Comparison of surgery and radiation therapy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung with mediastinal metastasis

Induction chemotherapy and continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (chart) for patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: the MRC INCH randomized trial

PURPOSE

Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that both CHART (continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy) and induction chemotherapy offer a survival advantage over conventional radical radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicenter randomized controlled trial (INCH) was set up to assess the value of giving induction chemotherapy before CHART.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with histologically confirmed, inoperable, Stage I-III NSCLC were randomized to induction chemotherapy (ICT) (three cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by CHART) or CHART alone.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were randomized (23 in each treatment arm) from 9 UK centers. As a result of poor accrual, the trial was closed in December 2007. Twenty-eight patients were male, 28 had squamous cell histology, 34 were Stage IIIA or IIIB, and all baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. Seventeen (74%) of the 23 ICT patients completed the three cycles of chemotherapy. All 42 (22 CHART + 20 ICT) patients who received CHART completed the prescribed treatment. Median survival was 17 months in the CHART arm and 25 months in the ICT arm (hazard ratio of 0.60 [95% CI 0.31-1.16], p = 0.127). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (mainly fatigue, dysphagia, breathlessness, and anorexia) were reported for 13 (57%) CHART and 13 (65%) ICT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This small randomized trial indicates that ICT followed by CHART is feasible and well tolerated. Despite closing early because of poor accrual, and so failing to show clear evidence of a survival benefit for the additional chemotherapy, the results suggest that CHART, and ICT before CHART, remain important options for the treatment of inoperable NSCLC and deserve further study.

Imaging of the Patient with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States for both men and women. Even though the 5-year survival rate of patients with lung cancer remains dismal at 14% for all cancer stages, treatments are improving and newer agents for lung cancer appear promising. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the extent of disease is critical to determine whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the staging evaluation of the patient; however, radiologists need to be aware that there are also important differences in what each specialist needs from imaging to provide appropriate treatment. This article reviews the role of imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an emphasis on the radiologic imaging findings relevant for each specialty.

Surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection (usually lobectomy) is considered the treatment of choice for individuals with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for some patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. However much of the evidence supporting surgery is observational.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether, in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection of cancer improves disease-specific and all-cause mortality compared with no treatment, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. To compare the effectiveness of different surgical approaches (e.g. lobectomy versus limited resection) in improving disease-specific or all-cause mortality in patients with early stage lung cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to December 2003)), bibliographies, handsearching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing surgery alone (or in combination with other therapy) with non-surgical therapy and randomised trials comparing different surgical approaches.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A pooled hazard ratio was calculated where possible. Tests for statistical heterogeneity were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included with a total of 1910 subjects. There were no studies with an untreated control group. In a pooled analysis of three trials, four-year survival was superior in patients with resectable stage I to IIIA NSCLC who underwent resection and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection compared with those undergoing resection and lymph node sampling, the hazard ratio was estimated to be 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005). A further trial found an increased rate of local recurrence in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with limited resection compared with lobectomy. One small trial found a survival advantage in favour of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC. However none of the other trials included in the review demonstrated a significant improvement in survival in patients treated with surgery compared with non surgical therapy. Several of the included trials had potential methodological weaknesses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions about the efficacy of surgery for local and loco-regional NSCLC are limited by the small number of participants studied to date and potential methodological weaknesses of trials. Current evidence suggests that lung cancer resection combined with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is associated with a small to modest improvement in survival compared with lung cancer resection combined with systematic sampling of mediastinal nodes in patients with stage I to IIIA NSCLC.

Postoperative radiotherapy increases locoregional control of patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the treatment records of 98 patients (58 men and 40 women; median age 61 years, range 31-91) with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA NSCLC who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at our institution between January 1990 and December 2000. Patients were grouped by treatment (chemotherapy/surgery alone vs. chemotherapy/surgery/RT), by disease stage and nodal classification. The rates of local control (LC), disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients, 40 had Stage IIB and 58 had Stage IIIA. The clinical disease stage and N stage were significantly greater in those patients who underwent RT than in those who did not; however, no statistically significant differences were identified in the additional characteristics between those receiving and not receiving RT within each stage or nodal group. The overall 5-year actuarial LC rate was 81% in the RT group and 54% in the chemotherapy/surgery-alone group (p = 0.07). Postoperative RT significantly improved the 5-year LC rate in patients with Stage IIIA disease (from 35% to 82%, p = 0.01). Postoperative RT did not significantly improve the 5-year OS rate (30% with RT vs. 49% without) for all patients or for patients with Stage IIIA disease. The disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the treatment groups. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had a significantly greater 5-year OS rate (49%) than did those with stable or progressive disease (22%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative RT in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery significantly improved LC without improving OS. Significantly improved survival was observed in all patients who responded to induction chemotherapy compared with those with stable or progressive disease.

[Limitations and perspectives of postoperative radiotherapy in bronchial cancer]

The role of postoperative irradiation for lung cancer remains a controversial issue. The available data suggest a reduction in local relapse in cases of positive mediastinal lymph node, but how this benefit translates into survival is not known. The current indications include tumors with positive mediastinal lymph node and incomplete resection with micro- or macroscopical residue. Nevertheless, postoperative irradiation requires a meticulous technique to avoid inducing life-threatening complications to vital organs such as the heart or the lung.

The impact of surgical adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement

BACKGROUND

Previous nonsmall cell lung carcinoma studies have shown that patients with ipsilateral mediastinal (N2) lymph node involvement who underwent surgical resection have a greater local recurrence rate than those with less lymph node involvement (N0, N1). Therefore, it was hypothesized that complete surgical clearance of subclinical lymph node disease is difficult in N2 patients and that adjuvant postoperative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may be beneficial.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to determine the local recurrence and survival rates for patients with N2 disease undergoing complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant TRT. Between 1987 and 1993 at the Mayo Clinic, 224 patients underwent complete resection of N2 nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. More than one mediastinal lymph node station was sampled in 98% of patients; 39% then received adjuvant TRT (median dose, 50.4 grays).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 3.5 years for the patients who were alive at the time of the analysis. The surgery alone versus surgery plus TRT groups were well balanced with respect to gender, age, histology, tumor grade, number of mediastinal lymph node stations dissected or involved, and involved N1 lymph node number. There were slightly more patients with right lower lobe lesions (compared with other lobes), patients with multiple lobe involvement, and patients with only one N2 lymph node involved in the surgery alone group. After treatment with surgery alone, the actuarial 4-year local recurrence rate was 60%, compared with 17% for treatment with adjuvant TRT (P < 0.0001). The actuarial 4-year survival rate was 22% for treatment with surgery alone, compared with 43% for treatment with adjuvant TRT (P = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, the addition of TRT (P = 0.0001), absence of superior mediastinal lymph node involvement (P = 0.005), and fewer N1 lymph nodes involved (P = 0.02) were independently associated with improved survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which to the authors' knowledge is the largest evaluating adjuvant TRT in N2 nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, suggests that adjuvant TRT may improve local control and survival.

Non-small cell lung cancer at the extremes of age: impact on diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Early detection and surgical resection offers the highest likelihood of cure for patients with lung cancer. Patients presenting at the extremes of age may fail to benefit maximally from these interventions. To study the impact of age on stage, histology, symptom, and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, we undertook a retrospective review.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred two patients with non-small cell lung cancer were identified between 1983 and 1993. Patients were selected by age as less than 45 years (55 patients) and 80 years or more (108 patients), and their medical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

Three younger patients (6%) presented with stage I or II disease, yet 15 (32%) underwent thoracic operation. Twenty-seven elderly patients (33%) presented with early stage disease and only 6% underwent operation. The median survival was significantly longer for the younger population with surgically resectable stages of disease (stage I to IIIA) (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference in survival was seen for the two groups with advanced disease (stage IIIB and IV).

CONCLUSIONS

Age significantly affects the presentation and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Although thoracic operation imparts the greatest survival advantage, this benefit is diminished due to advanced disease in the younger patients and lack of surgical intervention in the elderly.

Radiation therapy for lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review current applications of radiation therapy in the treatment of persons with lung cancer, providing the scientific basis for nursing management of disease and treatment effects.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, book chapters, clinical trial data, and professional practice experience from the radiation oncology, radiobiology, and nursing literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy has an important role in lung cancer treatment, regardless of histopathologic type. Intent of radiation treatment may be to cure, control, or palliate the disease and its symptoms. Combined therapy (especially chemotherapy and radiation therapy) produces enhanced side effects as well as enhanced tumoricidal effect.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Disease and treatment effects in the patient with lung cancer are particularly challenging to patients, family members, and care providers. Nurses have a major responsibility in patient/ family education and in providing the supportive care and self-help techniques needed for patients treated with radiation therapy.

Concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy have shown improved survival in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiosensitization may improve local tumor control when chemotherapy is given concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy, but also may increase toxicity. A Phase I/II trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15, was designed to evaluate whether this strategy could improve survival with acceptable toxicity and be part of a Phase III trial of chemoradiation sequencing.

METHODS

Vinblastine (5 mg/M2 weekly x 5 weeks) and cisplatin (75 mg/M2 days 1, 29, and 50) were given during twice-daily irradiation (1.2 Gy, 6 hours apart) to 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions in 6 weeks. Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II (unresected) or IIIA-B NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status 70 or greater; there were no weight loss restrictions.

RESULTS

Of 42 eligible patients, 76% had greater than 5% weight loss, 45% had T4 primary tumors, and 62% were Stage IIIB. All protocol treatment was completed in 53%. Acute toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 19 of 42 (45%) having Grade 4 toxicity or higher, three (7%) with septic death. Ten of 42 (24%) had Grade 3 or higher esophagitis. There were two (4.7%) patients with Grade 3 or higher (1 lung and 1 esophagus) and two (4.7%) with Grade 4 or higher (1 lung and 1 hematologic) late toxicities. Median survival time was 12.2 months, with an overall 1-year survival of 54%, an estimated 2 year survival of 28% and a 1-year progression free survival of 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer, who were not selected on the basis of weight loss, concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy had more intense acute toxicity than hyperfractionation alone, but late toxicity was acceptable. One and 2-year survival rates were 54 and 28%, respectively.

A prospective randomized comparison of radiation therapy plus lonidamine versus radiation therapy plus placebo as initial treatment of clinically localized but nonresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

By means of a multicenter, prospective randomized, placebo-controlled study, to assess the impact of adding the radiation-enhancing agent lonidamine to standard "curative-intent" radiation therapy upon overall survival, progression-free survival, and local progression-free survival of patients with clinically localized but nonresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Lonidamine, or the lonidamine-placebo, was administered at a dose of 265 mg/m2 in three divided daily doses. Drug therapy began 2 days prior to the initiation of radiation therapy and continued until progression of disease mandated a change in therapy. The radiation therapy dose was 55-60 Gy, at a daily dose of 1.8 Gy and five treatments per week. Patients with clinical Stage II or III nonsmall cell lung cancer were stratified within the treatment center, and within two histologic strata: epidermoid vs. other nonsmall cell cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were enlisted on study, 152 on the placebo arm and 158 on the lonidamine arm. The median survival durations were 326 days and 392 days for the placebo and lonidamine-treated groups respectively, p = 0.41 for a comparison of the survival curves. Median progression-free survival and median local progression-free survival durations were 197 days and 341 days for placebo + radiation therapy vs. 230 days and 300 days for lonidamine + radiation therapy; p-values for the respective curves were 0.75 and 0.42. Although there were proportionately more lonidamine-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrating continued local control in excess of 12 months, the numbers of patients still at risk after 24 months were too small for meaningful statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter Phase III study failed to demonstrate a significant advantage in the lonidamine-treated population in overally patient survival, in progression-free survival, or in the median duration of local control.

Inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 427 patients treated with high-dose radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The influence of patient and treatment characteristics on survival as well as normal tissue toxicity were retrospectively analyzed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four hundred twenty seven patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer received at least 60 Gy and two-thirds were treated with 70 Gy.

RESULTS

Five-year survival rates and median survival time (95% confidence interval) were 2 +/- 2% (mean +/- s.e.) and 11.1 months (9.1-14.5) after 60-66 Gy (median 60 Gy); 8 +/- 2% and 14.9 months (13.3-16.5) after > or = 70 Gy (p = 0.0013). Stage I-II patients had significantly higher survival rates as compared to Stage III patients (p = 0.0015). Within the subgroup of Stage III patients those with Stage IIIA had significantly higher survival rates than Stage IIIB (p = 0.0167). Female patients achieved 5-year survival rates after 70 Gy of 15 +/- 7% as compared to only 7 +/- 2% of their male counterparts. Chemotherapy, histology, Karnofsky status, and age had no influence on survival after univariate and multivariate analysis. Nine percent and 11% of the patients suffered from moderate to severe pneumonitis and esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

High-dose radiotherapy of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer with total doses > 60 Gy conventionally fractionated is feasible. With doses of > or = 70 Gy significantly higher survival rates were achieved as compared to 60-66 Gy. Normal tissue toxicity was acceptable. For Stage IIIB patients, however, treatment results are disappointingly low even after 70 Gy with no 5-year survivor.

The long-term outcome after radical radiotherapy for advanced localized non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

The incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastases and intercurrent disease was observed in 76 patients with advanced localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) entered into a pilot study of CHART. Patients were treated between January 1985 and March 1990 and have a median follow-up of 62 months. All patients had advanced, apparently localized, NSCLC and 76% were considered to show mediastinal involvement. Serial computed tomographic (CT) scans were used to assess patients' response to treatment, allowing us to determine the contribution of locoregional disease to death. Locoregional control was achieved in 32 (42%) of the 76 patients, with the figure falling to 23% at 2 years. Metastatic disease was demonstrated in 44 patients and, once detected, the median survival time was 3.8 months. Overall median survival for the group was 12.8 months, with patients attaining locoregional control faring better, with a median survival of 27.9 months compared with 9.9 months for those who did not achieve locoregional control. The life-tables show a 52% survival probability at 1 year for the whole group, but those attaining locoregional control showed a 75% survival probability compared with 39% for patients failing to achieve complete regression; these figures fell to 62% and 6% respectively at 2 years. To date, six patients remain alive and without evidence of disease at any site, and death has occurred in 12 without evidence of locoregional disease. The remaining 58 patients died with locoregional disease, with 35 also showing evidence of distant metastases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)