Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare the accuracy of transcutaneous (tc) to arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2) ) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2) ) in anesthetized rabbits.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective, randomized, experimental study.
ANIMALS
Eight healthy adult female New Zealand white rabbits weighing 4.05± 0.30 kg.
METHODS
Isoflurane anesthetized rabbits received six treatments in random order; PaCO(2) <35, 35-45, and >45 mmHg and PaO(2) < 80, 100-200, >200 mmHg. Arterial and transcutaneous measurements were taken after 15 minutes of stabilization at each condition. Linear regression, correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to compare PtcCO(2) to PaCO(2) and PtcO(2) to PaO(2) .
RESULTS
Over a range of measured PaCO(2) values from 21 to 67 mmHg (n=24) mean bias for PtcCO(2) was -1 mmHg and the 95% limits of agreement were -7 to 5 mmHg. The correlation between PtcCO(2) and PaCO(2) was strong with R(2) value of 0.9454. Over the entire range of measured PaO(2) values (46-508 mmHg) mean bias for PtcO(2) was -61 mmHg and the 95% limits of agreement were -226 to 104 mmHg. Correlation was poor with R(2) =0.5969. Comparing PtcO(2) to PaO(2) over a narrower range [PaO(2) < 150 mmHg (n=13)] improved the correlation, with an R(2) value of 0.8518, mean bias of -7 mmHg and 95% limits of agreement from -33 to 19 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
In healthy anesthetized rabbits, PtcCO(2) closely approximated PaCO(2) . In contrast PtcO(2) underestimated PaO(2) , particularly at high values. The PtcCO(2) sensor may be a useful noninvasive way to assess adequacy of ventilation in anesthetized rabbits.
Collapse