A combined staphylococcal coagglutination assay for rapid identification of rotavirus and adenovirus (COARA)

Comparison of two different combined test strips with fluorescent microspheres or colored microspheres as tracers for rotavirus and adenovirus detection

Background

Rotavirus (RV) and enteric adenovirus (AdV) mainly cause infantile infectious gastroenteritis. Several separate test methods for the detection of RV or AdV are currently available, but few tests are able to simultaneously detect both RV and AdV viruses, especially in primary medical institutions.

Methods

The present study was mainly designed to compare the performance of two combined test strips for the detection of RV and AdV: a rotavirus–adenovirus strip with fluorescent microspheres for tracers (FMT); and the CerTest rotavirus–adenovirus blister strip with colored microspheres for tracers (CMT). To test the strips cultures of RV, AdV and from other enteric pathogens were used, in addition to 350 stool specimens from 45 symptomatic patients with gastrointestinal infections.

Results

Detection thresholds for RV and AdV cultures using serial dilutions showed that the sensitivity of FMT was significantly higher than that of CMT (both P < 0.05). Specificity evaluation demonstrated that with culture mixtures of Coxsackie (A16), ECHO (type30), and entero- (EV71) viruses there was no detection of cross reaction using the two test strips, i.e., all the results were negative. With regard to the detection of RV in 350 clinical specimens, the total coincidence rate was 92.9%, the positive coincidence rate was 98.2%, and the negative coincidence rate was 90.8%. With regard to AdV detection, the total coincidence rate was 95.4%, the positive coincidence rate was 95.2%, and the negative coincidence rate was 95.5%.

Conclusions

FMT performed better than CMT with regard to the combined detection of RV and AdV.

Infection kinetics of human adenovirus serotype 41 in HEK 293 cells

The purpose of this work was to acquire an overview of the infectious cycle of HAdV-41 in permissive HEK 293 cells and compare it to that observed with the prototype of the genus, Human adenovirus C HAdV-2. HEK 293 cells were infected with each virus separately and were harvested every 12 h for seven days. Infection kinetics were analysed using confocal and electronic microscopy. The results show that, when properly cultivated, HAdV-41 was not fastidious. It had a longer multiplication cycle, which resulted in the release of complete viral particles and viral stocks reached high titres. After 60 h of infection, the export of viral proteins from the infected cell to the extracellular milieu was observed, with a pattern similar to that previously described for HAdV-2 penton-base trafficking after 30 h of infection. HAdV-41 had a non-lytic cycle and the infection spread from the first infected cell to its neighbours. The release process of the viral particles is unknown. The results observed for HAdV-41 infection in HEK 293 cells show how different this virus is from the prototype HAdV-2 and provides information for the development of this vector for use in gene therapy.

Coagglutination for viral DNA preparation of canine parvovirus for molecular diagnosis

The use of PCR for molecular diagnosis is accepted as the standard method for detecting nucleic acids from numerous major infectious agents using diverse sampling techniques. Although PCR is an essential tool in the research laboratory; the success of the method depends on a sample free of inhibitors that was obtained preferably by a simple and fast extraction method. The coagglutination test (COA test) is based on the propriety of protein A, from Staphylococcus aureus, which can bind specifically to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in various mammals and to several IgG subclasses in mice. In this study, the COA method capacity of generating inhibitor-free DNA sample was tested. Ten fecal samples positive for canine parvovirus were subjected to nucleic acid extraction using COA method and a commercial kit (Illustra GFX Genomic Blood DNA Purification Kit/G.E. Healthcare); and the samples' viral DNA content were compared using real-time PCR. The COA procedure allowed the extraction of larger amount of viral DNA from feces than the commercial kit. This method was shown to be simple and effective for DNA extraction, concentrating viral particles dispersed in the biological samples.