Treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: when, how and where?

Mechanisms and management of ventricular dysrhythmias in heart failure

Despite recent pharmacologic and surgical advances in the management of heart failure, the morbidity and mortality rates of this chronic illness remain high. Ventricular dysrhythmias are common in heart failure and may be independently associated with increased mortality rates. Although the risks of sudden cardiac death leading to the patient's death are increased by the presence of complex ventricular dysrhythmias, the management of dysrhythmias is subject to controversy. The purpose of this article is to review the normal electrophysiologic properties of the heart and to examine the likely mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and proposed treatments for ventricular dysrhythmias in heart failure.

Predictors of mortality in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardias or ventricular fibrillation and depressed left ventricular function: importance of beta-blockade

To study prognostic factors in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardias (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, we evaluated the predictive value of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic parameters for cardiac mortality and sudden cardiac death in 85 patients with VT or VF and left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45 (mean 0.27 +/- 0.10). Patients underwent serial drug testing and received appropriate antiarrhythmic treatment, with amiodarone given as last-resort therapy. During a follow-up of 24 +/- 13 months, 23 patients died of cardiac causes, and 18 of them died suddenly. Left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.27 and amiodarone treatment were related to greater cardiac mortality and increased risk of sudden cardiac death, whereas beta-blockade was associated with improved survival. In the multivariate model cardiac mortality was best predicted by a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.27, and absence of beta-blockade and severe left ventricular dysfunction were the strongest predictors of sudden cardiac death. We conclude that severe left ventricular dysfunction predicts increased cardiac mortality and high risk of sudden cardiac death. Moreover, beta-blocking treatment is associated with lower cardiac mortality and a reduced risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with sustained VT or VF and depressed left ventricular function. beta-Blocking agents may therefore be an important addition to conventional antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with VT or VF and left ventricular dysfunction.

Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for the evaluation of antiarrhythmic agents

This decision-analysis model assesses ambulatory cardiac monitoring (ACM), ACM followed by exercise testing, and electrophysiologic studies (EPS) in the evaluation and selection of antiarrhythmic agents in postinfarct patients with malignant arrhythmias. With existing data, we find no consistent advantage for one method of drug testing over another, although ACM appears to require fewer resources than does EPS. More patients qualify for EPS, but this fact does not increase the proportion of patients for whom a drug can be identified. These methods may test different aspects of arrhythmia activity and drug response, and sequential use may provide additional benefits. Such benefits must be determined empirically.

Survival after a first episode of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation

Recent outcome analyses in ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) have included patients undergoing electrophysiological study (EPS) at tertiary care centers. The selection process involved could introduce bias in the reported populations. We analyzed the outcome of 42 consecutive patients (aged 63 +/- 11 years) admitted to a coronary care unit within 48 hours of a first episode of VT/VF not associated with reversible causes. All patients recovered neurologically and were candidates for EPS. Nine patients (21%) died during the initial hospitalization (none had EPS), and another nine died during a follow-up of 17 +/- 12 months. Actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years was 64% and 62%, respectively. By Cox's model, congestive heart failure functional Class III-IV (P = 0.008; hazard ratio = 3.7) was the only independent prognostic factor. Among patients discharged, subsequent survival did not depend on the performance of EPS or on the antiarrhythmic therapeutic modalities used. Mortality after a first episode of VT/VF is high. Severe congestive heart failure is the most powerful prognostic factor. Studies including successfully referred patients undergoing EPS may not reflect the true natural history of patients with VT/VF.

Ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure

Heart failure is an increasingly common disorder leading to reduced quality and expectancy of life. Asymptomatic and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias are a frequent complication and have been found to be independent prognostic predictors for sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. Unfortunately, the positive predictive failure for this finding is low, but in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, variables indicating impaired pump function are the most important predictors of sudden and of nonsudden cardiac death. Arrhythmias in heart failure may have many different underlying mechanisms. Indications for, and mode of treatment of, arrhythmias in heart failure depend on the symptoms and prognostic significance of the arrhythmia. Primarily, pump function should be optimized and antiarrhythmic drug therapy instituted only when the arrhythmia persists. In poorly tolerated and life-threatening arrhythmias, implantable devices allowing pacing and defibrillation must be considered. No data are presently available indicating a protective role of antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure. Future directions should concentrate on the development of better stratification of risk for sudden death, better delineation of mechanisms of arrhythmias in heart failure (allowing the development of mechanism-specific antiarrhythmic drugs), and research into new nonpharmacologic techniques such as cardiomyoplasty and molecular biologic techniques to rebuild the failing heart muscles.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: role of the underlying etiology and the site of energy delivery

The role of DC catheter ablation (CA) to treat patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is still debated. To assess the efficacy of VT CA, we studied the follow-up of 49 patients with VT who underwent CA. There were 33 patients with an old myocardial infarction (MI) (group G I) and 16 patients had noncoronary VT (group G II): CA was performed at the earliest endocardial activation (EEA) (20 patients in G I, 14 patients in G II) or at the area of slow conduction (ASC) (13 patients in G I, 2 patients in G II). During the mean follow-up of 35 +/- 25 (1-79) months, there were 17 patients in G I (52%) and 12 patients in G II (75%) with VT recurrences (P less than 0.05). Recurrences of VT was observed in 4 of 15 patients (27%) when CA was performed at the ASC, compared to 25 of 34 patients (74%) with CA at the EEA (P less than 0.01). These data show that DC CA is more successful in patients with coronary artery disease, particularly when CA is performed at the ASC.

Antiarrhythmic drug treatment: need for continuous vigilance

Any physician treating cardiac arrhythmias should be aware of a possible worsening of the arrhythmia (so-called arrhythmogenesis) after the start of antiarrhythmic drug treatment. To facilitate the recognition of that complication the type and possible mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis are reviewed. Recognition also requires an understanding of (a) the time of appearance of arrhythmogenic effects after different drugs, (b) the value of non-invasive and invasive tests, and (c) the profile of the patient most likely to develop this problem. Guidelines are given to reduce the incidence of the arrhythmogenic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs and a plea is made that the physician should be always on the alert for this complication.

The Sicilian gambit. A new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology

The Queen's Gambit is an opening move in chess that provides a variety of aggressive options to the player electing it. This report represents a similar gambit (the Sicilian Gambit) on the part of a group of basic and clinical investigators who met in Taormina, Sicily to consider the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs. Paramount to their considerations were 1) dissatisfaction with the options offered by existing classification systems for inspiring and directing research, development, and therapy, 2) the disarray in the field of antiarrhythmic drug development and testing in this post-Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) era, and 3) the desire to provide an operational framework for consideration of antiarrhythmic drugs that will both encourage advancement and have the plasticity to grow as a result of the advances that occur. The multifaceted approach suggested is, like the title of the article, a gambit. It is an opening rather than a compendium and is intended to challenge thought and investigation rather than to resolve issues. The article incorporates first, a discussion of the shortcomings of the present system for drug classification; second, a review of the molecular targets on which drugs act (including channels and receptors); third, a consideration of the mechanisms responsible for arrhythmias, including the identification of "vulnerable parameter" that might be most accessible to drug effect; and finally, clinical considerations with respect to antiarrhythmic drugs. Information relating to the various levels of information is correlated across categories (i.e., clinical arrhythmias, cellular mechanisms, and molecular targets), and a "spread sheet" approach to antiarrhythmic action is presented that considers each drug as a unit, with similarities to and dissimilarities from other drugs being highlighted. A complete reference list for this work would require as many pages as the text itself. For this reason, referencing is selective and incomplete. It is designed, in fact, to provide sufficient background information to give the interested reader a starting frame of reference rather than to recognize the complete body of literature that is the basis for this article.

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing one- or two-stage strategies for myocardial revascularization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation

Internal defibrillation leads were placed at time of coronary revascularization in 79 patients. In 34, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was placed simultaneously (group I). A two-stage strategy (selective implantation of the ICD in patients with postoperative spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia [VT]) was followed in 45 patients (group II). Group I patients had failed more antiarrhythmic drug trials (2.9 +/- 1.6 vs 1.5 +/- 1.6; P = 0.02), including amiodarone (62% vs 20%; P less than 0.001). There were four operative deaths in each group. Postoperatively, VT was present in 27 group II patients (60%), 25 of whom received an ICD (two refused device implantation). Patients with postoperative VT had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction than those without VT (33 +/- 9 vs 47 +/- 16; P = 0.01). Actuarial survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 88 +/- 6, 88 +/- 7, and 88 +/- 10 in group I; and 83 +/- 6, 76 +/- 7, and 76 +/- 11 in group II (NS). No patient without an ICD (based on the postoperative electrophysiological study [EPS]) died suddenly. Five patients (6%) had ICD system infection. Sudden death was largely prevented by either strategy, but relatively high rates of operative mortality and ICD system infection were observed. Prospective studies should identify patients more likely to benefit from one or another strategy.

Predictors of ventricular tachycardia inducibility in programmed electrical stimulation and the effectiveness of serial drug testing: Polish multicenter study

In 100 patients with IHD and complex ventricular arrhythmias, programmed electrical stimulation was performed using up to three extrastimuli at sinus rhythm, and paced 100, 120 and 140 beats/min delivered from the RV apex, outflow tract or the LV with ventricular mapping to evaluate late potentials (LP) in 41 patients. Sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT) was provoked in 91% of 42 patients with a history of VT/VF, P less than 0.001, all five patients had SMVT in 24-hour ECG, P less than 0.005, and 91% of 21 patients with LV dyskinesis, P less than 0.01. After depolarizations were found in 62% of 21 patients with a history of VT, in 58% of 31 patients with inducible VT, P less than 0.01 and in five of six patients with LV dyskinesis. In patients with inducible VT, LP had a higher amplitude (105 +/- 35 vs 60 +/- 47 microV) and were more delayed (202 +/- 96 vs 133 +/- 75 msec) than in noninducible patients. In 17 patients, serial drug testing was performed after oral administration using mexilitene, disopyramide, chinidine, propafenone, sotalol, and amiodarone. If one drug was tested, the therapy efficacy was 25%, if two drugs-60%, and if three drugs-75%. In eight patients, VT was inducible in all tests, but in only one of these patients chronic antiarrhythmic therapy was not effective. We conclude that the most important predictors of VT inducibility are a history of VT or 24-hour ECG, and LV dyskinesis. Serial drug testing is efficient only when many drugs are tested, but even if VT is inducible, it does not exclude the possibility of a good clinical outcome in chronic therapy.

Sotalol in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias

To assess the antiarrhythmic efficacy of oral d,l-sotalol, 68 patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) (n = 62) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (n = 6) were studied by programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Fifty-one patients had coronary artery disease with a previous myocardial infarction and there were 17 patients without coronary disease: 11 patients had right and/or left ventricular dysplasia, one patient an aortic-valve replacement, and five patients had no visible heart disease. Prior to sotalol patients were treated with a mean of 3.6 +/- 1.3 antiarrhythmic class I drugs. None of these drugs prevented SMVT or VF. During control PVS (PVS 1), VF was induced in 8 patients (12%), SMVT in 47 patients (69%), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in 13 patients (19%). After loading with oral d,l-sotalol (320 mg/day), PVS (PVS 2) was repeated 4.2 +/- 3.3 weeks after PVS 1. In one of the patients (1%) VF was inducible, in 15 patients (22%) SMVT was induced, and in 18 patients (26%) NSVT was induced. In 34 patients (50%) either no or a short ventricular response was inducible. Our data show that oral d,l-sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic agent in patients with SMVT or VF.