Intraoperative evaluation of depth of invasion in Stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma

Use of preoperative MR imaging in the management of endometrial carcinoma: cost analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the cost of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and its ability to direct the use of lymph node dissection with the cost and ability of conventional surgery for the staging of endometrial carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative MR images of 25 patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. MR imaging results were compared with those of intraoperative gross dissection of the uterus and final histopathologic examination. Medicare reimbursements for two scenarios were compared in each patient. In the MR imaging scenario, the necessity for lymph node dissection was based on MR imaging results and histologic findings at biopsy. In the actual scenario, lymph node dissection was performed at the surgeon's discretion on the basis of findings at gross dissection of the uterus and histologic examination at biopsy.

RESULTS

The cost of the MR imaging scenario, as defined by Medicare reimbursements, was 1% ($1, 265/$148,500) less than that of the actual scenario. In the MR imaging scenario, all patients who required lymph node dissection received it, and 86% of the lymph node dissections performed were necessary. In the actual scenario, one necessary lymph node dissection was not performed, and only 31% of the lymph node dissections performed were necessary.

CONCLUSION

Staging with MR imaging has costs and accuracy similar to those of the current method of staging with intraoperative gross dissection of the uterus. In addition, MR imaging decreases the number of unnecessary lymph node dissections.

Hysterectomy with extended surgical staging and radiotherapy versus hysterectomy alone and radiotherapy in stage I endometrial cancer: a comparison of complication rates

Extended surgical staging (ESS) has been added to total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAHBSO) in patients with clinical Stage I endometrial cancer in order to better define patterns of metastatic spread and the response to treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy has a demonstrated efficacy in decreasing central recurrence in Stage I disease. The combined use of radical surgery and pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients results in an increased incidence of complications. This study compares major complication rates in Stage I endometrial cancer patients who underwent either TAHBSO with ESS or TAHBSO alone followed by adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (RT). Records of 52 patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were reviewed. Thirty-two patients underwent TAHBSO plus ESS and 20 patients had TAHBSO alone. All patients received postoperative, whole pelvis external radiotherapy. Four patients suffered complications potentially related to treatment which required rehospitalization, and all 4 were in the group which had undergone ESS. A comparison of complication rates between the ESS + RT group (4/37 or 10.8%) and TAHBSO + RT group (0/20) suggested a trend toward significance (P less than 0.10). Treatment protocols using extended surgical staging prior to adjuvant radiotherapy in Stage I endometrial cancer should examine complications potentially related to this combination, to further define treatment risks and benefits.