Is atrial activation beneficial in heart transplant recipients?

Rate-responsive pacing improves exercise tolerance in heart transplant recipients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Chronotropic incompetence is one cause of diminished exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients. If reinnervation occurs, it often is late after transplantation and is not always accompanied by functional improvements in peak heart rate and appropriate tachycardia during exercise. To determine the efficacy of rate-responsive pacing on peak heart rate and exercise capacity, the authors studied eight male heart transplant recipients (age 57 +/- 12 years; 23 +/- 9 months after transplantation) that had either atrial or dual-chambered pacemakers.

METHODS

All subjects completed two maximal graded exercise tests (GXT) using the Naughton treadmill protocol. During the first GXT, pacemakers were programmed for bradycardia support only and without rate responsiveness (unpaced). After a 14-day regimen of beta blockade with metoprolol to nullify the influence of circulating catecholamines on heart rate, subjects performed the second GXT with pacemakers programmed to respond optimally in the rate-responsive mode (paced).

RESULTS

Peak heart rate (149 versus 129 bpm), peak oxygen uptake (18.9 versus 15.4 mL/kg/min), treadmill time to exhaustion (14.6 versus 12.4 min), and minute ventilation (76.7 versus 66.2 L/min) were significantly increased (P < or = 0.05) during the paced versus unpaced GXT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that chronotropic support of the transplanted heart using a rate-responsive pacemaker, with activity-based sensors programmed for maximal sensitivity, improves both peak heart rate and exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients significantly more than circulating catecholamines alone.

Cardiac pacemakers in the transplanted heart: short term with the biatrial anastomosis and unnecessary with the bicaval anastomosis

Sinus node dysfunction occurs commonly after orthotopic heart transplantation and may be caused by surgical trauma, ischemia to the sinus node, rejection, drug therapy and increasing donor age. In the past, using the standard biatrial technique described originally by Lower and Shumway, many series have reported permanent pacing in more than 10% of patients. Unlike sinus node dysfunction in nontransplanted patients, which typically worsens with time, sinus node dysfunction in the transplanted heart usually improves over a period of weeks to months. Delaying the implantation of a permanent pacemaker may render it unnecessary. The development of the bicaval technique for implantation of the donor heart appears to have decreased even further or even eliminated the need for early permanent pacing. Because sinus node dysfunction in the transplanted heart does not predict subsequent development of atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction, rate-responsive atrial pacing should be used in the majority of cases. Even after appropriate pacing for sinus node dysfunction, the sinus node may recover and permanent pacing may be discontinued. AV conduction abnormalities are far less common and generally occur late after transplantation. Dual-chamber pacing is required and permanent pacing should be continued indefinitely.

Optimal cardiac pacing after heart transplantation

The transplanted heart is characterized physiologically by autonomic denervation, chronotropic incompetence, intermittent episodes of allograft rejection, and frequently by diastolic dysfunction. Sinus node dysfunction resulting in bradycardia is common in the early postoperative period following standard orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Bradycardia tends to remit spontaneously but there are no factors that accurately identify patients who will need long-term pacing. Patients in whom bradycardia persists beyond the second postoperative week despite treatment with theophylline require permanent pacemaker implantation. It has been observed that chronotropic incompetence and diastolic dysfunction are important determinants of exercise capacity following heart transplantation. Pacing that restores chronotropic competence improves exercise capacity, confirming the importance of impaired heart rate response. As in other settings, pacing that preserves atrioventricular (AV) synchrony results in increased cardiac output. For these reasons when pacing is necessary we recommend the DDDR mode (AAIR if intact AV nodal conduction is present) so that the 30%-50% of patients who remain pacemaker-dependent long-term obtain maximal benefit from their transplant.

Bicaval and standard techniques in orthotopic heart transplantation: medium-term experience in cardiac performance and survival

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the medium-term results of right heart pressures, tricuspid valve dysfunction, overall cardiac performance, and survival between the bicaval and standard techniques.

METHOD

Between 1991 and 1997, 201 heart transplantations were performed in our center. Right heart catheterization was performed up to 12 months after transplantation. Echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular and tricuspid valve function.

RESULT

The standard technique was used in 105 cases, and the bicaval technique was used in 96 cases. There was no difference in the age, preoperative parameters, pulmonary hemodynamics, or ischemic time between the 2 groups. Right atrial pressure (4.3 +/- 4.0 mm Hg for the bicaval vs 10.9 +/- 4.8 mm Hg for standard technique) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (17.5 +/- 5.3 mm Hg and 22.5 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, respectively) were lower for the bicaval recipients up to 12 months after the operation (P =.001 and. 01, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher for the recipients of the bicaval technique up to the most recent measurement (P =.005). The prevalence of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation was higher in the recipients of the standard technique up to the most recent measurement (28% vs 7%; P =.02). The actuarial survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 74%, 70%, and 62% for the recipients of the standard technique versus 87%, 82%, and 81% for the recipients of the bicaval technique (P <.03, <.04, and <.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The bicaval technique maintains good left ventricular function, lower incidence and severity of tricuspid valve dysfunction, and improved survival compared with the standard technique.

Permanent atrial pacing in cardiac transplant patients

Thirteen out of 223 consecutive cardiac transplant patients required permanent pacemaker implantation; 11 for sinus node dysfunction and 2 for complete AV block. Patients with sinus node dysfunction were considered for AAIR mode pacemakers if they had intact AV conduction defined as a Wenckebach point of > 120 beats/min. Ten of 11 patients with sinus node dysfunction had a single atrial lead placed. Atrial lead placement was most easily accomplished with a straight, active fixation lead and the use of manually curved stylets to find an optimal position in the donor atrium, although active fixation leads with a preformed atrial J were used as well. Two leads dislodged requiring revision. In contrast, only 1 of 250 atrial leads implanted in nontransplanted hearts dislodged (P < 0.0001). Transvenous endomyocardial biopsies have not caused atrial lead dislodgment. Most transplant recipients requiring permanent pacing have intact AV nodal function and require only atrial pacing. Atrial lead dislodgment requiring lead revision occurs more frequently in heart transplant recipients than in native hearts. Use of a straight active fixation lead with a manually formed curve in the stylet is useful in order to find the optimal position for pacing.

Complete atrioventricular cardiac transplantation: improved performance compared with the standard technique

BACKGROUND

There has been renewed clinical interest in an alternative technique to orthotopic cardiac transplantation involving six anastomoses: left pulmonary veins, right pulmonary veins, inferior vena cava, pulmonary artery, aorta, and superior vena cava (complete technique). In this study, the results of the complete technique are compared with those of the standard operation (ventricular transplantation with atrioplasty).

METHODS

Dogs were used for ten acute standard and ten acute complete atrioventricular transplantations. There were no significant differences in the baseline cardiac function (preload-independent right and left ventricular recruitable stroke work), bypass times, and cardiac ischemic times between the two groups.

RESULTS

After transplantation, sinus rhythm was preserved after all ten complete and after only one standard transplantation but no significant hemodynamic differences were observed. The right and left ventricular preload-independent recruitable stroke work in the complete group and the left ventricular preload-independent recruitable stroke work in the standard group were conserved after transplantation, but the right ventricular preload-independent recruitable stroke work decreased by 39% +/- 8% (p < 0.05) in the standard group. There was also a significant decrease in the rate of biventricular filling in the standard group after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete atrioventricular transplantation is a feasible alternative technique and conserves normal sinus rhythm. The ischemic and bypass times are comparable for both methods. The insignificant change in the rate of biventricular filling in the dogs undergoing the complete technique indicates right and left ventricular diastolic function may be conserved after transplantation.

Cardiovascular dynamics and dimensions after bicaval and standard cardiac transplantation

Bicaval orthotopic cardiac transplantation leaving the right atrium intact has been introduced recently into clinical practice as an alternative to the standard method. To determine the effect of the surgical technique, 27 patients were studied at rest and supine exercise 19 +/- 5 months after bicaval orthotopic cardiac transplantation (group A, n = 15) and 22 +/- 7 months after standard orthotopic cardiac transplantation (group B, n = 12). Resting hemodynamics showed no difference between groups. With exercise, a significantly higher right atrial pressure was noted in group B. Echocardiographic analysis showed asynchronous right atrial contraction in 83% of group B patients versus none in group A. Resting right ventricular dimensions were significantly greater in group B (right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, 3.27 +/- 0.44 cm versus 2.88 +/- 0.35 cm [p < 0.05]; right ventricular end-diastolic area, 21.3 +/- 2.85 cm2 versus 17.1 +/- 2.01 cm2 [p < 0.005]). A higher incidence and significantly higher grade of tricuspid regurgitation were found throughout exercise in group B. The exercise duration (17.34 +/- 3.53 minutes versus 14.04 +/- 4.11 minutes [p < 0.05]) and the exercise capacity (1.17 +/- 0.25 W/kg versus 0.93 +/- 0.34 W/kg [p < 0.05]) were increased in group A. These data provide some evidence that the bicaval technique of cardiac transplantation improves cardiovascular dynamics and dimensions as well as exercise capacity.

Orthotopic cardiac transplantation: a comparison of standard and bicaval Wythenshawe techniques

We describe an alternative technique for orthotopic cardiac transplantation (bicaval Wythenshawe technique), which maintains the right and left atrial anatomy. We compared the new bicaval technique with the conventional (Lower and Shumway) technique of orthotopic cardiac transplantation to identify any beneficial physiologic and clinical outcomes resulting from maintaining the normal anatomy. Seventy-five patients were randomized on an alternate basis to two groups: group A (n = 40) had orthotopic cardiac transplantation with the bicaval technique and group B (n = 35) had conventional orthotopic heart transplantation. All patients were studied with transthoracic echocardiogram, endomyocardial biopsies, and measurement of intracardiac pressures 1, 4, and 12 weeks after transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic profile, ischemic time, bypass time, implantation time, transpulmonary gradient, or pulmonary vascular resistance between the two groups. The hemodynamic data were collected in the absence of histologic signs of rejection. In group A right atrial pressure (mean 3.6 mm Hg) was significantly lower (p < 0.03) than in group B (mean 8.8 mm Hg). The right atrial a wave was recorded in 38 patients in group A compared with seven patients in group B (p = 0.041). Atrial tachyarrhythmias occurred in two patients in group A compared with 11 in group B (p < 0.016). Temporary pacing was required in 10 patients in group A and 16 patients in group B (p = 0.034). Four cases of mitral regurgitation (all mild) were detected in group A in comparison with 12 cases (10 mild, 2 severe) in group B (p = 0.008). The mean ejection fraction in the first week after transplantation was 58% in group A and 46% in group B (p = 0.5). In the first 3 months the need for diuretics was less in group A (mean dose 80.8 mg furosemide daily) than in group B (mean dose 134 mg furosemide daily in the first week increasing to 160 mg furosemide daily). Hospital stay was shorter in group A (mean 23 days) than in group B (mean 27 days) (p < 0.015). There were no early deaths as a result of right ventricular failure in group A (n = 0/40) compared with four (n = 4/35; 9%) in group B (p < 0.034). This difference suggests that bicaval orthotopic cardiac implantation is associated with a lower right atrial pressure, a lower likelihood of atrial tachyarrhythmias, less need for pacing, less mitral incompetence, a lower diuretic dose, and a shorter hospital stay.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic properties of cardiac allografts

The increasing number of heart transplant patients requires that physicians be able to recognize the electrocardiographic (ECG) and electrophysiologic properties of cardiac allografts. Cardiac allografts are characterized by modifications of resting ECGs and frequent arrhythmias in the postoperative period, and the loss of autonomic nervous control illustrated by permanent tachycardia and loss of heart rate variability during 24-hour ambulatory ECG recording. Some clinical and experimental observations suggest a mid-term reinnervation of the cardiac allograft, but this requires histologic confirmation. The electrophysiologic characteristics of the denervated myocardium are similar to those of the innervated myocardium at rest. However, supersensitivity to circulating catecholamines has been observed in cardiac allografts as in experimentally denervated hearts, which is responsible for a progressive increase in heart rate during exercise and a slow decrease during recovery. Supersensitivity of the denervated heart to acetylcholine may explain the high prevalence of donor sinus dysfunction due to impairment of its automaticity. More often, the sinus node dysfunction is transient and can be treated with an adenosine antagonist, such as theophylline, before permanent implantation of a pacemaker. In the case of pacemaker implantation, synchronization of the donor atria with the recipient atria is desirable, and an endocardial lead implantation is preferred. Several electrophysiologic changes have been observed during acute cardiac allograft rejection. From experimental studies, the most important of these are the disturbance of conduction in the atria and the atrioventricular node and a decrease in the amplitude of the ventricular potential. Initial studies on isolated myocytes show profound changes in membrane conductance during experimental cardiac rejection. The development of new noninvasive detection methods of cardiac allograft rejection, such as intramyocardial voltage electrogram monitoring and high-resolution ECG, could help early diagnosis.

A comparison of VVIR and DDDR pacing following cardiac transplantation

We compared the clinical course of patients paced in VVIR versus DDDR mode to determine the most appropriate method of pacing following cardiac transplantation. Pacemaker implantation was required in 9 of 90 orthotopic cardiac transplants (10%). Indications included sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest (8 patients) and AV node dysfunction (1 patient). VVIR pacemakers were implanted in four patients and DDDR in five patients. DDDR patients: The mean P wave was 1.7 mV and the mean atrial stimulation threshold was 0.8 V (at 0.5 msec). During follow-up of 20 months, two atrial lead complications developed (29% of leads in 33% of patients). No lead complications were directly related to endomyocardial biopsy. VVIR patients: All four patients developed VA conduction with mean VA time 180 msec (160-240 msec). Two patients developed pacemaker syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

VA conduction and pacemaker syndrome may develop in cardiac transplant recipients paced in the VVIR mode. Dual chamber pacing is technically feasible and preferable following cardiac transplantation.

Right ventricular function early after total or standard orthotopic heart transplantation

Right ventricular failure after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is classically related to preoperative pulmonary hypertension. However, the role of the enlarged atria in right ventricular dysfunction after OHT remains unclear. For that purpose, the right ventricular function in the first 2 days after OHT was compared in two groups of transplant recipients: 11 patients who underwent standard OHT (group I) and 9 patients who underwent total OHT, which consisted of total excision of both the left and right atria and OHT of an intact donor heart with its atria as well as its ventricle (group II). Right ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index, and right-sided pressures were recorded at baseline and 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after OHT using a Swan-Ganz catheter with a rapid-response thermistor. Right ventricular function parameters did not differ between groups; they were characterized by a decrease in right ventricular ejection fraction and an increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume index whereas cardiac index and right-sided pressures remained normal or slightly increased. Ischemic time (177 +/- 41 minutes in group I versus 178 +/- 39 minutes in group II) and preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (1.9 +/- 0.7 Wood units in group I versus 3.0 +/- 1.5 Wood units in group II) were not different between groups. These results suggest that the anatomic and physiologic advantages offered by the modified technique of OHT had no clinical relevance in this group of patients with low preoperative pulmonary vascular resistances when compared with a group of patients who underwent transplantation with the standard technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the need for long-term pacing and optimum mode of pacing in cardiac transplant recipients.

DESIGN

(a) A retrospective review of patient records. (b) A prospective study of pacemaker use by 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiography before and after reprogramming to minimise use of pacemakers.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic, supra-regional cardiopulmonary transplant unit.

PATIENTS

All 21 patients at this centre who had received permanent pacemakers after cardiac transplantation. 18 of 19 survivors completed the prospective part of the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The presence of pacing during a 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recording (programming: 50 beats/min, rate sensor inactivated).

RESULTS

21 of 191 (11%) recipients surviving one month or more received permanent pacemakers. The indication was sinus node dysfunction in 13 (62%) and atrioventricular (AV) block in eight (38%). Patients who paced on follow up 12 lead electrocardiograms declined from 38% at three months to 10% at three years after transplantation. After programming to 50 beats/min only five of 18 (28%) patients paced during a 24 hour ambulatory recording. Four of 11 (36%) recipients who received pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction paced compared with one of seven patients (14%) paced for AV block. No patient who had a pacemaker before the 16th day after operation continued to pace whereas five of nine implanted later were used long-term.

CONCLUSION

Only five of 18 (28%) patients with pacemakers continued to pace long-term. Continued pacing was more common in those with persistent sinus node dysfunction after the second week after operation but the need for long-term pacing was not predictable.

Normal AV node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction after cardiac transplantation

Postoperative atrioventricular nodal (AVN) function was compared in 55 patients with normal and 50 patients with impaired sinus node (SN) function after cardiac transplantation (corrected SN recovery time > 520 msec or sinus arrest +/- escape rhythm). Fifty-two patients had fixed atrial pacing at cycle lengths between 600 and 430 msec, and 53 patients at cycle lengths from 600 to 300 msec between postoperative weeks 1 to 3. Relative (stimulus-R interval; AVNRRP) and effective AVN refractory period (AVNERP) were determined in 53 patients at a cycle length of 500 msec. Only one of 105 recipients had high degree AVN conduction disturbance characterized by a Wenckebach phenomenon at cycle length < 630 msec in the first postoperative week. Three patients with normal and two patients with impaired SN function had Wenckebach cycle lengths > 430 msec while the Wenckebach cycle lengths were < or = 430 msec in the remainder (p = NS). Resting PQ interval (146 +/- 18 vs 162 +/- 32; p = 0.09), Wenckebach cycle length (350 +/- 53 vs 362 +/- 50 msec), AVNRRP (356 +/- 38 vs 367 +/- 37 msec), and AVNERP (217 +/- 48 vs 244 +/- 49 msec) did not differ significantly between patients with normal and impaired SN function. AVN conduction did not deteriorate during 318 +/- 130 days of follow-up (PQ at follow-up 154 +/- 17 and 158 +/- 22 msec, patients with normal and impaired SN function, respectively). One DDD pacemaker was placed for AVN conduction disturbance while 22 pacemakers were implanted for SN deficiency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Optimal pacing modes after cardiac transplantation: is synchronisation of recipient and donor atria beneficial?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response of the transplanted heart to different pacing modes and to synchronisation of the recipient and donor atria in terms of cardiac output at rest.

DESIGN

Doppler derived cardiac output measurements at three pacing rates (90/min, 110/min and 130/min) in five pacing modes: right ventricular pacing, donor atrial pacing, recipient-donor synchronous pacing, donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing, and synchronous recipient-donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing.

PATIENTS

11 healthy cardiac transplant recipients with three pairs of epicardial leads inserted at transplantation.

RESULTS

Donor atrial pacing (+11% overall) and donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing (+8% overall) were significantly better than right ventricular pacing (p < 0.001) at all pacing rates. Synchronised pacing of recipient and donor atrial segments did not confer additional benefit in either atrial or atrial-ventricular sequential modes of pacing in terms of cardiac output at rest at these fixed rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial pacing or atrial-ventricular sequential pacing appear to be appropriate modes in cardiac transplant recipients. Synchronisation of recipient and donor atrial segments in this study produced no additional benefit. Chronotropic competence in these patients may, however, result in improved exercise capacity and deserves further investigation.