A comparison of enprofylline and theophylline in the maintenance therapy of chronic reversible obstructive airway disease

In vivo observations provide insight into roles of eosinophils and epithelial cells in asthma

Observations in vivo in patients, supported by guinea-pig in vivo data, take centre stage in this perspective. Its objective is to highlight dichotomies between asthma features observed in vivo and accepted views involving cell/molecular biology research paradigms. For example, increased bronchial epithelial permeability is now considered a major paradigm and trait of asthma, yet, absorption of inhaled tracers has not been increased in vivo in asthma. Such maintained barrier function in exudative asthma reflects in vivo asymmetry of the epithelial lining as barrier between outside and inside world of molecules and cells. In desquamatory asthma, maintained epithelial tightness may be explained by in vivo demonstrations of exceedingly patchy epithelial loss, prompt creation of plasma-derived provisional barriers, and high-speed epithelial regeneration. Acknowledged protein/peptide secretion by epithelial cells in vitro is contrasted here with a dominant, unidirectional movement in vivo of plasma-derived proteins/peptides (including antimicrobial peptides) to the surface of an intact epithelial lining. Furthermore, longstanding claims that epithelium-produced adenosine is a mediator of asthma are eroded by observations in vivo in asthmatics. Notions concerning activation/fate of mucosal tissue eosinophils illustrate additional distinctions between accepted views and in vivo patient observations. Finally, in vitro-based paradigms preaching defect epithelial regeneration and increased permeability in pathogenesis of asthma are contrasted with experimental in vivo observations of exaggerated epithelial regeneration, which is multipathogenic in its own right. In conclusion, unexpected and challenging in vivo observations in recent decades underpin novel insights into mucosal mechanisms in asthma.

Oral theophylline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Oral theophylline has, for many years, been used as a bronchodilator in patients with COPD. Despite the introduction of new drugs, and its narrow therapeutic index, theophylline is still recommended for COPD treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of oral theophylline when compared to placebo in patients with stable COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Review Group and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Registers were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently abstracted and the methodological quality assessed by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Concomitant therapy varied from none to any other bronchodilator plus corticosteroid (oral and inhaled). The following outcomes were significantly different when compared to placebo. FEV1 improved with treatment: Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 100 ml; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 40, 160 ml. Similarly for FVC: WMD 210 ml 95%CI 100, 320. Two studies reported an improvement in VO2max; WMD 195 ml/min, 95%CI 113,27). At rest, PaO2 and PaCO2 both improved with treatment (WMD 3.2 mmHg; 95%CI = 1.2, 5., and WMD -2.4 mmHg; 95%CI = -3.5, -1.2, respectively). Walking distance tests did not improve (4 studies, Standardised Mean Difference 0.30, 95%CI -0.01, 0.62), neither did Visual Analogue Score for breathlessness isn two small studies (WMD 3.6, 95%CI -4.6, 11.8). The Relative Risk (RR) of nausea was greater with theophylline (RR 7.7; 95%CI 1.5, 39.9). However, patients' preference for theophylline was greater than that for placebo (RR 2.27; 95%CI = 1.26, 4.11). Very few patient withdrew from these studies for any reason.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Theophylline has a modest effect on FEV1 and FVC and slightly improves arterial blood gas tensions in moderate to severe COPD. These benefits were seen in patients receiving a variety of different concomitant therapies. Improvement in exercise performance depended on the method of testing. There was a very low dropout rate in the studies that could be included in this review, which suggests that recruited patients may have been known by the investigators to be theophylline tolerant. This may limit the generalisability of these studies.

Long-term xanthine therapy of asthma. Enprofylline and theophylline compared. International Enprofylline Study Group

BACKGROUND

Enprofylline is a new xanthine derivative that shares theophylline's bronchodilator properties but is free of theophylline's adenosine receptor antagonist activity. We compared the long-term efficacy and tolerability of enprofylline and theophylline given over a 1-year period to adults with asthma.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from 18 centers and 4 countries to participate in a 1-month double-blind comparison of enprofylline or theophylline in the treatment of asthma and were subsequently maintained on a regimen with the assigned medication for a further 11 months. The dosage of each xanthine was incremented from 150 mg twice daily at initiation to 300 and later 450 mg twice daily depending on the patient's tolerance and, in the case of theophylline, the rapidly assayed serum theophylline level. Patients kept a diary in which they recorded peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measured morning and evening, asthma symptom score, and the number of beta 2-agonists taken. Spirometry was checked at clinic visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following randomization.

RESULTS

Three-hundred forty-eight patients (174 enprofylline, 174 theophylline) participated in the trial. For both drugs there were significant improvements in PEFR and FEV1 during the first month of treatment with no significant difference between drugs (0.25 L for enprofylline vs 0.30 L for theophylline). Similarly, there were no differences in clinical outcome such as asthma exacerbations or beta 2-agonist usage between the two groups over follow-up. However, inhaled steroid dosage was more likely to have been incremented in theophylline-treated than enprofylline-treated patients (18% vs 8%, p = 0.025). Both drugs produced a modest increase in heart rate throughout the trial (approximately 5 beats/min). In 31 patients (26 enprofylline, 5 theophylline), asymptomatic elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase occurred at least once during the study. In five patients (four enprofylline, one theophylline), the increase exceeded three times the upper limit of the normal range. In some subjects receiving enprofylline, serum enprofylline levels rose progressively despite constant oral dosage of the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term xanthine therapy is well-tolerated by most adult asthmatics. However, long-term enprofylline administration may be associated with elevation in liver enzyme levels and unpredictable blood levels, thereby limiting its clinical usefulness.

Can fatal asthma be prevented?--a personal view

An increase in the mortality rate from asthma in several countries has been observed in recent years, notwithstanding the great improvement in pathophysiological findings and the introduction of new effective therapeutic agents. The phenomenon is difficult to explain but the causes of death and identification of high-risk patients have been widely studied. It is suggested that the most vital aim for physicians is the avoidance of those factors which may contribute to death from asthma. These are particularly: inadequate assessment of its severity by patients, general practitioners and hospital doctors, and inadequate and inappropriate treatment. From the diagnostic point of view, the measurement of airflow rates is necessary to establish the diagnosis in terms of reversibility, quantify the severity and assess the response to therapy. The different entity of reversibility of bronchial obstruction is due to the various mechanisms intervening in different patients. After adequate treatment, according to our observations, the reversibility is more complete in young people and when the duration of the disease is less than 2 years. Trigger factors must also be considered. From the therapeutic point of view, considering that the most important alteration in asthma is the inflammation of bronchial structures with intervention of several inflammatory cells and of numerous different chemical mediators, physicians have to apply treatment aimed at reducing inflammation rather than relying on symptomatic bronchodilator remedies. Treatment should be divided into three phases, according to symptoms: induction, consolidation and maintenance. Finally, on the basis of data here presented and of clinical experience, the essential measures for the prevention of asthma mortality are reported. If general practitioners take them into account, deaths from asthma will be reduced to a minimum.

Sleep disturbances in asthma: theophylline versus enprofylline

A double-blind cross-over study was performed on 22 asthmatic patients receiving maintenance treatment with theophylline who, in a previous study, had reported sleep problems. In one of two three-week periods the theophylline medication was replaced by an equipotent dose of slow-release enprofylline. Analysis of sleep questionnaires answered after each treatment period, and sleep diaries filled in throughout the study, showed no significant differences in the quality of sleep between the treatments. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the morning did not differ between the treatment periods, but mean PEF in the evening was slightly higher (20 l/min) during theophylline treatment. It was concluded that replacement of theophylline by enprofylline did not improve the quality of sleep subjectively in this group of theophylline treated asthmatics. The results suggest that adenosine receptor antagonism may not be a significant cause of sleep disturbances in asthmatic patients who are receiving theophylline as maintenance treatment.

A comparison of the CNS effects of enprofylline and theophylline in healthy subjects assessed by performance testing and subjective measures

1. The effects of intravenous infusions of enprofylline, theophylline, and placebo on subjective ratings and on psychological test performance were studied in a double-blind crossover experiment in 12 healthy subjects who abstained from caffeine throughout the experimental procedures. 2. Mean plasma concentrations of enprofylline were: mean 2.9 mg l-1 (range 1.9-3.4). Those for theophylline were: mean 12.1 mg l-1 (range 9.0-14.4). 3. Performance on the auditory vigilance task showed a significant improvement with theophylline compared with both enprofylline and placebo. The correct detection rates (out of 90) were 50.3, 43.4 and 39.1 respectively. A similar effect was seen with finger tapping rates: 404, 394 and 390 taps min-1 respectively. Other measures showed no significant effects, although choice reaction time showed a trend towards faster responses with theophylline. 4. Subjective ratings showed that subjects were significantly more alert with theophylline than with enprofylline. Subjects reported themselves as significantly more dizzy and ill with both active drugs compared with placebo. 5. These results suggest that emprofylline largely lacks the CNS stimulant effects of theophylline, but that the incidence of other unwanted effects of the drugs may be similar.