary cytoreductive surgery as an 'interval' procedure or its use in patients with progression on primary adjunctive therapy. This development of better chemotherapy regimens, such as cisplatin-based chemotherapy, has resulted in a greater need for effective primary cytoreductive surgery as it is apparent that, on utilizing these new regimens, better results are obtained in patients with minimal residual disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Continuous infusion fluoropyrimidines as salvage therapy for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma

A major challenge facing those caring for patients with ovarian carcinoma is inducing remission following the failure of first-line treatment. Toward this end, we have examined the efficacy of continuous infusion fluoropyrimidines. During a 2-year period, nine patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma received treatment with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-fluorouracil-deoxyribose as single agents or in combination with other drugs. Eight patients were evaluable, with responses obtained with each treatment regimen. Myelotoxicity was mild, with only 3 episodes of grade 4 toxicity out of 70 total cycles of chemotherapy. Mucositis was moderate to severe, tending to be the dose-limiting adverse effect. Continuous infusion 5-FU in these combinations appears to be active with very acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients.