The interaction between streptomycin and ribosomal RNA

Antibiotic drugs targeting bacterial RNAs

RNAs have diverse structures that include bulges and internal loops able to form tertiary contacts or serve as ligand binding sites. The recent increase in structural and functional information related to RNAs has put them in the limelight as a drug target for small molecule therapy. In addition, the recognition of the marked difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic rRNA has led to the development of antibiotics that specifically target bacterial rRNA, reduce protein translation and thereby inhibit bacterial growth. To facilitate the development of new antibiotics targeting RNA, we here review the literature concerning such antibiotics, mRNA, riboswitch and tRNA and the key methodologies used for their screening.

Natural populations of chickpea rhizobia evaluated by antibiotic resistance profiles and molecular methods

The aims of this study were to investigate the hypothesis that intrinsic antibiotic resistance (IAR) profiles of chickpea rhizobia are correlated with the isolates site of origin, and to compare the discriminating power of IAR profiles with molecular approaches in rhizobial strain identification and differentiation. Rhizobial diversity from five Portuguese soils was assessed by IAR profiles and molecular methods [16S rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, direct amplified polymorphic DNA (DAPD) fingerprinting, and SDS-PAGE analysis of protein profiles]. For each analysis, a dendrogram was generated using the software BioNumerics. All three molecular methods generated analogous clustering of the isolates, supporting previous results on 16S rDNA sequence-based phylogeny. Clusters obtained with IAR profile are similar to the species groups generated with the molecular methods used. IAR groups do not correlate significantly with the geographic origin of the isolates. These results may indicate a chromosomal location of antibiotic resistance genes, and suggest that IAR is species related. DAPD and IAR profiles proved to be the most discriminating approaches in strain differentiation and can be used as fast methods to screen diversity in new isolates.

Streptomycin binds to the decoding center of 16 S ribosomal RNA

Streptomycin, an error-inducing aminoglycoside antibiotic, binds to a single site on the small ribosomal subunit of bacteria, but this site has not yet been defined precisely. Here, we demonstrate that streptomycin binds to E. coli 16 S rRNA in the absence of ribosomal proteins, and protects a set of bases in the decoding region against dimethyl sulfate attack. The binding studies were performed in a high ionic strength buffer containing 20 mM Mg2+. The pattern of protection in the decoding region was similar to that observed when streptomycin binds to the 30 S subunit. However, streptomycin also protects the 915 region of 16 S rRNA within the 30 S subunit, whereas it did not protect the 915 region of the naked 16 S rRNA. The interaction of streptomycin with 16 S rRNA was further defined by using two fragments that correspond to the 3' minor domain of 16 S rRNA and to the decoding analog, a portion of this domain encompassing the decoding center. In the presence of streptomycin, the pattern of protection against dimethyl sulfate attack for the two fragments was similar to that seen with the full-length 16 S rRNA. This indicates that the 3' minor domain as well as the decoding analog contain the recognition signals for the binding of streptomycin. However, streptomycin could not bind to the decoding analog in the absence of Mg2+. This contrasts with neomycin, another error-inducing aminoglycoside antibiotic, that binds to the decoding analog in the absence of Mg2+, but not at 20 mM Mg2+. Our results suggest that both neomycin and streptomycin interact with the decoding center, but recognize alternative conformations of this region.

Cleavage of 16S rRNA within the ribosome by mRNA modified in the A-site codon with phenanthroline-Cu(II)

Cleavage of 16S rRNA was obtained through mRNA modified at position +5 with the chemical cleavage agent 1,10-o-phenanthroline. In the presence of Cu2+, and after addition of reducing agent to the modified mRNA-70S complex, cleavage of proximal nucleotides within the 16S rRNA occurred. Primer extension analysis of 16S rRNA fragments revealed that nucleotides 528-532, 1196, and 1396-1397 were cleaved. Nucleotides 1053-1055 were also cleaved but did not show the same level of specificity as the former. These results provide evidence that at some point in the translation process these regions are all within 15 A of position +5, the A-site codon, on the mRNA.

The translational function of nucleotide C1054 in the small subunit rRNA is conserved throughout evolution: genetic evidence in yeast

Mutations at position C1054 of 16S rRNA have previously been shown to cause translational suppression in Escherichia coli. To examine the effects of similar mutations in a eukaryote, all three possible base substitutions and a base deletion were generated at the position of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 18S rRNA corresponding to E. coli C1054. In yeast, as in E. coli, both C1054A (rdn-1A) and C1054G (rdn-1G) caused dominant nonsense suppression. Yeast C1054U (rdn-1T) was a recessive antisuppressor, while yeast C1054-delta (rdn-1delta) led to recessive lethality. Both C1054U and two previously described yeast 18S rRNA antisuppressor mutations, G517A (rdn-2) and U912C (rdn-4), inhibited codon-nonspecific suppression caused by mutations in eukaryotic release factors, sup45 and sup35. However, among these only C1054U inhibited UAA-specific suppressions caused by a UAA-decoding mutant tRNA-Gln (SLT3). Our data implicate eukaryotic C1054 in translational termination, thus suggesting that its function is conserved throughout evolution despite the divergence of nearby nucleotide sequences.

Genetic and comparative analyses reveal an alternative secondary structure in the region of nt 912 of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA

Mutations at position 912 of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA result in two notable phenotypes. The C-->U transition confers resistance to streptomycin, a translational-error-inducing antibiotic, while a C-->G transversion causes marked retardation of cell growth rate. Starting with the slow-growing G912 mutant, random mutagenesis was used to isolate a second site mutation that restored growth nearly to the wild-type rate. The second site mutation was identified as a G-->C transversion at position 885 in 16S rRNA. Cells containing the G912 mutation had an increased doubling time, abnormal sucrose gradient ribosome/subunit profile, increased sensitivity to spectinomycin, dependence upon streptomycin for growth in the presence of spectinomycin, and slower translation rate, whereas cells with the G912/C885 double mutation were similar to wild type in these assays. Comparative analysis showed there was significant covariation between positions 912 and 885. Thus the second-site suppressor analysis, the functional assays, and the comparative data suggest that the interaction between nt 912 and nt 885 is conserved and necessary for normal ribosome function. Furthermore, the comparative data suggest that the interaction extends to include G885-G886-G887 pairing with C912-U911-C910. An alternative secondary structure element for the central domain of 16S rRNA is proposed.

Pleiotropic effects of mutations at positions 13 and 914 in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA

Mutations at position 13 or 914 of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA exert pleiotropic effects on protein synthesis. They interfere with the binding of streptomycin, a translational miscoding drug, to the ribosomes. They increase translational fidelity, and this effect can be related to a perturbation of the higher order structure of the 530 stem-loop, a key region for tRNA selection. In contrast, the structure of the decoding center is not perturbed. The mutations also affect translational initiation, slowing down the formation of the 30S initiation complex. This effect can be related to a destabilization of the pseudoknot helix (17-19/916-918), at the convergence of the three major domains of 16S ribosomal RNA.

The accuracy center of a eukaryotic ribosome

Mutations in yeast ribosomal proteins and ribosomal RNAs have been shown to affect translational fidelity. These mutations include: proteins homologous to Escherichia coli's S4, S5, and S12; a eukaryote specific ribosomal protein; yeast ribosomal rRNA alterations at positions corresponding to 517, 912, and 1054 in 16S E. coli rRNA and to 2658 in the sarcin-ricin domain of 23S E. coli rRNA. Overall there appears to be a remarkable conservation of the accuracy center throughout evolution.

Positions 13 and 914 in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA are involved in the control of translational accuracy

Using a conditional expression system with the temperature-inducible lambda PL promoter, we previously showed that the single mutations 13U-->A and 914A-->U, and the double mutation 13U-->A and 914A-->U in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA impair the binding of streptomycin (Pinard et al., The FASEB Journal, 1993, 7, 173-176). In this study, we found that the two single mutations and the double mutation increase translational fidelity, reducing in vivo readthrough of nonsense codons and frameshifting, and decreasing in vitro misincorporation in a poly(U)-directed system. Using oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes which hybridize to the 530 loop and to the 1400 region of 16S rRNA, two regions involved in the control of tRNA binding to the A site, we observed that the mutations in rRNA increase the binding of the probe to the 530 loop but not to the 1400 region. We suggest that the mutations at positions 13 and 914 of 16S rRNA induce a conformational rearrangement in the 530 loop, which contributes to the increased accuracy of the ribosome.

Single-base mutations at position 2661 of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA increase efficiency of translational proofreading

Two single-base substitutions were constructed in the 2660 loop of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA (G2661-->C or U) and were introduced into the rrnB operon cloned in plasmid pKK3535. Ribosomes were isolated from bacteria transformed with the mutated plasmids and assayed in vitro in a poly(U)-directed system for their response to the misreading effect of streptomycin, neomycin, and gentamicin, three aminoglycoside antibiotics known to impair the proofreading control of translational accuracy. Both mutations decreased the stimulation of misreading by these drugs, but neither interfered with their binding to the ribosome. The response of the mutant ribosomes to these drugs suggests that the 2660 loop, which belongs to the elongation factor Tu binding site, is involved in the proofreading step of the accuracy control. In vivo, both mutations reduced read-through of nonsense codons and frameshifting, which can also be related to the increased efficiency in proofreading control which they confer to ribosomes.