Neurological sequelae in long-term survivors of small cell lung cancer

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in operable stage IIIA non small-cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results from a German multicenter randomized trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) within a trimodality protocol (chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, surgery) for patients with operable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After mediastinoscopic staging, patients with operable stage IIIA NSCLC were enrolled to a German multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive either primary resection followed by adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy (50 to 60 Gy; arm A) or preoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide [PE]; three cycles) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PE plus 45 Gy; 1.5 Gy twice per day) and definitive surgery (arm B), respectively. Patients in arm B were scheduled to receive PCI (30 Gy; 2 Gy daily fractions).

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned between November 1994 and July 2001. One hundred six patients were eligible (arm A: 51, arm B: 55), 90 males and 16 females, 50 with squamous cell, 16 with large cell, five with adenosquamous, and 35 with adenocarcenoma (median age, 57 years; range, 37 to 71 years). Forty-three patients received PCI as scheduled in arm B. Eleven long-term survivors (arm A: four; arm B: seven) underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. PCI significantly reduced the probability of brain metastases as first site of failure (7.8% at 5 years v 34.7%; P = .02), the overall brain relapse rate was reduced comparably (9.1% at 5 years v 27.2%; P = .04). A slightly reduced neurocognitive performance in comparison with the age-matched normal population was found for patients in both treatment groups. No significant difference between patients who were treated with or without PCI could be noted.

CONCLUSION

PCI is effective in preventing brain metastases following this aggressive trimodality approach. Neurocognitive late effects are not significantly different between patients treated with or without PCI.

Multimodality Therapy for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of stage III non–small-cell lung cancer has evolved over the last two decades, with combined-modality therapy the current standard of care. As a result, intermediate and long-term survival has improved for patients in this common stage category, compared to the poor outcomes achieved with the historical standard of once-daily radiation therapy alone. This review summarizes two decades of clinical research regarding bimodality and trimodality approaches for the heterogenous stage subsets within the stage III designation, discusses the rationale and status of prophylactic brain irradiation, and concludes with perspectives on progress and future directions. Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy given concurrently is the optimal treatment for the group of patients with advanced stage III disease. The potential role of a surgical resection following chemotherapy (with or without radiation) in this setting is still controversial. The only subsets for which trimodality treatments are clearly preferred include T4N0-1 disease and superior sulcus tumors. The other major stage III subgroup has a minimal disease burden with low tumor volume and/or microscopic N2 disease, thus technically could undergo a surgical resection upfront. Induction chemotherapy before surgery may yield a survival advantage, although the phase III trials in this area are not conclusive. Given the marked survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in even earlier stages of non–small-cell lung cancer, the proper sequence of surgery and chemotherapy (before v after surgery) remains an important unresolved question in this subgroup. Furthermore, how to incorporate radiation therapy, as well as whether it should be given at all in this subset of patients, are other important issues actively under study in ongoing trials.

Management of Toxicities of Combined Modality Therapy for Intrathoracic Malignancies

BACKGROUND: Combined radiation and chemotherapy for intrathoracic tumors can produce appreciable morbidity. Apprehension about the severity of these toxicities may inhibit optimal patient care. METHODS: The literature on recognition, diagnosis, prophylaxis, and management of these toxicities is reviewed and combined with the experiences of the authors to produce management recommendations. RESULTS: Toxicities include acute and chronic esophagitis, early and late pneumonitis with fibrosis, myelosuppression, and neurologic deficits. Measures are available to minimize their severity and to reduce their impact on the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity of combined radiation and chemotherapy patients with intrathoracic tumors can be minimized by recognizing potential toxicities and by applying appropriate prophylactic and management measures.