A non-docking intraoperative electron beam applicator system

Technical Note: Mobile accelerator guidance using an optical tracker during docking in IOERT procedures

PURPOSE

Intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) involves the delivery of a high radiation dose during tumor resection in a shorter time than other radiation techniques, thus improving local control of tumors. However, a linear accelerator device is needed to produce the beam safely. Mobile linear accelerators have been designed as dedicated units that can be moved into the operating room and deliver radiation in situ. Correct and safe dose delivery is a key concern when using mobile accelerators. The applicator is commonly fixed to the patient's bed to ensure that the dose is delivered to the prescribed location, and the mobile accelerator is moved to dock the applicator to the radiation beam output (gantry). In a typical clinical set-up, this task is time-consuming because of safety requirements and the limited degree of freedom of the gantry. The objective of this study was to present a navigation solution based on optical tracking for guidance of docking to improve safety and reduce procedure time.

METHOD

We used an optical tracker attached to the mobile linear accelerator to track the prescribed localization of the radiation collimator inside the operating room. Using this information, the integrated navigation system developed computes the movements that the mobile linear accelerator needs to perform to align the applicator and the radiation gantry and warns the physician if docking is unrealizable according to the available degrees of freedom of the mobile linear accelerator. Furthermore, we coded a software application that connects all the necessary functioning elements and provides a user interface for the system calibration and the docking guidance.

RESULT

The system could safeguard against the spatial limitations of the operating room, calculate the optimal arrangement of the accelerator and reduce the docking time in computer simulations and experimental setups.

CONCLUSIONS

The system could be used to guide docking with any commercial linear accelerator. We believe that the docking navigator we present is a major contribution to IOERT, where docking is critical when attempting to reduce surgical time, ensure patient safety and guarantee that the treatment administered follows the radiation oncologist's prescription.

Intraoperative radiation therapy using mobile electron linear accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 72

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been customarily performed either in a shielded operating suite located in the operating room (OR) or in a shielded treatment room located within the Department of Radiation Oncology. In both cases, this cancer treatment modality uses stationary linear accelerators. With the development of new technology, mobile linear accelerators have recently become available for IORT. Mobility offers flexibility in treatment location and is leading to a renewed interest in IORT. These mobile accelerator units, which can be transported any day of use to almost any location within a hospital setting, are assembled in a nondedicated environment and used to deliver IORT. Numerous aspects of the design of these new units differ from that of conventional linear accelerators. The scope of this Task Group (TG-72) will focus on items that particularly apply to mobile IORT electron systems. More specifically, the charges to this Task Group are to (i) identify the key differences between stationary and mobile electron linear accelerators used for IORT, (ii) describe and recommend the implementation of an IORT program within the OR environment, (iii) present and discuss radiation protection issues and consequences of working within a nondedicated radiotherapy environment, (iv) describe and recommend the acceptance and machine commissioning of items that are specific to mobile electron linear accelerators, and (v) design and recommend an efficient quality assurance program for mobile systems.

Clinical physics, applicator choice, technique, and equipment for electron intraoperative radiation therapy

IORT has been a widely used modality since the 1980s. The initial euphoria experienced at the beginning, however, has subsided, with the result that most centers still practicing IORT are academic institutions. The reason for the reduction in IORT performed at community hospitals is partly related to the method of treatment--namely, transporting the patient from the OR to the radiation therapy department. The advent of mobile linear accelerators, which require little or no shielding and can therefore be used in most OR rooms, is likely to reiginite interest in this modality. There are currently six new centers in the United States that practice IORT with a mobile linear accelerator and more than that in Europe.

Design optimization of intraoperative radiotherapy cones

PURPOSE

Electron intraoperative cones (EIORCs) commonly used for intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) often generate high-dose regions at superficial depths. This study was performed to optimize the use of rings in the EIORC design that reduces the high-dose region while minimizing the loss of the treatment volume at the prescribed depth.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Monte Carlo simulations were performed to study the dosimetry properties of various EIORC designs. Simulations were conducted with EIORCs of various internal radii, lengths, and material compositions irradiated by available electron beam energies. The data were analyzed in terms of volume receiving > 105% and < 90% of the prescription dose, respectively.

RESULTS

The high-dose volume increases with the EIORC size and the electron beam energy. The use of a ring inside the EIORC reduces the 105% dose volume but also increases the sub-90% volume. The degree of change of these volumes depends on the ring thickness and position.

CONCLUSION

The optimal ring position is about 10 cm from the bottom of the EIORC, regardless of the EIORC material, geometry, or electron energy. The optimal thickness of the ring is dependent on its material composition, the beam energy, and the preferred compromise between a uniform dose profile and a loss of treatment volume.

Comparative dosimetry of diode and diamond detectors in electron beams for intraoperative radiation therapy

The aim of the present study is to examine the validity of using silicon semiconductor detectors in degraded electron beams with a broad energy spectrum and a wide angular distribution. A comparison is made with diamond detector measurements, which is the dosimeter considered to give the best results provided that dose rate effects are corrected for. Two-dimensional relative absorbed dose distributions in electron beams (6-20 MeV) for intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) are measured in a water phantom. To quantify deviations between the detectors, a dose comparison tool that simultaneously examines the dose difference and distance to agreement (DTA) is used to evaluate the results in low- and high-dose gradient regions, respectively. Uncertainties of the experimental measurement setup (+/- 1% and +/- 0.5 mm) are taken into account by calculating a composite distribution that fails this dose-difference and DTA acceptance limit. Thus, the resulting area of disagreement should be related to differences in detector performance. The dose distributions obtained with the diode are generally in very good agreement with diamond detector measurements. The buildup region and the dose falloff region show good agreement with increasing electron energy, while the region outside the radiation field close to the water surface shows an increased difference with energy. The small discrepancies in the composite distributions are due to several factors: (a) variation of the silicon-to-water collision stopping-power ratio with electron energy, (b) a more pronounced directional dependence for diodes than for diamonds, and (c) variation of the electron fluence perturbation correction factor with depth. For all investigated treatment cones and energies, the deviation is within dose-difference and DTA acceptance criteria of +/- 3% and +/- 1 mm, respectively. Therefore, p-type silicon diodes are well suited, in the sense that they give results in close agreement with diamond detectors, for practical measurements of relative absorbed dose distributions in degraded electron beams used for IORT.

Design and dosimetry characteristics of a soft-docking system for intraoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The design concept and the dosimetric characteristics of an applicator system for intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) with special emphasis on alignment methods, the effect of a plastic scatterer in the beam, radiation leakage, and misalignment dosimetry, are presented in this paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A soft-docking system for a linear accelerator, which enables collimation of electron beams (4-22 MeV) for IORT has been developed. The system includes twenty-one circular polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) treatment cones of different lengths, diameters and end angles. All in-water measurements are made using p-type silicon diode detectors.

RESULTS

The effect of introducing a PMMA scatterer in the therapeutic beam includes increased surface dose values (above 83% for all nominal electron energies and for all cones) and improved dose homogeneity within the therapeutic range. Electrons scattered from the inside wall of the cone result in dose profile horns at depth of dose maximum always lower than 109%. The radiation leakage outside the cone is less than 13%. Large changes in the dose profiles occur if the intraoperative cone is misaligned more than 0.5.

CONCLUSION

The alignment procedure of the soft-docking system is easy to handle and the applicator design provides adequate collimation of electron beams for IORT.

Dosimetric characteristics of acrylic and stainless steel cones for electron beam therapy

Dosimetric characteristics of acrylic and stainless steel cones for electron beam therapy were investigated. Acrylic and stainless steel cylindrical cones of 6, 7, and 8 cm in diameter and electron beams of energies 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 MeV were used for the measurements. Both acrylic and stainless steel cones showed high dose areas along the rim. The dose along the rim grew with increasing electron beam energy. The highest dose along the rim was 115% of the maximum dose on a central axis when a 6-cm-diameter acrylic cone and 21-MeV electrons were combined.

Differential dose delivery using a nondocking applicator for intraoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Although treatment of a field within a field to deliver a boost dose is quite common with external photon beam radiation therapy, the same is not always true with electron beam radiation or in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). The purpose of this work is to report the results and details of a new technique developed to treat a field within a field in intraoperative radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This technique makes use of the nondocking IORT system currently used at our institution. Treatment is given in two segments: the large field is first treated by using standard circular lucite cones; the second dose segment is delivered using a new circular brass cone designed to fit concentrically within the large lucite cone.

RESULTS

Central axis depth dose, surface dose, output factors, and two-dimensional beam profiles have been measured for a 7 cm inner diameter (i.d.) flat lucite cone and 3.8 and 5 cm i.d. flat brass cones for electron beam energies ranging from 4-22 MeV. For different clinical target volumes, summed dose distributions differentially weighted in both energy and dose are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple technique for delivering differential dose in intraoperative radiation therapy is presented. The technique provides a method for escalating dose to higher values for a defined target volume.

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy: technique, dosimetry, and dose specification: report of task force 48 of the Radiation Therapy Committee, American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a treatment modality whereby a large single dose of radiation is delivered to a surgically open, exposed cancer site. Typically, a beam of megavoltage electrons is directed at an exposed tumor or tumor bed through a specially designed applicator system. In the last few years, IORT facilities have proliferated around the world. The IORT technique and the applicator systems used at these facilities vary greatly in sophistication and design philosophy. The IORT beam characteristics vary for different designs of applicator systems. It is necessary to document the existing techniques of IORT, to detail the dosimetry data required for accurate delivery of the prescribed dose, and to have a uniform method of dose specification for cooperative clinical trials. The specific charge to the task group includes the following: (a) identify the multidisciplinary IORT team, (b) outline special considerations that must be addressed by an IORT program, (c) review currently available IORT techniques, (d) describe dosimetric measurements necessary for accurate delivery of prescribed dose, (e) describe dosimetric measurements necessary in documenting doses to the surrounding normal tissues, (f) recommend quality assurance procedures for IORT, (g) review methods of treatment documentation and verification, and (h) recommend methods of dose specification and recording for cooperative clinical trials.

Design of a non-docking intraoperative electron beam applicator system

A development of a non-docking system is described which enables collimation of an electron beam for intraoperative radiation therapy. This system, adapted to a linear accelerator (SATURNE 43-CGR MeV), has been designed to minimize the mechanical, electrical and tumor visualization problems associated with a docking system. A number of dosimetric considerations and technical innovations have been used in the design of this system. Among them are the central axis of the beam alignment with the axis of the cone via a laser system and the clamping method of the intraoperative cone to the treatment couch by a rigid system. This collimation system can be adapted for different makes of linear accelerator. The dose distribution in this new design system shows a better homogeneity in the patient's target volume and small (thus accessable) leakage radiation dose to tissues outside the intraoperative cone. The design concept and dosimetric characteristics of this novel applicator system are presented in this paper.

Dosimetry characteristics of metallic cones for intraoperative radiotherapy

Dosimetry data were obtained on the first dedicated linear accelerator of its type designed for electron intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) within an operating room. The linear accelerator uses a high dose rate, 9 Gy.min-1, to reduce the treatment time. Its chrome-plated brass treatment cones, designed with straight ends and 22.5 degrees beveled ends, are not mechanically attached to the collimator head, but are aligned using a laser projection system. Dosimetry measurements were made for each combination of energy (6, 9, 12, 15, and 16 MeV), cone size (diameters range from 5 to 12 cm), and cone type (22.5 degrees beveled or straight). From these data, depth-dose curves, cone output, and air-gap correction factors were generated that allow the calculation of the monitor setting for delivering a prescribed dose at any depth for any irradiation condition (energy, cone, air gap). Isodose data were measured for every cone using film in a solid water phantom. Scatter off the inside wall of the cone resulted in peripheral dose horns near the surface that were energy and cone dependent, being as large as 120%.