Dual response of lobster muscle fibers to L-glutamate

Feeling the heat: source–sink mismatch as a mechanism underlying the failure of thermal tolerance

A mechanistic explanation for the tolerance limits of animals at high temperatures is still missing, but one potential target for thermal failure is the electrical signaling off cells and tissues. With this in mind, here I review the effects of high temperature on the electrical excitability of heart, muscle and nerves, and refine a hypothesis regarding high temperature-induced failure of electrical excitation and signal transfer [the temperature-dependent deterioration of electrical excitability (TDEE) hypothesis]. A central tenet of the hypothesis is temperature-dependent mismatch between the depolarizing ion current (i.e. source) of the signaling cell and the repolarizing ion current (i.e. sink) of the receiving cell, which prevents the generation of action potentials (APs) in the latter. A source–sink mismatch can develop in heart, muscles and nerves at high temperatures owing to opposite effects of temperature on source and sink currents. AP propagation is more likely to fail at the sites of structural discontinuities, including electrically coupled cells, synapses and branching points of nerves and muscle, which impose an increased demand of inward current. At these sites, temperature-induced source–sink mismatch can reduce AP frequency, resulting in low-pass filtering or a complete block of signal transmission. In principle, this hypothesis can explain a number of heat-induced effects, including reduced heart rate, reduced synaptic transmission between neurons and reduced impulse transfer from neurons to muscles. The hypothesis is equally valid for ectothermic and endothermic animals, and for both aquatic and terrestrial species. Importantly, the hypothesis is strictly mechanistic and lends itself to experimental falsification.

Temperature dependent modulation of lobster neuromuscular properties by serotonin

In cold-blooded species the efficacy of neuromuscular function depends both on the thermal environmental of the animal's habitat and on the concentrations of modulatory hormones circulating within the animal's body. The goal of this study is to examine how temperature variation within an ecologically relevant range affects neuromuscular function and its modulation by the neurohormone serotonin (5-HT) in Homarus americanus, a lobster species that inhabits a broad thermal range in the wild. The synaptic strength of the excitatory and inhibitory motoneurons innervating the lobster dactyl opener muscle depends on temperature, with the strongest neurally evoked muscle movements being elicited at cold (<5 degrees C) temperatures. However, whereas neurally evoked contractions can be elicited over the entire temperature range from 2 to >20 degrees C, neurally evoked relaxations of resting muscle tension are effective only at colder temperatures at which the inhibitory junction potentials are hyperpolarizing in polarity. 5-HT has two effects on inhibitory synaptic signals: it potentiates their amplitude and also shifts the temperature at which they reverse polarity by approximately +7 degrees C. Thus 5-HT both potentiates neurally evoked relaxations of the muscle and increases the temperature range over which neurally evoked muscle relaxations can be elicited. Neurally evoked contractions are maximally potentiated by 5-HT at warm (18 degrees C) temperatures; however, 5-HT enhances excitatory junction potentials in a temperature-independent manner. Finally, 5-HT strongly increases resting muscle tension at the coldest extent of the temperature range tested (2 degrees C) but is ineffective at 22 degrees C. These data demonstrate that 5-HT elicits several temperature-dependent physiological changes in the passive and active responses of muscle to neural input. The overall effect of 5-HT is to increase the temperature range over which neurally evoked motor movements can be elicited in this neuromuscular system.

The metabotropic glutamate receptors of the vestibular organs

This research sought to test the presence and function of metabotropic excitatory amino acid receptors (mGluR) in the frog semicircular canal (SCC). The mGluR agonist +/- 1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylate (ACPD) produced an increase in afferent firing rates of the ampullar nerve of the intact posterior canal. This increase was not due to a stimulation of cholinergic efferent terminals or the acetylcholine (ACh) receptor, since atropine, in concentrations which blocked the response to exogenous acetylcholine, did not affect the response to ACPD. Likewise, ACPD effects were not due to stimulation of postsynaptic NMDA receptors, since the NMDA antagonist D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (AP-5) did not affect the response to ACPD, reinforcing the reported selectivity of ACPD for mGluRs. When the SCC was superfused with artificial perilymph known to inhibit hair cell transmitter release (i.e. low Ca-high Mg), ACPD failed to increase afferent firing. This suggests that the receptor activated by ACPD is located on the hair cell. Pharmacological evidence suggested that the mGluRs involved in afferent facilitation belong to Group I (i.e. subtypes 1 and 5). In fact, the Group III agonist AP-4 had no effect, and the ACPD facilitatory effect was blocked by the Group I mGluR antagonists (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine (CPG) and (RS)-1-aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid (AIDA). Additional pharmacological evidence supported the presence of Group I mGluRs. Interestingly, the mGluR antagonists, AIDA and 4CPG, by themselves did not affect the resting firing rates of ampullar afferents. This may suggest that the mGluRs are not involved in resting activity but perhaps only in evoked activity (as suggested in Guth et al. (1991) Hear. Res. 56, 69-78). In addition, the mRNA for the mGluR1 has been detected in hair cells of both SCC, utricle, and saccule. In summary, the evidence points to an mGluR localized to the hair cell (i.e. an autoreceptor) which may be activated to produce a positive feedback augmentation of evoked but not resting transmitter release and thus affect afferent activity.

Differential modulation of spontaneous and evoked neurotransmitter release from hair cells: some novel hypotheses

It has been generally accepted that even in the absence of mechanical stimulation of the transductional elements, a resting depolarizing current exists which is ultimately responsible for the spontaneous release of neurotransmitter. Movement of the transductional elements modulates this resting current and thereby the evoked release of neurotransmitter occurs. Recent data from our laboratory and others have led us to question whether the relationship between spontaneous and evoked neurotransmitter release is as simple as stated. Indeed, a variety of experimental manipulations appear to influence the two modes of release differently. Examination of our results and the results of others has led us to four hypotheses: 1. the two modes of neurotransmitter release are processed differently by the hair cells; 2. cyclic AMP is involved in spontaneous but not evoked neurotransmitter release; 3. there is a positive feedback step involving an excitatory amino acid and its receptor on the hair cell in evoked neurotransmitter release and; 4. different pools of calcium are involved according to the mode of release. Accordingly, there may be several biochemical steps between the transductional movement of the stereocilia at the apex of the hair cells and the ultimate release of the neurotransmitter at the base of these cells. Some of these biochemical steps are different depending on whether the mode of release is spontaneous or evoked. These biochemical steps may amplify or at least interact with the biophysical processes previously described in the hair cells.