Does fluoxetine have a therapeutic window?

The mechanisms of tolerance in antidepressant action

There is increasing awareness that, in some cases, long-term use of antidepressant drugs (AD) may enhance the biochemical vulnerability to depression and worsen its long-term outcome and symptomatic expression, decreasing both the likelihood of subsequent response to pharmacological treatment and the duration of symptom-free periods. A review of literature suggesting potential side effects during long treatment with antidepressant drugs was performed. Studies were identified electronically using the following databases: Medline, Cinahl, PsychInfo, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Each database was searched from its inception date to April 2010 using "tolerance", "withdrawal", "sensitization", "antidepressants" and "switching" as key words. Further, a manual search of the psychiatric literature has been performed looking for articles pointing to paradoxical effects of antidepressant medications. Clinical evidence has been found indicating that even though antidepressant drugs are effective in treating depressive episodes, they are less efficacious in recurrent depression and in preventing relapse. In some cases, antidepressants have been described inducing adverse events such as withdrawal symptoms at discontinuation, onset of tolerance and resistance phenomena and switch and cycle acceleration in bipolar patients. Unfavorable long-term outcomes and paradoxical effects (depression inducing and symptomatic worsening) have also been reported. All these phenomena may be explained on the basis of the oppositional model of tolerance. Continued drug treatment may recruit processes that oppose the initial acute effect of a drug. When drug treatment ends, these processes may operate unopposed, at least for some time and increase vulnerability to relapse. Antidepressant drugs are crucial in the treatment of major depressive episodes. However, appraisal and testing of the oppositional model of tolerance may yield important insights as to long-term treatment and achievement of enduring effects.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in affective disorders--II. Efficacy and quality of life

Since their introduction, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become one of the most widely used classes of medication in psychiatry. Their popularity is based on apparent efficacy over a wide range of disorders and a favorable side-effect profile. However, as with any psychotropic medication, considerable data are required to define where a drug works and where it does not. There is now a wealth of evidence demonstrating that SSRIs may differ in their efficacy profiles in certain depressive symptoms, in different subtypes of depression, with respect to their ability to maintain efficacy over time, on broader outcomes such as quality of life, and in the consistency of the usually effective minimum therapeutic dose across the age spectrum and across indications. Although this review includes data on all SSRIs, it focuses on fluoxetine and sertraline, which in addition to being the most widely used SSRIs are also the most widely studied. The relative quantity and quality of data on these two SSRIs means that it is possible to make relatively firm inferences regarding their differential effects on affective symptoms and quality of life.

SSRI-induced extrapyramidal side-effects and akathisia: implications for treatment

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may occasionally induce extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) and/or akathisia. This may be a consequence of serotonergically-mediated inhibition of the dopaminergic system. Manifestations of these effects in patients may depend on predisposing factors such as the presence of psychomotor disturbance, a previous history of drug-induced akathisia and/or EPS, concurrent antidopaminergic and/or serotonergic therapy, recent monoamine oxidase inhibitor discontinuation, comorbid Parkinson's disease and possibly deficient cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme status. There is increasing awareness that there may be a distinct form of melancholic or endogenous depression with neurobiological underpinnings similar to those of disorders of the basal ganglia such as Parkinson's disease. Thus, it is not surprising that some individuals with depressive disorders appear to be susceptible to developing drug-induced EPS and/or akathisia. In addition, the propensity for the SSRIs to induce these effects in individual patients may vary within the drug class depending, for example, on their selectivity for serotonin relative to other monoamines, affinity for the 5-HT2C receptor, pharmacokinetic drug interaction potential with concomitantly administered neuroleptics and potential for accumulation due to a long half-life. The relative risk of EPS and akathisia associated with SSRIs have yet to be clearly established. The potential risks may be reduced by avoiding rapid and unnecessary dose titration. Furthermore, early recognition and appropriate management of EPS and/or akathisia is required to prevent the impact of these effects on patient compliance and subjective well-being. It is important that the rare occurrence of EPS in patients receiving SSRIs does not preclude their use in Parkinson's disease where their potentially significant role requires more systematic evaluation.

Effect of fluoxetine on rat liver mitochondria

The in vitro and in vivo effects of fluoxetine (and its active metabolite norfluoxetine) on mitochondrial respiration and F0F1-ATPase were studied, respectively, in mitochondria and submitochondrial particles isolated from rat liver. Fluoxetine in vitro inhibited state 3 mitochondrial respiration for alpha-ketoglutarate and succinate oxidations (50% of effect at 0.25 and 0.35 mM drug concentrations, respectively); stimulated state 4 for succinate; and induced a decrease in the respiratory control ratio (RCR) for both oxidizable substrates. The F0F1-ATPase activity was determined at various pH levels in the absence and presence of Triton X-100. The solubilized form was not affected markedly, but an inhibition, apparently non-competitive, was observed for the membrane-bound enzyme, with 50% of the effect at a 0.06 mM drug concentration in pH 7.4. These results suggest that fluoxetine in vitro acts on F0F1-ATPase through direct interaction with the membrane F0 component (similar to oligomycin), or first with mitochondrial membrane and then affecting F0. A very similar behavior concerning the respiratory parameters and F0F1-ATPase properties was observed with norfluoxetine. The in vivo studies with fluoxetine showed stimulation of mitochondrial respiration in state 4 for alpha-ketoglutarate or succinate oxidations in acute or prolonged treatments (1 hr after a single i.p. dose of 20 mg of drug/kg of body weight, and 22 hr after 12 days of treatment with a daily dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight, respectively), indicating uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. Pronounced changes were not observed in the K0.5 values of F0F1-ATPase catalytic sites, but the Vmax decreased during the prolonged treatment. The results show that fluoxetine (as well as norfluoxetine) has multiple effects on the energy metabolism of rat liver mitochondria, being potentially toxic in high doses. The drug effects seem to be a consequence of the drug and/or metabolite solubilization in the inner membrane of the mitochondria.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine

Fluoxetine is well absorbed after oral intake, is highly protein bound, and has a large volume of distribution. The elimination half-life of fluoxetine is about 1 to 4 days, while that of its metabolite norfluoxetine ranges from 7 to 15 days. Fluoxetine has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile. Therefore, the drug should be used with caution in patients with a reduced metabolic capability (i.e. hepatic dysfunction). In contrast with its effect on the pharmacokinetics of other antidepressants, age does not affect fluoxetine pharmacokinetics. This finding together with the better tolerability profile of fluoxetine (compared with tricyclic antidepressants) makes this drug particularly suitable for use in elderly patients with depression. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine are not affected by either obesity or renal impairment. On the basis of results of plasma concentration-clinical response relationship studies, there appears to be a therapeutic window for fluoxetine. Concentrations of fluoxetine plus norfluoxetine above 500 micrograms/L appear to be associated with a poorer clinical response than lower concentrations. Fluoxetine interacts with some other drugs. Concomitant administration of fluoxetine increased the blood concentrations of antipsychotics or antidepressants. The interactions between fluoxetine and lithium, tryptophan and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, in particular, are potentially serious, and can lead to the 'serotonergic syndrome'. This is because of synergistic pharmacodynamic effects and the influence of fluoxetine on the bioavailability of these compounds.

Fluoxetine and suicidal ideation--a review of the literature

The emergence of suicidal ideation has been noted in some case studies, where fluoxetine administration appears to be the precipitating agent. However, these observational claims are not supported by the clinical trial literature. A review of some of the trials and the case histories is followed by an assessment of the evidence, and possible explanations for the discrepancy. It is concluded that a definite link between fluoxetine and emerging suicidal ideation cannot be ascertained, but that further research is indicated. Vigilance in prescribing any antidepressant medication, including fluoxetine, is recommended.