Forearm, chest, and skin vascular changes during simple performance tasks

How are tonic and phasic cardiovascular changes related to central motor command?

We examined the influence of central motor command on heart rate, respiration, and peripheral vascular activity. Central command was enhanced or reduced using tendon vibration. Muscle tension was held constant permitting the examination of variation in central command. Experiment 1 demonstrated in 13 college-aged males an enhancement of heart rate and vascular responses to an isometric, extensor contraction when vibration of the flexor tendon was added. Experiment 2 asked whether changes in central command interacted with phasic cardiovascular changes such as stimulus-linked anticipatory cardiac deceleration. Twenty college-aged males performed either an isometric flexor or extensor contraction with or without flexor tendon vibration. As expected, vibration enhanced cardiovascular change with extensor contraction more than with flexor contraction. Relative to control contractions, however, the flexor change was not an absolute decrease in cardiovascular change. More importantly, tendon vibration failed to alter phasic cardiovascular changes. Force and central commands for force induce cardiovascular change, but this change seems independent of phasic changes induced by the anticipation and processing of environmental stimuli.

Response inhibition initiates cardiac deceleration: evidence from a sensory-motor compatibility paradigm

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that response selection processes alter the timing of the shift between anticipatory cardiac deceleration and acceleratory recovery. Experiment 1 compared changes in cardiac interbeat interval induced by the manipulation of sensory-motor compatibility in a four choice reaction time task. A direct spatial mapping between a linear array of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) was compared to randomly assigned, indirect (non-compatible) mappings. Experiment 2 repeated these two tasks and added a two choice condition with direct spatial mapping, a task frequently employed to examine heart rate deceleration. Fifteen college aged males participated in Experiment 1; 18 college aged males participated in Experiment 2. In both experiments anticipatory cardiac deceleration either reached a plateau or shifted to acceleration by the interbeat interval in which the stimulus occurred. In contrast to previous reports, a secondary deceleration, rather than cardiac acceleration, often followed the stimulus. The secondary deceleration was greater with non-compatible mapping, slow response speeds, and short intertrial intervals. The findings suggested that the motoric inhibition required during response selection induces a phasic cardiac deceleration.

On the shift from anticipatory heart rate deceleration to acceleratory recovery: revisiting the role of response factors

The influence of inducing motor responses of low and high force at different times in the cardiac cycle was examined. A handgrip response was used which allowed the separation of response initiation from response completion. Based on earlier work, we expected initiation, rather than completion, to initiate poststimulus cardiac acceleration. We also thought that preparation for a high force response might alter preparatory changes of interbeat interval differently from preparation for a low force response. Fifteen college-aged male subjects performed a warned reaction time task in which a visual stimulus signalled a handgrip requiring either a high or a low force to close. NoGo trials in which an inhibit signal was presented occurred on 12% of the trials. Stimuli occurred either on the R-wave of the electrocardiogram or 300 ms later. Reaction speed was varied in different trial blocks by rewarding response times of 200 ms (+/- 50 ms), 300 ms, or 400 ms. Results based on the timing of response initiation were essentially identical to those based on the timing of response completion. High force relative to low force was associated with both earlier response initiation and earlier cardiac acceleration. Force did not alter preparatory cardiac deceleration. Force and response speed did, however, alter the level of heart rate after response occurrence. Thus, response initiation (or an earlier response process) appears to induce a cardiac acceleration whose level is influenced by the speed and force of the motor response.