Latent period and yield of chemically-induced skin tumors in chimeric mice

Mosaic pattern and lineage analysis in chimeras

Mammalian chimeras have been used in a number of developmental studies over the years. A major limitation in these studies has been the lack of in situ procedures for establishing mosaic pattern in the tissues of these animals. Recently, a number of procedures have become available for the histochemical demonstration of mosaicism in chimeras. These include the elucidation of various enzymes, receptors, or surface antigens, which have variant expression between strains. The observation of pattern in organs of mosaic animals can suggest possible modes of organogenesis and organ maintenance. Experimentation with such animals can be used to establish some mechanisms of pathogenesis as well.

The study of mammalian organogenesis by mosaic pattern analysis

Chimeras are animals derived from more than one zygote and composed of two cell lineages which are distinguishable in some way at the cellular level. Spontaneous mosaic animals are also composed of distinguishable cell lineages but are monozygotic. The tissues of both mono- and multizygotic animals of this type are mosaic arrays in which aggregates of like cells form patches, the size and distribution of which can be useful in the analysis of diverse problems in developmental biology. Both biochemical and in situ methods have been applied to the elucidation of mosaic pattern. Both forms of mosaicism have proven useful in establishing theoretic constructs of the formation and maintenance of mammalian organs. A number of these constructs are discussed: cell fusion as related to myotube formation; mechanisms of coat pigmentation and the cellular origin of melanocytes; and pattern analyses of the retinal pigmented epithelium, the intestine, liver, adrenal cortex and thymus. Pathologic alterations in such animals have also been studied utilizing mosaic pattern analysis. In particular, neoplastic tumors and their associated preneoplastic lesions have been shown to be clonal.

On the clonal origin of tumors: a review of experimental models

A number of current models of carcinogenesis postulate that rare events are critical in the formation of malignant neoplasms. The most fundamental prediction of the hypothesis that these events are rare is the clonality of neoplasms. Evidence from spontaneous neoplasms supports the contention that such neoplasms are clonal. However, there are a number of reasons to believe that spontaneous neoplasms are derived from large numbers of cells. The issue can be resolved with experimental cancer models. In order to determine whether experimentally induced neoplasms are derived from the clonal expansion of single cells, a variety of benign and malignant tumors can be induced in mosaic rodents. These animals comprise 2 genetically distinguishable cell lineages. If the neoplastic tissues obtained from mosaic animals are composed entirely of progeny of one or the other of the 2 cell lineages, it may be concluded that they are clonal. If, on the other hand, the neoplasms began from the proliferation of many cells, then neoplastic masses would be expected to contain cells of both lineages. The results from a number of these experiments have led to the conclusion that chemically induced neoplasms are clonal. Furthermore, malignant neoplasms are generally believed to develop in a stepwise manner. If they were derived from a single cell, then each of the stages leading to the formation of the cancer should be clonal. A variety of stages thought to be necessary precursors of cancer have been analyzed in mosaic rodents. These preneoplastic lesions have been determined to be clonal in origin. Thus, theories of carcinogenesis must account for the rarity of the events critical to the formation of cancer.