Locally advanced breast cancer: the contribution of cytotoxic and endocrine treatment to radiotherapy. An EORTC Breast Cancer Co-operative Group Trial (10792)

Primary Radiotherapy versus Surgery and Radiotherapy in the Management of Postmenopausal Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

From 1978 through 1984, 103 postmenopausal patients with locally advanced breast cancer (T4 N1-2-3 MO) were treated by definitive radiotherapy (XRT, 35 patients) or mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy (RM+XRT, 68 patients). A control group of 35 of the 68 RM+XRT patients was selected by matching several prognostic variables with the XRT group. Patients were followed for 4 to 10 years. At 5 years the probabilities of overall survival and relapse-free survival were 49.9% and 33.2% for XRT patients and 49.2% and 42.8% for RM+XRT patients, respectively (with no significant difference). The probability to remain free of local-regional progression at 5 years, with censoring of deaths, was 71.9% in the XRT group and 79.8% in the RM+XRT group. Of the patients treated with definitive radiotherapy, those who received 60 Gy or more to the primary tumor had a significantly better 5-year rate of local control: 88.0 % vs. 68.0 %, p < 0.05. Our results suggest that adequate doses of radiotherapy can provide long-term local-regional control in a large proportion of survivors and can spare mastectomy in most patients, without however achieving substantial improvements in the poor survival results.

The role of chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors

PURPOSE

Unresectable T4 tumors of the breast are usually treated with systemic therapies, while the role of local therapies remains debatable. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy as a part of T4 breast cancer treatment, and to assess the role of local radiotherapies in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between February 1998 and June 2010, 39 unresectable T4 breast tumors were treated with chemoradiotherapy at our institutes. Clinical stages included stage IIIB (n = 15), stage IIIC (n = 3), and stage IV (n = 21). Twenty-one cases had undergone previous systemic therapies, whereas the remaining 18 cases reported no history of previous treatment. Radiation doses of 59-66 Gy (median 60 Gy) were administered to the breast in addition to concurrent chemotherapies. Acute adverse effects were assessed on a weekly basis during treatment to 2 weeks after completion of treatment, and were scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Treatment response was assessed at 1 month after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Statistical analysis of survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all cases. Greater than grade 3 hematological toxicities were observed with regard to lymphocytes (33%), platelets (8%), neutrophils (3%), and hemoglobin (3%). Greater than grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included chemoradiation dermatitis (23%) and pneumonitis (5%). Sixteen T4 tumors (41%) achieved complete response, whereas 23 (59%) achieved partial response. All patients were treated with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy following chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 3-96 months). Nineteen patients died because of progressive breast cancer. Infield recurrence or relapse was observed in 11 cases during the course of treatment, but only 3 cases were symptomatic. The 2-year overall local control rate was 73.6%, and the survival rate was 65.9%.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy represents a viable option for local treatment of unresectable T4 breast tumors.

The role of surgery in metastatic breast cancer

Some of the patients who present with breast cancer already have distant metastatic disease. According to recent literature, these patients may benefit from resection of the breast tumour. One explanation for the effect of this resection is that reducing the tumour load influences metastatic growth. Results of future randomised controlled trials should indicate whether surgery of the breast tumour truly improves survival. Selected patients could even benefit from metastasectomy of liver and lung metastases; survival seems to improve and these procedures seldom lead to major complications. When metastasectomy is not possible, minimally invasive techniques can be used in selected patients for the treatment of breast cancer liver metastases, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) being discussed most in the literature. Patients with locally advanced breast cancer are treated multidisciplinarily and with curative intent. Part of the treatment is surgery to reduce tumour load. Regarding treatment of the axilla, in a clinically negative axilla sentinel node biopsy is advised before neoadjuvant treatment; an axillary lymph node dissection is not warranted. In local recurrence, surgery is the primary treatment. Axillary staging can be done in patients with a previous negative sentinel node biopsy. Regional recurrence after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy is treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group

The use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is rapidly increasing. EUSOMA organised a workshop in Milan on 20-21st October 2008 to evaluate the evidence currently available on clinical value and indications for breast MRI. Twenty-three experts from the disciplines involved in breast disease management - including epidemiologists, geneticists, oncologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons - discussed the evidence for the use of this technology in plenary and focused sessions. This paper presents the consensus reached by this working group. General recommendations, technical requirements, methodology, and interpretation were firstly considered. For the following ten indications, an overview of the evidence, a list of recommendations, and a number of research issues were defined: staging before treatment planning; screening of high-risk women; evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; patients with breast augmentation or reconstruction; occult primary breast cancer; breast cancer recurrence; nipple discharge; characterisation of equivocal findings at conventional imaging; inflammatory breast cancer; and male breast. The working group strongly suggests that all breast cancer specialists cooperate for an optimal clinical use of this emerging technology and for future research, focusing on patient outcome as primary end-point.

(99m)Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy used to evaluate tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: A quantitative analysis

To evaluate the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (99m)Tc-sestamibi breast scintigraphy was proposed as a quantitative method. Fifty-five patients with ductal carcinoma were studied. They underwent breast scintigraphy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, along with clinical assessment and surgical specimen analysis. The regions of interest on the lesion and contralateral breast were identified, and the pixel counts were used to evaluate lesion uptake in relation to background radiation. The ratio of these counts before to after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed. The decrease in uptake rate due to chemotherapy characterized the scintigraphy tumor response. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the mean scintigraphic tumor response and histological type. Dunn's multiple comparison test was used to detect differences between histological types. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare means between quantitative and qualitative variables: scintigraphic tumor response vs. clinical response and uptake before chemotherapy vs. scintigraphic tumor response. The Spearman's test was used to correlate the quantitative variables of clinical reduction in tumor size and scintigraphic tumor response. All of the variables compared presented significant differences. The change in (99m)Tc-sestamibi uptake noted on breast scintigraphy, before to after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, may be used as an effective method for evaluating the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, since this quantification reflects the biological behavior of the tumor towards the chemotherapy regimen. Furthermore, additional analysis on the uptake rate before chemotherapy may accurately predict treatment response.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Locoregional Recurrence in Patients with Stage IIIB Noninflammatory Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to identify the clinicopathological factors affecting locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with clinical stage IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer (NIBC).

METHODS

The records of 120 stage IIIB NIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and then modified radical mastectomy followed by radiotherapy were evaluated. In this retrospective cohort, the effects of age, menopausal status, clinical tumor size, clinical response to NAC, pathological axillary status, number of positive axillary lymph nodes, pathological response to NAC, grade, lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, Her-2-neu status, and p53 status on LRR were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The clinical response rate of 120 patients was 79.2% (17.5% complete and 61.7% partial), with a complete pathological response rate of 12.5%. The median follow-up was 28 months (range: 10-74 months). The LRR rate was 13.3%. Based on the univariate analysis, the clinical tumor size, clinical response rate, pathological axillary status, four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, and estrogen receptor status were factors that significantly affected LRR. In the multivariate analysis, however, only the clinical response rate and the number of positive axillary lymph nodes were found to be statistically significant independent factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective local control of disease can be achieved in patients with stage IIIB NIBC using a combination of NAC, surgery, and radiotherapy. However, a worse clinical response after chemotherapy and four or more positive axillary lymph nodes affect LRR negatively in these patients.

Selective Mastectomy in the Management of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate local control for patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) managed by selective mastectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1996, 176 patients with LABC were prospectively managed by chemotherapy (CT)-irradiation (RT)-CT without routine mastectomy. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (75%) had a T4 tumor and 22 (12.5%) supraclavicular nodal disease. The clinical complete response rate was 91% (160/176), which included 13 patients who underwent mastectomy and 2 an iridium wire implant. The first site of failure was local for 43 patients (breast +/- axilla for 38); 27 of these patients underwent salvage mastectomy and 11 did not for an overall mastectomy rate of 23% (40/176). If all 176 patients had undergone routine mastectomy (136 extra mastectomies), 11 additional patients may have avoided an unsalvageable first local relapse. The others would have either have not had a local relapse or would have suffered local relapse after distant disease. No tumor or treatment related factor was found to predict local disease at death. Median disease-free and overall survival for all patients was 26 and 52 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective mastectomy in LABC may not jeopardize local control or survival.

Update on locally advanced breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer remains a clinical challenge as the majority of patients with this diagnosis develop distant metastases despite appropriate therapy. Patients with locally advanced disease encompass a wide range of clinical scenarios including advanced primary tumors (stage T4), advanced nodal disease (fixed axillary nodes or involvement of ipsilateral supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes), and inflammatory carcinomas. The prognoses of women with locally advanced breast tumors are also heterogeneous and depend on tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, and the presence or absence of inflammatory carcinoma. Women with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapy, and coordinated treatment planning among the medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, and radiation oncologist is necessary to optimize patient care. In this article, the epidemiology, evaluation, prognostic factors, and treatment for locally advanced breast cancer are discussed. Inflammatory cancer is also reviewed, but is considered separately due to its distinct biology and clinical behavior.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94).

CONCLUSION

Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.

The EORTC Breast Cancer Group: 40 years of research contributing to improve breast cancer management

The EORTC Breast Cancer Group (EBCG) is a multidisciplinary international group created in 1962 in conjunction with the EORTC. This group has always focused its activities on the development of new cancer treatments and strategies for all categories of breast cancer. It has been active both in drug development, as well as in the development of new radiotherapy and surgical techniques to attempt to improve cure rates and loco-regional control. Over 40 years, the EBCG has performed dozens of clinical studies including several thousands of patients. Many of these studies have contributed to the clinical knowledge on the treatment of breast cancer and have influenced the standard management of this tumour. Beside its clinical research activities, the Group has also been very active in developing guidelines for breast cancer research, promoting high standards of care in conferences, as well as in fellowships and quality assurance programmes. EBCG is a founding member of the Breast InterGroup (BIG).

Locally advanced primary breast cancer: medium-term results of a randomised trial of multimodal therapy versus initial hormone therapy

We report the medium-term (median follow-up=52 months) results of a prospective randomised trial of multimodal therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Patey mastectomy, postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant hormone therapy) (n=56) versus initial hormone therapy (n=52) for locally advanced primary breast cancer. Compared with multimodal therapy, initial hormone therapy was associated with reduced number of therapies for disease control (mean=3.6 versus 4.9) and mastectomy rate (31%). Multimodal therapy conferred better initial locoregional control and a longer disease-free interval. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant differences in the rates of survival, metastasis and uncontrolled locoregional disease, as well as in the time to metastasis between the two therapy groups. Regardless of the therapy groups, oestrogen receptor positivity conferred a lower metastasis rate, better survival and locoregional control. Thus, initial hormone therapy may be a reasonable option for managing locally advanced primary breast cancer, especially for oestrogen receptor-positive tumours.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in inoperable, locally advanced, and inflammatory breast carcinoma: a pilot study of MTT assay in vitro and outcome analysis of 10 patients

Patients with inoperable, locally advanced, and inflammatory breast carcinoma (LAIBC), whether with supraclavicular lymph nodes (SLN) or not (stage IIIB and IV), usually carry an overall poor prognosis. The current treatment for these patients is by means of combined modality, including preoperative chemotherapy. This strategy has led to a substantial improvement in clinical response, making some patients operable, and even making breast conservative surgery possible. However, the long-term results still are not promising. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay in vitro in directing chemotherapy (including preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy) for these patients. Between June 1994 and March 1997, 10 patients with inoperable LAIBC, whether with SLN or not, were enrolled. During the period of the combined therapy modalities, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was adopted for three cycles according to the results of chemosensitivity in vitro by MTT assay. Then a modified radical or radical mastectomy was performed, which was followed by radiotherapy and further postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with the same regimen as that of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients had been followed up from the beginning of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the end of October 1999. Two patients had clinical complete response (CRs), with one having pathologic CR in both breast tumor and axillary lymph node, and the other having pathologic CR in axillary lymph node. The other eight patients had partial response. By the time of analysis, six patients had been dead of relapse or progression. Among the four patients who were still alive, one had local relapse, one had distant metastatic disease, and the other two had no evident disease. By retrieving from MEDLINE before 1999, the authors learned that this is the first pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inoperable LAIBC using MTT assay to predict the chemosensitivity in vitro. Compared with conventional chemotherapy, the clinical response and long-term results seem to be more encouraging.

Monitoring the response of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using [technetium 99m]-sestamibi scintimammography

BACKGROUND

Mammographic and physical examination assessments of the response of locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) to neoadjuvant therapy have been shown to be inaccurate. The authors studied the feasibility and accuracy of [technetium 99m]-sestamibi (MIBI) for monitoring the response of patients with LABC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LABC underwent prone lateral scintimammography before therapy, after 2 months of therapy, and close to the completion of chemotherapy (presurgery) if chemotherapy continued for >3 months. Images were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively using the lesion-to-normal breast MIBI uptake ratio (L:N). Imaging results were compared with the clinical response and the pathologic response as determined from the posttherapy surgical specimen.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (29 who were assessable for primary tumor response and 28 who were assessable for lymph node response) were included in the study. The mean change in the primary tumor L:N MIBI uptake ratio after 2 months of chemotherapy was -35% for clinical responders and +17% for nonresponders (P<0.001). Patients achieving a pathologic primary tumor macroscopic complete response (CR) had a mean change in uptake on the presurgical scan of -58% versus -18% for patients with a partial response (P<0.005). A decrease of > or =40% in the MIBI uptake ratio identified CRs with 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Pretherapy imaging predicted axillary lymph node metastases in 85% of patients ultimately found to have > or =1 positive lymph nodes at surgery, but was less accurate in identifying residual lymph node disease after therapy (55% sensitivity and 75% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

MIBI imaging accurately assessed the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LABC. Further studies are needed to determine the role of MIBI in this group of patients.

Locally advanced breast cancer: the outcome of primary polychemotherapy based on infusional 5 fluorouracil

Over a 5-year period, 75 patients with locally advanced breast cancer presenting to the Edinburgh Breast Unit were managed with a policy of infusional primary chemotherapy. For 65 patients, the regimens comprised infusional 5 fluorouracil with anthracycline and/or either cyclophosphamide or cisplatinum (AcF, CAF or ECF) whilst 10 older patients had CMF-inf. The overall activity and tolerability for the regimens was good with a 76% objective response rate including 15% clinical complete responses. Surgery was possible in 64% and pathological complete responses confirmed in 7 (9.3%). Median disease free survival (DFS) is 5.23 years. Factors predicting for DFS or Overall Survival (OS) were assessed in this small group and ER positive patients did better than ER negative although there was surprisingly no negative DFS or OS association with inflammatory disease or advancing age. We found a paradoxical interaction with use of post-chemotherapy tamoxifen which was significantly associated with poorer DFS and OS overall and in the ER negative subgroups.

Locally advanced breast cancer

The multidisciplinary management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) has evolved over the last three decades. The introduction of chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy in conjunction with surgery and radiation therapy (XRT) have changed the natural history of this disease. The authors discuss the role of the taxanes, novel endocrine therapy, and high-dose CT programs in the management of LABC. Indications for breast-conserving surgery are presented. The role of prognostic and predictive tumor markers in LABC is discussed.

The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer

The aim of this study was to examine the possible influence on survival of delays prior to presentation and/or treatment among women with breast cancer. Duration of symptoms prior to hospital referral was recorded for 2964 women who presented with any stage of breast cancer to Guy's Hospital between 1975 and 1990. Median follow-up is 12.5 years. The impact of delay (defined as having symptoms for 12 or more weeks) on survival was measured from the date of diagnosis and from the date when the patient first noticed symptoms to control for lead-time bias. Thirty-two per cent (942/2964) of patients had symptoms for 12 or more weeks before their first hospital visit and 32% (302/942) of patients with delays of 12 or more weeks had locally advanced or metastatic disease, compared with only 10% (210/2022) of those with delays of less than 12 weeks (P < 0.0001). Survival measured both from the date of diagnosis (P < 0.001) and from the onset of the patient's symptoms (P = 0.003) was worse among women with longer delays. Ten years after the onset of symptoms, survival was 52% for women with delays less than 12 weeks and 47% for those with longer delays. At 20 years the survival rates were 34% and 24% respectively. Furthermore, patients with delays of 12-26 weeks had significantly worse survival rates than those with delays of less than 12 weeks. Multivariate analyses indicated that the adverse impact of delay in presentation on survival was attributable to an association between longer delays and more advanced stage. However, within individual stages, longer delay had no adverse impact on survival. Analyses based on 'total delay (i.e. the interval between a patient first noticing symptoms and starting treatment) yielded very similar results in terms of survival to those based on delay to first hospital visit (delay in presentation).

Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial on adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

To study the effects on survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control of adjuvant hormonal and chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer after a minimal follow-up period of 14 years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 118 patients were randomized between radiotherapy alone (arm I); radiotherapy, 12 courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), and tamoxifen (arm II); adriamycine, vincristine (AV) alternated with CMF, then radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (AV/CMF); and tamoxifen during the entire treatment period (arm III).

RESULTS

No improvement in survival, disease-free survival, or locoregional control was observed. After 6 years of follow-up, the overall survival curves grew apart, resulting in differences in 10-year survival rates: 15% (confidence interval-3%, 33%) between arms III and I.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the relatively small numbers of patients involved, the relative value of the three treatment modalities cannot be established completely.

The EORTC-Breast Cancer Cooperative Group clinical research programme in early breast cancer. EORTC-BCCG

The aims of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) are to conduct, develop, coordinate, and stimulate research in Europe on the experimental and clinical bases of cancer treatment. Along these lines, the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, which belongs to the EORTC treatment division, aims at improving the standard of early and advanced breast cancer treatment in Europe through the conduct of large, prospective, randomized, multicenter cancer clinical trials investigating innovative approaches as well as relevant questions regarding optimal surgery and radiotherapy or the optimal integration of these various treatment modalities. This paper reviews the current clinical research programme of this group in the field of "early" breast cancer and briefly alludes to the ongoing efforts of the group in areas such as quality control and translational research. Finally, the EORTC-BCCG has been instrumental in the foundation of the Breast International Group, "BIG", which is a large "intergroup" of existing European and Australian breast cancer research groups. It is hoped that BIG will accelerate the turnover of sufficiently large and well-designed breast cancer adjuvant clinical trials through increasing cooperation between its group members as well as collaboration, whenever indicated, with the American Breast Cancer Intergroup.

High-Dose Epirubicin in Locally Advanced Operable Noninflammatory Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Trial

Aims and background

Anthracyclines are among the most active agents for the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and activity of a relatively high-dose regimen with 4-epirubicin plus normal doses of cyclophosphamide over a short period of time without the use of hematologic growth factors as adjuvant in resected locally advanced breast cancer.

Methods.

Between January 1990 and June 1992, 43 consecutive patients, premenopausal or postmenopausal «60 yrs, were surgically resected and then treated with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide for at least 4 cycles (maximum 6). Electron beam (6–10 MeV energy) radiotherapy was delivered on the chest wall in patients with pathological skin infiltration (pT4b).

Results

Median age was 46 years (range, 27–59); 37 were premenopausal and 6 postmenopausal. The total number of administered cycles was 202 (6 in 15 patients and 4 in 28 patients); 195/202 (96.5%) were administered at full dose, and 7 (3.5%) were reduced to 75% of the planned dosage. The three-year disease-free survival was 67% for stage IlIa and 61% for stage IIIb patients. The three-year overall survival was 88% and 79%, respectively. Local relapse only was reported in one patient (2%), distant relapse in 11 patients (25%), and local and distant relapse in four patients (9%). Toxicity was acceptable and mainly hematologic.

Conclusions.

Our trial showed that the regimen is feasible without the use of hematologic growth factors. In this era of cost containment, the use of this short-term, high-dose induction course instead of repetitive courses of conventional dose regimens merits further evaluation, possibly in a large randomized trial.

Primary chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for patients with stage II larger than 3 cm or locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate possibility of breast-conserving therapy and outcome for patients with locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) and stage II >3 cm in diameter after primary chemotherapy (CT) followed by external preoperative irradiation (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1982 and 1990, 147 patients were treated by four courses of induction CT (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil) followed by preoperative RT (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas) and a fifth course of CT. Three different loco-regional approaches were proposed depending on tumour characteristics and tumour response. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of CT and a maintenance adjuvant CT regimen without anthracycline.

RESULTS

Mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed in 52 patients, and conservative treatment in 95 patients (48 achieved complete remission and received additional radiation boost to initial tumour bed; 47 had a residual mass < or =3 cm in diameter and were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site. Ten-year actuarial loco-regional failure rate was 20% after RT alone, 23% after wide excision and RT and 6% after mastectomy (P = 0.85). After multivariate analysis, possibility of breast-conserving therapy was related to initial tumour size. Ten-year overall survival rate was 66%; it was not influenced by local treatment (conservative vs. non-conservative local treatment, P = 0.89). However, local failure significantly decreased overall survival (P < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, tumour response after induction CT and clinical stage had a significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data indicate that induction CT followed by preoperative RT may permit the selection of some patients with LABC or stage II >3 cm for conservative treatment. The impact of this treatment modality on long term survival remains to be established.

Locally advanced breast cancer: early results of a randomised trial of multimodal therapy versus initial hormone therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate initial treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Patients were randomised to "multimodal" therapy (pre-operative chemotherapy, Patey mastectomy, flap irradiation and adjuvant hormone therapy) (n = 55), or initial "hormone" therapy (n = 53) with further therapy upon tumour progression. The objective response to chemotherapy was 57% (31/54) after four cycles. Of patients on hormone therapy, 36% (19/53) had an objective response and 32% (17/53) disease stasis at a 6 month assessment. At a median 30 months follow-up, there was no notable difference in development of metastases or survival: only 6 patients have uncontrolled loco-regional relapse (4 "hormonal", 2 "multimodal"). The number of treatments per patient required for this loco-regional control was lower in the "hormone" group (mean 2.13 versus 4.20 in the "multimodal" group). This small study has shown that the use of consecutive therapies, with the aim of tumour control, does not appear to compromise outcome in comparison with initial "multi-modal" therapy. Adopting such a policy may allow some patients to avoid unnecessary treatments.

Induction chemotherapy with versus without hormonal synchronisation in locally advanced breast cancer

Sixty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer were given induction chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (day 1) followed by methotrexate and 5-Fu (day 8). Thirty-two of these patients were also given tamoxifen (days 2-6) in an attempt to induce a G1 arrest in cancer cells, and oestrogen (days 7-8) to stimulate proliferation and thus induce a synchronized wave of proliferating cells. The induction therapy response rate was 61% in the series as a whole (n = 69), but was found to be significantly better in the group on the tamoxifen/oestrogen synchronization regimen than in the remainder on chemotherapy alone (82% vs. 43%). This difference was particularly marked in the respective receptor-positive subgroups [90% (9/10) vs. 30% (3/10); p < 0.001]. The findings suggest that, in combination with chemotherapy, tamoxifen/oestrogen therapy, given in the sequence outlined here, constitutes a promising regimen for the treatment of locally advanced receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

Cautionary tales of survival analysis: conflicting analyses from a clinical trial in breast cancer

Data from a completed randomized trial in breast cancer are used to demonstrate and quantify the variation in estimated survival curves and log-rank statistics at different times throughout a trial. False 'plateaux' are common, as are wide fluctuations in chi2 values obtained from the log-rank test when there are few events. We show how analyses conducted at different times can demonstrate different effects. Long follow-up is often necessary to allow correct interpretation of results. We discuss the assumption of proportional hazards and the consequences of making that assumption inappropriately. We show how checking whether hazards are proportional can help in avoiding erroneous conclusions.

A pilot evaluation of alternating preoperative chemotherapy in the management of patients with locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with preoperative and post operative chemotherapy, mastectomy, and irradiation for locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Between June 1986 and September 1990, 71 patients received 2 cycles of doxorubicin that alternated with 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil prior to mastectomy; irradiation was administered when the tumor was not amenable to surgical resection. Additional chemotherapy and tamoxifen, in hormone receptor-positive tumors, was used after mastectomy. Post-operative irradiation was given on a selective basis for patients at high risk for locoregional disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Although 5 patients (7%) had disease progression, clinical partial or complete tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy was noted in 46 patients (65%). Sixty-eight patients (96%) underwent mastectomy. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the relapse-free and overall survival rates at 5 years were 42% and 57% respectively. Locoregional tumor recurrence occurred in 14 patients (20%), and 28 patients (39%) developed metastatic disease. Menopausal status, clinical presentation (noninflammatory vs. inflammatory), and American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage were independent covariates associated with patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative alternating chemotherapy, with the selective use of irradiation, resulted in significant locoregional disease regression and the successful integration of mastectomy into the therapeutic strategy. Locoregional tumor control and relapse-free and overall survival estimates for the approach described herein compared favorably with other comtemporary reports for this condition.

Efficacy of up-front 5-fluorouracil-epidoxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy with an increased dose of epidoxorubicin in high-risk breast cancer patients

The prognosis of patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma with tumour spread to the apical axillary lymph nodes has hardly improved despite adequate locoregional control and the introduction of systemic adjuvant therapy. A combined modality regimen that includes anthracyclin-based chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support and radiation and hormonal therapy is currently under investigation in this subset of patients. The present study aims to document the efficacy and feasibility of dose-intensive epidoxorubicin in combination with a standard dose of 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide as up-front chemotherapy in this setting. A preoperative chemotherapy regimen consisting of three courses of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m-2, epidoxorubicin 120 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 (FE120C) was administered at 21 day intervals without haematopoietic growth factors to 70 patients with apex node-positive disease. All patients were below 60 years of age and had not had prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Sixty-six patients were evaluable for clinical response and histopathological examination could be performed in 62 of these. Thirteen patients achieved a clinical complete response (20%). Of these patients, microscopic examination of the mastectomy specimen revealed absence of malignant cells in two and exclusively ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in another two patients. In addition, of the 46 patients (70%) with a clinical partial response, at pathological examination one patient had sclerosis only and four had DCIS. This results in a pathological complete response in three (5%) of all patients and absence of invasive carcinoma in 10%. None of the patients progressed during chemotherapy. The major toxicity was moderate bone marrow suppression with a median white blood count (WBC) nadir of 1800 microliters-1 (range 500-4900). Other toxicities were mild. The full planned dose could be given without delays in 66 of 70 patients FE120C is well tolerated and is highly effective as up-front chemotherapy in relatively young patients with high-risk breast cancer, with a 90% (CI 74-98%) clinical objective response rate.

Possibility of conservative local treatment after combined chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate the outcome and the possibility of breast conservation therapy for patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer after primary chemotherapy followed by external preoperative irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1982 and June 1990, 97 patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic and noninflammatory breast cancer were treated. The median follow-up was 93 months from the beginning of treatment. The induction treatment consisted of four courses of chemotherapy (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil) followed by preoperative irradiation (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas). A fifth course of chemotherapy was given after irradiation therapy. Three different loco-regional approaches were proposed, depending on the tumoral response. In 37 patients (38%) with residual tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter or located behind the nipple or with bifocal tumors, mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed. Sixty other patients (62%) benefited from conservative treatment: 33 patients (34%) achieved complete remission and no surgery was done but additional radiation boost was given to the initial tumor bed; 27 patients (28%) who had a residual mass less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of chemotherapy. A maintenance adjuvant chemotherapy regimen without anthracycline was prescribed (12 monthly cycles).

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial loco-regional relapse rate was 16% after radiotherapy alone, 16% following wide excision and radiotherapy, and 5.4% following mastectomy. The 5-year loco-regional relapse rate was significantly higher after conservative local treatment (wide excision and radiotherapy, and radiotherapy alone) than after mastectomy (p= 0.04). After conservative local treatment, the 5-year breast conserving rate of patients with loco-regional disease-free status was 84%. For all patients included in this study, the 5-year breast-conserving rate of those who were loco-regional disease-free was 52%. In multivariate analysis, the possibility of breast conservative treatment was significantly related to the initial tumor size and age (more conservative treatment for tumor size < 6cm and age < 50 years). Five- and 10-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates were 80, 69, 73, and 61% respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were not influenced by the local treatment (conservative vs. nonconservative local treatment, p = 0.9). On the other hand, local failure significantly decreased the 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (p , 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, three factors had a significant impact on overall survival and disease-free survival: tumor response after induction chemotherapy, initial tumor size, and clinical stage. Arm lymphedema was noted in 12.5% (8 out of 64) of the patients treated with axillary dissection and in 3% (1 out of 33) without axillary dissection. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in 79% of patients after wide excision and radiotherapy and in 71% of patients treated by radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative irradiation may permit the selection of some patients with locally advanced breast cancer for conservative treatment. However, the impact of this treatment modality on long-term survival remains to be established.

Does supportive pamidronate treatment prevent or delay the first manifestation of bone metastases in breast cancer patients?

The effect of pamidronate treatment on the first development of bone metastases was investigated in 124 patients with breast cancer, with either locally advanced disease (n = 33) or extraskeletal metastases (n = 91), but no bone metastases in a randomised, multicentre, open controlled study. Patients were assigned to treatment with oral pamidronate, 300 mg/day, (n = 65) or to a control group (n = 59). Tumour therapy was freely allowed. A first clinical event of skeletal morbidity occurred in 22% pamidronate and 20% control patients; unequivocal first radiological manifestation of bone metastases was found in 36% pamidronate and 27% control patients (n.s.). The actuarial risk of a first skeletal event was similar in both groups. Quality-of-life measurements of bone metastases-related aspects showed no differences between the two groups. 19 patients withdrew from the study because of gastrointestinal complaints attributed to pamidronate. We conclude that supportive oral pamidronate treatment (300 mg/day) does not prevent nor delay the development of bone metastases in breast cancer patients at risk.

Pneumonitis complicating selective intra-arterial chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma

We describe a case of pneumonitis in a patient receiving selective intra-arterial chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Locally advanced breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial comparing primary treatment with tamoxifen or radiotherapy in post-menopausal women

We have previously reported the early results of a randomized cross-over study of radical radiotherapy vs tamoxifen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. This study has now recruited 143 patients with a median time from randomization of almost 10 years for both groups. Seventy-three patients received 20 mg tamoxifen twice daily, and 70 had primary radiotherapy at a dose of 40 Gy, which is a lower dose than currently administered. The treatment groups were similar in age, size of tumour and oestrogen receptor status. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for the combined initial response and static disease rates (89% for radiotherapy and 78% for tamoxifen, P = 0.15). The median duration of initial response was 12 months for both groups. When patients crossed over to the alternative therapy on local relapse, there was no difference in response/static disease rates (P = 0.34) and duration of response (P = 0.76). A non-significant prolongation of the metastatic-free interval in favour of tamoxifen (P = 0.08) was identified, although there was no difference in survival outcome (P = 0.38). This study shows that in this group of patients primary tamoxifen offers a similar clinical benefit to primary radiotherapy at a dose of 40 Gy, and is therefore an acceptable alternative primary treatment.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP) in a combined modality approach for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Long-term results

Thirty-one patients with locally advanced and inflammatory breast carcinoma (stage IIIA and IIIB) were treated with a combined modality approach between 1985 and 1989. All patients received as induction chemotherapy a combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP). Responsive patients and patients with operable stable disease underwent modified radical mastectomy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) adjuvant chemotherapy. Thirty patients were evaluable for response to CAP. The rate of objective response to induction chemotherapy was 76.7% with 2 patients (6.7%) obtaining a complete response and 21 patients (70%) a partial response. Twenty-five patients were rendered disease-free after induction chemotherapy and surgery. Only 2 of these had pathological complete response (8%). The median overall survival was 48.7 months, the median time to progression was 22.4 months and the median disease-free survival was 29.1 months. The patients with noninflammatory breast tumor had a significantly better overall survival, disease-free survival, and time to progression. The overall survival and the time to progression were statistically superior in patients with primary tumor size < or = 8 cm. At a median follow-up of 6 years, 29% (95% CI, 13.05 to 45.01) of patients were alive and 28% (95% CI, 10.4 to 45.6) were disease-free. This combined modality treatment seems feasible with quite acceptable toxicity; the CAP combination is an effective alternative to the other standard chemotherapeutic regimens. Our results, although encouraging, are still poor, and new drugs and strategies are required to improve the long-term outcome.

Primary systemic treatment with weekly doxorubicin monotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer; clinical experience and parameters predicting outcome

Sixty-three patients (median age 64 years) with locally advanced breast cancer (T3, T4 and/or N2) were treated with primary 'neoadjuvant' chemotherapy given as weekly doxorubicin monotherapy (14 mg/m2 per dose). Seven patients had solitary distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Twenty-eight patients (45%) achieved 'partial response' to primary chemotherapy. Twenty-nine patients (46%) had 'stable disease', and 6 patients (9%) had 'progressive disease' during treatment. Following chemotherapy, 52 patients were subjected to surgery and another 4 patients had surgery performed after radiotherapy. Surgery was considered impossible in only three patients. After a median observation time of 23 months, local recurrences were observed in 2 patients, one with progressive disease and one with stable disease during chemotherapy. Univariate analyses revealed that large tumour size, high histological grade and high mitotic frequency were associated with poor primary response to chemotherapy. Recent studies have demonstrated a correlation between p53-mutations and chemotherapy response.

The prognostic significance of the axillary apex biopsy in clinically operable breast cancer

To evaluate the prognostic significance of the axillary apex biopsy and its impact on clinical practice, a retrospective analysis was performed in 875 patients with clinically operable breast cancer who underwent this procedure from 1977 to 1985 (165 TNM stage I; 512 TNM stage II; 198 TNM stage IIIA). Apex biopsy is performed as a staging procedure. Apex biopsy positive patients are treated by radiotherapy alone, while apex biopsy negative patients are treated with breast conserving therapy or mastectomy, both including complete axillary dissection. The apex biopsy was tumour positive in 4% of TNM stage I patients; 17% of stage II patients and 40% of stage IIIA patients. Among patients with clinically node-negative disease, the apex biopsy was positive in 12%; in patients with palpable suspected lymph nodes this figure was 45%. Actuarial 8 y survival rates for patients with stage I, II and III disease and a negative apex biopsy were 83, 70 and 50%, respectively. The corresponding figures for patients with a positive apex biopsy were 60, 28 and 14%. In a multivariate analysis, a positive apex biopsy, clinical N classification and T classification were independent prognostic factors for survival (P < 0.0001). We conclude that a positive apex biopsy is rare in clinical stage I breast cancer, and that in patients with TNM stage II and III disease the procedure is an important tool to assess prognosis pre-operatively.

Locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in 125 patients homogeneously treated with a combined modality approach

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and < or = 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

The prognosis of stage III breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy and adriamycin-based chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen. Eight year follow-up results of a randomized trial

Sixty-one patients with primary node positive stage III breast cancers were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (eight cycles of CAFt: cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, oral ftorafur) with or without tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment. The five-year overall survival for all patients was 49% (with tamoxifen 48% and without tamoxifen 50%) and disease-free survival 33% (with tamoxifen 27% and without 39%). Local control for all patients was only 64% despite the postoperative radiotherapy. There was no significant difference between these two treatment groups in overall and disease-free survival or local control. The prognosis of stage III breast cancer remains grim despite modern adjuvant therapy. In addition to more effective systemic treatment more effective local therapy is also needed in order to obtain satisfactory local control. The most important studies in stage III breast cancer with 5-year survival results are reviewed here.

Primary chemotherapy for early and advanced breast cancer

While locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a small fraction of patients with breast cancer in industrialized nations, in developing countries it might constitute up to 50% of incident cases. The definition includes patients with stage IIB, III, and some with limited stage IV breast cancer. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is part of LABC, but it is often reported separately, because of its dismal prognosis. LABC can be considered technically operable (stage II and IIIA), or inoperable (stage IIIB, IV and IBC). For the last two decades, patients with inoperable LABC and IBC have been treated with increasing frequency with systemic therapy first, followed by regional therapy, either surgical resection or radiotherapy. Most treatment programs also included adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients with LABC and IBC respond to primary chemotherapy, and most can be rendered disease-free initially. Local control rates exceed 80% with modern combined-modality treatment strategies. Since most tumors are downstaged, some patients can be treated with breast-conserving treatments. The optimal sequence of local and systemic treatments has not been defined. Combined-modality therapies improve the treatment and the outcome for patients with LABC. Whether the sequence of utilization of various treatments influences outcome remains to be established. The administration of systemic therapies first also provides a useful biological model to assess the effects of systemic treatments on the primary tumor and regional metastases, since these are available for serial non-invasive evaluation and sampling of tumor tissue.

Determining factors which predict response to primary medical therapy in breast cancer using a single fine needle aspirate with immunocytochemical staining and flow cytometry

The increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in the management of breast cancer has lead us to evaluate and optimise the standard technique of cytocentrifugation of a single fine needle aspirate (FNA) taken from a breast tumour in-vivo, to determine a range of both immunocytochemical and flow cytometric factors which are predictive of response to primary medical therapy. Some of these factors are also of prognostic significance in early stage disease. An analysis of the cellularity and immunocytochemical staining characteristics of FNAs obtained from a series of 206 patients with palpable breast cancers indicate that in a sample of 46 cases it is possible to measure oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and c-erbB-2 providing over 400 cells per slide are obtained, with material obtained in a single FNA prepared by cytocentrifugation, using standard immunocytochemical methods. The staining results obtained were comparable to those obtained using frozen or paraffin embedded tissue sections taken from the same tumour. In addition an estimate of the proliferation indices could be made by flow cytometric analysis of the residual cell suspension fluid with measurement of DNA index and S-phase fraction in 131/164 (80%) and 110/164 (67%) of cases respectively. Providing all FNAs obtained for cytocentrifugation were taken at first presentation rather than immediately following a standard FNA, then it was possible to obtain adequately cellular (> 400 cells/slide) samples in 96 out of 126 (75%) of the last cohort of breast aspirates. These effects may be independent of T stage but not histological type as patients with lobular tumours only produced cellular aspirates in 1/7 (14%) of cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)