Diagnostic performance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): preliminary results in vascular occlusive disease of the abdominal and lower-extremity arteries

Evaluation of Renovascular Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to evaluate a clinically suspected renovascular hypertension (RVH) by means of MRI. It was to find out if functional MRI (fMRI) is able to provide adequate results with regard to MAG3 captopril scintigraphy and if contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) is able to provide adequate results in the stenosis grading compared with the nonselective digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

METHODS

This open, monocentric, prospective, phase 3 study included patients with a clinically suspected RVH. For fMRI a dynamic TurboFLASH sequence and for MRA a single-shot breath-hold flash 3D sequence was performed. Gadodiamide was injected as contrast medium.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. The correlation between fMRI and scintigraphy had an accuracy, a sensitivity, and a specificity of 69%, 5%, and 92%, respectively, and correlations between MRA and DSA of 95%, 92%, and 96%.

CONCLUSION

The noninvasive MRA can replace DSA in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. However, fMRI can not replace renal scintigraphy.

Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography--a review

OBJECTIVES

to review the current status of lower limb MRA.

DESIGN

a literature review based predominantly on a MEDLINE database search of English-language publications from January 1991 to October 2000.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

twenty-eight articles, concerning non-enhanced MRA (13), gadolinium-enhanced MRA (14) or both (1), met the predefined requirement for quality. Results gadolinium-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) seems to be more accurate, quicker and associated with fewer problems than non-enhanced (TOF) MRA. TOF-MRA has a sensitivity and specificity of 93% (range 64-100%) and 88% (range 57-100%) respectively, and CE-MRA presents values of 96% (range 71-100%) and 96% (63-100%), respectively, using conventional arteriography as the gold standard. Some articles report a substantial incidence of runoff vessels suitable for distal bypass visible on MRA but invisible on conventional arteriography. Gadolinium contrast is given intravenously and is generally well tolerated and has no known nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

CE-MRA is accurate compared to conventional arteriography, has the potential to increase the limb salvage rate for selected patients, is non-invasive and well tolerated.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to visualize the arteries from the distal aorta to the ankle joint and to determine the accuracy of MR angiography for detecting stenoses and occlusions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease underwent digital subtraction angiography and were examined on a 1.5-T MR scanner. The transit time for contrast material was determined with a test bolus injection. A T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence with short TR and TE was used for a dynamic measurement at the level of the iliac arteries, the upper leg, and the lower leg arteries. For each level a single dose of gadolinium was injected into an antecubital vein with an MR power injector. Maximal-intensity-projection reconstructions were calculated after subtraction of the first measurement at each level. Two experienced MR radiologists who were unaware of the digital subtraction angiography results interactively evaluated both the MIP reconstructions and the single slices on a workstation, first independently and then in a consensus interpretation.

RESULTS

With digital subtraction angiography, 80 hemodynamically significant stenoses and 39 occlusions were detected. For the stenoses and occlusions, a sensitivity of 100% was found for MR angiography. The specificity for the assessment of stenoses and occlusions was 98% and 94%, respectively, for the iliac arteries; 98% and 94%, respectively, for the upper leg arteries; and 94% and 95%, respectively, for the lower leg arteries. Most false-positive findings of occlusion were due to metal stents present in the iliac (n = 3) and upper leg (n = 4) arteries.

CONCLUSION

The MR imaging technique that we used revealed the arteries from the distal aorta to the ankle and proved to be reliable at showing arterial stenoses and occlusions.

Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience

PURPOSE

To compare stepping-table digital subtraction gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the distal aorta and lower extremity arteries with conventional catheter digital subtraction x-ray angiography in patients with arterio-occlusive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients underwent both conventional catheter angiography and fast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and outflow vessels at 1.5 T; the images were acquired in three consecutive imaging locations during a single infusion of a gadolinium chelate.

RESULTS

Compared with catheter angiography, according to the findings of two blinded independent reviewers, MR angiography had sensitivities of 81% and 89% and specificities of 91% and 95%, respectively, for demonstration of insignificant (< or = 50%) stenosis versus significant (51%-100%) stenosis. For demonstration of occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively, by consensus. There was good interobserver correlation between the two readers overall (kappa = 0.65 for reporting the degree of narrowing in all lesions; 0.86, for reporting of insignificant versus significant stenoses; and 0.928, for reporting of occluded versus patient segments).

CONCLUSION

Stepping-table digital subtraction contrast material-enhanced MR angiography has high accuracy compared with catheter angiography in patients with arterio-occlusive disease of the aorta and outflow vessels. These preliminary study results suggest that this technique may ultimately provide a safe, noninvasive, and cost-effective alternative to catheter angiography.

A phase contrast (PC) rephase/dephase sequence of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a new technique for imaging distal run-off in the pre-operative evaluation of peripheral vascular disease

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare a 3-D phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence (rephase/dephase) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in pre-operative evaluation for femoropopliteal grafting in peripheral vascular disease. Assessment of distal run-off vessels and suggested siting of distal graft anastomosis to the above or below knee segment of the popliteal artery was made.

METHODS

Twenty-two lower extremities booked for infra-inguinal vascular reconstruction were imaged pre-operatively using MRA and DSA. A PC rephase/dephase sequence which includes gradient motion refocusing (Siemens 1.0 T Magnetom Impact TR 50 ms, TE 14/14 ms and 15 degree flip angle) and 3-D MIP algorithm reconstruction was used to obtain the MR images. Standard techniques were used to obtain the DSA images, and the mean and median time between imaging modalities was one month. Blinded review by a consultant vascular radiologist scored nine vessel segments for each limb and assessed which popliteal arterial segment would be most suitable for distal anastomosis.

RESULTS

The score from DSA and MRA agreed for 155/198 vessel segments (kappa 0.57) and the suggested siting for distal anastomosis agreed for 19/22 limbs (kappa 0.72). Eighteen limbs had surgery as planned (distal anastomosis to the above knee popliteal eight limbs, below knee popliteal 10 limbs). For three limbs the siting of the distal anastomosis suggested by DSA and MRA disagreed. The more accurate modality was proved for one of three limbs and showed MRA to be superior to DSA.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional PC rephase/dephase MRA is a promising technique which compared well with DSA in the pre-operative assessment of distal run-off for femoropopliteal grafting.