Effect of conduction distance on amplitude and area of compound action potentials of A fiber and C fiber

Role of primary afferents in spinal cord stimulation-induced vasodilation: characterization of fiber types

Selected patients with peripheral vascular disease can be treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to improve blood flow in the limbs. However, the mechanisms producing these effects remain unclear. The present study was designed to investigate if SCS produces cutaneous vasodilation via antidromic activation of the unmyelinated C-fibers and/or the small myelinated fibers. SCS was applied to anesthetized rats with a ball electrode at the L2-L3 spinal level. In Protocol 1, effects of capsaicin were examined. Blood flow changes in the hindpaw induced by SCS were measured in the footpad with laser Doppler flowmeters. Topical application of capsaicin (1%) on the tibial nerve did not affect SCS-induced vasodilation at 30 and 60% of motor threshold (MT). However, the duration of vasodilation induced by SCS at 90% MT and at 10 times MT was significantly reduced after capsaicin application on the tibial nerve. In Protocol 2, antidromic compound action potentials (CAPs) of the tibial nerve were recorded in response to SCS. CAPs of the large and the small myelinated afferent fibers were observed in response to SCS at all intensities. However, even with SCS at ten times MT, CAPs of C-fibers could not be detected in the tibial nerve. In Protocol 3, antidromic CAPs of the dorsal root were measured in response to SCS. Antidromic CAPs of C-fibers in dorsal roots were evoked by SCS at >or=90% of MT. It is concluded that SCS-induced vasodilation at <or=60% of MT may be mediated via only the myelinated fibers, whereas vasodilation at >or=90% of MT may also involve antidromic activation of some unmyelinated C-fibers.

Sampling variation caused by A/D cards due to external trigger

In electrophysiological recording, a microcomputer-based analog-to-digital (A/D) card is an indispensable instrument for signal acquisition and analysis. In our studies, evoked responses sampled by our A/D card showed variation among different cycles. If several cycles had been averaged, the resultant waveform would have a smaller peak amplitude and a longer duration. To explain this phenomenon, a simulated sampling model of compound action potential was proposed. Our experimental data agreed very well with the prediction of the simulated model. The long and varied delay time between the external trigger and the first sampling in each cycle by our A/D card might be the main cause of such variation. This problem could not be solved by any post-sampled programming. Hence, for those electrophysiological laboratories which sampled evoked responses, to buy a new A/D card might be the most straightforward solution to the problem.

The activity of hippocampal interneurons and pyramidal cells during the response of the hippocampus to repeated auditory stimuli

Interneurons and pyramidal cells were identified electrophysiologically in the hippocampus of anesthetized rats. Paired tones were presented 500 ms apart, and the resulting neuronal response was compared to differences in the amplitude of an auditory evoked potential (N40) elicited by each of the tones. Generally, the N40 elicited in response to the second tone is less than the response to the first. Pyramidal cells exhibited their most pronounced activation within 40 ms after the first tone. The post-stimulus discharge activation of interneurons was less than the pyramidal cells, but activation of different interneurons occurred at various times throughout the interval between the two tones. The presence or absence of suppression of N40 amplitude in the paired stimulus paradigm correlated with differences in the auditory response of both the interneurons and pyramidal cells. The activity of interneurons in relationship to gating of hippocampal auditory response is discussed.

Microcomputer-based pulse stimulator

A low-cost PC-based 2-channel stimulator was designed. This device can generate regular current pulses for many neuroscience experiments. It can also generate irregular pulses for nerve stimulation, thus could possibly avoid the problem of sensitization or habituation in the central nervous system. The stimulation frequency (can be < 0.0005 Hz) and pulse duration (5 microseconds to 65 ms) of this device can be programmed by an interactive user interface. Furthermore, the output current (0-10 mA) can be continuously varied and was optically isolated to minimize stimulus artifact. Moreover, features such as low-power consumption (0.2 mA of a 9 V battery) and high-compliance output (> 120 V) could accommodate the stimulator for widespread applications. A trial of nerve stimulation was illustrated besides the electrical specifications of the stimulator.