1
|
Li Z, Zhang M, Zheng S, Song Y, Cheng X, Yu D, Du L, Ren L, Han H, Zhao Y. Genetic removal of the CH1 exon leads to the production of hypofunctional heavy chain-only IgG2a in rats. Transgenic Res 2020; 29:199-213. [PMID: 32078126 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-020-00189-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Despite great values in many applications, heavy chain-only antibodies (HcAbs) are naturally only produced in camelids and sharks, which are not easy to access and handle. Production of the type of antibodies in small laboratory animals would remarkably facilitate their applications. We previously reported a mouse line in which the CH1 exon of mouse γ1 was deleted that could express heavy chain-only IgG1 antibodies. However, these mice showed an extremely weak IgG1 response to specific antigens when immunized, and we could only achieve single VH domains with low affinity to antigens using these mice. One possibility is that the mouse germline VH repertoire was not sufficient to support the expression of functional heavy chain-only antibodies. In this study, we report the generation of a rat line in which the CH1 exon of the γ2a gene was removed and the γ1 and γ2b genes were silenced. Although the genetically modified rats expressed heavy chain-only IgG2a, they also exhibited a very weak IgG2a response to antigen immunization. Panning of a phage library constructed using IgG2a VH segments amplified from immunized rats identified antigen-specific single VH antibodies, which also exhibited much lower affinity than that of commercial mAbs. Together with our previous report, this study suggests that the simple genetic removal of the CH1 exon does not guarantee the successful expression of functional heavy chain-only antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenrong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Shunan Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Song
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueqian Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Di Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijuan Du
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Liming Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Haitang Han
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yaofeng Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Science, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
We have used cryoelectron tomography of vitreous-ice-embedded HIV-1 virions to compare the envelope (Env) spikes of a wild-type strain with those of a mutant strain in which the V1/V2 loop has been deleted. Deletion of V1/V2 results in a spike with far more structural heterogeneity than is observed in the wild type, likely reflecting greatly enhanced gp120 protomer flexibility. A major difference between the two forms is a pronounced loss of mass from the "peak" of the native Env spike. The apparent loss of contact among three gp120 protomers likely accounts for the more open structure, heterogeneity in configuration, and previous observations that broadly neutralizing epitopes and reactive sites on other structural elements are more exposed in such constructs.
Collapse
|