Outbreak of lethal coagulase-negative staphylococcal infection in a transplant unit: an epidemiological study

Enhanced ability to colonize the skin: a possible explanation for the epidemic spread of certain strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis

Experimental skin colonization was attempted on healthy volunteers using one epidemic and two non-epidemic strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from a bone marrow transplant unit. Although the three strains had similar biochemical reactions, they had different antibiograms and plasmid patterns, and the epidemic strain grew rather more slowly when in a mixture in broth. Two experiments involving sets of 5 volunteers were performed. The epidemic strain was mixed with one non-epidemic strain for experiment 1, and with the other for experiment 2. Each volunteer had an inoculum of a mixture of 10(7) cfu of each strain inoculated onto the antecubital fossae of both arms; one of the arms had had a prior treatment with chlorhexidine to see if this would prevent colonization. Quantitative skin cultures were continued until the test strains could no longer be isolated. Colonization occurred in all but one volunteer, and lasted from a few weeks to 17 months. Maximal counts of the epidemic strain were significantly higher than the maximal counts of the non-epidemic strains. Chlorhexidine had no effect in experiment 1, and caused a reduction in intensity and duration of colonization in experiment 2, although this did not achieve statistical significance. Plasmid patterns were unchanged throughout, but in two instances a variant of the epidemic strain that had lost resistance to methicillin and tobramycin was isolated together with the parent strain. The enhanced ability of the epidemic strain to colonize skin may be an important factor in allowing cross-infection.

Daily scrub with chlorhexidine reduces skin colonization by antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis

The aim of this study was to establish whether long-term use of chlorhexidine would prevent skin colonization by antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Ten nurses, working on a ward for haematological disorders, volunteered to participate in the test. They washed one arm every morning for three weeks with chlorhexidine gluconate, ('Hibiscrub' ICI Pharmaceuticals). The other arm served as a negative control. Samples from the antecubital fossa of both arms were taken two to three times a week during the wash period and two weeks thereafter, giving a total of 216 samples. The appearance of resistant S. epidermidis with different antibiograms was analysed. During the wash period the total bacterial counts and the counts of the resistant S. epidermidis strains on the test arm were both about one-tenth of those on the control arm, a significant difference (P < 0.05). Moreover, there were significantly fewer resistant S. epidermidis on the test arm, 1.3 per sample, than on the control arm, 2.5 per sample (P < 0.01). Most of the resistant S. epidermidis were only found once or a few times on the same site, after which they disappeared, though a few persisted on the skin even during 'Hibiscrub' washing. In an agar dilution test, chlorhexidine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of persisting strains were the same as for strains disappearing from the skin following 'Hibiscrub' washing, 1.0 or 2.0 mg l-1, but somewhat higher than MICs of strains isolated from healthy carriers outside the hospital whose MICs were 0.5 mg l-1. The relative contribution to the skin counts by those S. epidermidis strains found only occasionally were compared with those found repeatedly but no difference in reduction was found between these categories during 'Hibiscrub' washing.