The use of an electronic portal imaging device for exit dosimetry

Portal dose image verification: the collapsed cone superposition method applied with different electronic portal imaging devices

Two different commercial electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs), one based on a liquid ion chamber matrix and the other based on a fluoroscopic CCD camera, were used to acquire readings that, through a calibration procedure, provided images proportional to the absolute dose to a virtual water slab located at the EPID plane. The transformation of the matrix ion chamber image into a portal dose image (PDI) was based on a published relationship between dose rate and ionization current. For the fluoroscopic CCD-camera-based system, the transformation was based on a deconvolution with a radial light scatter kernel. Local response variations were corrected in the images from both systems using open field fluence maps. The acquired PDIs were compared with PDIs calculated with the collapsed cone superposition method for a three-dimensional detector model in water equivalent buildup material. The calculation model was based on the beam modelling and geometrical description of the treatment unit and energy used for treatment planning in a kernel-based system. The validity of the calculation method was evaluated for several field shapes and thicknesses of patient phantoms for the matrix ion chamber at 6 MV x-rays and for the camera-based EPID at 6 and 15 MV x-rays. The agreement between predicted and measured PDIs was evaluated with dose comparisons at points of interest and gamma index calculations. The average area failing the passing criteria in dose and position deviation was analysed to validate the performance of the method. For the matrix ion chamber on average an area less than 1% fails the passing criteria of 3 mm and 3%. For the camera-based EPID, the average area is 7% and 1% for 6 and 15 MV, respectively. The overall agreement centrally in the fields was 0.1 +/- 1.6% (1 sd) for the camera-based EPID and -0.1 +/- 1.6% (1 sd) for the matrix ion chamber. Thus, an absolute dose calibrated EPID could validate the delivered dose to the patient by comparing a calculated and a measured PDI.

Portal dose image verification: formalism and application of the collapsed cone superposition method

A formalism tailored for portal dose image verification is proposed to facilitate the comparison of calculated and measured portal dose distributions. Each portal image is converted into a dose proportional image and normalized to the reference beam calibration dose per monitor unit. The calculated or measured dose to a detector phantom is accordingly normalized so as to enable direct comparison. The collapsed cone kernel superposition method is adapted and evaluated for calculation of portal dose distributions in a water-equivalent detector phantom through comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations and with measurements. The deviation compared with Monte Carlo calculations for 6 and 15 MV was between +0.9% (the 0.9 quantile) and -2.1% (the 0.1 quantile) for a range of investigated geometries. Collapsed cone calculations compared with measurements for clinical fields agreed within [-1.9%, +2.4%] for 15 MV and [-0.9%, +3.2%] for 6 MV for the 0.1 and 0.9 quantiles, respectively. Hence, the absolute portal dose to a detector phantom could be calculated and verified well within the present accuracy requirements for clinical dose calculations.

Pre-treatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although intensity modulated radiation therapy is characterized by three-dimensional dose distributions which are often superior to those obtained with conventional treatment plans, its routine clinical implementation is partially held back by the complexity of the beam verification. This is even more so when a dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC) is used instead of a segmented beam delivery. We have therefore investigated the possibility of using a commercially available, liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for the pre-treatment quality assurance of dynamically delivered dose distributions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A special acquisition mode was developed to optimize the image acquisition speed for dosimetry with the liquid-filled EPID. We investigated the accuracy of this mode for 6 and 18 MV photon beams through comparison with film and ion chamber measurements. The impact of leaf speed and pulse rate fluctuations was quantified by means of dMLC plans especially designed for this purpose. Other factors influencing the accuracy of the dosimetry (e.g. the need for build-up, remanence of the ion concentration in the liquid and bulging of the liquid at non-zero gantry angles) were studied as well. We finally compared dosimetric EPID images with the corresponding image prediction delivered without a patient in the beam.

RESULTS

The dosimetric accuracy of the measured dose distribution is approximately 2% with respect to film and ion chamber measurements. The accuracy declines when leaf speed is increased beyond 2 cm/s, but is fairly insensitive to accelerator pulse rate fluctuations. The memory effect is found to be of no clinical relevance. When comparing the acquired and expected distributions, an overall agreement of 3% can be obtained, except at areas of steep dose gradients where slight positional shifts are translated into large errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate dosimetric images of intensity modulated beam profiles delivered with a dMLC can be obtained with a commercially available, liquid-filled EPID. The developed acquisition mode is especially suited for fast and accurate pre-treatment verification of the intensity modulated fields.