Interhemispheric engram transfer in chick

Brain glycogenolysis, adrenoceptors, pyruvate carboxylase, Na(+),K(+)-ATPase and Marie E. Gibbs' pioneering learning studies

The involvement of glycogenolysis, occurring in astrocytes but not in neurons, in learning is undisputed (Duran et al., 2013). According to one school of thought the role of astrocytes for learning is restricted to supply of substrate for neuronal oxidative metabolism. The present "perspective" suggests a more comprehensive and complex role, made possible by lack of glycogen degradation, unless specifically induced by either (1) activation of astrocytic receptors, perhaps especially β-adrenergic or (2) even small increases in extracellular K(+) concentration above its normal resting level. It discusses (1) the known importance of glycogenolysis for glutamate formation, requiring pyruvate carboxylation; (2) the established role of K(+)-stimulated glycogenolysis for K(+) uptake in cultured astrocytes, which probably indicates that astrocytes are an integral part of cellular K(+) homeostasis in the brain in vivo; and (3) the plausible role of transmitter-induced glycogenolysis, stimulating Na(+),K(+)-ATPase/NKCC1 activity and thereby contributing both to the post-excitatory undershoot in extracellular K(+) concentration and the memory-enhancing effect of transmitter-mediated reduction of slow neuronal afterhyperpolarization (sAHP).

Visual input and lateralization of brain function in learning in the chick

Several lines of evidence (biochemical, neuroanatomical, electrophysiological, and behavioural) have indicated a critical role for the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale of the chick forebrain in the acquisition of a passive avoidance response. Previous lesion studies indicated that bilateral or left, but not right, pretraining intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale lesions interfere with the acquisition of this task. We have further analysed this asymmetrical involvement of the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale by use of a monocular learning protocol and intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale lesions (sham, bilateral, or unilateral). The results indicated that there is interocular transfer of information of passive avoidance learning between the two eye systems, with a tendency to be more successful from the right eye system to the left than in the opposite direction. As in binocular conditions, bilateral pretraining intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale lesions impair learning in monocularly trained animals. Unilateral lesions to either left or right monocularly trained experimental animals resulted in amnesia when they were made to the right intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale and the chicks were trained/tested with the left eye open. These results indicate that, although right intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale lesions do not result in amnesia in binocular animals, this region is capable of participating in memory acquisition processes. They also suggest a connection between lateralization of intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale function in passive avoidance learning and the behavioural and structural visual asymmetries known to occur in chicks.

Behavioral and pharmacological unravelling of memory formation

A brief description of how a passive avoidance task, using one day-old chicks, has been used to test for memory formation is given. Chicks will peck at bright shiny beads but if a bead is painted with a bitter tasting chemical, after tasting it once, the chicks will refuse to peck on subsequent presentation of that bead. The chick associates the bitter taste with the particular characteristics of the bead. These experiments have led to the development of a model of memory. The basic model is made of short-term memory, which lasts 10 minutes, intermediate memory that has two phases A and B and lasts for 30 minutes and finally long-term memory. The use of certain classes of drugs to prolong, delay or abolish the various phases is described and then it is shown that many hormones and certain behavioral manipulations can modulate memory. Experiments are described which examine not only the temporal storage but delineate spatial storage within the brain. A brief discussion of current methodologies for looking at the exact spatial location of memory traces is given. The article concludes by emphasizing how even minor differences in protocols across laboratories can have large effects on the memory traces and stresses the significance of the narrow temporal windows, around the training trial, when memory can be modulated.

Role of the supraoptic decussation in the development of asymmetry of brain function in the chicken

The supraoptic decussation plays an important role in the development of asymmetry of brain function for visual discrimination learning in the chicken. Lesioning the decussation on day 2 has no effect on the asymmetry normally revealed by unilaterally treating either the left or right forebrain hemisphere with cycloheximide on day 4 of life. However, the lesion removes the asymmetry revealed by cycloheximide treatment on day 8 and reverses that revealed by treatment on day 10, albeit to a lesser extent. The asymmetry of learning performance between the left and right eyes present in untreated chickens tested monocularly in the second week of life is also removed by lesioning the supraoptic decussation. Thus, in the first week of life functional asymmetry is present but not dependent on left-to-right side coupling via the supraoptic decussation. The difference between lesioning during the first and second week of life may relate to the relative degree of maturation in the supraoptic decussation.

Sharply timed and lateralised events at time of establishment of long term memory

In the chick long term memory is known suddenly to become more resistant to disturbance 25 minutes after training. This was investigated using two bead pecking tasks: training involved either presentation of an ill-tasting bead (causing inhibition of spontaneous pecking) or habituation by prolonged presentation. Retention tests revealed two brief periods of improved recall, centred at 25 and at 30-32 minutes after learning. The first appeared to be associated with systems fed by the left eye and the second with right eye systems. In a final experiment memory formation in right or left hemisphere was directly disturbed by intracranial injection of the amnesic beta-antagonist sotalol. The first (and perhaps also second) period of improved recall was associated with interaction between the hemispheres. Right- and left-eyed birds differed markedly, both in the character of such interaction and in the outcome of learning.

The effects of colchicine and vinblastine on memory in chicks

Colchicine, injected bilaterally into the forebrain of day-old chicks at times before and after one-trial avoidance learning, produced transient amnesia for one to three hours after learning, that could not be accounted for as a perceptual or attentional defect. The amnesia was dose dependent and was produced only when injections occurred within a limited period before and after learning. No amnesia occurred when injections were given 120 min before or 60 min later than the learning trial, nor at times prior to the retrieval test. During the amnesic period, new learning could occur and be retrieved 15 min later. The amnesia could be overcome by retention-testing or by a new, related, learning experience before or up to 30 min after onset of amnesia. Control birds injected with saline or lumicolchicine, a biologically inactive derivative of colchicine, showed normal retention. Vinblastine sulphate, which also interrupts microtubular networks and hence axonal flow, had no amnesic properties. Colchicine injections had no effect on the levels of acetylcholinesterase, choline acetyltransferase, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the whole forebrain or in forebrain synaptosomes during the amnesic period. Nor did colchicine injections affect amino acid uptake and protein or glycoprotein synthesis before or during the amnesic period, although there was 10-20% inhibition of protein synthesis 5 h after injection. Thus over the amnesic period, there was no evidence of gross perturbation of brain function. Electron microscopy showed microtubules intact within 1 mm of the injection site 2.5 after injection. Oedema was found at this time in chicks injected with a high dose (100 micrograms) shown to disturb behaviour grossly, but not with a low dose (5 micrograms) which caused amnesia. Transient amnesia for one-trial avoidance learning is most probably caused by secondary effects of colchicine on nerve cell function. We suggest that the amnesic episode represents destruction of one of the stages of a multiple independent parallel process of memory consolidation.