Certification: philosophy, goals, and methods, with application to the discipline of infection control practice

Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia?

BACKGROUND

Australian infection control practitioners (ICPs) have not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association.

METHODS

In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65%) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.

Credentialing, diversity, and professional recognition-foundations for an Australian infection control career path

BACKGROUND

There are no regulatory, legislative, or professional criteria stipulating minimum qualifications or experience that a health care worker must meet to be capable of coordinating an Australian infection control (IC) program. Measurement of IC competence is important to protect the public and for the ongoing credibility and growth of the profession.

METHOD

Our study group was all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association in 1996. The survey examined perceived level of proficiency, level of education, and experience in health care and infection control. Almost three quarters (65%) of the members responded, and almost all (85%) of these respondents fulfilled the inclusion criterion of coordinating an IC program.

RESULTS

Experience in IC ranged from less than 2 years (33.6%) to more than 20 years (10.0%). The majority (65.0%) of infection control professionals (ICPs) had between 8 years and 12 years IC experience. The respective proportions of respondents' self-ranked levels of proficiency on a 5-point scale were novice (3.6%), advanced beginner (21.2%), competent (33.8%), proficient (34.7%), and expert (6.8%). Almost half (47%) of the novices agreed that a registered nursing (RN) qualification was required, whereas a majority (41%) of advanced beginners considered both an RN and a basic IC course (BASIC) were required. Competent ICPs agreed less often than the other levels about their requirements. However, 27% of competents identified a BASIC and an undergraduate degree (UG) as the minimum requirements for a competent ICP. Proficient ICPs agreed that they required an RN, UG, BASIC, and a postbasic course in IC. Nearly all experts (80.0%) agreed that they required an RN, UG, BASIC, postbasic course, and a course in hospital epidemiology (EP). Two thirds of experts expected a master's degree as a requirement.

CONCLUSION

The Australian IC profession is in an exciting period of development; however, the variation in ICP perception of the most appropriate qualifications and experience threatens the credibility and viability of the profession. This variation indicates the need for a clear-cut pathway that includes a system of credentialing, recognition of expertise, adoption of divergent roles, and improved networking. This pathway will lead to an increasingly credible and viable IC profession in Australia. Developing IC communities globally can benefit from the Australian experience.

Infection control in public health: a new perspective

As public health continues to meet the challenges of old and new health risks, the practice of infection control will be an integral part of its services. The public health infection control program should include effective policies and procedures, in-service programs and implementation, and systems of surveillance specific to each department. Public health personnel must place emphasis on the practice of infection control in the community setting. The ICP who accepts this challenge will be in the forefront of infection control in public health. Infection control is a respected part of the hospital setting and now is the time for the ICP to tailor this program to the public health delivery system.

Postdoctoral nursing education in infection control: program description

The need to identify and evaluate those clinical practices that are efficacious in reducing risk of nosocomial infection is clear. A model of large-scale programmatic evaluation is the Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control. Other important clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of practices such as closed urinary drainage and management of intravascular lines and the ineffectiveness of such practices as double bagging and routine gowning in the newborn nursery. Clearly, research is one essential way to direct practice in infection control. It is our goal that the Johnson & Johnson/SURGIKOS Postdoctoral Nursing Fellows in Infection Control will make a significant contribution to the knowledge base in the specialty. The need for collaboration by government, industry, and academia in addressing health care research needs has been recently emphasized. We also believe that this Program can serve as one model for such a collaborative effort.