In vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in community hospitals

Use of cephalosporins for prophylaxis and therapy of polymicrobial infection in mice

Cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole were compared in 10-day therapy of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous infections caused by three organisms: Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron combined with either Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus. Intra-abdominal infection was caused by B. fragilis plus B. thetaiotaomicron plus E. coli. Therapy was initiated immediately before inoculation or was delayed for 8 h. Mortality was 14 of 30 (47%) for saline-treated mice, and all survivors developed abscesses. Immediate therapy reduced mortality and the percentage of mice with abscesses (in survivors), respectively, to 17 and 20% with cefoxitin, 0 and 13% with cefotetan, and 0 and 17% with cefmetazole, and the numbers of all bacteria were reduced by all the cephalosporins. Delayed therapy reduced mortality and abscess formation, respectively, to 20 and 8% of mice with cefoxitin, 10 and 93% with cefotetan, and 7 and 96% with cefmetazole. B. thetaiotaomicron survived in all abscesses treated with cefotetan and cefmetazole. Subcutaneous abscesses were caused by each organism alone or in combinations of one aerobe (S. aureus or E. coli) and one or two Bacteroides species. Early therapy reduced the numbers of all bacteria independent of their in vitro susceptibility. All agents reduced the number of each Bacteroides species with either E. coli or S. aureus. However, when therapy was delayed, cefotetan and cefmetazole were less effective than cefoxitin against B. thetaiotaomicron. Cefotetan was the most active agent against E. coli, and cefmetazole was the most effective against S. aureus. These data illustrate the efficacy of all tested cephalosporins in the prophylaxis of polymicrobial infections.

Gangrenous and/or perforated appendix: clinical outcome and in vitro susceptibility testing

The data from this study indicate that cefoxitin was effective and generally well tolerated in the management of gangrenous and/or perforated appendicitis. No strong correlation was identified between in vitro susceptibility testing results and clinical outcome.

Cefmetazole (CS-1170), a "new" cephamycin with a decade of clinical experience

In vitro and in vivo study results were reviewed from cefmetazole, a "new" parenteral cephamycin. Cefmetazole's spectrum of activity was comparable to that of second-generation cephalosporins, which includes clinical coverage of many Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., streptococci, Haemophilus spp., pathogenic Neisseria, Branhamella catarrhalis, and anaerobic bacteria. Cefmetazole was generally more potent (two- to eightfold) than cefoxitin against organisms within their spectrums and was particularly active for staphylococci (MIC90, 2.0 micrograms/ml). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were more susceptible to cefmetazole alone or in combination (fosfomycin) than any other cephamycin. Cefmetazole has demonstrated excellent stability to aerobic and anaerobic organism-produced beta-lactamases. It also inhibits Type I cephalosporinases and, uniquely, some other cephalosporinases produced by the Bacteroides. This superior stability, enzyme interaction, and better penetration into bacterial cells results in a sustained bactericidal effect and a capacity for more infrequent dosing. The cefmetazole serum elimination half-life was 1.5 hr, also justifying use at greater than or equal to 8-hr intervals. Clinical trials in the United States and Japan demonstrated an acceptably high cefmetazole infection cure rate (88% to 100%), especially in direct comparative studies with cefoxitin. Cefmetazole was also proven very effective in minimizing infectious wound morbidity (prophylaxis) using 2 g single- or multidose regimens. Adverse drug reactions were usually minor; in the Japanese surveillance trial (118,318 patients) the rate was only 2.2% (8.8% in United States). Cefmetazole has been extensively and safely used in Japan since 1980.

Belgian Collaborative Study of the in-vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group. A Belgian Collaborative Study Group

The antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group obtained from nine large Belgian university and community hospitals was studied. Of the beta-lactam antibiotics tested, none were active against 100% of the isolates. Piperacillin was active against 93% of the strains at a breakpoint of 64 micrograms/ml. The percentage of isolates inhibited at 16 micrograms/ml (and 32 micrograms/ml) for the 7-alpha-methoxy antibiotics was: cefoxitin 84; latamoxef 87; and cefotetan 64. B. fragilis tended to be more susceptible to all beta-lactams than the other members of the group. Among the non beta-lactam antibiotics, the resistance rate for minocycline, doxycycline, clindamycin and erythromycin (at a breakpoint of 4 micrograms/ml) were 1%, 4%, 14% and 34%, respectively. Like the beta-lactams, clindamycin was less active against non B. fragilis species of the group. Chloramphenicol, metronidazole and tinidazole were still active against 100% of the isolates at their breakpoint values (8 micrograms/ml).

Cefotetan: a review of the microbiologic properties and antimicrobial spectrum

Cefotetan (formerly ICI 156834 and YM09330) is a 7-methoxy cephalosporin possessing some advantageous antimicrobial spectrum, safety, and pharmacokinetic characteristics compared with other so-called second-generation cephalosporins. The published literature was reviewed and the cefotetan quantitative susceptibility testing data from nearly 31,000 isolates was tabulated. Against 15,769 enteric bacilli, cefotetan was observed to have a potency and spectrum more closely resembling a third-generation cephalosporin and markedly superior to cefoxitin. The mean of all MIC 90s reported for the Enterobacteriaceae ranged from 0.06 to 13 micrograms/ml except for citrobacter species, E. cloacae, Enterobacter species, and C. freundii. The mean MIC 50 for all 22 recorded species was in the susceptible range. Cefotetan was very effective against B. catarrhalis, H. influenzae, and pathogenic Neisseria species. However, cefotetan and cefoxitin were not active against Pseudomonas species, Acinetobacter species, and some rarely isolated species. Cefotetan was moderately active against the staphylococci (mean MIC 50, 7.6 to 26 micrograms/ml) and streptococci (mean MIC 50, 0.9 to 6.6 micrograms/ml). The coagulase-negative staphylococcus species generally had higher cefotetan and cefoxitin minimum inhibitory concentrations compared with the S. aureus isolates. Oxacillin-resistant staphylococci were resistant to cefotetan. The enterococci, JK group diphtheroids, Corynebacterium species, and L. monocytogenes isolates were resistant. A review of 4,751 strict anaerobes showed cefotetan to have a very comparable activity and spectrum to cefoxitin. The 1,291 B. fragilis strains had a mean MIC 50 and MIC 90 of 5.4 and 23 micrograms/ml, respectively. These values were slightly superior to cefoxitin when tested in parallel. More elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations were observed for other B. fragilis group species for cefoxitin and cefotetan. The mean cefotetan MIC 90 for all other anaerobic bacteria except the Eubacterium species and Lactobacillus species predict favorable clinical efficacy. The beta-lactamase stability of cefotetan is very similar to that of other 7-methoxy cephalosporins. Cefotetan also inhibits Type Ia cephalosporinases with high enzyme affinity and is an inducer of these beta-lactamases, although cefotetan is not rapidly hydrolyzed. Synergy between cefotetan and numerous other antibiotics has been reported, but antagonism has also been occasionally observed.

Criteria for in vitro susceptibility testing of cefotetan. Correlations with clinical and bacteriologic responses

Standardized in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality-control guidelines for cefotetan have been well documented in the scientific literature. Cefotetan and cefoxitin differ in their in vitro spectrums of activity and cannot be used interchangeably for in vitro tests. In vitro susceptibility information failed to correlate with clinical or bacteriologic responses of treated patients when 314 anaerobic bacteria from 145 patients were evaluated. All cefotetan-resistant anaerobic bacteria were eradicated by cefotetan therapy, and 93 percent of patients with resistant strains were clinically curved. Most members of the Bacteroides distasonis-ovatus-thetaiotaomicron group of pathogens were resistant in vitro, but only one strain persisted after cefotetan therapy for a 96.6 percent cure rate. There was better correlation when 2,336 aerobic bacteria from 1,630 infected body sites were considered. Microorganisms susceptible or moderately susceptible by in vitro tests were equally responsive to therapy (95 percent of patients clinically cured and 94 percent of isolates eradicated). However, strains that were resistant by in vitro test criteria were less likely to respond clinically. Development of resistance during therapy or superinfections (1.7 percent) were not found to be clinically important problems with cefotetan chemotherapy.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria

One hundred nine recent clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria were tested in triplicate by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution procedure for their susceptibility to 32 antimicrobial agents. All isolates were inhibited by imipenem, but there were significant numbers of strains resistant to other beta-lactam drugs, and therefore the in vitro response to these antimicrobial agents cannot be predicted. This was particularly true for the bile-resistant or Bacteroides fragilis group. beta-Lactamase production was detected in 82% of the bacteroides with the nitrocefin test. Clavulanic acid combined with amoxicillin and ticarcillin and sulbactam combined with ampicillin resulted in synergistic activity against all beta-lactamase-positive organisms. Ceftizoxime was the most active of the cephalosporins. Two percent of the isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol and metronidazole. Clindamycin resistance was detected in 38% of the B. fragilis group, which is a marked increase from the 4% detected 10 years ago at this institution.