Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of enalapril (MK-421) in congestive heart failure

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a comparative review

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and dosages of the three currently available angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reviewed. This class of agents effectively inhibits the conversion of angiotensin I to the active vasoconstrictor angiotensin II, a hormone that also promotes, via aldosterone stimulation, increased sodium and water retention. The ACE inhibitors, therefore, are capable of lowering blood pressure primarily by promoting vasodilatation and reducing intravascular fluid volume. Captopril, the first orally active, commercially available ACE inhibitor, is a sulfhydryl-containing compound. Captopril was followed by the introduction of enalapril and lisinopril, two non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitors. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these three ACE inhibitors differ. Captopril has rapid onset with relatively short duration of action, whereas enalapril and lisinopril have slower onset and relatively long duration of action. Captopril is an active ACE inhibitor in its orally absorbable parent form. In contrast, enalapril must be deesterified in the liver to the metabolite enalaprilat in order to inhibit the converting enzyme; this accounts for its delayed onset of action. Lisinopril does not require metabolic activation to be effective; however, a slow and incomplete absorption pattern explains the delay in onset of activity. Captopril and its disulfide metabolites are primarily excreted in the urine with minor elimination in the feces. Approximately two-thirds of an administered enalapril dose is excreted in the urine as both the parent drug and the metabolite enalaprilat; the remainder of these two substances are excreted in the feces. Lisinopril does not undergo measurable metabolism and approximately one-third is excreted unchanged in the urine with the remaining parent drug being excreted in the feces. The ACE inhibitors lower systemic vascular resistance with a resultant decrease in blood pressure. Their efficacy is comparable to diuretics and beta-blockers in treating patients with mild, moderate, or severe essential and renovascular hypertension. In those patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) the ACE inhibitors produce a reduction in systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure. These drugs may produce improvement in cardiac output and stroke volume and, with chronic administration, may promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. The antihypertensive effects of the ACE inhibitors are enhanced when these agents are combined with a diuretic. Captopril and enalapril have been shown to be of particular benefits as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure, both in terms of subjective improvement of patient symptoms, and in improving overall hemodynamic status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Low-dose enalapril in severe chronic heart failure

In a 3-month prospective, single-blind, controlled trial, 38 patients in New York Heart Association functional class III-IV were assigned to group E (n = 19): enalapril 5 mg/day in addition to the previous therapy with digitalis and diuretics, or group C (n = 19): continuation of the previous therapy. In group E, 79% of the patients improved by at least one NYHA functional class after 3 months. In group C, the functional class did not change and four patients died. The echocardiographically determined end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle decreased in group E from 72 +/- 8 mm to 63 +/- 6 mm (p less than 0.001), and the scintigraphically determined ejection fraction of the left ventricle increased from 33 +/- 18% to 40 +/- 19% (p less than 0.002). In contrast, no significant change was found in group C. Plasma-renin activity increased in group E from 8.2 +/- 1.8 ng/ml h to 29.7 +/- 14 ng/ml h (p less than 0.001), and plasma aldosterone decreased from 47.7 +/- 7.6 ng/dl to 19.9 +/- 4.8 ng/dl (p less than 0.01). In group C no significant change occurred. Comparing the actual changes (deltas) of the NYHA functional class (p less than 0.02), end-diastolic diameter and ejection fraction of the left ventricle, plasma-renin activity, and plasma aldosterone (p less than 0.0001), a significant difference between the two groups was found. Thus, low-dose enalapril resulted in a significant improvement of the NYHA functional class in patients with severe chronic heart failure, accompanied by an improvement in left ventricular function and a decrease in secondary aldosteronism.

Hemodynamic effects of lisinopril after long-term administration in congestive heart failure

To determine whether acute effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril are maintained during long-term therapy, 19 patients were studied using right-sided heart catheterization before an initial randomized dose of lisinopril and again after 12 weeks of maintenance lisinopril therapy. During initial evaluation, lisinopril produced significant decreases in mean systemic arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, systemic vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mean right atrial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and concomitant increases in cardiac index and stroke volume index. After 12 weeks of therapy with lisinopril, the dosage of which was titrated to produce optimal relief of symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), repeat hemodynamic studies revealed persistent significant reductions in baseline systemic arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. However, the increases in cardiac index and stroke volume index were not statistically significant. To determine if further acute hemodynamic changes occur during long-term therapy, the patients were readministered a dose of lisinopril. This caused further decreases in systemic arterial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, systemic vascular resistance and mean right atrial pressure, and an increase in cardiac index. Lisinopril did not change stroke work index at either initial or rechallenge study. This study indicates that in patients with CHF treated with lisinopril, acute hemodynamic effects persist after 12 weeks of therapy, and acute hemodynamic response continues to occur upon drug readministration.

Clinical pharmacokinetics in heart failure. An updated review

Pharmacokinetics is the study of the effect that the body has on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The pharmacokinetics of a specific drug are assessed by the volume of distribution, bioavailability, clearance and elimination half-life. Elimination half-life is directly related to the volume of distribution and inversely related to clearance. Any 1 or more of these parameters may be altered by physiological changes such as ageing, or disease states such as congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure is associated with hypoperfusion to various organs including the sites of drug clearance, i.e. the liver and kidneys. It also leads to organ congestion as seen in the liver and gut. The main changes in drug pharmacokinetics seen in congestive heart failure are a reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance. The change in elimination half-life consequently depends on whether both clearance and the apparent volume of distribution change, and the extent of that change. Pharmacokinetic changes are not always predictable in congestive heart failure, but it seems that the net effect of reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance is that plasma concentrations of drugs are usually higher in patients with congestive heart failure than in healthy subjects. The changes in pharmacokinetics assume importance only in the case of drugs with a narrow therapeutic ratio (e.g. digoxin) and some of the antiarrhythmics such as lignocaine (lidocaine), procainamide and disopyramide. This necessitates reduction in both the loading and maintenance doses. Prolongation of the elimination half-life leads to delay in reaching steady-state, and therefore dose increments must be made more gradually. Plasma concentration measurements of the drugs concerned are a good guide to therapy and help to avoid toxicity. Pharmacokinetic changes are of less importance in the case of drugs with immediate clinical response, e.g. diuretics and intravenous vasodilators such as nitrates and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The dose in the latter group can be titrated to the desired effect. Not all adverse reactions to drugs that may occur in heart failure are the result of alterations in pharmacokinetics; rather, some may be due to important drug interactions. An interaction may occur directly e.g. reduction of renal clearance of digoxin by captopril and quinidine; or indirectly, e.g. through diuretic-induced hypokalaemia, which exacerbate arrhythmias associated with digoxin and antiarrhythmics such as quinidine and procainamide.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

There is convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, alone or in combination with a diuretic, effectively lower blood pressure in patients with all grades of essential or renovascular hypertension and that they are of particular benefit as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The hemodynamic, hormonal and clinical effects of the presently available ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, are comparable and their side effect profiles are extremely favorable. One important difference between the two oral ACE inhibitors, however, is their pharmacokinetics; enalapril's action is slower to begin and is of longer duration. Compared with other agents, ACE inhibitors offer important advantages, among them an improved feeling of well being. It is, therefore, expected that ACE inhibitors will gain greater acceptance by patients and physicians in the future.

Clinical utility of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension

Oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition was introduced eight years ago and is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. This treatment causes blood pressure lowering associated with suppression of angiotensin and aldosterone, lack of orthostatic hypotension or metabolic disturbances, redistribution of regional blood flows in favor of vital organs and, in the long term, decreased sympathetic drive and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. It is effective as monotherapy in more than 50 percent of unselected patients; addition of a diuretic increases the percentage of responders to more than 80 percent. It is the treatment of choice for patients with concurrent diabetes, asthma, gout, depression, or very active life-style. Side effects, observed originally in patients with severe hypertension and renal failure treated with very high doses of captopril, are rare in otherwise healthy hypertensive patients receiving smaller doses of this drug and virtually absent with second-generation angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors like enalapril.

Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To evaluate the concept that long duration of action is an advantageous property of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of severe heart failure, we randomly assigned 42 patients to therapy with either a short-acting inhibitor (captopril, 150 mg daily) or a long-acting inhibitor (enalapril, 40 mg daily) for one to three months while concomitant therapy with digoxin and diuretics was kept constant. The treatment groups had similar hemodynamic and clinical characteristics at base-line evaluation and similar initial responses to converting-enzyme inhibition. During long-term therapy, captopril and enalapril produced similar decreases in systemic blood pressure, but the hypotensive effects of enalapril were more prolonged and persistent than those of captopril. Consequently, although the patients in both groups improved hemodynamically and clinically during the study, serious symptomatic hypotension (syncope and near syncope) was seen primarily among those treated with enalapril. Sustained hypotension also probably accounted for the decline in creatinine clearance (P less than 0.05) and the notable retention of potassium (P less than 0.05) observed in the patients treated with enalapril but not in those treated with captopril. We conclude that when large, fixed doses of converting-enzyme inhibitors are used in the treatment of patients with severe chronic heart failure, long-acting agents may produce prolonged hypotensive effects that may compromise cerebral and renal function, and thus they may have disadvantages in such cases, as compared with short-acting agents.

Enalapril in congestive heart failure: acute and chronic invasive hemodynamic evaluation

Following hemodynamic evaluation using invasive and noninvasive methods, 73 patients were treated in an open, uncontrolled, multicenter study with single oral doses of enalapril maleate 1.25 to 40 mg until the optimal dose for each patient (based upon hemodynamic response) was achieved. Diuretics were withheld and reinstituted only if necessary. Hemodynamic measurements were made at 0 (predrug), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours postdrug. Patients were discharged on their optimal dose, treated 1 to 4 months and then rehospitalized for repeat hemodynamic measurements. The optimal enalapril single dose was associated with the following mean peak responses: increased cardiac index 42% (SE = 6) and decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 40% (SE = 3), systemic vascular resistance 39% (SE = 2), and mean arterial pressure 23% (SE = 1.5). These changes persisted during chronic therapy. Chronic treatment with enalapril also improved exercise capacity 40% (P less than 0.01), ejection fraction 18% (P less than 0.05) and clinical status (N.Y.H.A. functional class, P less than 0.01). Ten and 20 mg/day, taken as once- or twice-daily regimens, were the most commonly effective doses.

Enalapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure

Enalapril maleate is an orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. It lowers peripheral vascular resistance without causing an increase in heart rate. Enalapril 10 to 40 mg/day administered either once or twice daily is effective in lowering blood pressure in all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension, and shows similar efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, beta-blockers (propranolol, atenolol and metoprolol) and captopril. Most patients achieve adequate blood pressure control on enalapril alone or with hydrochlorothiazide. In patients with severe congestive heart failure resistant to conventional therapy, enalapril improves cardiac performance by a reduction in both preload and afterload, and improves clinical status long term. Enalapril appears to be well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects being reported. It does not induce the bradycardia associated with beta-blockers or the adverse effects of diuretics on some laboratory values. In fact, the hypokalaemic effect of hydrochlorothiazide is attenuated by the addition of enalapril. The incidence of the main (but rare) side effects of hypotension in hypovolaemic patients and reduced renal function in certain patients with renovascular hypertension, which are also seen with captopril, might be reduced by careful dosage titration, discontinuation of diuretics, and monitoring of at-risk patients. Thus, enalapril is a particularly worthwhile addition to the antihypertensive armamentarium, as an alternative for treatment of all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension. It also shows promise in the treatment of congestive heart failure.