Ultrasound-guided high dose rate conformal brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

Modern development of high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy is an invasive therapy with placement of radiation source into or near the tumor. The difference between planning target volume and clinical target volume is minimal, and the dose out of the tumor reduces rapidly due to the inverse-square law. High-dose-rate brachytherapy enables three-dimensional image guidance, and currently, tumor dose as well as doses of the surrounding normal structures can be evaluated accurately. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is the utmost precision radiation therapy even surpassing carbon ion therapy. Biological disadvantages of high-dose rate have been overcome by the fractional irradiation. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is indispensable in the definitive radiation therapy of cervical cancer. Also in prostate cancer and breast cancer, high-dose-rate brachytherapy plays a significant role. Brachytherapy requires techniques and skills of radiation oncologists at the time of invasive placement of the radiation source into the tumor area. Education of young radiation oncologists is most urgent and important.

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.

Ultrasound Imaging in Radiation Therapy: From Interfractional to Intrafractional Guidance

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is included in the treatment regimen of the majority of cancer patients. With the proliferation of hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment regimens, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), interfractional and intrafractional imaging technologies are becoming increasingly critical to ensure safe and effective treatment delivery. Ultrasound (US)-based image guidance systems offer real-time, markerless, volumetric imaging with excellent soft tissue contrast, overcoming the limitations of traditional X-ray or computed tomography (CT)-based guidance for abdominal and pelvic cancer sites, such as the liver and prostate. Interfractional US guidance systems have been commercially adopted for patient positioning but suffer from systematic positioning errors induced by probe pressure. More recently, several research groups have introduced concepts for intrafractional US guidance systems leveraging robotic probe placement technology and real-time soft tissue tracking software. This paper reviews various commercial and research-level US guidance systems used in radiation therapy, with an emphasis on hardware and software technologies that enable the deployment of US imaging within the radiotherapy environment and workflow. Previously unpublished material on tissue tracking systems and robotic probe manipulators under development by our group is also included.

Dose-Escalated Robotic SBRT for Stage I-II Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the precise external delivery of very high-dose radiotherapy to targets in the body, with treatment completed in one to five fractions. SBRT should be an ideal approach for organ-confined prostate cancer because (I) dose-escalation should yield improved rates of cancer control; (II) the unique radiobiology of prostate cancer favors hypofractionation; and (III) the conformal nature of SBRT minimizes high-dose radiation delivery to immediately adjacent organs, potentially reducing complications. This approach is also more convenient for patients, and is cheaper than intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several external beam platforms are capable of delivering SBRT for early-stage prostate cancer, although most of the mature reported series have employed a robotic non-coplanar platform (i.e., CyberKnife). Several large studies report 5-year biochemical relapse rates which compare favorably to IMRT. Rates of late GU toxicity are similar to those seen with IMRT, and rates of late rectal toxicity may be less than with IMRT and low-dose rate brachytherapy. Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes appear similar to IMRT in the urinary domain. Bowel QOL may be less adversely affected by SBRT than with other radiation modalities. After 5 years of follow-up, SBRT delivered on a robotic platform is yielding outcomes at least as favorable as IMRT, and may be considered appropriate therapy for stage I–II prostate cancer.

The effect of the shape and size of gold seeds irradiated with ultrasound on the bio-heat transfer in tissue

The aim of this report is to propose a new methodology to treat prostate cancer with macro-rod-shaped gold seeds irradiated with ultrasound and develop a new computational method for temperature and thermal dose control of hyperthermia therapy induced by the proposed procedure. A computer code representation, based on the bio-heat diffusion equation, was developed to calculate the heat deposition and temperature elevation patterns in a gold rod and in the tissue surrounding it as a result of different therapy durations and ultrasound power simulations. The numerical results computed provide quantitative information on the interaction between high-energy ultrasound, gold seeds and biological tissues and can replicate the pattern observed in experimental studies. The effect of differences in shapes and sizes of gold rod targets irradiated with ultrasound is calculated and the heat enhancement and the bio-heat transfer in tissue are analyzed.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: rationale and technique

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) is a method of conformal dose escalation to the prostate. It can be used as a local boost in combination with external beam radiotherapy, with a high degree of efficacy and low rate of long term toxicity. Data consistently reports relapse free survival rates of greater than 90% for intermediate risk patients and greater than 80% for high risk. Results are superior to those achieved with external beam radiotherapy alone. A wide range of dose and fractionation is reported, however, we have found that a single 15 Gy HDR combined with hypofractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions is well tolerated and is associated with a long term relapse-free survival of over 90%. Either CT-based or trans-rectal ultrasound-based planning may be used. The latter enables treatment delivery without having to move the patient with risk of catheter displacement. We have found it to be an efficient and quick method of treatment, allowing catheter insertion, planning, and treatment delivery to be completed in less than 90 minutes. High-dose-rate boost should be considered the treatment of choice for many men with high and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Radiation dose to rectum in high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a single implant and two fractions for prostate cancer, and its prediction by prostate volume

We aimed to clarify the differences between the estimated rectal dose (ERD) and the first measured dose (FMD) and second measured dose (SMD) to the rectum during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and to predict FMD from the prostate volume (PV) or the rectal dose-volume parameters (RDVPs). ERD, FMD, and SMD were assessed with a rectal dosimeter during HDR brachytherapy of 18 Gy given in two fractions to 110 patients (48 hormone recipients, 62 hormone-naïve patients) with prostate cancer. The correlations between FMD and PV, and between FMD and RDVP (D 2ml-D 5ml) were investigated. ERD (mean ± SD) was 219 ± 44 cGy, FMD was 255 ± 52 cGy, and SMD was 298 ± 63 cGy, which differed significantly (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between ERD and FMD, and between FMD and SMD, were 0.82 and 0.78, respectively. SMD was equivalent to 118 ± 16 % FMD. The measured doses were significantly greater in the hormone recipients than in the hormone-naïve patients (p < 0.001). The increase in FMD correlated with the increases in PV and in RDVPs. The correlation coefficients between PV and FMD in all of the patients, in the hormone recipients, and in the hormone-naïve patients were 0.61, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively, whereas that between RDVPs and FMD was <0.53. In conclusion, the dose to the rectum increased with time and was correlated with the increases in PV and RDVPs. The correlation coefficient between FMD and PV was greater than that between FMD and RDVPs.

Assessment of I-125 seed implant accuracy when using the live-planning technique for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Low risk prostate cancers are commonly treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy involving I-125 seeds. The implementation of a 'live-planning' technique at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) in 2007 enabled the completion of the whole procedure (i.e. scanning, planning and implant) in one sitting. 'Live-planning' has the advantage of a more reliable delivery of the planned treatment compared to the 'traditional pre-plan' technique (where patient is scanned and planned in the weeks prior to implant). During live planning, the actual implanted needle positions are updated real-time on the treatment planning system and the dosimetry is automatically recalculated. The aim of this investigation was to assess the differences and clinical relevance between the planned dosimetry and the updated real-time implant dosimetry.

METHODS

A number of 162 patients were included in this dosimetric study. A paired t-test was performed on the D90, V100, V150 and V200 target parameters and the differences between the planned and implanted dose distributions were analysed. Similarly, dosimetric differences for the organs at risk (OAR) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Small differences between the primary dosimetric parameters for the target were found. Still, the incidence of hotspots was increased with approximately 20% for V200. Statistically significant increases were observed in the doses delivered to the OAR between the planned and implanted data; however, these increases were consistently below 3% thus probably without clinical consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study assessed the accuracy of prostate implants with I-125 seeds when compared to initial plans. The results confirmed the precision of the implant technique which RAH has in place. Nevertheless, geographical misses, anatomical restrictions and needle displacements during implant can have repercussions for centres without live-planning option if dosimetric changes are not taken into consideration.

HDR Brachytherapy in the Management of High-Risk Prostate Cancer

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is used with increasing frequency for the treatment of prostate cancer. It is a technique which allows delivery of large individual fractions to the prostate without exposing adjacent normal tissues to unacceptable toxicity. This approach is particularly favourable in prostate cancer where tumours are highly sensitive to dose escalation and to increases in radiotherapy fraction size, due to the unique radiobiological behaviour of prostate cancers in contrast with other malignancies. In this paper we discuss the rationale and the increasing body of clinical evidence for the use of this technique in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, where it is combined with external beam radiotherapy. We highlight practical aspects of delivering treatment and discuss toxicity and limitations, with particular reference to current practice in the United Kingdom.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of single implant with two fractions combined with external beam radiotherapy for hormone-naïve localized prostate cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of a single implant with two fractions plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for hormone-naïve prostate cancer in comparison with radical prostatectomy. Of 150 patients with localized prostate cancer (T1c–T2c), 59 underwent HDR brachytherapy plus EBRT, and 91 received radical prostatectomy. The median follow-up of patients was 62 months for HDR brachytherapy plus EBRT, and 64 months for radical prostatectomy. In patient backgrounds between the two cohorts, the frequency of T2b plus T2c was greater in HDR brachytherapy cohort than in prostatectomy cohort (27% versus 12%, p = 0.029). Patients in HDR brachytherapy cohort first underwent 3D conformal RT with four beams to the prostate to an isocentric dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions and then, a total of 15–18 Gy in two fractions at least 5 hours apart. We prescribed 9 Gy/fraction for target (prostate gland plus 3 mm lateral outside margin and seminal vesicle) using CT image method for radiation planning. The total biochemical failure-free control rates (BF-FCR) at 3 and 5 years for the HDR brachytherapy cohort, and for the prostatectomy cohort were 92% and 85%, and 72% and 72%, respectively (significant difference, p = 0.0012). The 3-and 5-year BF-FCR in the HDR brachytherapy cohort and in the prostatectomy cohort by risk group was 100 and 100%, and 80 and 80%, respectively, for the low-risk group (p = 0.1418); 92 and 92%, 73 and 73%, respectively, for the intermediate-risk group (p = 0.0492); and 94 and 72%, 45 and 45%, respectively, for the high-risk group (p = 0.0073). After HDR brachytherapy plus EBRT, no patient experienced Grade 2 or greater genitourinay toxicity. The rate of late Grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity was 6% (n = 4). No patient experienced Grade 3 GI toxicity. HDR brachytherapy plus EBRT is useful for treating patients with hormone-naïve localized prostate cancer, and has low GU and GI toxicities.

AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137

During the past decade, permanent radioactive source implantation of the prostate has become the standard of care for selected prostate cancer patients, and the techniques for implantation have evolved in many different forms. Although most implants use 125I or 103Pd sources, clinical use of 131Cs sources has also recently been introduced. These sources produce different dose distributions and irradiate the tumors at different dose rates. Ultrasound was used originally to guide the planning and implantation of sources in the tumor. More recently, CT and/or MR are used routinely in many clinics for dose evaluation and planning. Several investigators reported that the tumor volumes and target volumes delineated from ultrasound, CT, and MR can vary substantially because of the inherent differences in these imaging modalities. It has also been reported that these volumes depend critically on the time of imaging after the implant. Many clinics, in particular those using intraoperative implantation, perform imaging only on the day of the implant. Because the effects of edema caused by surgical trauma can vary from one patient to another and resolve at different rates, the timing of imaging for dosimetry evaluation can have a profound effect on the dose reported (to have been delivered), i.e., for the same implant (same dose delivered), CT at different timing can yield different doses reported. Also, many different loading patterns and margins around the tumor volumes have been used, and these may lead to variations in the dose delivered. In this report, the current literature on these issues is reviewed, and the impact of these issues on the radiobiological response is estimated. The radiobiological models for the biological equivalent dose (BED) are reviewed. Starting with the BED model for acute single doses, the models for fractionated doses, continuous low-dose-rate irradiation, and both homogeneous and inhomogeneous dose distributions, as well as tumor cure probability models, are reviewed. Based on these developments in literature, the AAPM recommends guidelines for dose prescription from a physics perspective for routine patient treatment, clinical trials, and for treatment planning software developers. The authors continue to follow the current recommendations on using D90 and V100 as the primary quantitles, with more specific guidelines on the use of the imaging modalities and the timing of the imaging. The AAPM recommends that the postimplant evaluation should be performed at the optimum time for specific radionuclides. In addition, they encourage the use of a radiobiological model with a specific set of parameters to facilitate relative comparisons of treatment plans reported by different institutions using different loading patterns or radionuclides.

Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with intensity modulated brachytherapy or EBRT for prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Rectal toxicity remains a serious complication affecting quality of life for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. We began an investigational trial injecting hyaluronic acid (HA) in the perirectal fat to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. This is the first report using HA injection in oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a trial of external beam radiation therapy with HDR brachytherapy boosts in prostate cancer. During the two high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions, thermoluminescent dosimeter dosimeters were placed in the urethra and in the rectum. Before the second HDR fraction, 3-7 mL (mean, 6 mL) of HA was injected under transrectal ultrasound guidance in the perirectal fat to systematically create a 1.5-cm space. Urethral and rectal HDR doses were calculated and measured. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the stability of the new space.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled in the study. No toxicity was produced from the HA or the injection. In follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the HA injection did not migrate or change in mass/shape for close to 1 year. The mean distance between rectum and prostate was 2.0 cm along the entire length of the prostate. The median measured rectal dose, when normalized to the median urethral dose, demonstrated a decrease in dose from 47.1% to 39.2% (p < 0.001) with or without injection. For an HDR boost dose of 1150 cGy, the rectum mean Dmax reduction was from 708 cGy to 507 cGy, p < 0.001, and the rectum mean Dmean drop was from 608 to 442 cGy, p < 0.001 post-HA injection.

CONCLUSION

The new 2-cm distance derived from the HA injection significantly decreased rectal dose in HDR brachytherapy. Because of the several-month duration of stability, the same distance was maintained during the course of external beam radiation therapy.

Four year clinical statistics of iridium-192 high dose rate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the efficacy and complications of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy using iridium-192 (192Ir) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients underwent 192Ir HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT at our institution between February 1999 and December 2003. Of these, 84 patients were analysed in the present study. 192Ir was delivered three times over a period of 2 days, 6 Gy per time, for a total dose of 18 Gy. Interstitial application was followed by EBRT at a dose of 44 Gy. Progression was defined as three consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rises after a nadir according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria. The results were classified into those for all patients and for patients who did not undergo adjuvant hormone therapy.

RESULTS

The 4-year overall survival of all patients, the nonadjuvant hormone therapy group (NAHT) and the adjuvant hormone therapy group (AHT) was 87.2%, 100%, and 70.1%, respectively. The PSA progression-free survival rate of all patients, NAHT, and AHT was 82.6%, 92.0%, and 66.6%, respectively. Of all patients, the 4-year PSA progression-free survival rates of PSA<20 and PSA>or=20 groups were 100%, and 46.8%, respectively. According to the T stage classification, PSA progression-free survival rates of T1c, T2, T3, and T4 were 100%, 82.8%, 100%, and 12.1%, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival rates of groups with Gleason scores (GS)<7 and GS>or=7 were 92.8% and 60.1%, respectively. Of NAHT, PSA progression-free survival of PSA<20 was 100% vs 46.8% for PSA>or=20, that of T1c was 100% vs 75% for T2, and that of GS<7 was 100% vs 75% for GS>or=7. No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications requiring urgent treatment occurred except cerebellum infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

192Ir HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT was as effective as radical prostatectomy and had few associated complications.

Quality assurance of HDR prostate plans: Program implementation at a community hospital

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, and the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The utilization of radiation therapy is regarded as the definitive local therapy of choice for intermediate- and high-risk disease, in which there is increased risk for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or regional node involvement. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a logical treatment modality to deliver the boost dose to an external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment to increase local control rates. From a treatment perspective, the utilization of a complicated treatment delivery system, the compressed time frame in which the procedure is performed, and the small number of large dose fractions make the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program imperative. One aspect of this program is the QA of the HDR treatment plan. Review of regulatory and medical physics professional publications shows that substantial general guidance is available. We provide some insight to the implementation of an HDR prostate plan program at a community hospital. One aspect addressed is the utilization of the low-dose-rate (LDR) planning system and the use of existing ultrasound image sets to familiarize the radiation therapy team with respect to acceptable HDR implant geometries. Additionally, the use of the LDR treatment planning system provided a means to prospectively determine the relationship between the treated isodose volume and the product of activity and time for the department's planning protocol prior to the first HDR implant. For the first 12 HDR prostate implants, the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation was 3.05% between the predicted product of activity and time vs. the actual plan values. Retrospective re-evaluation of the actual implant data reduced the RMS deviation to 2.36%.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

Lack of benefit from a short course of androgen deprivation for unfavorable prostate cancer patients treated with an accelerated hypofractionated regime

PURPOSE

High-dose radiotherapy, delivered in an accelerated hypofractionated course, was utilized to treat prostate cancer. Therapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided conformally modulated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is (1) to assess long-term comparative outcomes from three trials using similar accelerated hypofractionated regimes; and (2) to examine the long-term survival impact of a short course of < or =6 months adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation when a very high radiation dose was delivered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1986 and 2000, 1,260 patients were treated at three institutions with pelvic EBRT (36-50 Gy) integrated with HDR prostate brachytherapy. The total dose including brachytherapy was given over 5 weeks. The biologic equivalent EBRT dose ranged between 90 and 123 Gy (median, 102 Gy) using an alpha /beta of 1.2. Patient eligibility criteria included a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or =10, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical stage > or =T2b. A total of 1,260 patients were treated, and 934 meet the criteria. Kiel University Hospital treated 198 patients; William Beaumont Hospital, 315; and California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, 459 patients. Brachytherapy dose regimes were somewhat different between centers and the dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 Gy x 2 Gy. Patients were divided for analysis between the 406 who received up to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and the 528 patients who did not. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 18 months (3 times the exposure to androgen deprivation therapy). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 1.5-14.5); 4 years for androgen deprivation therapy patients and 4.9 for radiation alone. There was no difference at 5 and 8 years in overall survival, cause-specific survival, or biochemical control among the three institutions. The corresponding 8-year rates with and without androgen deprivation therapy were biochemical control 85% and 81%; overall survival 83% and 78%; cause-specific survival 89% and 94%; and metastatic rates of 16.6% and 7.3%. A multivariate analysis revealed androgen deprivation therapy did not predict for biochemical failure for either the entire group or the subset of 177 patients harboring all three poor prognostic factors. Moreover, adding androgen deprivation therapy strongly correlated with higher rates of both metastasis (p = 0.09; hazard ratio, 2.08) and cancer-related deaths (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 3.25). These negative results for the most unfavorable group led us to question if androgen deprivation therapy might have a deleterious impact through delay in delivery of the potentially curative radiation or whether there may be a biologic basis by fixing the cycling cells in G0.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hypofractionated pelvic EBRT integrated with TRUS-guided conformally modulated HDR administered to 1,260 patients in three institutions was an excellent method of delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate in 5 weeks. Similar high overall, cause-specific, and biochemical no evidence of disease survival rates achieved show that prostate HDR can be successfully delivered in academic and community settings. At 8 years, the addition of a course of < or =6 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy to a very high radiation dose did not confer a therapeutic advantage but added side effects and cost. Furthermore, for the most unfavorable group, there was a higher rate of distant metastasis and more prostate cancer-related deaths. We question the value of a short course of androgen deprivation therapy when used with high-dose radiation.

Anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization in HDR prostate implant: A toxicity study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the acute and late complications in patients who have received HDR implant boost using inverse planning, and to determine dose volume correlations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 1999 and October 2002, 44 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PSA>/=10 ng/ml, and/or Gleason score>/=7, and/or Stage T2c or higher) were treated with 40-45 Gy external pelvic field followed by 2--3 fraction of inverse-planned HDR implant boost (6--9.5 Gy /fraction). Median follow-up time was 1.7 years with 81.8% of patients who had at least 12 months of follow up (range 8.6--42.5. Acute and late morbidity data were collected and graded according to RTOG criteria. Questionnaires were used to collect prostate related measures of quality of life, and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) before and after treatment. Dose-volume histograms for prostate, urethra, bladder, penis bulb and rectum were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 64 years. Of these, 32% were in the high risk group, and 61% in the intermediate risk group. 3 patients (7%) had no adverse prognostic factors. A single grade 3 GU acute toxicity was reported but no grade 3--4 acute GI toxicity. No grade 3--4 late GU or GI toxicity was reported. Acute (late) grade 2 urinary and rectal symptoms were reported in 31.8 (11.4%) and 4.6% (4.6%) of patients, respectively. A trend for predicting acute GU toxicity is seen for total HDR dose of more than 18 Gy (OR=3.6, 95%CI=[0.96--13.5], P=0.058). The evolution of toxicity is presented for acute and late GU/GI toxicity. Erectile dysfunction occurs in approximately 27% of patients who were not on hormonal deprivation, but may be taking sildenafil. The IPSS peaked on averaged 6 weeks post-implant and returned to the baseline at a median of 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Inverse-planned HDR brachytherapy is a viable option to deliver higher dose to the prostate as a boost without increasing GU or rectal complication. Further HDR dose escalation to the prostate is feasible.

Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high-dose-rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report the first long-term biochemical control rate of patients treated with two protocols using a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in Japan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1997 and July 2001, 71 patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of EBRT and HDR brachytherapy. Patient age ranged from 58 to 81 years (mean 70.5). Of the 71 patients, 12, 41, and 18 had Stage T1c, T2, and T3, respectively, according to the International Union Against Cancer classification system (1997). The mean initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 24.2 ng/mL (median, 11.9 ng/mL); 30% of the patients had an initial PSA level >20 ng/mL. Of the 71 patients, 31 had received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Hormonal therapy before treatment was stopped at the beginning of RT in all cases. Patients in this series were treated on two protocols. In the initial protocol, patients were treated with whole pelvis EBRT to 45.0 Gy in 25 fractions and three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (35 patients). In the second protocol, patients were treated with prostatic EBRT to 41.8 Gy in 19 fractions, with an added staging lymphadenectomy to rule out lymph node metastasis for patients with high-risk factors, and four HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (36 patients). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition for biochemical failure was used. Acute and chronic toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 65 months (median, 44 months).

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients, 69 were alive at the last follow-up. Two patients had died of hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer at 3.5 and 4.0 years after treatment with no biochemical failure. Sixty-six patients (93%), including the two who had died of intercurrent disease, showed a tendency for a PSA decline after treatment and had no biochemical or clinical evidence of disease at the last follow-up visit. Sixty patients (85%) achieved PSA nadir levels of < or =1.0 ng/mL. The biochemical/clinical failure-free control rate at 3 and at 5 years was 93% and 93%, respectively. The bladder and rectal complications were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high frequency of high-risk patients in the present patient population, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 93% at 5 years. Acute and chronic toxicity with this method was acceptable. Additional long-term follow-up is required to assess this treatment, because the median survival is not likely to be reached for several years.

Long-term outcome by risk factors using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with or without neoadjuvant androgen suppression for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to analyze, during the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era, the long-term outcome of patients treated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost to the prostate with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) when patients are stratified by risk factors for failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1986 and 2000, 611 patients were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer in three prospective trials of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and dose-escalating HDR brachytherapy (BT) boost. There were 104 patients treated at Seattle, 198 at Kiel University, and 309 at William Beaumont Hospital. Of the 611 patients, 177 received a short course of neoadjuvant/concurrent ADT. The patients were divided into three risk groups. Group I, comprised of 46 patients, had stage < or =T2a, Gleason score (GS) < or = 6, and initial PSA (iPSA) < or = 10 ng/mL. Group II comprised 188 patients with stage > or =T2b, GS > or = 7, and iPSA > or = 10, with any one factor higher. Group III included 359 patients with any two risk factors higher. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure was used.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 0.2-15.3). For the 611 patients, the 5-year and 10-year biochemical control (BC) rates were 77% and 73%, disease-free survival (DFS) was 67% and 49%, and cause-specific survival (CSS) was 96% and 92%, respectively. BC at 5 years for Group I patients was 96%, for Group II 88%, and for Group III patients 69%. CSS at 5 years was 100% in Group I, 99% in Group II, and 95% in Group III patients. In univariate and multiple regression analyses for BC, risk group, stage, iPSA, and GS were significant in predicting failure. However, age, follow-up interval, and ADT did not.

CONCLUSIONS

EBRT with HDR-BT produced excellent long-term outcomes in terms of BC, DFS, and CSS in patients with prostate cancer even for those at highest risk. Conformal HDR-BT is both a precise dose delivery system and an effective treatment for both favorable and unfavorable prostate cancer. The addition of a short course of neoadjuvant/concurrent ADT failed to improve outcome. The results were similar at all three institutions, giving credence to the reproducibility of the brachytherapy treatment.

No Apparent Benefit at 5 Years From a Course of Neoadjuvant/Concurrent Androgen Deprivation for Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With a High Total Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

We examined the survival impact of a course of 6 months or less of adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation in patients with unfavorable prostate cancer treated to high radiation doses with external beam (EBRT) and a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 2000, 507 patients were treated with pelvic EBRT (46 Gy) with HDR prostate brachytherapy as a boost. The biological equivalent EBRT dose was between 90 and 130 Gy. At Kiel University and at William Beaumont Hospital 198 and 309 patients were treated. Patient eligibility was pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or greater, Gleason score 7 or greater, or clinical stage T2b or greater. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 x 2 Gy. Patients were divided between 177 receiving and 330 not receiving androgen suppression therapy (AST). AST was given for a mean of 6 months. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 68 years. Mean followup was 4.8 years (range 0.7 to 15.3), that is 4.5 years for AST and 4.9 for radiation alone. Five-year actuarial rates for biochemical control were 74% and 76%, for overall survival they were 81% and 87%, and for disease-free survival they were 67% and 66%, while cause specific survival with and without AST was 90% and 98%, and the 5-year metastatic rates were 10.7% and 6.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis AST did not improve biochemical control.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with a transrectal ultrasound guided HDR boost is an excellent method of delivering a high radiation dose to the prostate without rendering the patient radioactive. This trial showed high overall, cause specific and no biochemical evidence of disease survival. For this unfavorable group of patients the addition of a course of 6 months or less of neoadjuvant/concurrent AST to a high radiation dose did not appear to confer a 5-year therapeutic advantage. However, it added side effects and the significant cost of hormones.

In vivo thermoluminescence dosimetry dose verification of transperineal 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy using CT-based planning for the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of in vivo thermoluminescence dosimetry to estimate the accuracy of dose delivery in conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 50 LiF, TLD-100 cylindrical rods were calibrated in the dose range of interest and used as a batch for all fractions. Fourteen dosimeters for every treatment fraction were loaded in a plastic 4F catheter that was fixed in either one of the 6F needles implanted for treatment purposes or in an extra needle implanted after consulting with the patient. The 6F needles were placed either close to the urethra or in the vicinity of the median posterior wall of the prostate. Initial results are presented for 18 treatment fractions in 5 patients and compared to corresponding data calculated using the commercial treatment planning system used for the planning of the treatments based on CT images acquired postimplantation.

RESULTS

The maximum observed mean difference between planned and delivered dose within a single treatment fraction was 8.57% +/- 2.61% (root mean square [RMS] errors from 4.03% to 9.73%). Corresponding values obtained after averaging results over all fractions of a patient were 6.88% +/- 4.93% (RMS errors from 4.82% to 7.32%). Experimental results of each fraction corresponding to the same patient point were found to agree within experimental uncertainties.

CONCLUSIONS

Experimental results indicate that the proposed method is feasible for dose verification purposes and suggest that dose delivery in transperineal high-dose-rate brachytherapy after CT-based planning can be of acceptable accuracy.

[Curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Treatment methods and results]

Radiation oncology has undergone rapid technical development during the last few years. The further development of treatment planning systems and treatment machines had a major impact on the improvement of radiation therapy results in prostate cancer. This paper presents different treatment modalities and results. Currently available are three-dimensional conformal radiation, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), high dose rate brachytherapy, and low dose rate brachytherapy (seed implantation). All modalities offer the possibility for dose escalation, which is essential for curative treatment. Dose escalation using these techniques makes it possible to reduce the dose for the surrounding organs at risk. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy can be delivered with doses up to 78 Gy. The biochemical control rate is up to 90% depending on the risk factors T stage, initial PSA, and Gleason score. The incidence of late side effects is <10%. IMRT is a newer modality for percutaneous radiotherapy. By individual dose modification in the treatment fields, doses >80 Gy can be delivered in small treatment volumes. Treatment has to be highly precise to avoid dose peaks in the organs at risk, i.e., rectum and bladder. The preliminary data for remission and toxicity rates are promising, but it is too early for final conclusions. For cases with high-risk factors such as PSA >10 ng/ml, Gleason score >6, and stage T3, percutaneous radiation can be combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal treatment. Randomized trials showed an improvement of the results in favor of combined treatment. HDR brachytherapy in combination with external radiation is a good option for dose escalation in patients with locally advanced tumors and/or other high-risk factors. The biochemical control rates are between 60 and 84%, late effects occur in less than 10%. Seed implantation (LDR brachytherapy) as sole treatment is indicated for prognostically favorable situations (PSA <10 ng/ml, Gleason score < or =6, and T1c or T2a tumors). The biochemical control rates are between 80 and 90%. Toxicity consists of urine retention and proctitis, occurring in 10-20% of the patients.

3D dose verification in 192Ir HDR prostate monotherapy using polymer gels and MRI

VIPAR polymer gels and 3D MRI techniques were evaluated for their ability to provide experimental verification of 3D dose distributions in a simulation of a 192Ir prostate monotherapy clinical application. A real clinical treatment plan was utilized, generated by post-irradiation, CT based calculations derived from Plato BPS and Swift treatment planning systems. The simulated treatment plan involved the use of 10 catheters and 39 source positions within a glass vessel of appropriate dimensions, homogeneously filled with the VIPAR gel. 3D high resolution MR scanning of the gel produced T2 relaxation time maps, from which 3D dose distributions were derived via an appropriate calibration procedure. Results were compared to corresponding dose distributions obtained from the Plato and Swift treatment planning systems. Quantitative comparison, on a point by point basis, was based on user adopted acceptance criteria of 5% dose-difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement. Significant deviations between experimental and calculated dose distributions were found for doses lower than 50% due to the reduced dose resolution of the method in the low dose, low dose gradient region. Measurement errors were observed at 1.0-1.5 mm around each catheter due to MR imaging susceptibility artifacts. For most remaining points the acceptance criteria were fulfilled. Systematic offsets of the order of 1-2 mm, observed between measured and corresponding calculated isocontours at specific segments, are attributed to the 1 mm uncertainty in catheter reconstruction and 1 mm uncertainty in the alignment of the MR and CT imaging planes.

Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate

PURPOSE

To present an exhaustive dosimetric comparison between three geometric optimization methods and our inverse-planning simulated annealing (IPSA) algorithm, with two different prescriptions for high-dose-rate (HDR) boost of the prostate. The objective of this analysis was to quantify the dosimetric advantages of the IPSA algorithm compared with more standard geometric optimizations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1999 and June 2001, 34 patients were treated to a dose of 40-44 Gy by external pelvic fields, followed by an HDR boost of 18 Gy in 3 fractions. The first 4 patients were treated with HDR using geometric optimization, and anatomy-based inverse-planning dose optimization was used for the remaining 30 patients. We retrospectively used the data from these 30 patients to create HDR dose distributions according to five different dose optimization protocols, including our IPSA algorithm. The various geometric optimization procedures differed in the way the dwell positions were activated and plan normalization was performed. Dose-volume histograms from all these plans were analyzed and multiple implant quality indexes extracted.

RESULTS

The IPSA algorithm provided better clinical tumor volume prescription dose coverage than did the geometric optimizations. The average prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) was 96.3% and 94.5% for IPSA with two different prescriptions compared with 92.1%, 92.6%, and 88.8% for the three geometric optimization schemes. The average urethra V150 value was 0.0% and 0.7% for IPSA with two different prescriptions, and the three geometric optimization protocols generated average values of 22.9%, 33.9%, and 38.8%. The bladder and rectal dose-volume histograms were similar, although the latest version of the IPSA algorithm slightly decreases the dose to these organs at risk because of organ-specific dose constraints included in the objective function.

CONCLUSION

We found that planning an HDR prostate boost could be performed in a fast, secure, and effective manner with the IPSA algorithm. We demonstrated that our inverse-planning algorithm produces superior HDR plans than more conventional geometric optimizations for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The organs at risk protection included in the objective function is a major feature of the algorithm and should allow us to escalate the HDR dose to the prostate without increasing undesirable side effects.

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.

Three-dimensional controlled interstitial hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma--a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To perform a feasibility study of three-dimensional spatially controlled interstitial hyperthermia for locally advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twelve patients with prostate cancer (T3NxM0) were treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy and one interstitial hyperthermia treatment. Hyperthermia was delivered with the 27-MHz multielectrode current source (MECS) interstitial hyperthermia technique on an outpatient basis. Guided by transrectal ultrasonography, 12 catheters (range 7-16) were placed in the prostate through a template. Two electrodes per probe were inserted. Thermometry (average 100 sensors) was performed from within the probes for online temperature control. Additional thermometry was done in the prostate, rectum, urethra, and bladder. Reconstruction was done by sonography. Prostate perfusion was estimated from the thermal decay at the end of treatment. The full three-dimensional temperature distribution was calculated.

RESULTS

No toxicities greater than Grade 2 were recorded. A learning curve for implantation, position verification, reconstruction, and temperature simulation was experienced. Perfusion was 47 mL/100 g/min (range 30-65). The average measured temperature was T(90) (90% of the prostate reached a temperature of at least:) 39.9 degrees C and T(50) 44.1 degrees C. The average calculated temperatures were lower: T(90), 39.4 degrees C and T(50), 41.8 degrees C, because the entire prostate was taken into account. The tumor temperatures were T(90), 40.7 degrees C and T(50), 43.0 degrees C. The bladder and rectal temperatures were below the safety limits.

CONCLUSION

Multielectrode-current-source interstitial hyperthermia is technically feasible and well tolerated. It was not possible to achieve the goal temperature of 42-43 degrees C because of high perfusion and implantation limitations.

Brachytherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: techniques, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

Brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma has developed as either low dose rate permanent implants or high dose rate afterloading. Both approaches offer unsurpassed dose escalation and, particularly with permanent implants, the convenience of a single outpatient treatment. These therapies have now entered the mainstream of treatment options and are in the refinement phase of development. Techniques of implantation, treatment planning approaches, innovative fractionation schemes, and appropriate patient selection are the subject of current investigation. Treatment results are available beyond 10 years and appear equivalent or superior to other modalities. Although short term morbidity can be significant with brachytherapy, most current series report low long-term urinary and rectal complications. Meaningful quality of life studies and randomized cooperative group trials are now underway and should help define the role of brachytherapy in the near future.

Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American Brachytherapy Society

PURPOSE

The preplanned technique used for permanent prostate brachytherapy has limitations that may be overcome by intraoperative planning. The goal of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) project was to assess the current intraoperative planning process and explore the potential for improvement in intraoperative treatment planning (ITP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the ABS with expertise in ITP performed a literature review, reviewed their clinical experience with ITP, and explored the potential for improving the technique.

RESULTS

The ABS proposes the following terminology in regard to prostate planning process: *Preplanning--Creation of a plan a few days or weeks before the implant procedure. *Intraoperative planning--Treatment planning in the operating room (OR): the patient and transrectal ultrasound probe are not moved between the volume study and the seed insertion procedure. * Intraoperative preplanning--Creation of a plan in the OR just before the implant procedure, with immediate execution of the plan. *Interactive planning--Stepwise refinement of the treatment plan using computerized dose calculations derived from image-based needle position feedback. *Dynamic dose calculation--Constant updating of dose distribution calculations using continuous deposited seed position feedback. Both intraoperative preplanning and interactive planning are currently feasible and commercially available and may help to overcome many of the limitations of the preplanning technique. Dosimetric feedback based on imaged needle positions can be used to modify the ITP. However, the dynamic changes in prostate size and shape and in seed position that occur during the implant are not yet quantifiable with current technology, and ITP does not obviate the need for postimplant dosimetric analysis. The major current limitation of ITP is the inability to localize the seeds in relation to the prostate. Dynamic dose calculation can become a reality once these issues are solved. Future advances can be expected in methods of enhancing seed identification, in imaging techniques, and in the development of better source delivery systems. Additionally, ITP should be correlated with outcome studies, using dosimetric, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints.

CONCLUSION

ITP addresses many of the limitations of current permanent prostate brachytherapy and has some advantages over the preplanned technique. Further technologic advancement will be needed to achieve dynamic real-time calculation of dose distribution from implanted sources, with constant updating to allow modification of subsequent seed placement and consistent, ideal dose distribution within the target volume.

Phase II prospective study of the use of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: a feasibility report

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical feasibility and tolerance of image-guided transperineal conformal high-dose-rate (C-HDR) brachytherapy as the sole treatment modality for favorable, localized cancer of the prostate, and to analyze possible intrafraction and interfraction volume changes in the prostate gland which may affect dosimetric quality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were eligible for this prospective Phase II trial if they had biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with favorable prognostic factors (Gleason score < or =7, PSA < or =10 ng/ml and Stage < or =T2a). The technique consisted of a transperineal implant procedure using a template with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. An interactive on-line real-time planning system was utilized with geometric optimization. This allowed dosimetry to be generated and modified as required intraoperatively. Prescription was to the minimum dose point in the implanted volume, assuring conformal coverage of the prostate at its widest dimension with no margin. Total dose was 3800 cGy in 4 fractions of 950 cGy each, delivered twice a day over 2 days. The dose to any segment of rectum and urethra was limited to < or =75% and < or =125% of the prescription dose, respectively. Before each fraction, needle positions were verified under fluoroscopy and adjusted as required. For the last 10 patients, the adjustments required were measured in a prospective fashion in representative extrema of the gland. TRUS images were recorded for all patients before any needle manipulation, again just before delivering the first fraction and immediately after the last fraction. This typically meant approximately 36 h to pass between the first and last measurements. Implant quality was assessed via dose-volume histograms (DVH).

RESULTS

Between 3/99 and 6/00, 41 patients received C-HDR interstitial brachytherapy as their only treatment for prostate cancer at our institution. Median age was 64 years (range 51-79). Stage distribution was 27 T1c patients and 14 T2a patients. Three patients had Gleason score (GS) of 5; 34 had GS of 6; 4 patients had GS of 7. Median pretreatment PSA was 4.7 ng/ml (range 0.8-13.3). All patients tolerated the treatment well with minimal discomfort. For 23 patients, data on volume changes in the gland during the implant were tabulated. They demonstrated a mean prostate volume of 30.7 cc before any manipulation with needles, 37.0 cc at the end of fraction 1, and 38.2 cc at the end of fraction 4. In addition, for those 10 patients prospectively evaluated for required adjustments, the overall mean adjustment between fraction 1 and fraction 2 was 2.0 cm, between fraction 2 and 3 was 0.4 cm, and between fractions 3 and 4 was 0.4 cm. For 10 consecutive patients, the average prescriptions dose -D90 for fractions 1 and 4 were 104% and 100%, respectively. The corresponding average urethral D10 for fractions 1 and 4 were 122% and 132%.

CONCLUSION

Our protocol using C-HDR interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy for early cancer of the prostate was feasible and well tolerated by 41 patients treated. Changes in interfraction prostate volume do not appear to be significant enough to warrant modification of dosimetry for each fraction. Both excellent dose coverage of the prostate gland and low urethral dose are achieved as measured by DVH. However, paramount attention should be given to needle displacement before each fraction. Needle movement is most significant between fractions 1 and 2. Acute toxicity (RTOG) has been modest. Late toxicity and tumor control rates will be reported as longer follow-up allows.

High dose rate brachytherapy boost treatment in radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer

The natural history of prostate cancer is for early invasion of the prostatic capsule and seminal vesicles. This will be present in the majority of patients presenting with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) >10 or Gleason score >7. In these patients a combination of external beam treatment to provide a regional dose of radiation followed by a high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy boost to enable conformal dose escalation within the prostate gland presents an attractive option in local treatment. Accurate placement of catheters is now possible using transrectal ultrasound to provide high quality implants. A number of centres have now developed this technique as a routine clinical tool. There remains variation in the optimal dose fractionation with a range of BED(10) values from 100 to 77 and BED(3) values from 246.6 to 122.5. This does not, however, take into account geometric variations in dose distribution exploiting the physical advantage of BT in achieving a rapid dose fall off close to critical structures such as the rectum. Early results show PSA response levels of around 90% with grade III toxicity in 5-9% of patients. Critical evaluation of this technique in prospective, randomized trials is required.

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

PURPOSE

To improve results for localized prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of hyperfractionated Iridium-192 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy was initiated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1995 and September 1998, 22 implants were performed on 22 patients with localized prostate cancer (T1:T2:T3:T4 = 4:6:9:3) at Osaka University Hospital. Nineteen patients, who had T3-T4 tumors or pretreatment PSA >/= 20.0 ng/mL, received hormone therapy. No patient had external beam radiation. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance were performed, followed by dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice a day, with a time interval of more than 6 h. Total dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Median follow-up time was 31 months.

RESULTS

HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy was well-tolerated. No significant intra- or peri-operative complications occurred. No patient experienced acute toxicity of grade 3 or more. PSA levels normalized in 95% of patients within 20 months after irradiation. Four-year clinical and biochemical relapse-free rates were 95% and 55%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Acute toxicity with this method was acceptable. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone.

RESULTS

EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

[Prostatic brachytherapy: an alternative therapy. Review of the literature]

Radical prostatectomy remains the 'golden standard' therapy for localized prostate carcinoma for patients with a survival rate of more than ten years. However, because of the complications inherent in this surgical procedure, prostatectomy is presently increasingly challenged by various radiotherapy procedures. In the last decade, more sophisticated conformal therapy techniques have been proposed for prostate cancer patients. In parallel, for highly selected patients, brachytherapy is being promoted by an increasing number of medical centers. In fact, brachytherapy techniques for prostate cancers can be traced back to 1911, but recently developed techniques offer reliability and reproducibility, with satisfactory results in terms of tumor control and reduced toxicity, in selected patients. We present here the different techniques that are available today in prostate cancer brachytherapy.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level </= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score </= 6, and a 1997 AJCC clinical stage T1bN0-T2bN0. Eleven (21%) patients received radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles; the remaining patients were treated to the prostate only. The 3D-CRT treatment planning guidelines in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406 were followed after 1994 (similar treatment planning was used before the protocol became available). Typically, 4 oblique and 2 lateral fields were treated. All patients were seen at least weekly while under treatment, 1 month postirradiation and then every 3 months. Total radiation doses ranged from 66.0-79.2 Gy, with a median dose of 73.8 Gy in 41 fractions over 8 weeks. Acute toxicity is described according to the RTOG acute toxicity scoring system.

RESULTS

Overall, 3D-CRT was well-tolerated: 29% of patients experienced RTOG Grade 1 and 27% experienced Grade 2 acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Forty percent and 33% of patients experienced Grade 1 and 2 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively. As expected, more acute morbidity, especially GI, was observed with a larger clinical target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles versus prostate only; p = 0. 05). Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not increase the incidence or severity of radiation-induced side effects. No acute toxicity >/= Grade 3, e.g., hourly nocturia, gross hematuria, diarrhea requiring parenteral support, narcotics for pain control, or catheterization for acute urinary retention, was observed.

CONCLUSION

Although relatively high doses of radiation are delivered to prostate cancers with 3D-CRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT is surprisingly well-tolerated. No patients in the cohort eligible for implant monotherapy experienced acute toxicity >/= Grade 3.

Imaging and radiotherapy of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in men. Over the past 10 to 20 years, advances in screening and diagnostic and management paradigms have led to improved treatment outcomes. This article offers an overview of the evolution of the role and nature of diagnostic imaging techniques in the management of prostate cancer.

High dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer

Because the HDR brachytherapy treatments are delivered within minutes and on an outpatient basis, HDR brachytherapy is very well tolerated by patients and offers complete radiation safety. Published studies2, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 22, 24, 25 have shown high local clinical and biochemical control rates. Chronic complications have been acceptably low. Very low rates of urinary incontinence and high sexual potency rates have been reported. Gastrointestinal morbidity has been minimal. The development of Ir-192 HDR afterloading brachytherapy and refinements in the dosimetry have ushered in a new era in prostate brachytherapy. The control of the radiation dose and the ability to shape the radiation treatment envelope using a stepping source have allowed a giant step forward in radiation oncology technology. It is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses of radiation conformally to the prostate while minimizing the dose to the bladder, urethra, and rectum. At present, HDR afterloaded brachytherapy is the optimal whole-organ and tumor-specific conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

A comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy: defining an optimal technique

PURPOSE

A comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy literature was performed to determine if an optimal method of implantation could be identified, and to compare and contrast techniques currently in use.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in the English language on prostate cancer brachytherapy from 1985 through 1998. Articles were reviewed and grouped to determine the primary technique of implantation, the method or philosophy of source placement and/or dose specification, the technique to evaluate implant quality, overall treatment results (based upon pretreatment prostate specific antigen, (PSA), and biochemical control) and clinical, pathological or biochemical outcome based upon implant quality.

RESULTS

A total of 178 articles were identified in the MEDLINE database. Of these, 53 studies discussed evaluable techniques of implantation and were used for this analysis. Of these studies, 52% used preoperative ultrasound to determine the target volume to be implanted, 16% used preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans, and 18% placed seeds with an open surgical technique. An additional 11% of studies placed seeds or needles under ultrasound guidance using interactive real-time dosimetry. The number and distribution of radioactive sources to be implanted or the method used to prescribe dose was determined using nomograms in 27% of studies, a least squares optimization technique in 11%, or not stated in 35%. In the remaining 26%, sources were described as either uniformly, differentially, or peripherally placed in the gland. To evaluate implant quality, 28% of studies calculated some type of dose-volume histogram, 21% calculated the matched peripheral dose, 19% the minimum peripheral dose, 14% used some type of CT-based qualitative review and, in 18% of studies, no implant quality evaluation was mentioned. Six studies correlated outcome with implant dose. One study showed an association of implant dose with the achievement of a PSA nadir < or = 0.5. Two studies showed an improvement in biochemical control with a D90 (dose to 90% of the prostate volume) of 120 to 140 Gy or higher, and 2 additional studies found an association of clinical outcome with implant dose. One study correlated implant quality with biopsy results. Of the articles, 33 discussed evaluable treatment results, but only 16 reported findings based upon pretreatment PSA and biochemical control. Three- to 5-year biochemical control rates ranged from 48% to 100% for pretreatment PSAs < or = 4, 55% to 90% for PSAs between 4 and 10, 30% to 89% for PSAs > 10, < or = 20 and < 10% to 100% for PSAs > 20. Due to substantial differences in patient selection criteria (e.g., median Gleason score, clinical stage, pretreatment PSA), number of patients treated, median follow-up, definitions of biochemical control, and time points for analysis, no single technique consistently produced superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy literature failed to identify an optimal treatment approach when studies were analyzed for treatment outcome based upon pretreatment PSA and biochemical control. Although several well-designed studies showed an improvement in outcome with total dose or implant quality, the numerous techniques for implantation and the varied and inconsistent methods to specify dose or evaluate implant quality suggest that standardized protocols should be developed to objectively evaluate this treatment approach. These protocols have recently been suggested and, when implemented, should significantly improve the reporting of treatment data and, ultimately, the efficacy of prostate brachytherapy.