Blindness associated with high-dose carboplatin

Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Macular Thickness Pre- and Post-Chemotherapy With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer

Background Carboplatin and paclitaxel are two standard chemotherapeutic agents known to cause neurotoxicity. In this study, we aim to evaluate the toxicity of these agents by measuring the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness in patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers who are receiving them. Methods A one-year prospective cohort study involving 28 patients who were treated intravenously with carboplatin (200-400 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) three-weekly for six cycles was conducted. RNFL and macula thickness were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) before the commencement of chemotherapy, after the third cycle, and one month after the sixth cycle. The main outcome measurements were the average RNFL thickness and central subfield thickness of the macula. Results The mean age of the 28 participants was 54.68 years old (standard deviation [SD] 9.03). Eleven had endometrial cancer, while 17 had ovarian cancer. The mean of the average RNFL thickness during baseline pre-chemotherapy was 96.43 µm (SD 11.39). One month after cessation of treatment, the mean RNFL thickness increased to 101.57 µm (SD 13.54). Statistical analysis showed a significant increment in the mean RNFL thickness (p ≤ 0.001), from baseline to after three cycles, and baseline to one month after six cycles of chemotherapy, except the nasal quadrant. The increment of all macular quadrants was statistically significant (p < 0.05) except for central subfield thickness. Conclusion Systemic administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel affected both the peripapillary RNFL and macula thickness. This represents early evidence of subacute subclinical retinal toxicity. OCT can be used as a screening tool to assess peri-chemotherapeutic retinal alterations.

Retinal toxicities of systemic anticancer drugs

Newer anticancer drugs have revolutionized cancer treatment in the last decade, but conventional chemotherapy still occupies a central position in many cancers, with combination therapy and newer methods of delivery increasing their efficacy while minimizing toxicities. We discuss the retinal toxicities of anticancer drugs with an emphasis on the mechanism of toxicity. Uveitis is seen with the use of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B editing anticancer inhibitors as well as immunotherapy. Most of the cases are mild with only anterior uveitis, but severe cases of posterior uveitis, panuveitis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like disease may also occur. In the retina, a transient neurosensory detachment is observed in almost all patients on mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Microvasculopathy is often seen with interferon α, but vascular occlusion is a more serious toxicity caused by interferon α and MEK inhibitors. Crystalline retinopathy with or without macular edema may occur with tamoxifen; however, even asymptomatic patients may develop cavitatory spaces seen on optical coherence tomography. A unique macular edema with angiographic silence is characteristic of taxanes. Delayed dark adaptation has been observed with fenretinide. Interestingly, this drug is finding potential application in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.

Bilateral macular infarction after gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To report a case of macular infarction after doublet chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin.

METHODS

A middle-aged lady presenting with bilateral macular infarction post-chemotherapy for metastatic cervical malignancy was investigated for thromboembolic risks and treated.

RESULTS

The macular perfusion and edema improved with control of hypertension and treatment with pentoxifylline. Visual improvement was satisfactory, and the possible associated risk such as hypertension was noted.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the need for active screening of patients on chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin for retinal vascular occlusive changes when hypertension is associated.

Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Childhood Brain Tumor Survivors

This population-based cross-sectional study evaluates the clinical value of electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in childhood brain tumor survivors. A flash electroretinography and a checkerboard reversal pattern visual evoked potential (or alternatively a flash visual evoked potential) were done for 51 survivors (age 3.8-28.7 years) after a mean follow-up time of 7.6 (1.5-15.1) years. Abnormal electroretinography was obtained in 1 case, bilaterally delayed abnormal visual evoked potentials in 22/51 (43%) cases. Nine of 25 patients with infratentorial tumor location, and altogether 12 out of 31 (39%) patients who did not have tumors involving the visual pathways, had abnormal visual evoked potentials. Abnormal electroretinographies are rarely observed, but abnormal visual evoked potentials are common even without evident anatomic lesions in the visual pathway. Bilateral changes suggest a general and possibly multifactorial toxic/adverse effect on the visual pathway. Electroretinography and visual evoked potential may have clinical and scientific value while evaluating long-term effects of childhood brain tumors and tumor treatment.

Unilateral Optic Disc Papilloedema following Administration of Carboplatin Chemotherapy for Ovarian Carcinoma

A 48-year-old woman with a positive BRCA1 gene mutation was diagnosed with stage 3b high-grade ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. She was treated with adjuvant carboplatin at a dose of 740 mg (AUC 6) in 3-weekly cycles. Five days after her fifth cycle of carboplatin, she awoke with new-onset blurred vision in her left eye. An ophthalmology review showed left-sided disc oedema with normal optic nerve function tests and 6/24 visual acuity. A CT scan of the head and orbits was performed which showed no evidence of metastasis or raised intracranial pressure. An autoimmune screen was performed which did not reveal any explanation for her visual symptoms. Fundus fluorescein angiography showed bilateral intense late disc leakage with no evidence of vasculitis. Her chemotherapy was stopped in view of a radiological and biochemical remission and her visual symptoms were monitored. She was also started on a tapering dose of prednisolone 40 mg daily. Five months after the initial review, she has developed left optic disc atrophy with 6/18 visual acuity, while the right eye remains asymptomatic. The diagnosis was felt to be that of carboplatin-induced unilateral disc oedema, a very rare side effect of this chemotherapy.

Carboplatin-Induced Bilateral Papilledema: A Case Report

We report on a patient with carboplatin-induced bilateral papilledema, as it was described in the 1970s for cisplatin. Loss of visual accuracy up to full blindness, often loss of color vision and scotomas can be seen as a result of cortical blindness, macula degeneration, retrobulbar neuritis and papilledema. These symptoms are mostly unilateral and initially mild, so that more chemotherapy is given before the diagnosis is made. The symptoms are usually reversible within weeks to months after cessation of the platinum treatment. The therapeutic strategy is stopping the platinum treatment. In addition the empiric use of corticosteroids is suggested.

Reversible posterior leucoencephalopathy syndrome associated with anticancer drugs

BACKGROUND

Reversible posterior leucoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) is an underappreciated clinical-radiologic syndrome characterized by reversible cortical dysfunction preferentially involving the occipital lobes in conjunction with imaging findings of reversible subcortical oedema. As RPLS is being increasingly identified within the oncology population in association with cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted agents, a review of the published work in English was carried out.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of the published work in English was conducted to identify cases of RPLS in patients more than 16 years of age who were treated with anticancer drugs for documented malignancy. Only cases with adequate documentation regarding demographic and treatment data, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging and outcome were selected.

RESULTS

We identified 24 patients with RPLS associated with a variety of anticancer drugs, most commonly complicating polychemotherapy and/or bevacizumab-containing regimens. There was a female predominance: 18 females and 6 males (P= 0.023). Women were of premenopausal age and were younger than males: 49.3 +/- 16.4 years versus 60.7 +/- 6.4 years (P= 0.09). Most patients presented with acute headache (67%), seizures (63%), confusion (54%) or cortical blindness (46%) with mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 168 +/- 15 and 98 +/- 15 mm Hg, respectively. Findings on magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense lesions on T(2)-weighted images in all patients, which involved the occipital lobes in 75% of patients; all patients experienced clinical and radiologic resolution within days to weeks. No deaths were directly attributed to RPLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination and single-agent chemotherapy as well as novel anticancer drugs are associated with RPLS. We found RPLS to be overrepresented in premenopausal woman; the prevalence in this subgroup may be related to an anticancer drug-oestrogen interaction inducing altered cerebral vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction.

Update on ocular complications of systemic cancer chemotherapy

The constantly growing list of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics requires a new survey of ophthalmic complications, which are often underestimated. Based on the review by Imperia et al (1989), an update on ophthalmic complications of currently used cytotoxic chemotherapeutics in oncology was written. Vision is a quality of life issue, which must be nurtured, especially if loss of vision can be prevented. The broad spectrum of ophthalmic complications induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy includes reversible and irreversible acute and chronic disorders. Mild to moderate ophthalmic complications are very common and reversible after cessation of anti-cancer therapy. Some major ocular toxicities may require a dose reduction or the discontinuation of cytotoxic chemotherapy in order to prevent visual loss. Ocular toxicities can be treated or even prevented, if detected early enough. That is why an ophthalmic baseline examination for patients receiving cytosine arabinoside, 5-fluorourocil, methotrexate, or docetaxel should be taken into consideration, and a consultation with an ophthalmologist has to be done as soon as symptoms are recognized. Oncologists and ophthalmologists must be aware of potential ophthalmic complications during cytotoxic chemotherapy, and should work together.

Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management

Neurotoxic side effects of chemotherapy occur frequently and are often a reason to limit the dose of chemotherapy. Since bone marrow toxicity, as the major limiting factor in most chemotherapeutic regimens, can be overcome with growth factors or bone marrow transplantation, the use of higher doses of chemotherapy is possible, which increases the risk of neurotoxicity. Chemotherapy may cause both peripheral neurotoxicity, consisting mainly of a peripheral neuropathy, and central neurotoxicity, ranging from minor cognitive deficits to encephalopathy with dementia or even coma. In this article we describe the neurological adverse effects of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The vinca-alkaloids, cisplatin and the taxanes are amongst the most important drugs inducing peripheral neurotoxicity. These drugs are widely used for various malignancies such as ovarian and breast cancer, and haematological cancers. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is clearly related to cumulative dose or dose-intensities. Patients who already have neuropathic symptoms due to diabetes mellitus, hereditary neuropathies or earlier treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy are thought to be more vulnerable for the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methotrexate, cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) and ifosfamide are primarily known for their central neurotoxic side effects. Central neurotoxicity ranges from acute toxicity such as aseptic meningitis, to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits, hemiparesis, aphasia and progressive dementia. Risk factors are high doses, frequent administration and radiotherapy preceding methotrexate chemotherapy, which appears to be more neurotoxic than methotrexate as single modality. Data on management and neuroprotective agents are discussed. Management mainly consists of cumulative dose-reduction or lower dose-intensities, especially in patients who are at higher risk to develop neurotoxic side effects. None of the neuroprotective agents described in this article can be recommended for standard use in daily practise at this moment, and further studies are needed to confirm some of the beneficial effects described.

Neurologic complications of cancer therapy

Neurologic complications of chemotherapy are relatively common. The diagnosis of chemotherapy-associated neurotoxicity remains a clinical one, and is largely based on the exclusion of other possible causes. The goal of this review is to describe the neurotoxicity associated with established chemothrerapeutic agents and with some of the newer biologic agents, monoclonal antibodies and targeted molecular therapies used in the treatment of cancer.

Cortical blindness as a manifestation of hypomagnesemia secondary to cisplatin therapy: case report and review of literature

Cisplatin is widely used in the treatment of solid tumors and is known to have a number of side effects including hypomagnesemia. We present a case report of a patient with a Stage IIA carcinoma of the cervix who initially was treated with radiotherapy and cisplatin and subsequently presented with sudden onset of blindness. The diagnosis was uncertain but the possibility of functional blindness was considered. Serum magnesium was low. Correction of this electrolyte abnormality resolved this profound visual symptom. This case emphasizes the importance of serially observing cisplatin-treated patients for the possible development of the clinical syndrome of magnesium deficiency.

Ocular toxicity and cancer chemotherapy. A review

BACKGROUND

Systemic anticancer therapies can produce acute and chronic organ damage, but the eye is usually considered a protected site. Nonetheless, the oculo-visual system has a potentially high degree of sensitivity to toxic substances. Ocular toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy includes a broad spectrum of disorders, reflecting the unique anatomic, physiologic, and biochemical features of this essential organ.

METHODS

A review of the literature regarding the ocular toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, hormonal agents, biologic agents, and high dose chemotherapy with allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation was conducted.

RESULTS

Ocular toxicity induced by anticancer chemotherapy is not uncommon. The development of more aggressive regimens as well as new agents and combination chemotherapies have resulted in a significant increase of reported cases of chemotherapy-induced ocular side effects. In most instances, the mechanisms of ocular toxicity continue to be poorly understood.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular toxicities induced by chemotherapeutic agents are generally not preventable; therefore, clinicians must be aware of potential vision-threatening complications. Prompt consultation with an ophthalmologist can lead to early detection, proper diagnosis, and appropriate therapeutic measures. Dose reduction or discontinuation of incriminated drugs may help in reducing the severity and the duration of side effects.