Molecular cloning and sequencing of a nuclear gene encoding tRNA(Gln) (UUG) from Arabidopsis thaliana

Novel in vivo system to monitor tRNA expression based on the recovery of GFP fluorescence and its application for the determination of plant tRNA expression

We developed a novel assay system to quantitatively detect amber codon suppression by tRNAs expressed in plant cells. The assay was based on recovery of the expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter, in which a fourth Lys codon (AAG) was changed to a premature amber codon TAG, designated as GFP/amber. Plasmids carrying GFP/amber, suppressor tRNA, and red fluorescent protein (RFF) as an internal control, respectively, were introduced into onion epidermal cells to monitor cell numbers with GFP and RFP fluorescence. First, an amber suppressor tRNA^Ser from tobacco (NtS2) to suppress a TAG codon in GFP mRNA was examined, leading to the recovery of GFP fluorescence. Second, we used two different tRNAs (i.e., AtY3II-am and AtY3II-amiG7), both of which are intron-containing amber suppressor tRNAs^Tyr, the former impaired precursor-tRNA splicing but the latter did not, as confirmed previously using two different approaches (Szeykowska-Kulinska and Beier, 1991; Akama and Beier, 2003). As expected, coexpression of GFP/amber with AtY3II-am gave no green fluorescence, but significant fluorescence was observed with AtY3II-amiG7. Then, we applied this system for the analysis of 5'-regulatory sequences of the tRNA^Gln gene family from Arabidopsis. A 5'-flanking sequence of each of the 17 tRNA^Gln genes was fused to a coding region of an amber suppressor tRNA^Ser gene (NtS2/amber) and its 3'-flanking sequence. Chimeric tRNA^Ser gene, GFP/amber, and RFP were coexpressed, and the GFP or RFP fluorescence intensity was determined in cells using laser-scanning microscopy. In parallel, 17 kinds of original Arabidopsis tRNA^Gln genes and their chimeric genes with NtS2/amber were all analyzed in cell-free nuclear extract (Yukawa et al., 1997). Comparison of in vitro and in vivo expression of these chimeric tRNA genes displayed generally similar results, accompanied by a wide range of variance in the expression of each gene. Nevertheless, the expression patterns of several genes were clearly the opposite of each other comparing between the two different system, demonstrating the importance of in vivo systems in the study on tRNA expression in plants.