A prospective trial of progesterone therapy for malignant peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial carcinoma

Malignant peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: a contemporary review

INTRODUCTION

: In endometrial cancer, malignant peritoneal cytology (MPC) refers to the presence of tumor cells in the peritoneal cytologic specimen obtained at hysterectomy. MPC was once a component of uterine cancer staging criteria, but it is no longer included in the current revision. Multiple societies and organizations, however, continue to recommend peritoneal cytologic testing at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

AREAS COVERED

This contemporary review provides a clinical summary of recent studies evaluating MPC, including risk factors and prognosis. Compared to prior studies showing a lack of impact on oncologic outcome, recent studies have larger sample sizes, use stricter inclusion criteria, and perform histology/cancer stage-specific analyses to balance risk factors and provide explicit interpretations for oncologic outcomes related to MPC. These newer data provide evidence that MPC does have a prognostic impact.

EXPERT OPINION

Three key domains related to MPC are followings: First, recognition of MPC as a prognostic factor for endometrial cancer irrespective to stage (early and advanced) and histology (endometrioid and non-endometrioid) is necessary. Second, peritoneal cytologic testing at the beginning of each staging surgery is recommended. Last, incorporation of peritoneal cytology status in adjuvant treatment algorithms is useful and merits further development.

Steroid hormone intervenes in the endometrial tumorigenesis of pten ablation

Background:

Endometrial cancer, the most common gynecological cancer, is closely associated with endometrial hyperplasia, unopposed estrogen exposure, and genetic alterations. Phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor genes completely lost or mutated in >50% of primary endometrioid endometrial cancers. Estrogen-dependent endometrioid carcinoma is the most common type of endometrial cancer. Progesterone is a hormone that antagonizes the growth-promoting properties of estrogen in the uterus. Progestin is used as a conservative endocrine treatment of early endometrial cancer in order to preserve fertility as well as a palliative measure for advanced-stage patients. Progesterone therapy has been shown to be effective in preventing endometrial cancer as well as controlling growth of the endometrium. However, the effectiveness of progestin for women with endometrial cancer is less clear.

Methods:

In order to understand the effect of steroid hormone on endometrial cancer progression, we used a mouse endometrial cancer model with conditional loss of Pten in the mouse uterus (PR^cre/+Pten^f/f, Pten^d/d). To assess the effect of steroid hormones, ovariectomized Pten^f/f and Pten^d/d mice were treated with estrogen or progesterone over a period of three month.

Results:

Uterine weight gain was significantly decreased in ovariectomized PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice compared to intact PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice. Ovariectomized PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice treated with P4 or vehicle also exhibited decreased uterine cancer size compared with intact PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice. Proliferation of ovariectomized PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice treated with P4 is highly decreased compared to other groups. The levels of stromal progesterone receptor were highly increased in ovariectomized PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice treated with P4 which resulted in decreased epithelial proliferation.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that P4 treatment significantly reduces tumor mass but does not affect cancer progression in PR^cre/+Pten^f/f mice.

Iatrogenic transtubal spill of endometrial cancer: risk or myth

INTRODUCTION

Although intrauterine procedures are essential for endometrial evaluation in many cases, the significance of the amount of tumor cell dissemination during these procedures, the viability and invasive potential of the endometrial cancer (EC) cells, and their impact on prognosis remain elusive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive search was performed in the Cochrane Central Trials Registry, the Web of Science, and PubMed for publications about the role of hysteroscopy (H/S), saline infusion sonography (SIS) and laparoscopy (L/S) in dissemination of EC cells and prognostic significance of positive peritoneal washings (PPW), between 1988 and 2010 and English language. All eligible trials were included.

CONCLUSION

PPW rates vary between 0-14% after dilatation and curettage (D&C), 0-83% after H/S, 0-10% after L/S and 12-52% after SIS. The majority of the studies about EC cell dissemination during H/S and SIS suggest that they increase the risk of spill. There is not enough evidence to support the association between tumor spill and pressure, type and volume of distension medium, duration of the procedure, stage, grade and interval between H/S or SIS and laparotomy. Investigation into the rate of spill of EC cells during laparoscopic surgery is in the early stages and not yet definitive. There are too few in vivo and in vitro studies to comment definitively on the viability of the disseminated EC cells. The limited data we do have, however, questions the ability of disseminated EC cells to maintain and grow. Most published studies support the idea that prognosis is not affected by PPW in stage I EC. The changes in FIGO 2009 staging of EC appears to have merit when considering the sum of the data. H/S and SIS probably increase the risk of spill, however this increase does not seem effect prognosis. Although peritoneal washings are still expected to be performed, PPW itself does not necessitate additional treatment.

Management of Surgical Stage III and IV Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: An Overview

This paper covers an overview of the literature on the management of advanced endometrial cancer, concentrating on patients with histopathologic endometrioid type of tumors. The different treatment modalities are described and management recommendations are proposed.

The standard surgical procedure includes an extrafacial total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, collection of peritoneal washings for cytology, and exploration of the intraabdominal contents. In cases of extensive disease in the abdomen, an optimal surgical cytoreduction is associated with improved survival. Further treatment with radiotherapy may be indicated based on the pathological staging information to improve loco-regional control. Primary radiotherapy is indicated in cases where surgery is contraindicated. Systemic treatment can either be hormone therapy or chemotherapy. Progesterons are the cornerstone of hormone therapy. Prognostic factors for response are the presence of high levels of progesterone and estrogen receptors and low grade histology. Paclitaxel is the most active single agent drug. The combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is adopted as first choice in patients with endometrial cancer because of the efficacy and low toxicity, although not proven in a randomized trial.

The literature on the management of patients with advanced endometrial cancer is discussed in detail. Each stage of advanced disease is presented separately, and management recommendations are proposed, and alternative approaches are given.

Ongoing clinical trials are described, and the focuses of ongoing research are mentioned.

Assessment of prognostic factors in stage IIIA endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was the assessment of prognostic factors in stage IIIA endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 1993, 51 patients with stage IIIA endometrial cancer received definitive treatment at our institution. Thirty-seven patients had positive peritoneal cytologic findings only (stage IIIA1), and 14 had adnexal or uterine serosal involvement (USI) (stage IIIA2). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 82.5 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-related survival (DRS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 88 and 73%, respectively. RFS was 79% in patients with stage IIIA1 disease, compared with 57% in patients with stage IIIA2 disease (P = 0.04). However, DRS did not significantly differ between stages IIIA1 and IIIA2. In the 37 patients with stage IIIA1 tumors, histologic grade 3, nonendometrioid histologic subtype, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) significantly predicted a poor prognosis, with extraabdominal sites of failure (P < 0.05). Of the 22 patients who had stage IIIA1 disease with endometrioid histologic subtype and without LVI, none had recurrence [17 had whole abdominal irradiation (WAR) or intraperitoneal injection of (32)P, 2 had pelvic external radiotherapy (PRT)]. By contrast, of the 15 patients with either nonendometrioid histologic subtype or LVI, 9 (60%) had recurrence and 7 (47%) died of disease (12 had WAR or (32)P). An extraabdominal component was present in 7 of the 9 recurrences observed in this subgroup. Among the 14 patients with stage IIIA2 tumors (6 had WAR, 6 had PRT), those with USI had a 5-year DRS of 83% and a rate of extraabdominal failure of 83%, compared with 100 and 12.5% in patients without USI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IIIA endometrial cancer who have endometrioid tumors, no LVI, and positive peritoneal cytologic findings as the only sign of extrauterine disease have an excellent prognosis. Nonendometrioid histologic subtype, LVI, and USI are strong predictors of distant failures and poor prognosis. Patients with either of these histologic factors should be considered candidates for systemic adjuvant therapy.

Endometrial adenocarcinoma: a primer for the generalist

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. The mean and median age of women with endometrial adenocarcinoma is 61 years. Most endometrial cancers are type I estrogen-dependent endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Most women with endometrial adenocarcinoma have stage I disease. Patients with stage I disease endometrial adenocarcinoma can be treated with a simple hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal lavage, and periaortic node dissection in selected cases. The probability of survival according to international statistics is as follows: stage IA, 91%; stage IB, 88%; stage IC, 81%; stage IIA, 77%; stage IIB, 67%; stage IIA, 60%; stage IIIB, 41%; stage IIC, 32%; stage IVA, 20%; stage IVB, 5%.

High incidence of positive peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) has evolved into an alternative form of surgical management in the treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether low-risk endometrial cancer patients are subject to a higher incidence of positive peritoneal cytology when treated with LAVH compared to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (grade 1--2 endometrioid type with no evidence of extrauterine spread or grade 3 with <50% myometrial invasion (MI), no cervical or adnexal involvement, and negative lymph nodes when sampled) treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from January 1993 to September 1999. We compared 131 patients treated with LAVH to 246 controls who underwent TAH. The two groups were compared for known prognostic factors including grade, MI, vascular space involvement, and lower uterine segment extension.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients who underwent LAVH (61 years) was similar to that of the controls (62 years). Fourteen (10.3%) of the patients treated with LAVH had positive peritoneal cytology compared to only 7 (2.8%) of the control population. Factors including FIGO grade, myometrial invasion, and preoperative hysteroscopy did not influence the final results. When stratifying for these factors, the odds ratios of having positive peritoneal washings in those patients treated by LAVH were 5.2, 5.2, and 3.7, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer by LAVH is associated with a significantly higher incidence of positive peritoneal cytology. This may be due to the retrograde dissemination of cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity during uterine manipulation. The clinical significance of these findings is yet to be determined.

The significance of peritoneal cytology in uterine cervix and endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology and to elucidate the prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in patients with uterine cervix and endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The incidence of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in 642 patients including 339 uterine cervix and 303 endometrial cancers. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method in a subgroup of 116 stage II cervix and 199 stage I endometrial cancers, and multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model was used to identify an independent prognostic factor.

RESULTS

The incidence of positive peritoneal cytology was found to be 9% in uterine cervix cancer and 15% in endometrial cancer. The incidence was higher in patients with some clinicopathologic status such as advanced stage, lymph node metastasis, ovarian metastasis, and deeper myometrial invasion. The 5-year survival rate for patients with positive or negative peritoneal cytology was 44 or 80% in stage II cervix cancers and 80 or 92% in clinical stage I endometrial cancers, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent prognostic determinants were pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis and peritoneal cytology in stage II cervix cancer and peritoneal cytology in stage I endometrial cancer. Proper treatment protocol should be scheduled for patients with positive peritoneal cytology.

Excellent long-term survival and absence of vaginal recurrences in 332 patients with low-risk stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with hysterectomy and vaginal brachytherapy without formal staging lymph node sampling: report of a prospective trial

PURPOSE

The value of adjuvant radiation therapy and staging pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to report the long-term survival, rate of recurrences, and complications in patients with Stage I endometrial cancer, Grade 1-2, with <50% myometrial invasion treated with hysterectomy (without formal staging pelvic and periaortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy) and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 303 patients with pathologic Stage I endometrial cancer, Grade 1-2, with <50% myometrial invasion and nonmalignant peritoneal cytology, were treated with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy (30 Gy to point 0.5 cm depth) in a prospective study extending from 1958 to 1994. In addition, 29 additional Stage I, Grade 1-2 patients with <50% myometrial invasion and malignant peritoneal cytology were treated with 1 year of progesterone therapy. Patients were followed for 1.2-32 years (median 8.1 y).

RESULTS

Six patients had recurrences and died secondary to disease. There were no vaginal recurrences. The 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year disease-free survivals of the 303 patients with nonmalignant peritoneal cytology were 98.9%, 97.8%, 96.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. Patients with malignant peritoneal cytology had a 5- and 10-year disease-free survival of 100%. Significant radiation complications occurred in 2.1% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with low-risk, Stage I endometrial cancer, hysterectomy and adjuvant postoperative vaginal brachytherapy provide excellent long-term survival, eliminate vaginal recurrences, and are not associated with significant complications. The addition of 1 year of progesterone therapy to patients with malignant cytology provides 100% long-term survival. Based on these results, patients with low-risk, Stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma do not need formal staging pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy.