Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)

Sarcopenia screening and clinical outcomes in surgical patients: A longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The SARC-CalF was developed as a screening tool for sarcopenia, but little is still known about its validity in surgical patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prognostic value of SARC-CalF in predicting clinical outcomes in patients admitted for any elective surgery in a hospital.

METHODS

Cohort study with prospective data collection of surgical patients ≥18 years of age screened for sarcopenia within 48 h of admission using the SARC-CalF (score ≥11 points classified patients at suggestive signs of sarcopenia). A standard questionnaire for sociodemographic and clinical data was filled and anthropometric data were measured. Clinical outcomes of interest comprised postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay (LPHS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Among the 303 patients admitted for elective surgery across various specialties (58.2 ± 14.6 years; 53.8% men) included, 21.5% presented suggestive signs of sarcopenia (SARC-CalF ≥11). LOS (16.0 [10.0-29.0] vs 13.5 [8.0-22.0] days; P < 0.05) and LPHS (6.0 [3.0-14.5] vs 5.0 [1.0-8.2] days; P < 0.05) were longer in patients with SARC-CalF ≥11 compared with those without this condition. The frequency of severe postoperative complications (23.1% vs 8.8%; P < 0.05) and the incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.9%; P < 0.05) were higher in patients with SARC-CalF ≥11. However, in the multivariate analyses, no association between SARC-CalF ≥11 and clinical outcomes was found.

CONCLUSION

Signs of sarcopenia (SARC-CalF ≥11) were present in >20% of patients who were hospitalized for any elective surgery, but it was not an independent predictor of extended hospital stay, complications, and death.

A Quality Improvement Initiative for Echocardiogram Ordering Patterns in an Academic Hospital

Background Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for echocardiography are a useful tool to deliver quality healthcare. Our quality-based interventional study was designed to assess the trends in appropriate utilization rates for echocardiography in our institution and improve adherence to the AUC criteria for transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE). Methodology A prospective, time series analysis was conducted at the Upstate University Hospital for the months of July 2019 and August 2020. A chart analysis was performed on 620 consecutive inpatients who underwent TTE for the month of July 2019. We assessed the trends of the appropriate ordering of TTEs. We then updated our order form incorporating the 42 most common appropriate indications. A post-intervention chart analysis was performed on all inpatient TTEs ordered for the month of August 2020 (n = 410). The appropriateness of the TTE for the entire group was determined based on the true indication per chart review. The primary outcome was the proportion of appropriate and inappropriate TTEs ordered. Secondary outcomes included assessing for concordance between the indication on the order requisition form and by chart review. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Using the 2011 AUC for the entire group, 81% of the pre-intervention TTEs and 79.5% of the post-intervention TTEs were appropriate (p = 0.55). There was a statistically significant reduction in the number of discordant TTE orders before and after the intervention (p < 0.01). In addition, we noted increased appropriateness of TTEs in the concordant group both pre and post-intervention. Conclusions Our study demonstrates a significant increase in the concordance between the TTE order sheet and actual indication per chart review with the intervention. This can translate into improved scanning and physician reading quality and time, thereby increasing focus on areas of interest according to the true indication. There was no significant increase in the appropriate TTEs ordered.

An Overview of the Implications for Perianesthesia Nurses in terms of Intraoperative Changes in Temperature and Factors Associated with Unintentional Postoperative Hypothermia

Patients undergo surgery and anaesthesia on a daily basis across the United States and throughout the world. A major source of worry for these patients continues to be inadvertent hypothermia, once core temperature <36°C (96.8°F). Despite well-documented adverse physiological consequences, anaesthesia nurses continue to have a difficult task in keeping patient warmth pre-/peri-/post-surgical procedure. Thermostasis within postoperative patient necessitates the collaboration of many individuals. In order to provide safe and high-quality treatment, it is essential to use the most up-to-date data to guide therapeutic procedures targeted at achieving balance body temperature in surgical patients. Providing a review of the physiology of perioperative temperature variations and the comorbidities linked with accidental intraoperative hypothermia, this article will also provide preventive and treatment methods.

Pre-Anesthetic Medical Evaluations: Criteria Considerations for Telemedicine Alternatives to Face to Face Visits

Background

The number of pre-anesthetic medical evaluations (PAMEs) being conducted in primary care is increasing. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine has surged, providing a feasible way to conduct some of these visits. This study aimed to identify patient-related factors where a face to face (FTF) evaluation is indicated, measured by the need for pre-operative testing.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients age ≥ 18 years who had a PAME between January 2019–June 2020 at a rural primary care clinic in Southeast Minnesota. Data collected included age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score, medications, revised cardiac risk index (RCRI), smoking status, exercise capacity, body mass index, and pre-operative testing. Logistical regression modeling for odds ratios of outcomes was performed.

Results

254 patients were included, with an average age of 64.1 years; 43.7% were female. Most were obese (mean BMI 31.6), non-smoking (93.7%) with excellent functional capacity (87.8% ≥ 5 METs). 76.8% of the planned surgeries were intermediate or high risk. 35.0% (n = 89) of visits resulted in medication adjustments and 76.7% (n = 195) in pre-operative testing. Age ≥ 65 years, ≥7 current medications, and diabetes all significantly increased the odds of requiring pre-operative testing (P < .05).

Conclusions

This study was able to identify patient-related factors that increased the likelihood of requiring pre-operative testing. Patients who are age ≥ 65 years, ≥7 current medications, and those with diabetes could be scheduled for a FTF evaluation. Others could be scheduled for a telemedicine visit to minimize health-care exposures.

Mitigating the stress response to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing emergency surgery with the addition of beta-adrenergic blockade

As population age, healthcare systems and providers are likely to experience a substantial increase in the proportion of elderly patients requiring emergency surgery. Emergency surgery, compared with planned surgery, is strongly associated with increased risks of adverse postoperative outcomes due to the short time available for diagnosis, optimization, and intervention in patients presenting with physiological derangement. These patient populations, who are often frail and burdened with a variety of co-morbidities, have lower reserves to deal with the stress of the acute condition and the required emergency surgical intervention. In this review article, we discuss topical areas where mitigation of the physiological stress posed by the acute condition and asociated surgical intervention may be feasible. We consider the impact of the adrenergic response and use of beta blockers for these high-risk patients and discuss common risk factors such as frailty and delirium. A proactive multidisciplinary approach to peri-operative care aimed at mitigation of the stress response and proactive management of common conditions in the older emergency surgical patient could yield more favorable outcomes.

Frequency and Outcomes of Preoperative Stress Testing in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty from 2004 to 2017

Importance

Cardiac stress testing is often performed prior to noncardiac surgery, although trends in use of preoperative stress testing and the effect of testing on cardiovascular outcomes are currently unknown.

Objective

To describe temporal trends and outcomes of preoperative cardiac stress testing from 2004 to 2017.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional study of patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty from 2004 to 2017. Trend analysis was conducted using Joinpoint and generalized estimating equation regression. The study searched IBM MarketScan Research Databases inpatient and outpatient health care claims for private insurers including supplemental Medicare coverage and included patients with a claim indicating an elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2017.

Exposures

Elective total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Trend in yearly frequency of preoperative cardiac stress testing.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 801 396 elective total hip (27.9%; n = 246 168 of 801 396) and total knee (72.1%; 555 228 of 801 396) arthroplasty procedures, with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range, 57-70 years) and 58.1% women (n = 465 545 of 801 396). The overall rate of stress testing during the study period was 10.4% (n = 83 307 of 801 396). The rate of stress tests increased 0.65% (95% CI, 0.09-1.21; P = .03) annually from quarter (Q) 1 of 2004 until Q2 of 2006. A joinpoint was identified at Q3 of 2006 (95% CI, 2005 Q4 to 2007 Q4) when preoperative stress test use decreased by -0.71% (95% CI, -0.79% to 0.63%; P < .001) annually. A second joinpoint was identified at the Q4 of 2013 (95% CI, 2011 Q3 to 2015 Q3), when the decline in stress testing rates slowed to -0.40% (95% CI, -0.57% to -0.24%; P < .001) annually. The overall rate of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest was 0.24% (n = 1677 of 686 067). Rates of myocardial infraction and cardiac arrest were not different in patients with at least 1 Revised Cardiac Risk Index condition who received a preoperative stress test and those who did not (0.60%; n = 221 of 36 554 vs 0.57%; n = 694 of 122 466; P = .51).

Conclusions and Relevance

The frequency of preoperative stress testing declined annually from 2006 through 2017. Among patients with at least 1 Revised Cardiac Risk Index condition, no difference was observed in cardiovascular outcomes between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative testing.

Refractory Hypotension During General Anesthesia Despite Withholding Telmisartan

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used to treat hypertension. However, similar to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs can also cause refractory hypotension during general anesthesia. Therefore, it has been recommended that ARBs be withheld for 24 hours prior to the induction of anesthesia. This is a case report of refractory hypotension requiring the administration of potent vasopressors after the induction of general anesthesia despite withholding telmisartan for 24 hours. In the same patient undergoing a subsequent general anesthetic, telmisartan was withheld for 5 days before induction, leading to mild intraoperative hypotension that responded adequately to phenylephrine. The primary cause of refractory hypotension during the first general anesthetic was suspected to be an insufficient telmisartan washout period. Telmisartan's half-life of 24 hours is notably the longest of all ARBs in current use. This case report demonstrates that refractory hypotension during general anesthesia cannot always be avoided by withholding telmisartan for 24 hours before the induction of anesthesia. Therefore, a washout period greater than 24 hours is preferable for patients taking telmisartan.

Preoperative Evaluation Before Noncardiac Surgery

The medical complexity of surgical patients is increasing and medical specialties are frequently asked to assist with the perioperative management surgical patients. Effective pre-anesthetic medical evaluations are a valuable tool in providing high-value, patient-centered surgical care and should systematically address risk assessment and identify areas for risk modification. This review outlines a structured approach to the pre-anesthetic medical evaluation, focusing on the asymptomatic patient. It discusses the evidence supporting the use of perioperative risk calculation tools and focused preoperative testing. We also introduce important key topics that will be explored in greater detail in upcoming reviews in this series.

Development and Feasibility of a Group-Based Therapeutic Yoga Program for Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain

Objective

To develop a group-based therapeutic yoga program for women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and explore the effects of this program on pain severity, sexual function, and well-being.

Methods

A yoga therapy program for CPP was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, researchers, and yoga consultants. Women reporting moderate to severe pelvic pain for at least six months were recruited into a single-arm trial. Participants attended twice weekly group classes focusing on Iyengar-based yoga techniques and were instructed to practice yoga at home an hour a week for six weeks. Participants self-rated the severity of their pelvic pain using daily logs. The impact of participants' pain on everyday activities, emotional well-being, and sexual function was assessed using an Impact of Pelvic Pain (IPP) questionnaire. Sexual function was further assessed using the Sexual Health Outcomes in Women Questionnaire (SHOW-Q).

Results

Among the 16 participants (age range = 31-64 years), average ratings of the severity of pain "at its worst," "at its best," and "on average" decreased by 29%, 32%, and 34%, respectively, from start to six weeks (P < 0.05 for all). Women demonstrated improvements in scores on IPP subscales for daily activities (1.8 ± 0.7 to 0.9 ± 0.7, P < 0.001), emotional well-being (1.7 ± 0.9 to 0.9 ± 0.7, P = 0.005), and sexual function (1.9 ± 1.1 to 1.0 ± 0.9, P = 0.04). Scores on the SHOW-Q "pelvic problem interference" scale also improved over six weeks (53 ± 23 to 27 ± 23, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Findings provide preliminary evidence of the feasibility of teaching women with CPP to practice yoga to self-manage pain and improve quality of life and sexual function.

Beta-blockers in noncardiac surgery: Did observational studies put us back on safe ground?

Based on landmark trials, international guidelines had for years promoted the use of beta-blockers in the setting of non-cardiac surgery. In 2011, concerns were raised regarding the integrity of some of the landmark trials, as the Dutch Erasmus Medical Center found some of them to be scientifically incorrect. Based on the remaining studies that were to be trusted, investigations showed that, in contrast to prior beliefs, the widespread use of perioperative beta-blockers might be harmful. A call for further investigations into the matter ushered in several observational studies evaluating the safety of perioperative beta-blocker therapy in specific patient subgroups. Within this review, we discuss important aspects for making these decisions, and compare the major observational studies and specific estimates of risk in subgroups of interest. We conclude that patients at high risk with heavy co-morbidities, such as heart failure, may benefit from beta-blocker therapy, whereas low-risk patients, such as patients with uncomplicated hypertension, may be at increased risk with beta-blocker therapy. We provide a critical review of current perioperative guidelines in view of the new observational data, suggesting that the recommended schematics, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, for risk stratification of patients in this setting may be suboptimal. Further, we provide discussions of other aspects, including risk of sepsis, type of beta-blocker, and the potential of perioperative beta-blocker withdrawal, which may be important in guiding future studies. Summarising the current evidence, we argue that, after a precarious decade, we may just now, be back on safe ground.

Preoperative Assessment of the Patient with Cardiac Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association has published Guidelines on Perioperative Evaluation. Preoperative evaluation should focus on identifying patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic coronary artery disease. The guidelines advocate using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Risk Index to determine perioperative risk. Diagnostic testing should be reserved for those at increased risk with poor exercise capacity. Indications for coronary interventions are the same in the perioperative period as in the nonoperative setting. In patients with a prior coronary stent, optimal antiplatelet therapy and timing of elective noncardiac surgery is evolving.

Is Preoperative Cardiac Testing Indicated Prior to Elective Carotid Endarterectomy?

The high incidence of coronary artery disease in patients with peripheral and cerebrovascular occlusive disease has been well established. While preoperative cardiac evaluation has been shown to be beneficial in patients undergoing elective aortic reconstruction, the role of preoperative cardiac testing in patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy has not been defined. In this study, the charts of 289 consecutive patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, were evaluated to determine the need for cardiac “clearance” prior to surgery. Ages ranged from 48 to 98, with a mean of 70.4 years. The male-to-female ratio was 165:124. Risk factors for coronary artery disease were also assessed: 203 patients (70%) were hypertensive, and 162 patients (56%) gave a history of smoking. An abnormalappearing preoperative EKG was identified in 139 patients (48%). Sixty-seven patients (23%) presented with a history of angina pectoris, and 80 patients (28%) had sustained a myocardial infarction in the past. No patient presented with unstable angina or angina at rest. No patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary artery angioplasty immediately prior to carotid endarterectomy. Of the 289 endarterectomies 154 (53%) were performed under regional anesthesia. All patients were monitored with intraoperative arterial pressure catheters. There were no postoperative deaths. No patient sustained a documented postoperative myocardial infarction. One patient experienced chest pain for 24 hours postoperatively. This patient had a history of angina pectoris and a previous myocardial infarction. One patient had an episode of shortness of breath postoperatively. There were two postoperative strokes. These data suggest that patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease can safely undergo elective carotid endarterectomy without extensive cardiac testing prior to surgery.

ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY AMONG THE ELDERLY: CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Care for elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, particularly for those requiring emergency surgery, needs to take into account an analysis of physical capacity and risks specific to elderly individuals, in an attempt to reduce the risks. Nevertheless, these remain high in this group. Despite the risks, procedures developed promptly have a positive effect on these patients’ evolution. Coordinated care, composed of teams of specialists within clinical medicine, geriatrics, orthopedics, anesthesiology and critical care, along with other healthcare professionals, may be highly beneficial for this group of patients.

Use of Preoperative Testing and Physicians' Response to Professional Society Guidance

IMPORTANCE

The value of routine preoperative testing before most surgical procedures is widely considered to be low. To improve the quality of preoperative care and reduce waste, 2 professional societies released guidance on use of routine preoperative testing in 2002, but researchers and policymakers remain concerned about the health and cost burden of low-value care in the preoperative setting.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term national effect of the 2002 professional guidance from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the American Society of Anesthesiologists on physicians' use of routine preoperative testing.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective analysis of nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine adults in the United States who were evaluated during preoperative visits from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2010. A quasiexperimental, difference-in-difference (DID) approach evaluated whether the publication of professional guidance in 2002 was associated with changes in preoperative testing patterns, adjusting for temporal trends in routine testing, as captured by testing patterns in general medical examinations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Physician orders for outpatient plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, electrocardiogram, and cardiac stress testing.

RESULTS

During the 14-year period, the average annual number of preoperative visits in the United States increased from 6.8 million in 1997-1999 to 9.8 million in 2002-2004 and 14.3 million in 2008-2010. After accounting for temporal trends in routine testing, we found no statistically significant overall changes in the use of plain radiography (11.3% in 1997-2002 to 9.9% in 2003-2010; DID, -1.0 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.2), hematocrit (9.4% in 1997-2002 to 4.1% in 2003-2010; DID, 1.2 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.7), urinalysis (12.2% in 1997-2002 to 8.9% in 2003-2010; DID, 2.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -1.7 to 7.1), or cardiac stress testing (1.0% in 1997-2002 to 2.0% in 2003-2010; DID, 0.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.5) after the publication of professional guidance. However, the rate of electrocardiogram testing fell (19.4% in 1997-2002 to 14.3% in 2003-2010; DID, -6.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -10.6 to -2.7) in the period after the publication of guidance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The release of the 2002 guidance on routine preoperative testing was associated with a reduced incidence of routine electrocardiogram testing but not of plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, or cardiac stress testing. Because routine preoperative testing is generally considered to provide low incremental value, more concerted efforts to understand physician behavior and remove barriers to guideline adherence may improve health care quality and reduce costs.

Learning from mistakes in clinical practice guidelines: the case of perioperative β-blockade

For more than two decades, the role of beta-blockers in preventing cardiac complications after major surgery has been the subject of contentious scientific and policy debate. Based on two small but highly publicized randomized trials published in 1996 and 1999, prominent U.S. organizations embraced preoperative beta-blocker initiation as a “best practice” and an opportunity for widespread safety improvement. Yet only a few years later, expert recommendations regarding preoperative beta-blockers were revised and downgraded when subsequent research failed confirm promising early findings and called attention to potential harms associated with beta-blocker overuse. In this paper, we trace the history of preoperative beta-blocker recommendations as a case study in lessons to be learned from reversals of guideline recommendations based initially on evidence drawn from randomized, controlled trials. Ultimately, we find that the policy significance that stakeholders ascribed to early beta-blocker studies combined with the prestige that experts assigned to the randomized controlled trial as a form of evidence to short-circuit discourse on the risks of preoperative beta-blocker initiation and led it to be elevated prematurely as a best practice. As such, the story of preoperative beta-blockers illustrates threats to objectivity in guidelines that can emerge from policy imperatives that lend primacy to the rapid translation of research into practice and from perspectives that unduly emphasize the strengths of randomized trials.

Estimation of cardiac risk before noncardiac surgery: the evolution of cardiac risk indices

Postoperative cardiac complications are among the most feared events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Hospitalists, internists, cardiologists, and anesthesiologists are frequently asked to provide preoperative consultations to assess risk and optimize medical treatment for the patient. Over the years, numerous studies have attempted to define preoperative risk factors in an attempt to risk stratify patients and determine when interventions may be applied to reduce risk. These studies have proposed various risk indices and algorithms based on identification of different risk factors, related to variations in patient populations, types of surgery, definitions of comorbidities, and endpoints studied. This article reviews many of these risk indices, highlighting their findings, utilities, and limitations.

Overuse of preoperative cardiac stress testing in medicare patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and predictors of cardiac stress testing before elective noncardiac surgery in Medicare patients with no indications for cardiovascular evaluation.

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines indicate that patients without class I (American Heart Association high risk) or class II cardiac conditions (clinical risk factors) should not undergo cardiac stress testing before elective noncardiac, nonvascular surgery.

METHODS

We used 5% Medicare inpatient claims data (1996-2008) to identify patients aged ≥ 66 years who underwent elective general surgical, urological, or orthopedic procedures (N = 211,202). We examined the use of preoperative stress testing in the subset of patients with no diagnoses consistent with cardiac disease (N = 74,785). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of preoperative cardiac stress testing.

RESULTS

Of the patients with no cardiac indications for preoperative stress testing, 3.75% (N = 2803) received stress testing in the 2 months before surgery. The rate of preoperative stress testing increased from 1.72% in 1996 to 6.44% in 2007 (P < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics showed a significant increase in preoperative stress testing over time. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02-1.21], presence of other comorbidities [OR 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.35], high-risk procedure (OR 2.42; 95% CI: 2.04-2.89), and larger hospital size (OR 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.32) were positive predictors of stress testing. Patients living in regions with greater Medicare expenditures (OR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.05-1.45) were also more likely to receive stress tests.

CONCLUSIONS

In a 5% sample of Medicare claims data, 2803 patients underwent preoperative stress testing without any indications. When these results were applied to the entire Medicare population, we estimated that there are over 56,000 patients who underwent unnecessary preoperative stress testing. The rate of testing in patients without cardiac indications has increased significantly over time.

Cardiac risk factors of revascularization in chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia (CALEI) undergoing revascularization without noninvasive stress testing (NIST).

METHODS

From January 2007 to January 2012, patients with CALEI who underwent revascularization were retrospectively reviewed. Emergent operations, revision procedures for previous surgery, or patients with active cardiac conditions were excluded. NIST was not performed for patients without active cardiac conditions. Cardiac risk was categorized into low, intermediate and high risk, according to the Lee's revised cardiac risk index. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction or any cardiac death within 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 459 patients underwent elective lower extremity revascularization procedures (240 open surgeries, 128 endovascular procedures, and 91 hybrid surgeries). The treated lesions comprised of 18% aorto-iliac, 58% infrainguinal, and 24% combined lesions. With regard to cardiac risk, low-, intermediate- and high risks were 67%, 32% and 2%, respectively. MACE was developed in 7 patients (2%). High or intermediate risk group by the Lee's index was related to postoperative MACE. Subgroup analysis for open surgery or hybrid surgery group identified female gender as an independent risk factor of MACE (P = 0.049; odds ratio, 5.168; confidence interval, 1.011 to 26.423).

CONCLUSION

The Lee's index was a useful predictor of MACE. MACE is more common in female patients than male patients after open or hybrid surgery. Routine preoperative NIST is not suggested for all patients undergoing revascularization for CALEI, especially for those in the low risk group.

Criteria for Patient Selection and Multidisciplinary Evaluation and Treatment of the Weight Loss Surgery Patient

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and to recommend the medical and nutritional aspects of multidisciplinary care required to minimize perioperative and postoperative risks in patients with severe obesity who undergo weight loss surgery (WLS).

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Members of the Multidisciplinary Care Task Group conducted searches of MEDLINE and PubMed for articles related to WLS in general and medical and nutritional care in particular. Pertinent abstracts and literature were reviewed for references. Multiple searches were carried out for various aspects of multidisciplinary care published between 1980 and 2004. A total of 3000 abstracts were identified; 242 were reviewed in detail.

RESULTS

We recommended multidisciplinary screening of WLS patients to ensure appropriate selection; preoperative assessment for cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and other obesity-related diseases associated with increased risk for complications or mortality; preoperative weight loss and cessation of smoking; perioperative prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE); preoperative and postoperative education and counseling by a registered dietitian; and a well-defined postsurgical diet progression.

DISCUSSION

Obesity-related diseases are often undiagnosed before WLS, putting patients at increased risk for complications and/or early mortality. Multidisciplinary assessment and care to minimize short- and long-term risks include: comprehensive medical screening; appropriate pre-, peri-, and postoperative preparation; collaboration with multiple patient care disciplines (e.g., anesthesiology, pulmonary medicine, cardiology, and psychology); and long-term nutrition education/counseling.

Preoperative microvascular dysfunction: a prospective, observational study expanding risk assessment strategies in major thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Brachial artery reactivity testing (BART)--a surrogate test of microvascular function--predicts cardiac risk in the nonsurgical population and associates it with adverse outcome after vascular surgery. This pilot study investigated BART-derived variables, including flow-mediated dilation (FMD), in preoperative risk stratification for major thoracic surgery.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, BART was performed in 63 patients before major thoracic surgery. Ultrasonography recorded two-dimensional images and Doppler flow signals of the brachial artery preoperatively at baseline and after induced reactive hyperemia. Variables derived using BART were correlated with preoperative risk factors, established risk scores, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The median preoperative FMD value in patients without postoperative complications was 11.5%. This value was used to delineate all patients into two groups: low (FMD < 11.5%) and high (FMD ≥ 11.5%) FMD cohorts. Patients in the low FMD group experienced more postoperative complications: 54% versus 30% had one or more adverse postoperative event, and 11% versus 0% had three or more adverse postoperative events (p < 0.001), respectively. The low FMD group required longer intensive care unit (3.9 ± 2.0 days versus 0.9 ± 0.3 days; p = 0.015) and hospital (14.0 ± 3.3 days versus 6.8 ± 0.6 days; p = 0.007) stays. This cutoff point for FMD accurately predicted 71% of the patients with adverse postoperative events, achieving 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 54.7 to 88.2) sensitivity and 48.6% (95% confidence interval, 32.0 to 65.1) specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Using BART, preoperative microvascular dysfunction can be identified in patients at increased risk for postoperative complications. These data suggest that larger observational studies and studies exploring preoperative optimization strategies aimed at improving microvascular function are warranted.

Anesthesia for bone replacement surgery

Advances in clinical medicine, improved understanding of pathophysiology, and the extensive application of medical technology have projected hitherto high risk and poor outcome surgical procedures into the category of routine and relatively good outcome surgeries. Bone replacement surgery is one amongst these and is wrought with a multitude of perioperative complexities. An understanding of these goes a long way in assisting in the final outcome for the patient. Here we present a review of the literature covering various issues involved during the different stages of the perioperative period.

Preoperative cardiac evaluation of the vascular surgery patient--an anesthesia perspective

The morbidity and mortality associated with vascular surgery procedures are largely the results of cardiac events. National guidelines have been regularly proposed and updated by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) to ensure optimal perioperative management and risk stratification. Controversy remains between experts and other cardiology societies regarding several patient care issues including revascularization before surgery, timing of β-blocker therapy, and the administration of antiplatelet therapy. Several landmark articles recently published have helped to modify the guidelines in the hope of improving vascular patient outcomes. In this review, we searched all recent available literature pertaining to perioperative cardiac evaluation before major vascular surgery. We propose an algorithm for preoperative cardiac evaluation, which is a modification to the AHA recommendations. Incorporated in this algorithm are recent published pivotal articles that can help in guiding physicians caring for the vascular patient requiring major operative or endovascular interventions.

Postoperative pain monitor after total knee replacement

Aim of this work was to study the postoperative pain within the first week of a total knee replacement by comparing three different forms of administration of analgesia. We proposed to verify the correspondence between a subjective pain assessment made by the patient on a Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and an objective assessment made by assaying the serum algogenic cytokines interleukin-1 (IL1), interleukin-6 (IL6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Statistical analysis of the data on the VAS and the three cytokine assays done preoperatively and on the third and seventh days postoperatively showed that while the VAS declined progressively postoperatively, IL6 tended to be higher on the third postoperative day and then lower on the seventh. The other two cytokines showed no differences preoperatively and postoperatively. On the basis of our results, we support the validity of IL6 dosage to monitor the postoperative pain during future studies.

Emergency thoracic surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

Emergency thoracic surgery in the elderly represents an extreme situation for both the surgeon and patient. The lack of an adequate patient history as well as the inability to optimize any co-morbidities, which are the result of the emergent situation, are the cause of increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the outcome and prognostic factors for this selected group of patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Emergency patients treated at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Luebeck, Germany.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Co-morbidities, mortality, risk factors and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 124 thoracic procedures were performed on 114 patients. There were 79 men and 36 women (average age 72.5 ±6.4 years, range 65-94). The overall operative mortality was 25.4%. The most frequent indication was thoracic/mediastinal infection, followed by peri- or postoperative thoracic complications. Risk factors for hospital mortality were a high ASA score, pre-existing diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study documents a perioperative mortality rate of 25% in patients over 65 who required emergency thoracic surgery. The main indication for a surgical intervention was sepsis with a thoracic/mediastinal focus. Co-morbidities and the resulting perioperative complications were found to have a significant effect on both inpatient length of stay and outcome. Long-term systemic co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus are difficult to equalize with respect to certain organ dysfunctions and significantly increase mortality.

N-Terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Is Useful to Predict Cardiac Complications Following Lung Resection Surgery

Background

Cardiovascular complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality following non-cardiac thoracic operations. Recent studies have demonstrated that elevation of N-Terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels can predict cardiac complications following non-cardiac major surgery as well as cardiac surgery. However, there is little information on the correlation between lung resection surgery and NT-proBNP levels. We evaluated the role of NT-proBNP as a potential marker for the risk stratification of cardiac complications following lung resection surgery.

Material and Methods

Prospectively collected data of 98 patients, who underwent elective lung resection from August 2007 to February 2008, were analyzed. Postoperative adverse cardiac events were categorized as myocardial injury, ECG evidence of ischemia or arrhythmia, heart failure, or cardiac death.

Results

Postoperative cardiac complications were documented in 9 patients (9/98, 9.2%): Atrial fibrillation in 3, ECG-evidenced ischemia in 2 and heart failure in 4. Preoperative median NT-proBNP levels was significantly higher in patients who developed postoperative cardiac complications than in the rest (200.2 ng/L versus 45.0 ng/L, p=0.009). NT-proBNP levels predicted adverse cardiac events with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.545~0.988, p=0.01]. A preoperative NT-proBNP value of 160 ng/L was found to be the best cut-off value for detecting postoperative cardiac complication with a positive predictive value of 0.857 and a negative predictive value of 0.978. Other factors related to cardiac complications by univariate analysis were a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, a higher NYHA functional class and a history of hypertension. In multivariate analysis, however, high preoperative NT-proBNP level (>160 ng/L) only remained significant.

Conclusion

An elevated preoperative NT-proBNP level is identified as an independent predictor of cardiac complications following lung resection surgery.

C-Reactive protein predicts acute myocardial infarction during high-risk noncardiac and vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts cardiovascular events in a wide range of clinical contexts. However, the role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a predictive marker for perioperative acute myocardial infarction during noncardiac surgery is not yet clear. The present study investigated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels as predictors of acute myocardial infarction risk in patients undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

This concurrent cohort study included patients aged ≥ 50 years referred for high-risk noncardiac surgery according to American Heart Association/ACC 2002 criteria. Patients with infections were excluded. Electrocardiograms were performed, and biomarkers (Troponin I or T) and/or total creatine phosphokinase and the MB fraction (CPK-T/MB) were evaluated on the first and fourth days after surgery. Patients were followed until discharge. Baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were compared between patients with and without acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, including 33 vascular procedures (17 aortic and 16 peripheral artery revascularizations), were studied. Sixty of the patients were men, and their mean age was 66 years. Baseline levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were higher in the group with perioperative acute myocardial infarction than in the group with non-acute myocardial infarction patients (mean 48.02 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005). All five acute myocardial infarction cases occurred in vascular surgery patients with high CRP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery, especially vascular surgery, and presenting elevated baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels are at increased risk for perioperative acute myocardial infarction.

Free flap breast reconstruction in advanced age: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

Due to perceived medical and surgical risk, patients of advanced age may not be offered free flap breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether complications are actually higher in patients of advanced age.

METHODS

A review of 1031 muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous, deep inferior epigastric perforator, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps over 15 years was performed. There were 976 patients younger than 65 years and 55 patients aged 65 and older. Population variables, operative variables, and outcome variables were compared. Statistical analysis included chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and two-sample t tests.

RESULTS

The mean age was 47 years (range, 24 to 79 years). The older group had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists status (2.1 versus 1.9; p = 0.05), a higher prevalence of hypertension (38 percent versus 18 percent; p < 0.001), a higher average body mass index (30 versus 28; p = 0.039), and lower rates of preoperative (28 percent versus 13 percent; p = 0.016) and postoperative (17 percent versus 2 percent; p = 0.003) chemotherapy. In the older group, more blood transfusions (7 percent versus 2 percent; p = 0.03) were administered and the coupler was used less often (13 percent versus 32 percent; p = 0.009). There was no difference in length of stay (3.5 days), medical complications (4 percent), surgical complications (32 percent), take-backs (1 percent), or revisions (19 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher rates of hypertension, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists status, higher body mass index, and higher rates of blood transfusion, the 65 years and older group had outcomes equal to those of the general population. Thus, free flap breast reconstruction in patients of advanced age is safe, and should be offered when indicated.

Cardiac screening before noncardiac surgery

Cardiovascular complications are infrequent but can result in significant morbidity following noncardiac surgery, especially in patients with peripheral vascular disease or increased age. All patients require some level of preoperative screening to identify and minimize immediate and future risk, with a careful focus on known coronary artery disease or risks for coronary artery disease and functional capacity. The 2007 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines are clear that noninvasive and invasive testing should be limited to circumstances in which results will clearly affect patient management or in which testing would otherwise be indicated. beta-Blocker therapy has become controversial in light of recent publications but should be continued in patients already on therapy, and started in patients with high cardiac risk undergoing intermediate- or high-risk surgery.

Cardiac complications and mortality rates in diabetic patients following non-cardiac surgery in an Australian teaching hospital

This retrospective study of diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery has identified that a greater number of patients are at risk of cardiac complications and death in the perioperative period than had previously been suggested. As well as insulin-dependent diabetic patients and patients with elevated creatinine (> 178 micromol/l) as previously found, our study suggests that non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients and patients with creatinine > 120 micromol/l are also at increased risk of cardiac complications and death following non-cardiac surgery. This increases by a factor of six those diabetic patients at risk of perioperative complications from non-cardiac surgery and also increases the number of patients with renal failure similarly at risk. The study confirms similar risks of cardiac complications and death to other recently published data and suggests ongoing comparisons will contribute to quality assurance activities in anaesthesia and surgery.

Perioperative cardiovascular assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

Preoperative assessment of the cardiac patient before noncardiac surgery is common in the clinical practice of the medical consultant, anesthesiologist, and surgeon. Currently, most noncardiac surgical procedures are performed for patients of advanced age, and the number of such surgeries is likely to increase with the aging of the population. These same patients have an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, especially ischemic heart disease, which is the primary cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with noncardiac surgery. Since 1996, 3 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline documents have been published, each reflecting the available literature, with recommendations for the preoperative cardiovascular evaluation and treatment of the patient undergoing noncardiac surgery. Our review describes the 2007 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the most recent revision, focusing on a newly recommended 5-step algorithmic approach to managing this clinical problem, particularly for the patient with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Continued emphasis should be given to preoperative clinical risk stratification, with noninvasive testing reserved for those patients in whom a substantial change in medical management would be anticipated based on results of testing. Pharmacologic therapy holds more promise than coronary revascularization for the reduction of major adverse perioperative cardiac events that might complicate noncardiac surgery.

Perioperative cardiovascular assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

Preoperative assessment of the cardiac patient before noncardiac surgery is common in the clinical practice of the medical consultant, anesthesiologist, and surgeon. Currently, most noncardiac surgical procedures are performed for patients of advanced age, and the number of such surgeries is likely to increase with the aging of the population. These same patients have an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, especially ischemic heart disease, which is the primary cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with noncardiac surgery. Since 1996, 3 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline documents have been published, each reflecting the available literature, with recommendations for the preoperative cardiovascular evaluation and treatment of the patient undergoing noncardiac surgery. Our review describes the 2007 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the most recent revision, focusing on a newly recommended 5-step algorithmic approach to managing this clinical problem, particularly for the patient with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Continued emphasis should be given to preoperative clinical risk stratification, with noninvasive testing reserved for those patients in whom a substantial change in medical management would be anticipated based on results of testing. Pharmacologic therapy holds more promise than coronary revascularization for the reduction of major adverse perioperative cardiac events that might complicate noncardiac surgery.