Stage III ovarian carcinoma: an analysis of treatment results and complications following hyperfractionated abdominopelvic irradiation for salvage

Consolidation Radiation Therapy following Cytoreductive Surgery, Chemotherapy and Second-Look Laparotomy for Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Long-Term Follow-Up

Background

From 1979-1987, 139 stage IC-IV ovarian cancer patients who had undergone cytoreductive surgery received 6-11 cycles of cisplatin and adriamycin.

Study design

Eighty-four clinically complete responders underwent second-look laparotomy, and 60 of them received consolidation abdominal irradiation. The patients were then followed for a median follow-up of 39 months.

Results

Five- and 10-year actuarial survival for all patients was 43% and 24%, for no residuum at primary surgery, 80% and 35%, for residual tumor <2 cm, 45% and 35%, and for residual tumor >2 cm, 20% and 4%. Median survival for stage III-IV patients negative at second-look laparotomy was 72 months in irradiated compared to 25 months in non-irradiated patients (P = 0.14) and 77 months in irradiated patients with microscopic disease at second-look laparotomy. Median survival in patients with macroscopic disease at second-look laparotomy was 23.5 months if irradiated compared to 18 months if not (P = 0.05).

Conclusions

Consolidation whole abdominal irradiation in advanced stages of ovarian cancer may be of value in patients with negative or microscopic disease at second-look laparotomy. Unfortunately, despite the initial survival advantage observed in irradiated patients, owing to late recurrences there was no significant difference in their long-term survival probability.

Whole-abdomen radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using twice-daily fractionation

PURPOSE

To report the tolerability and efficacy of twice-daily whole-abdomen irradiation (WAI) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 123 patients treated for NHL with WAI, 37% received previous chemotherapy, 28% received WAI as part of comprehensive lymphatic irradiation (CLI), and 32% received WAI for palliation. The median dose to the whole abdomen was 25.0 Gy, followed by a median tumor boost of 9.8 Gy in 58 patients. Fractionation was 1.0 Gy once daily (54%) or 0.8 Gy twice daily (46%). Blood counts were measured weekly.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, local control was 72% and overall survival was 55% at 5 years. Median time of WAI was 42 days for once-daily treatment and 32 days for twice-daily treatment. Patients receiving twice-daily WAI did not have a significantly higher rate of acute side effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, platelet or red blood cell toxicity). Overall, acute thrombocytopenia was the most frequent side effect of treatment; 24 of 96 patients (25%) with available hematologic data had Grade 3+ toxicity. There was no acute Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and no late small bowel obstruction. Multiple regression indicated that patients with four or less involved sites and disease size < or =6 cm had improved local control and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-daily WAI using 0.8 Gy/fraction does not appear to have any greater toxicity compared with once-daily treatment using 1 Gy/fraction. Small doses per fraction (0.8-1 Gy/fx) are effective, tolerated well in the acute setting, and associated with a low rate of late toxicity.

Effective palliative radiation therapy in advanced and recurrent ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review our experience using radiation therapy as a palliative treatment in ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty patients who received radiation therapy for ovarian carcinoma between 1983 and 1998 were reviewed. The indications for radiation therapy, radiation therapy techniques, details, tolerance, and response were recorded. A complete response required complete resolution of the patient's symptoms, radiographic findings, palpable mass, or CA-125 level. A partial response required at least 50% resolution of these parameters. The actuarial survival rates from initial diagnosis and from the completion of radiation therapy were calculated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 67 years (range 26 to 90 years). A median of one laparotomy was performed before irradiation. Zero to 20 cycles of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were delivered before irradiation (median = 6 cycles). The reasons for palliative treatment were: pain (n = 22), mass (n = 23), obstruction of ureter, rectum, esophagus, or stomach (n = 12), a positive second-look laparotomy (n = 9), ascites (n = 8), vaginal bleeding (n = 6), rectal bleeding (n = 1), lymphedema (n = 3), skin involvement (n = 1), or brain metastases with symptoms (n = 11). Some patients received treatment for more than one indication. Treatment was directed to the abdomen or pelvis in 64 patients, to the brain in 11, and to other sites in 5. The overall response rate was 73%. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced a complete response of their symptoms, palpable mass, and/or CA-125 level. Forty-five percent had a partial response. Only 11% suffered progressive disease during therapy that required discontinuation of the treatment. Sixteen percent had stable disease. The duration of the responses and stable disease lasted until death except in 10 patients who experienced recurrence of their symptoms between 1 and 21 months (median = 9 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates from diagnosis were 89%, 73%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The survival rates calculated from the completion of radiotherapy were 39%, 27%, 13%, and 10%, respectively. Five percent of patients experienced Grade 3 diarrhea, vomiting, myelosuppression, or fatigue. Fourteen percent of patients experienced Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, 19% experienced Grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting, and 11% had Grade 1 or 2 myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of radiation therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma, the response, survival, and tolerance rates compare favorably to those reported for current second- and third-line chemotherapy regimens. Cooperative groups should consider evaluating prospectively the use of radiation therapy before nonplatinum and/or nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy in these patients.

Consolidative 32P after second-look laparotomy for ovarian carcinoma

We report our experience with consolidative 32P after second-look laparotomy. Forty-three patients received consolidative 32P after platinum-based chemotherapy and a negative (39 patients, 91%) or positive (4 patients) second-look laparotomy. Thirty-one patients (72%) initially had stage III (30 patients) or stage IV (1 patient) disease; 28 patients (65%) had grade 3 tumors. Patients had follow-up from 3.5 to 14.9 years (median, 7.7 years); no patient was lost to follow-up. The 5-year rates of control of disease within the abdomen (local control) for the overall group and the subset of patients with stage II-IV disease and a negative second-look laparotomy were 65% and 69%, respectively. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 78 and 81%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that tumor found at second-look laparotomy significantly influenced the likelihood of local control and cause-specific survival. Acute side effects included cellulitis (1 patient) and ileus (3 patients). Two patients (5%) experienced severe late complications; both experienced small bowel obstruction that necessitated surgical intervention. Consolidative 32P appears to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival after negative second-look laparotomy. The risk of significant complications is low.

Clinical radioimmunotherapy

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a promising new therapy for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. General principles of RIT are discussed, including important considerations in the selection of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) and radionuclides for RIT. Results of clinical trials using RIT for the treatment of lymphoma, leukemia, and solid tumors are summarized. The results from many of these trials are promising, especially for the treatment of lymphohematopoietic malignancies, in which a variety of MAb, radionuclides, and study designs have resulted in high response rates with a number of durable responses. Encouraging results have also been obtained using RIT to treat some solid tumors, primarily in patients with relatively low tumor burdens. RIT is generally well tolerated, with the primary toxicity being transient reversible myelosuppression in most nonmyeloablative studies. Nonhematologic toxicity, especially at nonmyeloablative doses, has been minimal in most studies. Approaches for increasing the therapeutic index of RIT are reviewed, which may further potentiate the efficacy and decrease the toxicity of RIT.

Integrating radiation therapy in the curative management of ovarian cancer: current issues and future directions

Although important advances in surgery, chemotherapy (CT), and radiation therapy (RT) have been made, overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) has not changed significantly. Despite its long history in the treatment of OC and its proven curative role in patients with microscopic or minimal residual disease, the proper role of RT in the management of OC is not clearly established. Although the use of primary adjuvant RT (whole abdominal irradiation) has declined in the last 15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in RT as part of a combined modality approach and as salvage therapy for patients with small-volume persistent disease after primary cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based CT. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of RT alone or combined with chemotherapy as primary adjuvant therapy or in the salvage setting. Current issues in the radiotherapeutic management are discussed along with ideas for future clinical research directions.

Superfractionation as a potential hypoxic cell radiosensitizer: prediction of an optimum dose per fraction

PURPOSE

A dose "window of opportunity" has been identified in an earlier modeling study (1) if the inducible repair variant of the LQ model is adopted instead of the pure LQ model, and if all survival curve parameters are equally modified by the presence or absence of oxygen. In this paper we have extended the calculations to consider survival curve parameters from 15 sets of data obtained for cells tested at low doses using clonogenic assays.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A simple computer model has been used to simulate the response of each cell line to various doses per fraction in multifraction schedules, with oxic and hypoxic cells receiving the same fractional dose. We have then used pairs of simulated survival curves to estimate the effective hypoxic protection (OER') as a function of the dose per fraction.

RESULTS

The resistance of hypoxic cells is reduced by using smaller doses per fraction than 2 Gy in all these fractionated clinical simulations, whether using a simple LQ model, or the more complex LQ/IR model. If there is no inducible repair, the optimum dose is infinitely low. If there is inducible repair, there is an optimum dose per fraction at which hypoxic protection is minimized. This is usually around 0.5 Gy. It depends on the dose needed to induce repair being higher in hypoxia than in oxygen. The OER' may even go below unity, i.e. hypoxic cells may be more sensitive than oxic cells.

CONCLUSIONS

If oxic and hypoxic cells are repeatedly exposed to doses of the same magnitude, as occurs in clinical radiotherapy, the observed hypoxic protection varies with the fractional dose. The OER' is predicted to diminish at lower doses in all cell lines. The loss of hypoxic resistance with superfractionation is predicted to be proportional to the capacity of the cells to induce repair, i.e. their intrinsic radioresistance at a dose of 2 Gy.

Hyperfractionation: where do we stand?

Hyperfractionation is generally expected to allow an escalation of total dose, thereby increasing tumour control rate, without increasing the risk of late complications. The purpose of this review is to assess the empirical evidence for this therapeutic gain from hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Although extensive clinical data have been accumulated until now, especially on treatment of head and neck cancer, the line of evidence is not consistent. The present analysis indicates that the dose per fraction generally used in standard radiotherapy is already a good choice.

Chemotherapy, early surgical reassessment, and hyperfractionated abdominal radiotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer: results of a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes and treatment toxicities in patients with optimal (< or = 1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma treated with three courses of cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, surgical reassessment (SRA), and hyperfractionated whole abdominal irradiation (WAI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two eligible patients entered this prospective Phase II study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Disease characteristics were as follows: age range, 32-76 years (median 58); Stage IIIA (n = 1, 2%), IIIB (n = 2, 5%), IIIC (n = 39, 93%); histology-serous papillary (n = 21, 50%); other (n = 21, 50%); Grade 1 (n = 1, 2%); 2 (n = 14, 33%); 3 (n = 27, 54%); residual disease after initial surgery (present: n = 23, 55%; absent: n = 19, 45%). Five patients progressed while on chemotherapy, could not be effectively cytoreduced, and were not eligible for WAI. Of the remaining 37 patients, 35 received WAI. Surgical reassessment was not performed in five patients.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients with known SRA status after chemotherapy, 21 (57%) were grossly positive, 4 (11%) were microscopically positive, and 12 (32%) were negative. Based on measurements recorded following initial laparotomy and surgical reassessment, progression during chemotherapy was noted in 40%, stage disease in 37%, and objective response in 23%. Toxicity during hyperfractionated WAI was limited and reversible. No patient beginning WAI failed to complete or required a significant treatment break. Following WAI, six patients underwent laparotomies for abdominal symptoms; five had recurrent disease. Five additional patients were managed conservatively for small bowel obstruction (SBO) or malabsorption, of whom three subsequently developed recurrence. Twenty-two patients having pelvic boosts were significantly more likely to require management for gastrointestinal morbidity (p = 0.0021). Considering all eligible patients, median disease-free and overall survivals were 18.5 and 39 months, respectively. Considering patients completing chemotherapy and WAI, median disease-free and overall survivals were 24 and 46 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

(a) Disease progression occurred within three cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in 40% of patients with optimal (< or = 1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma. (b) Following limited chemotherapy, hyper-fractionated WAI was acutely well tolerated. (c) Late radiation-related toxicity was observed in only three patients (8.6%) in the absence of recurrent disease. Late gastrointestinal morbidity was significantly associated with the administration of a pelvic radiotherapy (RT) boost. (d) Short duration chemotherapy followed by SRA and hyperfractionated WAI without a pelvic boost is a promising management option for patients with optimal Stage III ovarian cancer. A Phase III trial will be necessary to determine how this treatment strategy compares with chemotherapy or RT alone in this patient population.