Replacement of special enzyme immunoassay transport medium by a standard viral transport medium in the Herpcheck herpes simplex virus antigen detection test

Spin-amplified culture followed by enzyme immunoassay for detection of herpes simplex virus in patient specimens: a comparative study

In a comparative study it was found that a combination technique of spin-amplified culture and detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) antigen in 48-h incubated cell culture lysate by a HSV antigen detection enzyme immunoassay kit (Dupont Herpchek) detected the largest number (227) of confirmed HSV positives when compared to standard cell culture (191) and direct Herpchek (146) on the same 415 clinical specimens.

Comparison of a direct antigen enzyme immunoassay, Herpchek, with cell culture for detection of herpes simplex virus from clinical specimens

Direct enzyme immunoassay (Herpchek) was compared with culture on 21,522 specimens mainly from asymptomatic women for herpes simplex virus detection. Sensitivity and specificity were 73.8 and 97.7%, respectively. The 33% detection rate by enzyme immunoassay in 5 h increased to 43% when the enzyme immunoassay was combined with culture. Herpchek alone was not sensitive enough, but in combination with culture, maximum detection was achieved.

Comparison of three monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassays for detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens

Three commercial monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassays (Herpchek, IDEIA HSV and SureCell HSV) for detection of herpes simplex virus antigen were compared with isolation of virus in cell cultures. A total of 51 culture positive and 49 culture negative consecutively collected specimens that had been stored at -70 degrees C for a period of up to ten months were used in the study. Herpchek, IDEIA HSV and SureCell HSV assays gave a sensitivity of 88.2%, 82.4% and 47.1% respectively, and a specificity of 95.9%, 93.9% and 83.7% respectively compared to cell culture. A blocking antibody test showed that two culture negative specimens contained herpes simplex virus-specific antigens. If these two specimens were considered to be true positive, Herpchek, IDEIA HSV and SureCell HSV assays had a sensitivity of 88.7%, 83.0% and 47.2%, and a specificity of 100%, 97.9% and 85.1% respectively. The positive predictive value (using the resolved sample results) for Herpchek, IDEIA HSV and SureCell HSV was 100%, 97.8% and 78.1% respectively, and the negative predictive value 88.7%, 83.6% and 58.8% respectively. These results demonstrated that Herpchek and IDEIA HSV are sensitive and highly specific assays. Results could be obtained in less than five hours after receipt of specimens. SureCell HSV gave results in 15 minutes, but both the sensitivity and specificity were too low for this test to be considered as a substitute for culture.

Evaluation of new transport medium for detection of herpes simplex virus by culture and direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The transport medium Multi-Microbe Media (M4) was evaluated prospectively by culture and direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of herpes simplex virus from 473 specimens. In addition, 377 specimens in Bartels Viral Transport Medium were evaluated. By using culture as a "gold standard," the ELISA sensitivity was approximately 85%, while the specificities exceeded 96% for both media.

Diagnostic virology--then and now

In the past five years, technologic advances in the shell vial assay and expanding availability of rapid membrane EIA tests have allowed over 90% of the viruses detected in our laboratory to be reported within 24 h postinoculation. PCR technology promises to add a new practical dimension to diagnostic virology especially for the detection of viruses in CSF, tissues, and blood. Extension of these diagnostic capabilities from investigative protocols to general laboratories for routine use will be our biggest challenge and be based on considerations of cost, licensing, and availability of this technology in "kit" formats.

Comparison of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of herpes simplex virus antigen

Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for herpes simplex virus (HSV) detection were compared with culture in a prospective, blinded study with 153 patients with suspected recurrent oral or genital HSV. A subset of 15 of these subjects were studied daily until symptom resolution during a single episode of recurrent HSV. Direct-site specimens were collected and either placed in viral transport media (for Ortho ELISA and fresh inoculation into primary rabbit kidney cells) or frozen in ELISA collection media (DuPont). One hundred eighty-six culture-ELISA comparisons were analyzed. On the basis of culture positivity, the DuPont and Ortho ELISAs differed substantially with regard to sensitivity (93 versus 35%) but had similar specificities (95 versus 100%) and positive (85 versus 100%) and negative (98 versus 85%) predictive values. There were seven DuPont ELISA-positive, culture-negative samples which were confirmed positive for HSV by blocking antibody test (revised specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%). Six of these discrepant samples were from previously culture-positive subjects. These results demonstrate that currently available ELISA kits vary substantially as to their sensitivities in detecting HSV antigen from direct-site specimens. In addition, antigen detection, by ELISA technology, is not always synonymous with state of viral infectivity as judged by tissue culture cytopathic effect.