Simultaneous adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer--toxicity and dose modification: a Transtasman Radiation Oncology Group Multi-Institution study

Concurrent Radiotherapy Does Not Affect Adjuvant CMF Delivery but is Associated with Increased Toxicity in Women with Early Breast Cancer

We evaluated whether concurrent radiotherapy (RT) affected delivery and toxicity of adjuvant intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) in women with operable breast cancer. The medical charts of 321 consecutive breast cancer patients who received CMF either alone for 6 cycles, or for 4 cycles following of an anthracycline (A-CMF) were reviewed. One hundred forty-four women underwent radiotherapy concurrently with CMF. Optimal CMF delivery (success as opposite to failure) was defined as the combined achievement of an average relative dose intensity (aRDI) > or = 85% and an average percent of the total dose (aPTD) > or = 90% for the three drugs in the CMF regimen. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent-RT did not affect CMF delivery (OR for success 1.391 p=0.230). The sequential A-CMF regimen (OR for success 0.208, 95% C.I. 0.120-0.360, p<0.001) and age > or = 56 (OR for success 0.351, 95% C.I. 0.200-0.161, p<0.001) were independently associated with suboptimal CMF delivery. Moreover, concurrent RT was independently associated with increased leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, upper abdominal pain, mucositis and fatigue. Our retrospective analysis suggests that concurrent-RT has no impact on optimal CMF delivery, but it increases the burden of CMF-related toxicity.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgery for localised breast cancer, radiotherapy (RT) improves both local control and breast cancer-specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different sequencing of adjuvant CT and RT for women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

An updated search was carried out in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register (20 May 2011), MEDLINE (14 December 2011), EMBASE (20 May 2011) and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (20 May 2011). Details of the search strategy and methods of coding for the Specialised Register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. We extracted studies that had been coded as 'early', 'chemotherapy' and 'radiotherapy'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating different sequencing of CT and RT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the eligibility and quality of the identified studies and extracted data from the published reports of the included trials. We derived odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) from the available numerical data. Toxicity data were extracted, where reported. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and conducted analyses on the basis of the method of sequencing of the two treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials reporting two different sequencing comparisons were identified. There were no significant differences between the various methods of sequencing adjuvant therapy for local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, relapse-free survival and metastasis-free survival based on 1166 randomised women in three trials. Concurrent chemoradiation increased anaemia (OR 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.15), telangiectasia (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.37 to 10.87) and pigmentation (OR 15.96; 95% CI 2.06 to 123.68). Treated women did not report worse cosmesis with concurrent chemoradiation but physician-reported assessments did (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.42 to 3.07). Other measures of toxicity did not differ between the two types of sequencing. On the basis of one trial (244 women), RT before CT was associated with an increased risk of neutropenic sepsis (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.26 to 6.98) compared with CT before RT, but other measures of toxicity did not differ.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data included in this review, from three well-conducted randomised trials, suggest that different methods of sequencing CT and RT do not appear to have a major effect on recurrence or survival for women with breast cancer if RT is commenced within seven months after surgery.

Concomitant adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with anthracycline-based regimens in breast cancer: a single centre experience

PURPOSE

This study was done to evaluate the toxicity related to concurrent radiotherapy and anthracycline (AC)-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer and to investigate the impact of treatment interruptions and the feasibility of this uncommon therapeutic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2002 to December 2007, 60 patients were treated at our Centre. The mean age at presentation was 48.5 (range 38-64) years. All patients underwent conservative surgery, and radiotherapy to the entire breast (mean dose 50 Gy; range 46-52 Gy). AC-based regimens consisted of four cycles of AC (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) or four cycles of epirubicin (EPI) followed by four courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).

RESULTS

Concomitant treatment caused acute skin G3 toxicity in 8.9% of patients and one case of G4 toxicity (1.7%). Concerning cardiac assessment, six of the 56 evaluable patients (10.7%) developed an asymptomatic decline of left ventricular ejection fraction >10% and <20% of the baseline value. Radiotherapy was temporarily stopped in 21.3% and chemotherapy in 57.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, concomitant chemotherapy did not emerge as a significant factor in radiotherapy interruption. Moreover, no severe cardiac events were recorded.

Evidence based radiation oncology: Breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is, similar to surgery, a local treatment. In the case of breast cancer, it is generally given after conservative or after more extensive, tumour and patient adapted, surgery. The target volumes can be the breast and/or the thoracic wall and/or the regional lymph node areas. The integration and the extent of radiotherapy as part of the comprehensive treatment of the breast cancer patient, including the amount of surgery and the sequencing with the systemic treatments, has to be well discussed with all medical specialists involved in treating breast cancer on a multidisciplinary basis. Guidelines for the appropriate prescription and execution of radiotherapy are of utmost importance. However, individualisation based on the individual patients' and tumours' characteristics should always be envisaged.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a review of the literature the level of evidence that is available for the indications for radiotherapy is summarised, as well as the main clinical questions that are unanswered today. An overview of the recent and ongoing clinical trails in breast cancer will highlight some of the current ongoing debates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of breast cancer, radiotherapy, given after as well conservative as extensive risk-adapted surgery, significantly reduces the risk of local and regional recurrences. Especially for patients with an intermediate to high absolute risk for local recurrences, a positive influence on overall survival has been shown, notably when appropriate radiotherapy techniques are used. Most important is that the best results that we can offer to our breast cancer patients for all clinical endpoints (local and regional control; quality of life; cosmetic results; survival) can be obtained by a multidisciplinary and patient-oriented approach, involving all those involved in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Feasibility of concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequence of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) remains uncertain after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The current study was performed to evaluate whether the concurrent RT with CT increases the toxicities.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with stages I and II breast cancers were prospectively allocated to concurrent CT and RT (n = 133) and sequential CT and RT (n = 105) after BCS. In the sequential group, RT was started after the completion of three cycles of CT and additional three cycles of CT were delivered after RT.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during CT between the two groups. Radiation related adverse effects were not different between the two groups. During the median follow-up period of 42 months (range: 16-60 months), 18 patients (13.5%) of the concurrent group had systemic recurrence of breast cancer, whereas 20 patients (19.1%) of the sequential group had systemic recurrence. Disease-free survival and local recurrence were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent CT and RT were not associated with increased toxicity and showed reasonable cosmetic results. The current study indicates that concurrent RT and CT after BCS is a feasible treatment modality with an advantage of shortening the treatment time.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgery for localised breast cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy improves both local control and breast cancer specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer is not clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialized Register (10 March 2005). Details of the search strategy and methods of coding are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. We extracted studies that had been coded as 'early', 'chemotherapy' and 'radiotherapy'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating different sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the eligibility and quality of the identified studies and extracted data from the published reports of the included studies. We derived odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios from the available numerical data. Hazard ratios were extracted directly from text. Toxicity data were extracted, where reported. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and conducted analyses on the basis of the method of sequencing of the two treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials reporting two different sequencing comparisons were identified. There were no significant differences between the various methods of sequencing adjuvant therapy for survival, distant metastases or local recurrence, based on 853 randomised patients in two trials. One of these two trials (647 women) provided data on toxicity. Haematological toxicity (OR 1.43, confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 2.03) and oesophageal toxicity (OR 1.44, CI 1.03 to 2.02) were significantly increased with concurrent therapy, and nausea and vomiting were significantly decreased (OR 0.70, CI 0.50 to 0.98). Other measures of toxicity did not differ between the two types of sequencing. On the basis of one trial (244 women), radiotherapy before chemotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of neutropenic sepsis (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.26 to 6.98) compared with chemotherapy before radiotherapy, but other measures of toxicity were not significantly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data included in this review, from three well conducted randomised trials, suggest that different methods of sequencing chemotherapy and radiotherapy do not appear to have a major effect on survival or recurrence for women with breast cancer if radiation therapy is commenced within 7 months after surgery.

La chimiothérapie concomitante de la radiothérapie augmente la toxicité tardive après chirurgie conservatrice du cancer du sein

PURPOSE

In 1996, a multicenter randomized study comparing after breast-conservative surgery, sequential vs concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with radiation therapy (RT) was initiated (ARCOSEIN study). Seven hundred sixteen patients were included in this trial. After a median follow-up of 6.7 (4.3-9) years, we decided to prospectively evaluate the late effects of these two strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 297 patients were asked to follow-up from the five larger including institutions. Seventy-two percent (214 patients) were eligible for late toxicity. After breast-conserving surgery with axillary dissection, patients were treated either with sequential treatment with CT first followed by RT (arm A) or CT administered concurrently with RT (arm B). In all patients, CT regimen combined mitoxantrone (12 mg/m(2)), 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)), 6 cycles (day 1-day 21). In arm B, patients received concurrently the first 3 cycles of CT with RT. In arm A, RT started 3 to 5 weeks after the 6th cycle of CT. Conventional RT was delivered to the whole breast using a 2 Gy-fraction protocol to a total dose of 50 Gy (+/-boost to the primary tumour bed). The assessment of toxicity was blinded to treatment and was graded by the radiation oncologist according to the LENT-SOMA scale. Skin pigmentation was also evaluated using a personal 5-points scoring system (excellent, good, moderate, poor, very poor).

RESULTS

Among the 214 evaluated patients, 107 were treated in each arm. The two populations were homogeneous for patients', tumors' and treatment characteristics. Subcutaneous fibrosis (SF), telengectasia (T), skin pigmentation (SP), and breast atrophy (BA) were significantly increased in arm B. Twenty patients experienced grade superior or equal to 2 (SF) in arm B vs five in arm A (P=0.003). Twenty-five and seven patients showed grade superior or equal to 2 (T) in arm B and A, respectively (P=0.001). Forty-four and twenty patients showed grade superior or equal to 2 (BA) in arm B and A, respectively (P=0.0006). Thirty patients experienced grade superior or equal to 3 (SP) in arm B vs fifteen in arm A (P=0.02). No statistical difference was observed between the two arms concerning grade superior or equal to 2 pain, breast oedema, and lymphoedema. No deaths were caused by late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Following breast conserving surgery, the concurrent use of CT with RT is significantly associated with an increase incidence of grade 2 or greater late side effects.

Concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery enhances late toxicities: Long-term results of the ARCOSEIN multicenter randomized study

PURPOSE

In 1996, a multicenter randomized study was initiated that compared sequential vs. concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (ARCOSEIN study). After a median follow-up of 6.7 years (range, 4.3-9 years), we decided to prospectively evaluate the late effects of these 2 strategies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 297 patients from the 5 larger participating institutions were asked to report for a follow-up examination. Seventy-two percent (214 patients) were eligible for evaluation of late toxicity. After breast-conserving surgery, patients were treated either with sequential treatment with CT first followed by RT (Arm A) or CT administered concurrently with RT (Arm B). In all patients, CT regimen consisted of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2), 5-FU (500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), 6 cycles (Day 1 to Day 21). Conventional RT was delivered to the whole breast by administration of a 2 Gy per fraction protocol to a total dose of 50 Gy (+/- boost to the primary tumor bed). The assessment of toxicity was blinded to treatment and was graded by the radiation oncologist, according to the LENT/SOMA scale. Skin pigmentation was also evaluated according to a personal 5-points scoring system (excellent, good, moderate, poor, very poor).

RESULTS

Among the 214 evaluable patients, 107 were treated in each arm. The 2 populations were homogeneous for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Subcutaneous fibrosis (SF), telangectasia (T), skin pigmentation (SP), and breast atrophy (BA) were significantly increased in Arm B. No statistical difference was observed between the 2 arms of the study concerning Grade 2 or higher pain, breast edema, or lymphedema. No deaths were caused by late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

After breast-conserving surgery, the concurrent use of CT with RT is significantly associated with an increase incidence of Grade 2 or greater late side effects.

A phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in operable node-positive breast cancer: final results

PURPOSE

To compare concomitant and sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in node-positive, operable breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a randomized, French, multicenter, phase III trial enrolling 638 eligible women with prior breast surgery and positive axillary dissection. Patients in Arm A received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 12 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with concomitant radiotherapy (50 Gy +/- 10-20-Gy boost). Patients in Arm B received 500 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil, 60 mg/m2 epirubicin, and 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with subsequent radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

Median treatment durations were 64 and 126 days (Arms A and B, respectively), with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival favored patients with conservative surgery (two thirds of the population), with less local and/or regional recurrence in Arm A than in Arm B (3% vs. 9%; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis in this subgroup showed a 2.8-fold increased risk of locoregional recurrence with sequential chemoradiotherapy, independent of other prognostic factors (p = 0.027). Febrile neutropenia and Grade 3-4 leukopenia were significantly more frequent in Arm A. Subclinical left ventricular ejection fraction events at 1 year were more frequent with concomitant radiotherapy (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant radiotherapy with adjuvant fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide has significantly better locoregional control in node-positive breast cancer after conservative surgery and 50% shorter treatment, albeit with slightly more acute toxicity. With mitoxantrone no longer available for adjuvant breast cancer treatment, alternative concomitant chemoradiotherapy studies are needed.

Delaying Radiotherapy for the Delivery of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Combined Modality Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Is It Disadvantageous and Could Combined Treatment be the Answer?

Women with early stage breast cancer are increasingly being treated with both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The optimal sequence of these two treatment modalities is yet to be defined. It remains controversial whether delaying radiotherapy in order to deliver chemotherapy compromises local disease control and survival. Consequently, clinical practice in the UK is divided, with a number of different combination schedules being used in an effort to bring forward the start of radiotherapy. In practice, however, any benefit in local control must be balanced against a potential increase in toxicity. A review of the current literature on the effect of radiotherapy delay is presented, together with data on the toxicity of combined chemo-radiotherapy schedules and recent data from clinical trials designed to determine the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy With Cytoprotection Combined With Trastuzumab, Liposomal Doxorubicine, and Docetaxel in c-erbB-2???Positive Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Trastuzumab, an antic-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody, has become a standard component of chemotherapy for c-erbB-2-positive advanced breast carcinoma. Despite the experimental evidence of its radiosensitizing properties, trastuzumab has never been used in combination with radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with c-erbB-2-positive locally advanced chemoresistant (7 patients) or with high-risk breast cancer (15 patients) were recruited in a treatment protocol combining hypofractionated/accelerated radiotherapy (hypoARC) supported with high-dose amifostine (1000 mg subcutaneous), concurrently with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Thirteen of these patients (including all 7 inoperable cases) received concurrently chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel (25 mg/m2 and 40 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, respectively).

RESULTS

Administration of trastuzumab together with highly accelerated amifostine-supported radiotherapy was feasible without an increase in early and late radiation toxicity. This was obtained despite the concurrent administration of aggressive chemotherapy. Complete responses were noted in 5 of 7 patients with locally, often far advanced, chemoresistant disease. None of the complete responders or the 15 high-risk breast cancer patients relapsed within the 3- to 26-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of trastuzumab in the radiochemotherapy protocols for breast cancer does not increase radiation or systemic toxicity. The concurrent administration of aggressive radiotherapy with docetaxel and liposomal doxorubicin is feasible when supported with amifostine. The value of such regimens in the treatment of locally advanced or high risk c-erbB-2 positive breast cancer patients deserves further evaluation.

A cosmetic evaluation of breast cancer treatment: A randomized study of radiotherapy boost technique

PURPOSE

To compare cosmetic results of two different radiotherapy (RT) boost techniques used in the treatment of breast cancer after whole breast radiotherapy and to identify factors affecting cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1996 and 1998, 142 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer were treated with breast conservative surgery and adjuvant RT. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive a boost dose of 15 Gy delivered to the tumor bed either by iridium 192, or a combination of photons and electrons. Cosmetic evaluations were done on a 6-month basis, with a final evaluation at 36 months after RT. The evaluations were done using a panel of global and specific subjective scores, a digitized scoring system using the breast retraction assessment (BRA) measurement, and a patient's self-assessment evaluation. As cosmetic results were graded according to severity, the comparison of boost techniques was done using the ordinal logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented.

RESULTS

At 36 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the global subjective cosmetic outcome (OR = 1.40; 95%CI = 0.69-2.85, p = 0.35). Good to excellent scores were observed in 65% of implant patients and 62% of photon/electron patients. At 24 months and beyond, telangiectasia was more severe in the implant group with an OR of 9.64 (95%CI = 4.05-22.92, p < 0.0001) at 36 months. The only variable associated with a worse global cosmetic outcome was the presence of concomitant chemotherapy (OR = 3.87; 95%CI = 1.74-8.62). The BRA value once adjusted for age, concomitant chemotherapy, and boost volume showed a positive association with the boost technique. The BRA value was significantly greater in the implant group (p = 0.03). There was no difference in the patient's final self-assessment score between the two groups. Three variables were statistically associated with an adverse self-evaluation: an inferior quadrant tumor localization, postoperative hematoma, and concomitant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this trial showed that at 36 months of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the overall global cosmetic scores between the implant boost group and the photon/electron boost group, telangiectasia was more severe and the BRA value was greater in the implant group.

Improving the accuracy of a photographic assessment system for breast cosmesis

AIMS

To determine how the accuracy of a photographic system for cosmetic assessment of the breast after conserving treatment can be maximised.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Photographs of 40 women undergoing breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer were taken. Upward and lateral retraction was measured using a digitiser to enter the locations of reference marks on the photographs into a computer programme. In the readings produced, reduction in three potential sources of variation was considered by determining how few repeated photographs or measures were necessary to achieve an estimate within +/-2 mm of a mean value obtained from a large series. These included variation between assessments of the same photograph, between different photographs of the same patient and between different observers. We also sought to determine whether the attachment of white nipple markers (WNM) at the time of photography would reduce variation.

RESULTS

A minimum of five readings was required from each photograph in order to obtain a result that was stable (defined as within 1 mm of that achieved by 20 readings). Using similar criteria, we found that at least four photographs of each patient were required, and that each should be assessed by at least four observers. The addition of WNM reduced the standard deviations by 36-45%.

CONCLUSION

The use of WNM, which is simple, quick and cheap, is effective in reducing variation and can be recommended for use in clinical trials where overhead costs need to be contained.

Successful treatment of radiation induced breast ulcer with hyperbaric oxygen

The purpose of this report was to investigate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the management of a persisting radiation induced ulcer following standard breast irradiation. A 57-year-old Caucasian patient was referred following partial mastectomy and axillary node clearance for a T2N0 grade 3 infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the left breast. She received 45 Gy in 25 fractions at 1.8 Gy per fraction to the isocentre to the whole breast using tangential fields and 4 MV photons, in conjunction with intravenous chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5 fluorouracil). Treatment was interrupted for 3.5 weeks because of a grade 4 skin and subcutaneous reaction. Treatment resumed to the tumour bed alone. Chemotherapy was abandoned. The tumour bed received 14 Gy in 7 fractions at 2 Gy per fraction prescribed to the 100% using 10 MeV electrons and a direct field, completing treatment on 7 July 1998. The radiation induced a painful 8x4 cm ulcer which persisted in spite of rigorous treatment including Gentian Violet, Silvazine Cream, Duoderm and antibiotics. The patient received 30 hyperbaric treatments, six times a week, completing treatment on 15 December 1998. The patient required insertion of bilateral ear grommets under local anaesthetic. The breast ulcer showed a response to treatment with early healing after 7-8 days and clinical evidence of re-epithelization. At completion of 30 treatments the patient was left with a small shallow faintly discharging multilocular 3-4 cm ulcer. The ulcer had completely healed by 14 January 1999. The patient has been symptom free since completion of treatment. This report highlights the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of persisting radiation-induced ulcers.

Irradiation et chimiothérapie concomitante après chirurgie pour cancer du sein

In breast cancer, radiation therapy improves local control rate and survival. When chemotherapy and radiation are indicated the sequencing of the two treatments is still controversial. Several studies have suggested that adjuvant radiotherapy could be safely delayed until adjuvant chemotherapy was completed. Other studies, most of them retrospective, pointed out that a delay in the initiation of radiotherapy to give chemotherapy first, will result in a increased rate of local recurrence. Concomitant administration of the two treatments is an alternative. Pilot studies have suggested the feasibility of simultaneous administration using selected regimen as CMF or FNC. A randomized phase III trials has been conducted to compare sequential treatment with chemotherapy first and radiation versus concomitant treatments. Preliminary results of this study are presented.

Acute toxicity of concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CMF or AC) in breast cancer patients. a prospective, comparative, non-randomised study

The concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer treatment might lead to an increased incidence of side-effects. In this prospective, non-randomised, comparative study, the acute toxicity of radiotherapy alone (RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC/RT) and radiotherapy concurrent with cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF/RT) was compared. We used the common toxicity criteria (CTC) to score the level of acute toxicity before, during and 6 months after the completion of the period of irradiation. The number of hospital admissions, as well as the compliance of chemotherapy, were noted. We observed that patients treated with AC/RT and CMF/RT had significant higher incidences of (high-grade) skin-toxicity, oesophagitis, dyspnoea, malaise, anorexia, nausea and hospital admission compared with those treated with RT only. The target-volume of radiotherapy was the main predictor of (high-grade) acute skin toxicity and oesophagitis. AC/RT was associated with significant more (high-grade) skin toxicity than CMF/RT. The dose of chemotherapy was reduced to less than 85% of the planned dose in 11% of patients, 17% of patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy needed admission to hospital. From the results of our study, we conclude that the concurrent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy leads to an unacceptably high level of acute toxicity.

Concurrent sequencing of full-dose CMF chemotherapy and radiation therapy in early breast cancer has no effect on treatment delivery

With the increasing use of breast-conserving therapy plus systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of early breast cancer, the optimal sequencing of radiation therapy and chemotherapy remains controversial. Sequencing of therapy may influence not only treatment delivery, but control rates, complications and cosmesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether concurrent sequencing of standard doses of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) and adjuvant radiation therapy for early breast cancer impacted on optimum treatment delivery. As both an intravenous (i.v.) 3-week regimen and classic (standard) CMF were utilised in this study, both types of CMF were compared. The effect of sequencing on complications and treatment delays were also assessed. 116 patients treated with CMF chemotherapy and adjuvant tangent breast radiation were studied. 73 patients were treated prospectively with concurrent therapy and were retrospectively compared with a matched group of 40 patients treated with sequential or sandwich therapy. All patients had stage 1 or 2 cancers. There were no planned dose reductions introduced for either treatment modality. Concurrent sequencing had no impact on the ability to deliver optimum radiation or chemotherapy doses. There was no significant difference in acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) skin reactions or complications between the two groups. Although small, there was a significant delay (1.32 days (0-15 versus 0.36 (0-7)) in the concurrent group (P=0.03) in the delivery of radiation therapy. Sequencing had no significant effect on haematological parameters. 'Standard' CMF had a more profound effect on treatment delivery than i.v. CMF (Radiation delay 2.2 days versus 0.26, P=0.002, % chemotherapy delivered 93% versus 99% P=0.000004). At a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, there was no difference in the cosmetic scores between the two groups. Both local and distant control rates were excellent. This study has shown that standard radiation therapy can be delivered safely concurrently with CMF chemotherapy. Whether this approach may lead to better control rates in the future needs further study.

Concurrent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a well tolerated adjuvant regimen

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to assess the toxicity of concurrent adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for early breast carcinoma.

METHODS

In the current study, the authors reviewed the records of 680 consecutive breast carcinoma patients who received adjuvant CMF at the Princess Margaret Hospital between 1980-1990. Surgery was comprised of mastectomy in 64% of patients, breast conservation in 35% of patients, and was unknown in 1% of patients. Two hundred two patients received concurrent CMF/RT that was defined as an overlap in CMF and RT administration of at least 21 days. Forty-seven patients received sequential CMF/RT (defined as no overlap or an overlap of < 7 days in CMF and RT administration). Other patients received CMF alone. Adverse effects of RT were graded retrospectively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) system. Reasons for interruption or failure to complete RT were recorded. The magnitude of chemotherapy dose reductions and delays also were noted.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 44 years (range, 26-68 years) and 88% of the patients had lymph node-positive disease. RT was interrupted or discontinued due to side effects in 4% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-7.7%) and 0% (95% CI, 0-7.6%), respectively, of the concurrent and sequential groups (P = 0.36). The incidence of Grade 3 or Grade 4 RT toxicity was 1.5% (95% CI, 0.3-4.3%) and 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1-11.3%), respectively, for the concurrent and sequential groups (P = 0.57). The median relative dose intensity of chemotherapy for patients receiving concurrent CMF/RT, sequential CMF/RT, and CMF alone was 0.87, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that the concurrent administration of CMF and RT is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and is an acceptable adjuvant regimen for patients with breast carcinoma.

[Respective roles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of cancer of the breast: theoretical importance and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy]

Concomitant radiochemotherapy is of potential interest in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Radiotherapy improves local control after both conservative surgery and mastectomy and in this last case also improves overall survival. Some questions however still exist concerning the role of the delay between surgery and radiotherapy on the efficacy of this treatment. Over 6 months, the benefit due to radiotherapy could be reduced. Adjuvant chemotherapy leads to improved survival in all categories of patients with breast cancer, either with or without axillary-node involvement. Anthracyclin-containing regimens seem to be the most efficient, but their superiority on "historical" standard regimens such as cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil has never been fully established. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have synergistic effects. Used simultaneously, their effect on residual disease after surgery could be increased. Moreover, this therapeutic modality enables reduction of treatment duration as well as the delay between surgery and radiotherapy. Some studies have demonstrated the good tolerance of concomitant radiotherapy and FNC (5-fluoro-uracil, mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide) or CMF. Three French randomized trials testing the value of concomitant vs sequential radiotherapy + chemotherapy are ongoing. However, careful and critical interpretation of survival data will be required to consider concomitant chemoradiotherapy as a standard adjuvant treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients

To evaluate the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy, we analyzed the toxicities of chemotherapy for primary breast cancer in Japanese women. Since the opening of the National Cancer Center Hospital East, 180 female breast cancer patients have received adjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-hormonal therapy following surgical treatment between June 1992 and December 1995. On the basis of informed consent about prognosis and adjuvant therapy, most patients decided to choose the type of cytotoxic chemotherapy themselves. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of oral fluoropyrimidine compounds (OFP), cyclophosphamide + adriamycin +/- 5-fluorouracil [CA(F)] or cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Toxicity was determined using the Toxicity Grading Criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Sixty-six patients received OFP, 59 CA(F) and the rest 55 CMF. The toxicity grading of leukocytes and neutrophils was significantly higher in patients treated with CA(F) or CMF than in those treated with OFP. Similar results were also seen relating to the toxicity of nausea/vomiting and alopecia. There was no statistical difference in the toxicity grading of hemoglobin, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GOT/GPT) and stomatitis/ gastritis between the three groups of patients. Interestingly, the number of patients that were forced to discontinue chemotherapy was higher in those receiving OFP than in those receiving CA(F) or CMF. Cytotoxic chemotherapy of CA(F) or CMF results in greater toxicity than OFP, but is tolerated and feasible in the adjuvant setting used in Japanese breast cancer patients from the viewpoint of toxicities by anticancer chemotherapy.

[Role of radiotherapy in the management of adenocarcinoma of the breast accessible to conservative surgery]

Standard treatment for limited stage adenocarcinoma of the breast includes lumpectomy (or a quadrantectomy), axillary node dissection, regional radiation therapy and, if the prognostic factors are unfavourable, chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. This is supported by the results of American and European randomised trials. There have been many attempts at improving the modalities of conservative surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in order to maximize local control and minimize late sequellae. It is also likely that induction chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy applied in selected cases increase the proportion of patients who can be offered conservative surgery.