Sham versus transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic bladder outflow obstruction

Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A variety of minimally invasive treatments are available as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, it is unclear which treatments provide better results.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH through a network meta-analysis. Our secondary objective was to obtain an estimate of relative ranking of these minimally invasive treatments, according to their effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 24 February 2021. We had no restrictions on language of publication or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the following minimally invasive treatments, compared to TURP or sham treatment, on men with moderate to severe LUTS due to BPH: convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy (CRFWVT); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model for pair-wise comparisons and a frequentist network meta-analysis for combined estimates. We interpreted them according to Cochrane methods. We planned subgroup analyses by age, prostate volume, and severity of baseline symptoms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs to express continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men, mostly over age 50, with severe LUTS due to BPH. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low due to concerns regarding bias, imprecision, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and incoherence. Based on the network meta-analysis, results for our main outcomes were as follows. Urologic symptoms (19 studies, 1847 participants): PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urologic symptoms scores (MD of International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS]) compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD range 0 to 35; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 1.47, 95% CI -4.00 to 6.93; PAE: 1.55, 95% CI -1.23 to 4.33; low-certainty evidence). CRFWVT, TUMT, and TIND may result in worse urologic symptoms scores compared to TURP at short-term follow-up, but the CIs include little to no difference (CRFWVT: 3.6, 95% CI -4.25 to 11.46; TUMT: 3.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 7.10; TIND: 7.5, 95% CI -0.68 to 15.69; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (QoL) (13 studies, 1459 participants): All interventions may result in little to no difference in the QoL scores, compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD of IPSS-QoL score; MD range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 0.06, 95% CI -1.17 to 1.30; PAE: 0.09, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.75; CRFWVT: 0.37, 95% CI -1.45 to 2.20; TUMT: 0.65, 95% CI -0.48 to 1.78; TIND: 0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to 2.79; low-certainty evidence). Major adverse events (15 studies, 1573 participants): TUMT probably results in a large reduction of major adverse events compared to TURP (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; moderate-certainty evidence). PUL, CRFWVT, TIND and PAE may also result in a large reduction in major adverse events, but CIs include substantial benefits and harms at three months to 36 months; PUL: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.22; CRFWVT: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 18.62; TIND: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01 to 24.46; PAE: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.68; low-certainty evidence). Retreatment (10 studies, 799 participants): We are uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP (12 to 60 months; PUL: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.1; PAE: RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.44; very low-certainty evidence). TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates (RR 9.71, 95% CI 2.35 to 40.13; low-certainty evidence). Erectile function (six studies, 640 participants): We are very uncertain of the effects of minimally invasive treatments on erectile function (MD of International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]; range 5 to 25; higher scores indicates better function; CRFWVT: 6.49, 95% CI -8.13 to 21.12; TIND: 5.19, 95% CI -9.36 to 19.74; PUL: 3.00, 95% CI -5.45 to 11.44; PAE: -0.03, 95% CI -6.38, 6.32; very low-certainty evidence). Ejaculatory dysfunction (eight studies, 461 participants): We are uncertain of the effects of PUL, PAE and TUMT on ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; PUL: RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00 to 1.06; PAE: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; TUMT: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; low-certainty evidence). TURP is the reference treatment with the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms, QoL and retreatment, but the least favorable in terms of major adverse events, erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among minimally invasive procedures, PUL and PAE have the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and QoL, TUMT for major adverse events, PUL for retreatment, CRFWVT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and QoL compared to TURP at short-term follow-up. They may result in fewer major adverse events, especially in the case of PUL and PAE; resulting in better rankings for symptoms scores. PUL may result in fewer retreatments compared to other interventions, especially TUMT, which had the highest retreatment rates at long-term follow-up. We are very uncertain about the effects of these interventions on erectile function. There was limited long-term data, especially for CRFWVT and TIND. Future high-quality studies with more extended follow-up, comparing different, active treatment modalities, and adequately reporting critical outcomes relevant to patients, including those related to sexual function, could provide more information on the relative effectiveness of these interventions.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is an alternative, minimally-invasive treatment that delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings published up to 31 May 2021, with no restrictions by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs of participants with BPH who underwent TUMT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion at each stage and undertook data extraction and risk of bias and GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence (CoE). We considered review outcomes measured up to 12 months after randomization as short-term and beyond 12 months as long-term. Our main outcomes included: urologic symptoms scores, quality of life, major adverse events, retreatment, and ejaculatory and erectile function.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we identified no new RCTs, but we included data from studies excluded in the previous version of this review. We included 16 trials with 1919 participants, with a median age of 69 and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms. The certainty of the evidence for most comparisons was moderate-to-low, due to an overall high risk of bias across studies and imprecision (few participants and events). TUMT versus TURP Based on data from four studies with 306 participants, when compared to TURP, TUMT probably results in little to no difference in urologic symptom scores measured by the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) on a scale from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 2.03; moderate certainty). There is likely to be little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.47; 1 study, 136 participants, moderate certainty). TUMT likely results in fewer major adverse events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; 6 studies, 525 participants, moderate certainty); based on 168 cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 135 fewer (153 to 96 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. TUMT, however, probably results in a large increase in the need for retreatment (risk ratio (RR) 7.07, 95% CI 1.94 to 25.82; 5 studies, 337 participants, moderate certainty) (usually by repeated TUMT or TURP); based on zero cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 90 more (40 to 150 more) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. There may be little to no difference in erectile function between these interventions (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.63; 5 studies, 337 participants; low certainty). However, TUMT may result in fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.53; 4 studies, 241 participants; low certainty). TUMT versus sham Based on data from four studies with 483 participants we found that, when compared to sham, TUMT probably reduces urologic symptom scores using the IPSS at short-term follow-up (MD -5.40, 95% CI -6.97 to -3.84; moderate certainty). TUMT may cause little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.95, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.77; 2 studies, 347 participants; low certainty) as measured by the IPSS quality-of-life question on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effects on major adverse events, since most studies reported no events or isolated lesions of the urinary tract. TUMT may also reduce the need for retreatment compared to sham (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.88; 2 studies, 82 participants, low certainty); based on 194 retreatments per 1000 men in the sham group, this corresponds to 141 fewer (178 to 23 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. We are very uncertain of the effects on erectile and ejaculatory function (very low certainty), since we found isolated reports of impotence and ejaculatory disorders (anejaculation and hematospermia). There were no data available for the comparisons of TUMT versus convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy, prostatic urethral lift, prostatic arterial embolization or temporary implantable nitinol device.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

TUMT provides a similar reduction in urinary symptoms compared to the standard treatment (TURP), with fewer major adverse events and fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction at short-term follow-up. However, TUMT probably results in a large increase in retreatment rates. Study limitations and imprecision reduced the confidence we can place in these results. Furthermore, most studies were performed over 20 years ago. Given the emergence of newer minimally-invasive treatments, high-quality head-to-head trials with longer follow-up are needed to clarify their relative effectiveness. Patients' values and preferences, their comorbidities and the effects of other available minimally-invasive procedures, among other factors, can guide clinicians when choosing the optimal treatment for this condition.

Clinically and Statistically Significant Changes Seen in Sham Surgery Arms of Randomized, Controlled Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery Trials

PURPOSE

Medication trials frequently involve a placebo arm to more fairly assess the efficacy of the study drug. However, benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery trials rarely include a sham surgery group due to the inherent risks associated with simulating treatment in these patients. As a result the placebo response to sham surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia is largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature to look for randomized, controlled trials involving endoscopic or intraprostatic injection benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments that included a sham surgical arm from January 1990 to February 2015. Studies that included an objective symptom questionnaire and maximum urinary flow at 3 months were included. Results were analyzed together with weighting based on study sample size.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded a total of 1,998 potential studies. After reviewing abstracts and full text articles 14 randomized, controlled trials were included in some part. An average decrease from 22.3 to 16.7 (-27%) was seen in studies of the AUASS (American Urological Association symptom score) 3 months after a sham endoscopic procedure (p=0.0003) with an increase in maximum urinary flow of 1.3 ml per second (14%, p=0.001) at 3 months. Prostate injection based studies at 3 months were similar with a decrease from 21.3 to 15.7 (-26%, p<0.001). Maximum urinary flow increased by 2.0 ml per second (23%, p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Sham controlled endoscopic and injection benign prostatic hyperplasia interventions demonstrate a considerable and statistically significant change in symptom scores and maximum urinary flow, which is comparable to the response seen in medication trials. Future uncontrolled benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical trials should consider these findings when interpreting outcomes.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Preliminary data suggest that microwave thermotherapy, which delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue, is a safe, effective treatment for BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave thermotherapy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were identified from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles, reviews, technical reports, and by contacting relevant expert trialists and microwave manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials evaluating transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for men with symptomatic BPH were eligible for this review. Comparison groups could include transurethral resection of the prostate, minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques, sham thermotherapy procedures, and medications. Outcome measures included urinary symptoms, urinary function, prostate volume, mortality, morbidity, and retreatment. Two review authors independently identified potentially relevant abstracts and then assessed the full papers for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study design, baseline characteristics, and outcomes data and assessed methodological quality using a standard form. We attempted to obtain missing data from authors or sponsors, or both.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we identified no new randomized comparisons of TUMT that provided evaluable effectiveness data. Fifteen studies involving 1585 patients met the inclusion criteria, including six comparisons of microwave thermotherapy with TURP, eight comparisons with sham thermotherapy procedures, and one comparison with an alpha-blocker. Study durations ranged from 3 to 60 months. The mean age of participants was 66.8 years and the baseline symptom scores and urinary flow rates, which did not differ across treatment groups, demonstrated moderately severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The pooled mean urinary symptom scores decreased by 65% with TUMT and by 77% with TURP. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was -1.00 (95% CI -2.03 to -0.03), favoring TURP. The pooled mean peak urinary flow increased by 70% with TUMT and by 119% with TURP. The WMD for peak urinary flow was 5.08 mL/s (95% CI 3.88 to 6.28 mL/s), favoring TURP. Compared to TURP, TUMT was associated with decreased risks for retrograde ejaculation, treatment for strictures, hematuria, blood transfusions, and the transurethral resection syndrome, but increased risks for dysuria, urinary retention, and retreatment for BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy improved IPSS symptom scores (WMD -5.15, 95% CI -4.26 to -6.04) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.01 mL/s, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.16) compared with sham procedures. Microwave thermotherapy also improved IPSS symptom scores (WMD -4.20, 95% CI -3.15 to -5.25) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.30 mL/s, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.13) in the one comparison with alpha-blockers. No studies evaluated the effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermotherapy techniques are effective alternatives to TURP and alpha-blockers for treating symptomatic BPH in men with no history of urinary retention or previous prostate procedures and prostate volumes between 30 to 100 mL. However, TURP provided greater symptom score and urinary flow improvements and reduced the need for subsequent BPH treatments compared to TUMT. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit comparisons between devices with different designs and energy levels. The effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, or prostate volume on treatment response are unknown.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Preliminary data suggest that microwave thermotherapy, which delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue, is a safe, effective treatment for BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave thermotherapy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Collaboration Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles and reviews, and by contacting expert relevant trialists and microwave manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials evaluating transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for men with symptomatic BPH were eligible for this review. Comparison groups could include transurethral resection of the prostate, minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques, sham thermotherapy procedures, and medications. Outcome measures included urinary symptoms, urinary function, prostate volume, mortality, morbidity, and retreatment. Two reviewers independently identified potentially relevant abstracts and then assessed the full papers for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted study design, baseline characteristics and outcomes data and assessed methodological quality using a standard form. We attempted to obtain missing data from authors and/or sponsors.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 1493 patients met inclusion criteria, including six comparisons of microwave thermotherapy with TURP, seven comparisons with sham thermotherapy procedures, and one comparison with an alpha blocker. Study durations ranged from 3 to 60 months. The mean age of subjects was 66.8 years, and the baseline symptom scores and urinary flow rates, which did not differ across treatment groups, demonstrated moderately severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The pooled mean urinary symptom scores decreased by 65% with TUMT and by 77% with TURP. The weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval) for the symptom score was -1.36 (-2.25 to -0.46), favoring TURP. The pooled mean peak urinary flow increased by 70% with TUMT and by 119% with TURP. The WMD for peak urinary flow was 5.08 (3.88 to 6.28) mL/s, favoring TURP. Compared to TURP, TUMT was associated with decreased risks for retrograde ejaculation, treatment for strictures, hematuria, blood transfusions, and the transurethral resection syndrome, but increased risks for dysuria, urinary retention, and retreatment for BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.75, 95% CI -3.89 to -5.60) and peak urinary flow (WMD 1.67 mL/s, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.34) compared with sham procedures. Microwave thermotherapy also improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.20, 95% CI -3.15 to -5.25) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.30 mL/s, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.13) in the one comparison with alpha blockers. No studies evaluated the effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermotherapy techniques are effective alternatives to TURP and alpha-blockers for treating symptomatic BPH for men with no history of urinary retention or previous prostate procedures and prostate volumes between 30 to 100 mL. However, TURP provided greater symptom score and urinary flow improvements and reduced the need for subsequent BPH treatments compared to TUMT. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit comparison between devices with different designs and energy levels. The effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, or prostate volume on treatment response are unknown.

Suprapubic Prostatectomy With a Novel Catheter

PURPOSE

We evaluated the postoperative morbidity and technical complications of a new handmade catheter used for suprapubic prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 146 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who had indications for open prostatectomy were enrolled in the study from January 2003 to August 2004. Of the patients 96 were treated with a novel technique without a urethral catheter but with a special handmade cystostomy catheter, while the other 50 underwent the traditional procedure using cystostomy and a urethral catheter. The same surgical team operated on the 2 groups. Clot retention episodes, hemoglobin decreases, irritative symptoms, voiding status after cystostomy removal and incontinence were evaluated postoperatively. Three months later we followed the patients with symptom score, maximum flow rate and cystoscopic examination.

RESULTS

Preoperatively mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 31.6 in each group. Postoperatively none of the patients with the novel catheter complained of significant irritative urinary symptoms, clot retention and true or stress urinary incontinence. Of the cohorts 94% were satisfied with voiding but 86% of controls were satisfied. There was no report of urinary tract infection or epididymo-orchitis in the cohorts, while we found epididymo-orchitis in 4 controls (8%). Three months after the operation the mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 4.4 (range 1 to 7) and the mean maximum flow rate was 22.6 ml per second (range 14 to 25) in patients with the novel catheter, and 4.2 (range 1 to 7) and 22.5 ml per second (range 15 to 25), respectively, in those with the traditional catheter. At followup there was no bladder neck contracture but 4 patients (4.1%) showed some degree of membranous urethral stricture. We also noted 7 controls (14%) with urethral stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

Transurethral prostate resection has been introduced as the surgical treatment of choice in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, open adenomectomy still has a place. Urethral catheter-free suprapubic prostatectomy can be safely applied with a low postoperative risk of infection, incontinence and stricture formation.

The association between lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction are common conditions in aging men. In the past few years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of whether these conditions are associated in any way. The conventional belief of the majority of urologists so far has been that the coexistence of these two conditions is coincidental. This review was conducted to discuss the recent literature on this issue. In addition we will concisely address the effect of the different treatment modalities on sexual function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several trials were conducted recently to assess the association between lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction. These trials all made use of self-reported questionnaires on urinary symptoms and sexual function sent to representative samples of the community. The occurrence of urinary symptoms appeared to be a risk factor for the development of erectile dysfunction, ejaculation disorder and decreased libido. Importantly, this association was independent of age and various co-morbidities.

SUMMARY

In contrast to long-established opinion, an age-independent association between lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction was found in several recent population-based trials. The nature of this association, however, remains unclear. Future study is required to gain a better understanding of the possible underlying mechanisms.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: the gold standard for minimally invasive therapies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

From all available minimally invasive methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) has gained a firm position as the most attractive option. Recent research has produced innovations in high-energy TUMT, including new treatment protocols, refined selection criteria, and monitoring of intraprostatic temperature. Furthermore, long-term results from randomized studies comparing TUMT with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or medical treatment are now available. All these data indicate that more durable clinical outcomes and less morbidity can be achieved with TUMT, strengthening its position as a standard treatment for BPH. This paper describes the status of TUMT in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH, focusing on variations in the outcomes with different devices, the durability of treatment outcomes, morbidity, selection criteria, and cost. The relation of TUMT to medical management and TURP also is addressed.

The 2-year symptomatic and urodynamic results of a prospective randomized trial of interstitial radiofrequency therapy vs transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 2-year symptomatic and urodynamic results of a prospective randomized trial of interstitial radiofrequency therapy of the prostate (IRFT) vs transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and urodynamic evidence of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) were randomized to undergo IRFT or TURP and were followed up using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and urodynamic assessment for 2 years.

RESULTS

At 2 years there was a clinically relevant reduction in the IPSS in the IRFT (20 to 9) and TURP groups (22 to 4). There was also a statistically significant reduction in the detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow in both groups, but the reduction in the IRFT group was probably not sufficient to explain the observed symptomatic improvements solely from a reduction in BOO.

CONCLUSION

IRFT can produce a sustained improvement in LUTS for at least 2 years. However, such improvements are unlikely to be entirely the result of a reduction in BOO. The effects of radiofrequency energy may, at least partly, be independent of any thermal effect and depend instead on neuromodulation of lower urinary tract nerves.

Minimally invasive procedures as an alternative to medical management for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Data are reviewed relating to the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive transurethral microwave thermotherapy and medical management in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recent evidence is summarized indicating more pronounced long-term beneficial effects of microwave treatment. alpha-Blockade, however, offers the advantage of more rapid action than microwave treatment. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy can accelerate symptom and flow rate improvement in patients receiving microwave treatment. Compared with medical management, microwave treatment possesses greater versatility, allowing patients with severe baseline symptoms and small prostate sizes to be treated with a high probability of success.

Microwave thermotherapy: historical overview

The application of heat with curative aim is an old and very well-known principle in medicine. A review of the history of heat use in the treatment of prostatic disease is presented. The article is based on bibliographic research (MEDLINE Search and PubMed) and focuses on treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) since the first clinical documentation of transrectal hyperthermia for this condition. Then, in a chronological sequence, not only the evolution toward thermotherapy but also enhancements of the latest techniques are presented. The new advances in the field of patient selection, indications, and outcome predictors, as well as new trends in treatment are briefly considered.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: an alternative to medical management in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is being increasingly considered as an alternative to medical management with alpha-blockers or finasteride in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Enduring clinical benefits have been demonstrated after a single 1-hour microwave treatment session under topical anesthesia, and the associated morbidity is low. Optimal results are obtained with the delivery of high thermal doses and accurate targeting of microwave energy. Extensive evidence from randomized clinical trials supports the safety and efficacy of both microwave treatment and medical management, but randomized trial data have only recently become available directly comparing these two approaches to BPH treatment. These data indicate that greater long-term improvements in symptoms, peak urinary flow rates, and quality of life are attained with microwave treatment than with alpha-blockade. Furthermore, the actuarial rate of treatment failure is markedly lower in patients undergoing microwave v alpha-blocker treatment. However, the onset of action of alpha-blocker treatment is more rapid. The principal limitations of alpha-blockade are side effects and lack of efficacy leading to treatment failure in some patients. The maximal effects of finasteride are modest and require a period of months to be manifested, although the side effect profile and tolerability of this agent are favorable. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy can accelerate symptom and flow rate improvement after TUMT. In contrast to medical management, microwave treatment is highly versatile, allowing patients over a broad range of baseline symptom severities and prostate sizes to be treated with a high probability of success.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: how does it work?

Although some authors have proposed that the favorable impact of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia has only a placebo effect, this idea is inconsistent with the findings of a number of sham-controlled clinical trials. Histologic and immunohistochemical studies have shown that the nerve fibers in the periurethral tissue are damaged or ablated by TUMT, and it appears that the heat affects the innervation of the smooth muscle cells. Among the nerves damaged are the sensory neurons of the posterior urethra, and this change might reduce the excitatory signals from the urethrodetrusor facilitating reflexes. Necrosis and apoptosis within a limited area also have been described. Thus, there is likely more than one basis for the therapeutic effect of TUMT.

Relation between intraprostatic temperature and clinical outcome in microwave thermotherapy

PURPOSE

The study was designed to explore the relation between prostatic temperature and the clinical outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were treated. Baseline evaluation included Madsen score, flowmetry, and pressure-flow study. Two fiberoptic thermosensors were placed in the prostate targeted to the region 10 and 20 mm below the bladder neck and 5 to 15 mm lateral to the prostatic urethra. The TUMT was carried out using either the low-energy (2.0) or high-energy (2.5) Prostasoft program. Follow-up was at 6, 12, and 26 weeks.

RESULTS

A moderate correlation between intraprostatic temperatures and energy output (r = 0.409; P < or = 0.046) and prostate volume (r = 0.303; P < or = 0.0424) was observed. Outlet obstruction was associated with higher temperatures (obstructed 49.6+/-5.8 v unobstructed 46.1+/-4.2 degrees C; P < or = 0.033). A significant relation between temperature and clinical outcome was found. Patients with intraprostatic temperatures <46 degrees, 46-50 degrees, and < or = 50 degrees C had significant differences in Madsen score change (-50%, -68% and -86%) and in maximum flow rate (+26%, +32%, and +48%). Patients with temperatures >50 degrees C had a significant improvement in obstruction status (86% to 18%). A slight worsening in voiding dynamics was observed in patients with temperatures <50 degrees C.

CONCLUSION

A significant relation exists between intraprostatic temperatures achieved during TUMT and the clinical outcome. Temperatures in excess of 50 degrees C seem to be associated with a greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. These data provide a sound rationale for monitoring intraprostatic temperatures and developing invasive thermometry feedback mechanisms for thermal treatments of BPH.

Clinical results of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a truly office procedure without the need for anesthesia for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Several devices have been developed. Continuous refinement of the procedure led to higher energy protocols and high-intensity dose protocols applying the heat-shock strategy. We report on the clinical results of these protocols. Symptom scores improve around 60%, whereas maximum urinary flow rate improve from an average 9 to 10 mL/sec at baseline to 14 to 15 mL/sec during follow-up. No significant differences have been shown between the outcomes with the different devices. Long-term data show satisfactory results after 4 years. Initial clinical results with the heat-shock strategy show results comparable to those of higher-energy protocols with decreased morbidity. Treatment morbidity of higher energy protocols is moderate and consists mainly of the need for catheterization and a higher percentage of retrograde ejaculation. To improve treatment efficacy, patient selection appears to be most important. Prostate size, bladder outlet obstruction, age, and prostate composition are of predictive value for treatment outcome. Further development of the treatment protocols and refinement of the urethral applicators might enhance outcome.

Sham treatment compared with 30 or 60 min of thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in subjective and objective results after 30 or 60 min of transurethral thermotherapy (TUMT) or sham treatment in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with lower urinary tract symptoms caused by BPH were randomized to undergo 30 or 60 min of TUMT or sham treatment (14, 16 and 14 patients, respectively). The patients were evaluated using symptom scores, timed micturition, free flow rates and urodynamics before and after treatment. They were followed for 1 year, at the end of which they rated the treatment results on a self-administered visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients completed the study. The treatment failed in some patients in all groups, but the improvement in maximum and median flow rates, timed micturition and micturition frequency (day and night) was greater after TUMT than in the sham-treated group. Symptom scores also improved more after TUMT, although not significantly. There was a good correlation between the decrease in urinary frequency, especially nocturnal, and the patients' perception of a successful treatment, whereas the increase in maximum urinary flow rate was apparently of little importance.

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT had a better effect than the placebo treatment, having a greater impact on irritative than on obstructive symptoms. More patients were satisfied after the 30-min than after the 60-min treatment.

Sexual function following high energy microwave thermotherapy: results of a randomized controlled study comparing transurethral microwave thermotherapy to transurethral prostatic resection

PURPOSE

We evaluate changes in sexual function in patients treated with high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to transurethral resection of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 147 patients randomized to undergo transurethral microwave thermotherapy or transurethral resection of the prostate were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire evaluating sexual function before, and 3 and 12 months after treatment. The questionnaire dealt with such items as social status, libido, quality of erection, ejaculation and overall satisfaction of sexual functioning.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant improvement of micturition in both groups. The improvement in the transurethral prostatic resection group was significantly better than in the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group. Antegrade ejaculation occurred at 3 months following treatment in 27% of the transurethral prostatic resection group compared to 74% of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and at 1 year in 37 and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients undergoing transurethral prostatic resection (36%) had changes in sexual function compared to the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group (17%). The transurethral microwave thermotherapy group was more satisfied with the sex life. Of these patients 55% graded sex as very satisfying compared to 21% in the transurethral prostatic resection group. The severity of symptoms was not correlated with sexual function in this study. In general, older patients had sexual dysfunction more often, while younger patients had pain during sexual activities more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinically less effective, high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a better therapeutic option than surgery for patients who want to preserve sexual function. In particular ejaculation is often preserved after transurethral microwave thermotherapy while there is significant deterioration following transurethral prostatic resection. In general, older patients have greater sexual dysfunction.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: what role should it play versus medical management in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Both transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and medical management by alpha-blockade or 5-alpha-reductase inhibition are increasingly being considered as alternatives to surgery for treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We review current evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of TUMT and medical management. Factors for consideration in appropriately selecting patients for TUMT versus medical management are suggested. Available data indicate that TUMT confers greater long-term benefits than medical management as judged by symptom score and peak urinary flow rate improvements. TUMT-associated morbidity is comparatively low. Alpha-blockade affords more rapid relief than TUMT for patients with BPH; however, other strategies such as the use of temporary intraurethral endoprostheses during the acute post-TUMT recovery period may diminish or abolish the differences in time-course of symptom and flow rate improvement between TUMT and alpha-blockade. 5-Alpha-reductase inhibition with finasteride offers a favorable side-effect profile, although the magnitude of symptom and flow rate improvements is modest, and maximal effects of finasteride do not become manifest until after several months of treatment. As TUMT continues to evolve, increasing attention is being accorded the delivery of high thermal doses and precise targeting of the thermal energy delivered. The development of alpha-blockers with a more favorable side-effect profile continues to be a major focus of investigation. The potential clinical utility of combination therapy with TUMT and alpha-blockade is currently under investigation.

Long-term follow-up of transurethral microwave thermotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with up to 5 years of follow-up at our institution.

METHODS

From October 1991 to November 1993, 106 patients were treated for BPH with TUMT using the Prostatron 2.0. Of the 106 patients, 64 were available for evaluation of symptoms (Madsen-Iverson score), uroflow, residual urine, and retreatment rate at a mean follow-up of 50+/-5.4 months (mean+/-SD).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 65.2+/-9.8 years. Thirty-two patients (50.0%) were treated with one session of TUMT. Additional treatments were required for 32 patients (50.0%). Three patients had two sessions of TUMT, 14 underwent transurethral resection of prostate, and 3 had laser prostatectomy. Twelve patients received medical therapy. The mean symptom score decreased significantly from 12.9+/-2.5 to 5.7+/-3.6 (P = 0.001). The mean peak flow rates and postvoid residual volume showed little difference before and after TUMT. On the basis of the criteria described by Poincelet and Cathaud the overall clinical efficacy rate was 39.1% (15.6% complete response and 23.5% partial response). No obvious clinical parameter was useful to predict favorable outcome after TUMT.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the efficacy rate of TUMT with the Prostatron 2.0 at 50 months was 39.1 %. None of the preoperative clinical factors was predictive of a favorable outcome.

Office treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The less invasive procedures described herein are suitable for use in the office setting. Improvement in symptoms and quality of life are similar to that achieved with TURP. With the exception of TUIP, flow rate improvement is less than with TURP. TURP, however, tends to produce a "super normal" flow rate, which may be unnecessary. Patients are concerned regarding symptoms and quality of life and the avoidance of complications. In regard to decreased complications, less invasive procedures have an advantage. The main concern with these new treatments, with the exception of TUIP, is durability. Treatment failure may lead to other treatments, thereby increasing overall management costs. In this regard, it must be remembered that there is a significant treatment failure rate with TURP. Although patients failing less invasive treatments are likely to be offered other treatments, this is less likely after an adequate TURP. Therefore, when results are compared, it may be more appropriate to evaluate failure rates based on symptoms and quality of life rather than on the use of additional treatments. More patient follow-up for a longer period of time will be required before a definite answer is available on durability. All of the procedures described herein can be performed to a variable extent using topical anesthesia. TUNA has been performed using topical lidocaine alone but frequently requires intravenous sedation/analgesia and, in some instances, a regional block. If the patient can tolerate rigid cystoscopy fairly well, topical anesthesia alone may suffice. Similar requirements for anesthesia apply to ILC with the Nd:YAG or indigo systems. Using the Targis (T3) microwave device, Peterson and co-workers reported that 60% of patients were treated with topical urethral lidocaine alone, whereas 40% also received oral Toradol. Djavan (personal communication) using the Targis (T3) device randomized patients to topical urethral anesthesia alone or combined with intravenous sedoanalgesia. Pain was evaluated using a 0 to 10 visual analog scale score. At the commencement of treatment, the mean score was 1.4 in the topical anesthesia alone group and 1.3 in the sedoanalgesia group. During therapy, the score increased to a peak at 30 minutes of 2.2 and 2.0 in the topical and sedoanalgesia groups, respectively. After this, the visual analog score declined, falling to 0.2 and 0.1, respectively, by 1 hour following treatment. This study shows that microwave treatment with the Targis (T3) system is well-tolerated using topical urethral anesthesia alone. No difference was observed between outcomes in the two groups. Capital and operating costs as well as reimbursement issues are important in the introduction of these treatments into the office; however, until more information is available on the durability of results, the cost-effectiveness of these newer treatments remains unclear.

The long-term effects of prostatic infarction in the rat

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effects of infarction, which usually induces organ atrophy, on the prostate by examining the changes occurring in rat ventral prostate after infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The unilateral arteriolar branches to the ventral prostate were electrocauterized under an operative microscope in 10 adult rats. The gross and histological changes of the treated lobes of the ventral prostate were compared with those of untreated control lobes in the same rats 12 weeks later.

RESULTS

The size and mean (SD) weight of the treated lobes decreased markedly, to 148 (34) mg, compared with those of the controls, at 698 (62) mg (P<0.01). The treated lobes were composed of both normal and atrophic glandular tissue.

CONCLUSION

Prostatic atrophy can be induced by infarction in the rat; prostatic infarction might have potential as a new therapeutic strategy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Tolerability of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy with topical urethral anesthesia: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial

PURPOSE

We determine the tolerability of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy with topical urethral anesthesia alone without supplementary systemic sedoanalgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy using either topical urethral anesthesia alone (topical anesthesia group) or topical anesthesia with adjunctive intravenous sedoanalgesia (sedoanalgesia group). Pain was evaluated sequentially by means of a 0 to 10 visual analog scale score. Posttreatment followup included determinations of International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine, and quality of life score at 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Upon commencement of microwave treatment mean visual analog scale score was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.7) in the sedoanalgesia group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9) in the topical anesthesia group. During therapy visual analog scale score increased to a peak at 30 minutes of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.6) in the sedoanalgesia and topical anesthesia groups, respectively. Thereafter, visual analog scale score continuously declined, falling to 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.2) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.3) in the 2 respective groups by 1 hour following conclusion of the treatment period. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the treatment profile of visual analog scale scores (p = 0.701). Significant posttreatment improvements were demonstrated in International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine and quality of life scores but there were no significant differences between the groups in the magnitude of improvement in these outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

High energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is well tolerated by patients under topical anesthesia alone and, therefore, can be administered in the outpatient setting without potent medications that necessitate intensive patient monitoring, pose risks for side effects and add to treatment costs.

Tolerability of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy with topical urethral anesthesia: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial

PURPOSE

We determine the tolerability of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy with topical urethral anesthesia alone without supplementary systemic sedoanalgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy using either topical urethral anesthesia alone (topical anesthesia group) or topical anesthesia with adjunctive intravenous sedoanalgesia (sedoanalgesia group). Pain was evaluated sequentially by means of a 0 to 10 visual analog scale score. Posttreatment followup included determinations of International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine, and quality of life score at 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Upon commencement of microwave treatment mean visual analog scale score was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.7) in the sedoanalgesia group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9) in the topical anesthesia group. During therapy visual analog scale score increased to a peak at 30 minutes of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.6) in the sedoanalgesia and topical anesthesia groups, respectively. Thereafter, visual analog scale score continuously declined, falling to 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.2) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.0 to 0.3) in the 2 respective groups by 1 hour following conclusion of the treatment period. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the treatment profile of visual analog scale scores (p = 0.701). Significant posttreatment improvements were demonstrated in International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, post-void residual urine and quality of life scores but there were no significant differences between the groups in the magnitude of improvement in these outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

High energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is well tolerated by patients under topical anesthesia alone and, therefore, can be administered in the outpatient setting without potent medications that necessitate intensive patient monitoring, pose risks for side effects and add to treatment costs.

Why is transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) positively effective?

Between 1992 and 1994, 157 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). In evaluating the efficacy of TUMT with the International PrOstate Symptom Score (I-PSS) in 121 patients, 18 (15%) showed excellent and 42 (35%) showed good response. In evaluation of QOL, the result was 43 patients (33%) excellent and 42 patients (35%) good response. In objective evaluation of uroflow in 93 patients, 12 (13%) showed excellent and 13 (14%) showed good response. The prostatic volume did not show a significant decrease after treatment. In terms of overall improvement, according to the criteria proposed at the 2nd International Consultation on BPH, the treatment was considered effective in 53 of 108 patients (48%). Histological examination of the prostate enucleated from a patient 7 months after TUMT revealed degenerative changes of nerve fibres on S-100 protein immunohistochemical staining, which were more extensive than those in smooth muscle cells on HE staining. In in vitro tests the isometric contraction force of the rabbit prostatic tissue was measured after exposure to different temperatures, ranging from 37 to 50 degrees C. No significant change was observed up to 45 degrees C vs. 37 degrees C. After exposure to 48 degrees C, the nerve mediated contractions became completely depressed, although phenylephrine or KCl induced contractions were only partially suppressed. After exposure to 50 degrees C, no contraction was induced by any type of stimuli. In conclusion, it is suggested that good symptomatic improvement after TUMT results from both neural and muscular damage to the prostate. As TUMT is not aiming at a relief of anatomical obstruction, 50 degrees C is thought to be a sufficient thermal condition to cause an irreversible damage to prostatic tissue, which will provide a relief from functional obstruction and urethral instability.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVES

This is the first and largest single institution retrospective study in the United States to examine the effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

From September 1996 to June 1997, 78 men with moderate to severe symptomatic BPH were treated with the Prostatron at our institution. Patient age ranged from 52 to 85 years. Prostate volume ranged from 23 to 110 cc, and mean total energy applied during the treatment was 156.17 kJ. Patients were re-evaluated at 3 months and were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding their opinion about the treatment.

RESULTS

At 3 months there was a significant decrease in mean symptom score from 19.6 to 11.2 (P <0.0001). Mean peak flow rate increased from 8.5 to 12.8 mLs (P <0.0001). Mean postvoid residual urine decreased from 56.8 to 22.0 mL (P <0.0001). We did not observe any severe complications. Unlike prior studies, we removed the Foley catheter, and patients performed clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) when necessary. There was no significant differences in subjective and objective parameters between these patients and those who did not need CIC. Patient opinion about the treatment was not affected by CIC. About two thirds (67.2%) of the patients in the study group were satisfied with the results of treatment, and 60.3% would undergo the same procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT of the prostate is an effective, safe, and acceptable form of treatment for patients with BPH. Longer follow-up is needed to examine the durability of TUMT treatment.

A high-efficiency microwave thermoablation system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled, prospective, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness, safety, and impact on patient quality of life (QOL) of a novel transurethral microwave thermoablation system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

A total of 169 patients with BPH were randomized to undergo a 1-hour microwave (n = 125) or sham (n = 44) procedure using the Urologix Targis thermoablation system on an outpatient basis, without general or regional anesthesia. Symptoms, flow rates, and QOL scores were determined before the study procedure and periodically thereafter up to 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean American Urological Association (AUA) score in the microwave group diminished 50% (P <0.0005) by the 6-month evaluation (10.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2 to 11.8) compared with baseline values (20.8, 95% CI 19.8 to 21.9). The sham group also exhibited lower postprocedural AUA scores; however, the magnitude of the postprocedural decline in AUA score in the microwave group was significantly greater (P <0.01) than that in the sham group. Half the microwave group had an AUA score of less than 9 by 6 months, and the decrease in symptoms was similar among patients with initially moderate versus initially severe symptoms. Mean peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) in the microwave group increased 51% (P <0.0005) by 6 months to 11.8 mL/s (95% CI 10.7 to 13.0) versus a pretreatment value of 7.8 mL/s (95% CI 7.4 to 8.2). The magnitude of the postprocedural increase in Qmax was significantly greater in the microwave than the sham group (P <0.05). In nearly half the microwave group (47%), Qmax increased 50% or more by 6 months compared with 24% of the sham group. Microwave treatment resulted in a significantly greater (P <0.05) positive impact on patient QOL than did the sham procedure. By 6 months, the QOL score in microwave-treated patients (2.2, 95% CI 1.9 to 2.4) averaged 48% lower (P <0.0005) than that at baseline (4.2, 95% CI 4.0 to 4.4). Significantly greater durability of treatment effects was also evident with microwave than with sham treatment, as judged by the higher proportion of microwave-treated patients (98.4%) requiring no further treatment during the 6-month study period versus 83.3% of sham control patients (P <0.0005). Microwave treatment was well tolerated, and complications were generally minor, readily manageable, and transitory.

CONCLUSIONS

The microwave thermoablation system proved to be an effective and safe treatment modality for BPH, with a positive impact on patient QOL.

Minimally invasive alternative therapeutic options for lower urinary tract symptoms

Many minimally invasive techniques designed to alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms have been evaluated, each of which offers a glimpse of the next generation of treatment. These minimally invasive techniques improve upon transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) by reducing the risk of postoperative complications. However, none have been compared with TURP in large-scale controlled trials, and therefore will not be able to replace TURP until their long-term durability is known.

Microwave thermotherapy: a long-term follow-up of 67 patients from a single centre

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term therapeutic value of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of bladder outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 67 patients with BPH, assessed using symptom scores and measurements of urinary flow rate, underwent TUMT using the Leo Microthermer system (Laser Electro Optics Ltd, London, UK) between October 1990 and June 1992. Follow-up information was obtained on 60 patients (90%). If they had undergone no further treatment for their BPH, they were re-assessed with symptom scores and measurements of flow rate.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 52.4 months; eight of the 6 7 patients had died and seven were lost to follow-up. Sixteen of the remaining 52 (31%) had undergone another treatment for BPH; one patient developed prostatitis and one developed localized carcinoma of the prostate. Thirty-four patients had had no further treatment, 29 of whom attended for assessment. In these patients, a statistically significant improvement in both the symptom score and flow rate was maintained at 4 years. No patients developed retrograde ejaculation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report a follow-up of at least 4 years after TUMT with any device. Treatment with the Leo Microthermer provided at least a 50% symptomatic improvement in 16 of 50 patients treated at 4 years. However, 30% of the patients needed further treatment for their BPH. TUMT is safe and effective in patients not wanting anaesthesia and in young patients concerned about retrograde ejaculation.

Is there a clinically significant change in pressure-flow study values after urethral instrumentation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of urethral instrumentation on pressure-flow study values and subsequent grading of bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using suprapubic intravesical pressure monitoring.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-two men with LUTS underwent pressure-flow study using suprapubic intravesical pressure monitoring. The urethra was then instrumented successively with a 12 F catheter and a 17 F cystoscope, and a further pressure-flow study recorded after each procedure. Standard pressure-flow variables were measured for the three recordings. The presence and degree of obstruction were determined using commonly recognized grading systems, i.e. the Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. the linear passive urethral resistance ratio (LPURR) and the urethral resistance algorithm (URA).

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in the detrusor pressure at maximum flow and detrusor opening pressure between the uninstrumented and instrumented studies (12 F and 17 F) but no difference in peak flow rates between the groups or in the Abrams-Griffiths number or URA value between studies. Using the LPURR, there was a tendency to a lower obstruction class after urethral instrumentation, ranking as 17 F > 12 F > no instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes seen after urethral instrumentation represent no more than the biological intra-individual variation normally seen in pressure-flow studies and do not lead to a clinically significant change in obstruction class.

The so-called "placebo effect" in benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment trials represents partially a conditional regression to the mean induced by censoring

OBJECTIVES

To study the variability of assessment instruments (symptom questionnaires and flow rate recordings) in healthy volunteers during repeat administration in short intervals. To study the effect of inclusion criteria-based censoring of patients during screening for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment trials on the outcome of subsequent tests.

METHODS

One hundred forty-five male volunteers without known prostatic diseases with a mean age of 52 years (range 23 to 83) were given the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index (SI), BPH Impact Index (II). Quality of Life (QOL) score, and a flow rate recording twice 10 to 20 days apart without any healthcare intervention. Data were collected and analyzed after typical BPH trial criteria were applied to the first test, and patients who did not "qualify" were censored.

RESULTS

Good correlation exists between two closely spaced administrations of the AUA SI, BPH II, QOL score, and flow rate recordings in healthy male volunteers with correlation coefficients between 0.73 and 0.89. Censoring patients and excluding them from the analysis of the second test based on typical BPH trial criteria induces a regression to the mean phenomenon, which results in an artificial improvement in these outcome parameters. The magnitude of the improvement increases as the selection and censoring criteria tighten. The mean differences between the first and second test range from 1.4 to 1.7 mL/s for the peak flow rate, from -1.0 to -1.4 for the AUA SI, and from -0.4 to -0.8 for the BPH II. All these differences induced solely by censoring with resulting regression to the mean are statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Censoring of patients based on inclusion and exclusion criteria is typical for BPH treatment trials. One of the under-recognized effects of censoring is a regression to the mean, which leads to an apparent improvement in the outcome parameters assessed. In both placebo or sham-controlled trials, as well as in clinical series without controls, one must keep this effect and its relative magnitude in mind, and interpret the data from such trials with appropriate caution.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical outcome after 4 years

PURPOSE

We describe long-term results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy. We determined pretreatment variables favorable for the outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed for 4 years 187 patients treated with Prostatron software 2.0.* Preoperative evaluations consisted of score, cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasonography, urine flow and residual volume measurements. Followup examinations with score and urodynamics were performed for 4 years after transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Kaplan-Meier plots and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A decrease in the number of satisfied patients was noted from 62% at 1 year after transurethral microwave thermotherapy to 23% at 4 years. Initial decrease in score and increase in urine flow were followed by increase in score and decrease in flow at the 4-year followup of the 56 patients who had not received supplementary benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment. The Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the median time for need of supplementary BPH treatment to be 45 months. Pretreatment urine flow greater than 10 ml. per second and an irritative score less than 5 were the only factors related to a favorable outcome. Prostate volume or energy delivered to the prostate did not influence the result.

CONCLUSIONS

Four years after transurethral microwave thermotherapy 23% of the initially treated group were satisfied with the result. Two-thirds had received supplementary BPH treatment. Preoperatively less obstructed patients and those with low initial irritative scores responded more favorably to transurethral microwave thermotherapy treatment.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the Dornier Urowave: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, sham-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To study the efficacy and safety of a new transurethral microwave thermotherapy device (the Urowave) in the treatment of men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

METHODS

A total of 220 patients (mean age 66.2 years) with clinical BPH, an American Urological Association symptom index (AUA SI) of 13 points or more, and a peak flow rate of 12 mL/s or less were enrolled and randomized 2:1 for active versus sham treatment. All treatments were conducted as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia, with oral sedation and analgesia only. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The treatments were well tolerated, and no patient received general or spinal anesthesia. The AUA SI dropped from 23.6 to 12.7 points at 6 months (P < 0.05) in the active group and from 23.9 to 18.0 points in the sham-treated group (P < 0.05, between-group difference). Statistically significant improvements were also noted for peak flow rate (7.7 to 10.7 mL/s at 6 months for active treatment, 8.1 to 9.8 mL/s for sham treatment, P < 0.05, between-group difference) and for average flow rate. A decrease in AUA SI of more than 30% was achieved in 72% versus 38% of patients (active versus sham treatment, respectively) and more than 50% in 50% versus 19% of patients. In general, active Urowave-treated patients perceived "a lot" of improvement, whereas sham-treated patients perceived "a little" to "some" improvement. More of the actively treated patients had dysuria and urgency after treatment, and ejaculatory dysfunction (e.g., hematospermia) was more common in actively treated patients as well. Secondary urinary retention after removal of the catheter occurred in 8 patients (5.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Dornier Urowave transurethral microwave thermotherapy device for treatment of clinical BPH is effective in decreasing symptoms and bother and improving quality of life and flow rate and is superior to sham treatment. Patients perceive a great deal of improvement, independent of their baseline symptom severity. Adverse events are in general transient and mild in nature. Extended follow-up is necessary to document long-term durability of improvements.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia in Sweden 1987 to 1994: changing patterns of treatment, changing patterns of costs

OBJECTIVES

To assess health care use and costs for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Sweden from 1987 to 1994 when minimal invasive procedures, including transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) and drugs, were introduced, in addition to conventional surgery.

METHODS

Cross-sectional annual data on health care utilization based on national information systems and surveys were used for calculation of direct 1994 cost.

RESULTS

The total number of men in the age group at risk for BPH was virtually constant, and the total direct health care costs for BPH treatment increased from 1987 to 1992. A slight decrease was evident for the years 1993 and 1994, notwithstanding the introduction of new ambulatory procedures in 1991 and of new drugs in 1992. The number of physician office visits changed little during the study period, although this estimate may be low. TUMT procedures were introduced rapidly but decreased; nevertheless, their share was never more than 3% of total costs. Drug sales were 15-fold those in 1992 and accounted for 12% of the total costs in 1994. Conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) operations decreased markedly after the introduction of the new treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The new treatments were adopted differently. TUMT procedures decreased as rapidly as they were introduced. Three years after the introduction of the new drugs, drug sales indicated that the number of men receiving drug treatment was greater than the annual number of men receiving TURP operations and TUMT procedures combined. Yet the total costs showed a slight decrease, mainly due to the decreasing numbers of TURP operations.

High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms

Since 1993, we have treated patients having lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction using the high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) protocol (Prostasoft; software version 2.5). This study was conducted to investigate the outcome and durability of this treatment. A series of 301 patients with a mean prostate size of 56.4 cc were treated by HE-TUMT if they had a Madsen Symptom Score > or = 8, a maximum flow rate < 15 mL/sec, a voided volume > or = 100 mL, and a postvoiding residual volume < 350 mL. The prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography was > or = 25 cc. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 12, 52, 78, and 104 weeks. Patients were stratified according to the response evaluation criteria set at the 3rd International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. These response criteria were measured at 12 weeks. At 2 years, there appeared to be a better response in the bigger prostates. Irrespective of relief of outflow obstruction, a good symptomatic response was seen in both good and poor responders. Twenty-two patients were re-treated during the 2-year follow-up period: three underwent bladder neck incision, nine transurethral resection, two laser prostatectomy, one open prostatectomy, and seven additional medical therapy. At 2-year follow-up, HE-TUMT resulted in a durable good outcome in 93% of patients with an objective improvement rate of 42% and a subjective improvement rate of 65%. The best predictor of durability appeared to be the extent of relief of obstruction. Of the 96 bad responders in this group, 14 underwent retreatment, compared with 6 of the 100 good responders.

A novel transurethral microwave thermal ablation system to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life of a newly designed microwave thermal ablation system in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microwave thermal ablation was administered to 154 BPH patients at 3 centers in Canada and the United Kingdom during a single 1 to 2-hour office or clinic procedure without general or regional anesthesia and without need for potent medications necessitating intensive patient monitoring. Various measures of symptoms, voiding function and patient quality of life were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and-3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Mean American Urological Association symptom score 12 months after treatment (8.8, 95% confidence interval 7.7 to 10.0) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) by 56% than that at baseline (20.1, 95% confidence interval 19.1 to 21.0). The incidence of mild symptoms increased from 0 to 57%, while that of severe symptoms decreased from 49 to 8%. There was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in peak flow rate of 45% from 9.3 ml. per second (95% confidence interval 8.8 to 9.7) at baseline to 13.4 ml. per second (95% confidence interval 12.5 to 14.4) at 12 months. Similar symptomatic and urodynamic improvements occurred in all prostate volume categories. Convalescence was rapid after treatment with little or no need for home bed rest or restriction of usual activities. Patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with treatment and found the prostate symptoms to be significantly more tolerable. Adverse events were infrequent, transient and readily managed.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermal ablation proved to be safe and effective for treatment of BPH with a significant positive impact on patient quality of life.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: one-year results with the PRIMUS U + R device

We report on one-year results after transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in patients with symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The material consists of 91 cases, treated with the PRIMUS U + R device in a single, one-hour out-patient procedure. The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), S, fell from baseline 23 (17-27) to 12 (7-18.8), quality of life assessment, L, improved from 4 (3-5) to 2 (1-3) and peak urinary flow increased from 9.6 +/- 0.3 to 11.1 +/- 0.4 (ml/sec) after one year. No changes in postvoiding residuals were observed. Sixty five per cent of the patients were assessed as responders to the treatment. Complications were urinary retention and bacteriuria. Neither enlargement of prostate nor a prominent median lobe, seem to be predictors of subjective outcome. TUMT appears to be a safe and, in the majority of patients, effective measure to relieve symptoms due to BPH.

Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of morbidity among older men. Primary care physicians need to develop expertise in its management. The causes of BPH are unknown; aging and the presence of male androgens are the dominant risk factors. Obtaining a medical history is a key step in assessing whether lower urinary tract symptoms are due to BPH or to some other process. A reliable and valid seven-item questionnaire has been developed to objectively assess symptom severity. A focused physical examination including a digital rectal exam should be performed, as well as a urinalysis and serum creatinine. Optional tests include uroflowmetry, post-void residual urine, and prostate-specific antigen measurements. BPH is treated primarily to improve the quality, rather than increase the quantity, of life. Optimal decisions about treatment are best made by a clinician and an informed patient working together.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy v sham treatment: double-blind randomized study

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is a single-session, 1-hour office-based treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A randomized, double-blind study has been conducted at our institutions involving 115 patients who, after satisfying the entry criteria, were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive TUMT or a sham treatment. Three months' unblinding revealed both statistically and clinically significant improvement in the efficacy measures for the real treatment compared with the sham. The mean Madsen Symptom Score decreased 55% and the mean peak flow rate increased 58% in the TUMT-treated patients v 28% and 27% in the sham-treated patients (P < 0.001). Also, the TUMT-treated patients improved in mean AUA Symptom Score by 43% v 26% for sham-treated patients (P < 0.01). Reclassification of patients after therapy showed a greater shift to the mild category of AUA Symptom Score: 37% for TUMT patients v 6.5% for sham-treated patients. In addition, prostate-specific antigen elevation to >4 times baseline was noted 1 week after TUMT v no statistically significant change for sham-treated patients. This double-blind study demonstrates that thermotherapy's efficacy is not placebo related and that the mechanism of action is related to thermal ablation of transition zone adenoma.

Transrectal ultrasonography to predict the clinical outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and determined whether the indices obtained with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) can predict the clinical response to TUMT.

METHOD

Between November 1991 and June 1992, 43 patients with symptomatic BPH were treated with TUMT using the Prostcare device. The therapy consisted of a 1-hour treatment under topical anesthesia. The findings of uroflowmetry and AUA symptom score before treatment were compared with those obtained at each visit after the therapy. As the indices, the transition zone (TZ) volume, transition zone ratio (TZ ratio = TZ volume/total prostate volume), total prostate volume, and presumed circle area ratio (PCAR) were calculated.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between pretreatment TZ ratio and residual urine volume (r = 0.472, P = 0.0022). The efficacy rates calculated by response criteria on the 3 point scale at 2 months, 12 months, and 30 months were 44.2%, 30.2%, and 25%, respectively. The significant prognostic factors that predicted the clinical effect 1 year after treatment were the TZ ratio and intraprostatic temperature. After controlling for the treatment temperature, the multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated that the TZ ratio was the significant predictor (P = 0.049) of 1 year efficacy of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the efficacy rate of TUMT at 30 months was 25%, and that TRUS provides a simple parameter, the TZ ratio, which predicts the efficacy of TUMT.