On the efficacy of piracetam in geriatric patients with acute cerebral ischemia: a clinically controlled double-blind study

The "ART" of facial filler injections: Avoid, recognize, and treat hyaluronic acid-induced complications

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are frequently used for cosmetic purposes as volumizers or as wrinkle fillers. One of the major advantages of hyaluronic acid use is the possibility to neutralize it by using hyaluronidase should complications occur.

PATIENT

A case of a 21-year-old female patient is presented, in whom a hyaluronic acid injection-induced vascular occlusion was seen four days after the initial injection, with increasing pain and severe signs of ischemia.

METHOD

Treatment consisted of an immediate hyaluronidase injection, supplemented with administration of acetylsalicylic acid, piracetam, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), corticosteroids, analgesics, prophylactic antibiotics, application of topical nitroglycerin and warmth, smoking cessation, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

RESULTS

The initial progress and evolution of the deformity with possible therapeutic options are being discussed.

CONCLUSION

The "ART" (avoid, recognize, and treat) in handling filler complications is presented, as a new universal guideline for clinical aesthetic practitioners and injectors.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Piracetam in Focal Cerebral Ischemic Rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cerebral ischemia affects hepatic enzymes and brain permeability extensively. Piracetam was investigated up to phase III of clinical trials and there is lack of data on brain penetration in cerebral ischemic condition. Thus, knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and brain penetration of piracetam during ischemic condition would aid to improve pharmacotherapeutics in ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion for 2 h in male Wistar rats followed by reperfusion. After 24 h of middle cerebral artery occlusion or 22 h of reperfusion, piracetam was administered for pharmacokinetic, brain penetration, and pharmacological experiments. In pharmacokinetic study, blood samples were collected at different time points after 200-mg/kg (oral) and 75-mg/kg (intravenous) administration of piracetam through right external jugular vein cannulation. In brain penetration study, the cerebrospinal fluid, systemic blood, portal blood, and brain samples were collected at pre-designated time points after 200-mg/kg oral administration of piracetam. In a separate experiment, the pharmacological effect of the single oral dose of piracetam in middle cerebral artery occlusion was assessed at a dose of 200 mg/kg.

RESULTS

All the pharmacokinetic parameters of piracetam including area under curve (AUC_0-24), maximum plasma concentration (C _max), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (t _max), elimination half-life (t _1/2), volume of distribution (V _z), total body clearance, mean residence time, and bioavailability were found to be similar in ischemic stroke condition except for brain penetration. Piracetam exposure (AUC_0-2) in brain and CSF were found to be 2.4- and 3.1-fold higher, respectively, in ischemic stroke compared to control rats. Piracetam significantly reduced infarct volume by 35.77% caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no change in the pharmacokinetic parameters of piracetam in the ischemic stroke model except for brain penetration. This indicates that variables influencing brain penetration may not be limiting factors for use of piracetam in ischemic stroke.

Piracetam Attenuates LPS-Induced Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Impairment in Rats

The present study was performed to investigate the effect of piracetam on neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and resulting changes in cognitive behavior. Neuroinflammation was induced by a single dose of LPS solution infused into each of the lateral cerebral ventricles in concentrations of 1 μg/μl, at a rate of 1 μl/min over a 5-min period, with a 5-min waiting period between the two infusions. Piracetam in doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg i.p. was administered 30 min before LPS infusion and continued for 9 days. On ninth day, the behavioral test for memory and anxiety was done followed by blood collection and microdissection of the hippocampus (HIP) and prefrontal cortex brain regions. Piracetam attenuated the LPS-induced decrease in coping strategy to novel environment indicating anxiolytic activity. It also reversed the LPS-induced changes in the known arm and novel arm entries in the Y-maze test indicating amelioration of spatial memory impairment. Further, piracetam moderated LPS-induced decrease in the mitochondrial complex enzyme activities (I, II, IV, and V) and mitochondrial membrane potential. It ameliorated changes in hippocampal lipid peroxidation and nitrite levels including the activity of superoxide dismutase. Piracetam region specifically ameliorated LPS-induced increase in the level of IL-6 in HIP indicating anti-neuroinflammatory effect. Further, piracetam reduced HIP Aβ (1-40) and increased blood Aβ level suggesting efflux of Aβ from HIP to blood. Therefore, the present study indicates preclinical evidence for the use of piracetam in the treatment of neuroinflammatory disorders.

The developing utility of zebrafish models for cognitive enhancers research

Whereas cognitive impairment is a common symptom in multiple brain disorders, predictive and high-throughput animal models of cognition and behavior are becoming increasingly important in the field of translational neuroscience research. In particular, reliable models of the cognitive deficits characteristic of numerous neurobehavioral disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia have become a significant focus of investigation. While rodents have traditionally been used to study cognitive phenotypes, zebrafish (Danio rerio) are gaining popularity as an excellent model to complement current translational neuroscience research. Here we discuss recent advances in pharmacological and genetic approaches using zebrafish models to study cognitive impairments and to discover novel cognitive enhancers and neuroprotective mechanisms.

Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Piracetam has neuroprotective and antithrombotic effects that may help to reduce death and disability in people with acute stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2006 and 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of piracetam in acute, presumed ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 15 May 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2011), EMBASE (1980 to May 2011), and ISI Science Citation Index (1981 to May 2011). We also contacted the manufacturer of piracetam to identify further published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing piracetam with control, with at least mortality reported and entry to the trial within three days of stroke onset.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality and this was checked by the other two review authors. We contacted study authors for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials involving 1002 patients, with one trial contributing 93% of the data. Participants' ages ranged from 40 to 85 years, and both sexes were equally represented. Piracetam was associated with a statistically non-significant increase in death at one month (approximately 31% increase, 95% confidence interval 81% increase to 5% reduction). This trend was no longer apparent in the large trial after correction for imbalance in stroke severity. Limited data showed no difference between the treatment and control groups for functional outcome, dependence or proportion of patients dead or dependent. Adverse effects were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some suggestion (but no statistically significant result) of an unfavourable effect of piracetam on early death, but this may have been caused by baseline differences in stroke severity in the trials. There is not enough evidence to assess the effect of piracetam on dependence.

Does long term use of piracetam improve speech disturbances due to ischemic cerebrovascular diseases?

Aphasia causes significant disability and handicap among stroke survivors. Language therapy is recommended for aphasic patients, but not always available. Piracetam, an old drug with novel properties, has been shown to have mild beneficial effects on post-stroke aphasia. In the current study, we investigated the effects of 6 months treatment with piracetam on aphasia following stroke. Thirty patients with first-ever ischemic strokes and related aphasia were enrolled in the study. The scores for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Gülhane Aphasia Test were recorded. The patients were scheduled randomly to receive either 4.8 g piracetam daily or placebo treatment for 6 months. At the end of 24 weeks, clinical assessments and aphasia tests were repeated. The level of improvement in the clinical parameters and aphasia scores was compared between the two groups. All patients had large lesions and severe aphasia. No significant difference was observed between the piracetam and placebo groups regarding the improvements in the NIHSS, BI and mRS scores at the end of the treatment. The improvements observed in spontaneous speech, reading fluency, auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, repetition, and naming were not significantly different in the piracetam and placebo groups, the difference reached significance only for auditory comprehension in favor of piracetam at the end of the treatment. Piracetam is well-tolerated in patients with post-stroke aphasia. Piracetam taken orally in a daily dose of 4.8 g for 6 months has no clear beneficial effect on post-stroke language disorders.

Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure (BP) should be altered actively during the acute phase of stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of lowering or elevating BP in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on BP in acute stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), EMBASE (1980 to October 2009), and Science Citation Index (1981 to October 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of interventions that would be expected, on pharmacological grounds, to alter BP in patients within one week of the onset of acute stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the trial inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 131 trials involving in excess of 18,000 patients; a further 13 trials are ongoing. We obtained data for 43 trials (7649 patients). Among BP-lowering trials, beta receptor antagonists lowered BP (early systolic BP (SBP) mean difference (MD) -6.1 mmHg, 95% CI -11.4 to -0.9; late SBP MD -4.9 mmHg, 95% CI -10.2 to 0.4; late diastolic BP (DBP) MD -4.5 mmHg, 95% CI -7.8 to -1.2). Oral calcium channel blockers (CCB) lowered BP (late SBP MD -3.2 mmHg, 95% CI -5.4 to -1.1; early DBP MD -2.5, 95% CI -5.6 to 0.7; late DBP MD -2.1, 95% CI -3.5 to -0.7). Nitric oxide donors lowered BP (early SBP MD -10.3 mmHg, 95% CI -17.6 to -3.0). Prostacyclin lowered BP (late SBP MD, -7.7 mmHg, 95% CI -15.6 to 0.2; late DBP MD -3.9 mmHg, 95% CI -8.1 to 0.4). Among BP-increasing trials, diaspirin cross-linked haemoglobin (DCLHb) increased BP (early SBP MD 15.3 mmHg, 95% CI 4.0 to 26.6; late SBP MD 15.9 mmHg, 95% CI 1.8 to 30.0). None of the drug classes significantly altered outcome apart from DCLHb which increased combined death or dependency (odds ratio (OR) 5.41, 95% CI 1.87 to 15.64).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to evaluate reliably the effect of altering BP on outcome after acute stroke. However, treatment with DCLHb was associated with poor clinical outcomes. Beta receptor antagonists, CCBs, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin each lowered BP during the acute phase of stroke. In contrast, DCLHb increased BP.

On the inhibitory affect of some dementia drugs on DNA polymerase Beta activity

Some drugs are routinely prescribed for dementia that sets in either due to normal ageing or due to neurodegenerative disorders. We have studied the effect of three of these drugs, Donepezil hydrochloride, Rivastigmine tartrate and Nootropyl, on the activity of DNA polymerases beta, a crucial enzyme in the base excision repair pathway, the most important mode of DNA repair in brain. All the three drugs inhibited DNA polymerase beta activity to varying degrees although the affects of Donepezil being the least and inconsistent. The drugs preferentially bind to and inhibit the activities of 8 kDa domain of DNA polymerase beta that is known to possess the dRP lyase activity. The function of 31 kDa domain dealing with template driven addition of nucleotides at 3' end of the primer is not adversely affected. The inhibitory action of most widely used dementia drugs on DNA repair potential signifies that pharma sector needs to consider this aspect especially while designing drugs targeted towards brain.

Piracetam improves cognitive deficits caused by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in rats

Piracetam is the derivate of gamma-aminobutyric acid, which improves the cognition,memory,consciousness, and is widely applied in the clinical treatment of brain dysfunction. In the present experiments, we study the effects of piracetam on chronic cerebral hypoperfused rats and observe its influence on amino acids, synaptic plasticity in the Perforant path-CA3 pathway and apoptosis in vivo. Cerebral hypoperfusion for 30 days by occlusion of bilateral common carotid arteries induced marked amnesic effects along with neuron damage, including: (1) spatial learning and memory deficits shown by longer escape latency and shorter time spent in the target quadrant; (2) significant neuronal loss and nuclei condensation in the cortex and hippocampus especially in CA1 region; (3) lower induction rate of long term potentiation, overexpression of BAX and P53 protein, and lower content of excitatory and inhibitory amino acids in hippocampus. Oral administration of piracetam (600 mg/kg, once per day for 30 days) markedly improved the memory impairment, increased the amino acid content in hippocampus, and attenuated neuronal damage. The ability of piracetam to attenuate memory deficits and neuronal damage after hypoperfusion may be beneficial in cerebrovascular type dementia.

Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Piracetam has neuroprotective and antithrombotic effects which may help to reduce death and disability in people with acute stroke.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of piracetam in acute presumed ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 20 June 2005). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (1980 to April 2005), and ISI Science Citation Index (1981 to April 2005). We also contacted the manufacturer of piracetam to identify further published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing piracetam with control, with at least mortality reported and entry to the trial within approximately 48 hours of stroke onset.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data and assessed trial quality and this was checked by the other two authors. Study authors were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials involving 1002 people were included, with one trial contributing 93% of the data. Participants' ages ranged from 40 to 85, and both sexes were equally represented. Piracetam was associated with a statistically non-significant increase in death at one month (approximately 31% increase, 95% confidence interval 81% increase to 5% reduction). This trend was no longer apparent in the large trial after correction for imbalance in stroke severity. Limited data showed no difference between the treatment and control groups for functional outcome, dependency or proportion of patients dead or dependent. Adverse effects were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some suggestion (but no statistically significant result) of an unfavourable effect of piracetam on early death, but this may have been caused by baseline differences in stroke severity in the trials. There is not enough evidence to assess the effect of piracetam on dependency.

Quality of the stroke rehabilitation research

The Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review revealed a wide range of quality scores across primary studies. The aim of this section is to determine what differences there are across studies and to provide a detailed examination of methodological issues in the stroke rehabilitation literature. Methodology of each article was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality scale. Mean PEDro scores and percentage of studies meeting individual PEDro criteria were determined for all studies, for therapy-based studies only, and for drug-based studies only. It was noted that the stroke rehabilitation literature lacked rigor in the area of concealed allocation, blinding of the assessor, and intention-to-treat analysis. Investigation of the methodological quality of stroke rehabilitation literature emphasizes the need for improved treatment protocols, taking into account previous deficits, during research.

An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation

A comprehensive evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation was created to be an up-to-date review of the current evidence in stroke rehabilitation and to provide specific conclusions based on evidence that could be used to help direct stroke care at the bedside and at home. A literature search using multiple data-bases was used to identify all trials from 1968 to 2001. Methodological quality of the individual randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality assessment scale. A five-stage level-of-evidence approach was used to determine the best practice in stroke rehabilitation. Over 403 treatment-based articles investigating of various areas of stroke rehabilitation were identified. This included 272 randomized controlled trials.

Can nootropic drugs be effective against the impact of ethanol teratogenicity on cognitive performance?

Rats exposed pre- (PA) and postnatally (PNA) to ethanol at a dose of 1 g/kg for 24 h developed fetal alcohol effects (FAE). This was measured using a condition-reflex method for active avoidance with punishment reinforcement (shuttle-box) in which pronounced learning and memory deficits in 3-month-old rats were found after ethanol exposure (Vaglenova and Petkov, 1998. Fetal alcohol effects in rats exposed pre- and postnatally to a low dose of ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 22(3), 697--703). In the present study the effects of piracetam (Pyramem) at a dose of 600 mg/kg body weight, aniracetam at 50 mg/kg, and meclophenoxate (Centrophenoxine) at 100 mg/kg were studied. The drugs were administered orally during 10 days to separate groups of naive and pre- and postnatally exposed to ethanol rats. All the investigated nootropic drugs showed a significant possibility to alleviate learning and memory disability of rats with FAE. Aniracetam was administered to 1-month-old rats, demonstrating a prolonged (2 months) therapeutic effect, observed in rats aged 3 months. As previously reported (Vaglenova and Petkov, 1998), between male rats with FAE and controls, 66 and 33% were 'poor learners', respectively. In all nootropic treatment groups the percentage of 'poor learners' dropped to 28%. The positive effects of piracetam, aniracetam and meclophenoxate suggest that these drugs could be used for both treatment and prophylactic of FAE-connected disturbances of cognition.

Pharmacological treatment for aphasia following stroke

BACKGROUND

Aphasia describes language impairment associated with a brain lesion.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of drugs on language abilities when given to people with aphasia following stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Register (last searched: May 2001), and reference lists of relevant articles to December 1998. We also contacted academic institutions and other researchers to identify further published and unpublished trials. MEDLINE was searched from 1966-1998, and CINAHL from 1982-1998. We searched the International Journal of Disorders of Communication by hand (known by other names in the past), from 1969 to 1998.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing: ~bullet~Any drug given to improve language, versus no treatment, or versus placebo ~bullet~Any drug given to improve language versus speech and language therapy ~bullet~One drug given to improve language versus another drug given with the same aim

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The principal reviewer collected the data, and assessed the quality of the trials with independent data checking and methodological advice. If we could not perform a statistical combination of different studies, we sought missing data. Failing that we provided a description. We sought missing data from authors, or where appropriate, a drug company.

MAIN RESULTS

We considered fifty two studies in detail, from which we identified ten trials suitable for the review. In most cases the methodological quality was unassessable, and only one trial reported sufficient detail for us to complete a description and analysis. This study did lose a large number of patients during its course. Drugs used in the trials identified were piracetam, bifemalane, piribedil, bromocriptine, idebenone, and Dextran 40. We found weak evidence that patients were more likely to have improved on any language measure at the end of the trial if they had received treatment with piracetam (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.7). The evidence is considered weak because of the large numbers of drop outs from the trials identified, who were lost to follow up. Patients who were treated with piracetam were no more likely (considering statistical significance) than those who took a placebo to experience unwanted effects, including death (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval for difference 0.9 to 1.7). However, the differences in death rates between the two groups, even though not not statistically significant, do give rise to some concerns that there may be an increased risk of death from taking piracetam. We could not determine if drug treatment is more effective than speech and language therapy. We could not determine whether one drug is more effective than another.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The main conclusion of this review is that drug treatment with piracetam may be effective in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. Further research is needed to explore the effects of drugs for aphasia, in particular piracetam. If a trial is done, this must be large enough to have adequate statistical power. The safety of the drug should be of primary interest. Researchers should examine the long term effects of this treatment, and whether it is more effective than speech and language therapy.

Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure should be managed after acute stroke and if so whether it is best to reduce or increase blood pressure.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of lowering or elevating blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (1999 Issue 1) using the CDSR and the CCTR databases, MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), BIDS ISI (Science Citation Index from 1981), and existing review articles. We contacted researchers in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of interventions that would be expected, on pharmacological grounds, to alter blood pressure in patients within two weeks of the onset of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently applied the trial inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty five trials were identified involving in excess of 11,500 patients; a further 5 trials are ongoing. Data were obtained for 32 trials (5,368 patients). Significant imbalances in baseline blood pressure were present across trials of intravenous calcium channel blockers and prostacyclin. Major imbalances in baseline blood pressure between treatment and control groups have made the interpretation of these results difficult. Intravenous calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and oral CCBs significantly lowered late blood pressure as compared to controls. (systolic/diastolic BP): iv CCBs -8.2/-6.7 mm Hg (95% CI -12.6 to -3.8)/ (95% CI -9.2 to -4.3); oral CCBs -3.2/-2.1 mm Hg (95% CI -5.0 to -1.3)/ (95% CI -3.0 to -1.0). Beta blockers significantly lowered late diastolic blood pressure but not significantly late systolic blood pressure; -5.0/-4.5 mm Hg (95% CI -10.2 to 0.4)/(95% CI -7.8 to -1.15). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and prostacyclin non-significantly reduced late BP as compared to the controls by -5.4/-3.0 mm Hg (95% CI -16.5 to 5.8)/(95% CI -11.1 to 5.0) and -7.4/-3.9 mmHg (95% CI -15.6 to 0.2)/(95% CI -8.1 to 0.4) respectively. Magnesium, naftidrofuryl and piracetam had no significant effect on blood pressure. Oral CCBs and beta blockers each significantly reduced late heart rate (beats per minute (bpm)): CCBs -2.8 bpm (95%CI -3.9 to -1.7); beta blockers -9.3 bpm (95% CI -12.0 to -6.6). Prostacyclin significantly increased late heart rate by +5.6 bpm (95% CI 0.8 to 10.4). None of the drug classes significantly altered outcome apart from beta blockers and streptokinase which increased early case fatality (odds ratio 1.77, 95%CI, 1.05 to 3.00) and 2.27 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.67).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence reliably to evaluate the effect of altering blood pressure on outcome after acute stroke. CCBs, beta blockers, and probably ACE-inhibitors, prostacyclin and nitric oxide, each lowered BP during the acute phase of stroke. In contrast, magnesium, naftidrofuryl and piracetam had little or no effect on BP.

Piracetam for dementia or cognitive impairment

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical efficacy of piracetam for the features of dementia or cognitive impairment, classified according to the major subtypes of dementia: vascular, Alzheimer's disease or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or unclassified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials was searched using the terms "piracetam", "nootropic" and "2-oxo-l-pyrrolidine acetamide". Electronic bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, PychLit, Current Contents, Sociofile were searched back to 1966 with the terms piracetam, nootropics, 2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine and trials. In addition the pharmaceutical company responsible for marketing most of the piracetam worldwide, UCB Pharma, provided a comprehensive list of abstracts, which included many unpublished studies. As many of these unpublished, placebo control studies will be reviewed as possible.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded trials specified as randomised in which treatment with piracetam was administered for more than a day and compared with placebo in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or uncalssified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Each study was independently verified as fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were rated for methodological quality by assessment of blinding and loss before analysis as described by Jadad et al. (1996). Studies were pooled if appropriate and possible, and the pooled odds ratios (95%CI) or the average differences (95%CI) were estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine if successive elimination of those studies performing most poorly on these quality criteria changed the effect estimate.

MAIN RESULTS

Unfortunately, many of these studies were crossover in design and data were unavailable from the first period. In many other studies data were not able to be extracted from the first period. From the data that were pooled there was only one outcome where significant amounts of evidence were available, Global Impression of Change. There was evidence of heterogeneity in the results from the individual studies, Chi squared test = 20.8 (df=5). Using a fixed effects model the odds ratio for improvement in the Piracetem group compared with the Placebo group was 3.55, [95% CI][2.45, 5.16]. If a random effects model was used the odds ratio was 3.47 [1.29, 9.30]. If one single-blind study was excluded, the fixed effects model yielded an odds ratio of 3.36 [2.29, 4.99] and if a random effects model was applied then the odds ratio was 2.89 [1.01, 8.24]. The evidence of effects on cognition and other measures, was inconclusive.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

At this stage the evidence available from the published literature does not support the use of Piracetem in the treatment of people with dementia or cognitive impairment because effects were found only on global impression of change but not on any of the more specific measures. There is a need for further evaluation of piracetam by : 1) Obtaining the data from these studies for an individual patient database review, 2) Performing a randomised trial of Piracetam in patients with diagnoses made by currently accepted diagnostic criteria. Piracetam should be trialled for a period of at least 6 months and preferably longer. Specific cognitive instruments which are sensitive to change, Clinician Global Impression of Change, levels of dependency and caregiver quality of life scales should also be incorporated in such a study.

Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Piracetam has neuroprotective and antithrombotic effects which may help to reduce death and disability in people with acute stroke.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of piracetam in acute presumed ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Review Group trials register, Medline (from 1965), Embase (from 1980), BIDIS ISI (from 1981). We also contacted manufacturers and handsearched 15 journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing piracetam with control, with at least mortality reported and entry to the trial within approximately 48 hours of stroke onset.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality and this was checked by the other two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials involving 1002 people were included, with one trial contributing 97% of the data. Participants' ages ranged from 40 to 85, and both sexes were equally represented. Piracetam was associated with a statistically non significant increase in death (31% increase, 95% confidence interval 81% increase to 5% reduction). This trend was no longer apparent in the large trial after correction for imbalance in stroke severity. Limited data showed no difference between the treatment and control groups for functional outcome, dependency or proportion of patients dead or dependent. Adverse effects were not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is some suggestion of an unfavourable effect of piracetam on early death, but this may have been caused by baseline differences in stroke severity in the trials. Piracetam does not appear to reduce dependency for stroke patients.