Reversal of reentry and acceleration due to double-wave reentry: two mechanisms for failure to terminate tachycardias by rapid pacing

Double-wave reentry in excitable media

A monolayer of chick embryo cardiac cells grown in an annular geometry supports two simultaneous reentrant excitation waves that circulate as a doublet. We propose a mechanism that can lead to such behavior. The velocity restitution gives the instantaneous velocity of a wave as a function of the time since the passage of the previous wave at a given point in space. Nonmonotonic restitution relationships will lead to situations in which various spacings between circulating waves are possible. In cardiology, the situation in which two waves travel in an anatomically defined circuit is referred to as double-wave reentry. Since double-wave reentry may arise as a consequence of pacing during cardiac arrhythmias, understanding the dynamic features of double-wave reentry may be helpful in understanding the physiological properties of cardiac tissue and in the design of therapy.

Collision-based spiral acceleration in cardiac media: roles of wavefront curvature and excitable gap

We have previously shown in experimental cardiac cell monolayers that rapid point pacing can convert basic functional reentry (single spiral) into a stable multiwave spiral that activates the tissue at an accelerated rate. Here, our goal is to further elucidate the biophysical mechanisms of this rate acceleration without the potential confounding effects of microscopic tissue heterogeneities inherent to experimental preparations. We use computer simulations to show that, similar to experimental observations, single spirals can be converted by point stimuli into stable multiwave spirals. In multiwave spirals, individual waves collide, yielding regions with negative wavefront curvature. When a sufficient excitable gap is present and the negative-curvature regions are close to spiral tips, an electrotonic spread of excitatory currents from these regions propels each colliding spiral to rotate faster than the single spiral, causing an overall rate acceleration. As observed experimentally, the degree of rate acceleration increases with the number of colliding spiral waves. Conversely, if collision sites are far from spiral tips, excitatory currents have no effect on spiral rotation and multiple spirals rotate independently, without rate acceleration. Understanding the mechanisms of spiral rate acceleration may yield new strategies for preventing the transition from monomorphic tachycardia to polymorphic tachycardia and fibrillation.

Atrial flutter: from ECG to electroanatomical 3D mapping

Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia that may cause significant symptoms, including palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain and even syncope. Frequently it’s possible to diagnose atrial flutter with a 12-lead surface ECG, looking for distinctive waves in leads II, III, aVF, aVL, V1,V2. Puech and Waldo developed the first classification of atrial flutter in the 1970s. These authors divided the arrhythmia into type I and type II. Therefore, in 2001 the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology developed a new classification of atrial flutter, based not only on the ECG, but also on the electrophysiological mechanism. New developments in endocardial mapping, including the electroanatomical 3D mapping system, have greatly expanded our understanding of the mechanism of arrhythmias. More recently, Scheinman et al, provided an updated classification and nomenclature. The terms like common, uncommon, typical, reverse typical or atypical flutter are abandoned because they may generate confusion. The authors worked out a new terminology, which differentiates atrial flutter only on the basis of electrophysiological mechanism.

Usefulness and limitations of the surface electrocardiogram in the classification of right and left atrial flutter

Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia that may cause significant symptoms, including palpitations, dyspnoea, chest pain and even syncope. Frequently, it is possible to diagnose atrial flutter with a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG), looking for distinctive waves in leads II, III, aVF, aVL, V1 and V2. Puech and Waldo developed the first classification of atrial flutter in the 1970s. These authors divided the dysrhythmia into types I and II. Therefore, in 2001, the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology developed a new classification of atrial flutter based not only on the ECG, but also on the electrophysiological mechanism. More recently, Scheinman and colleagues have provided an updated classification and nomenclature. Terms such as common, uncommon, typical, reverse typical or atypical flutter are abandoned, because they may generate confusion. The authors worked out a new terminology, which differentiates atrial flutter only on the basis of electrophysiological mechanism.

Interactions between paced wavefronts and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: implications for antitachycardia pacing

OBJECTIVES

Interactions between paced wavefronts and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) dictate antitachycardia pacing outcomes. We used optical mapping to assess those interactions during single and dual site pacing of rabbit ventricular epicardium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Monomorphic VTs were initiated in six isolated rabbit hearts that were endocardially cryoablated to limit viable tissue to visible epicardium and establish apical tissue as the anatomic anchor. Preparations were optically mapped during single (n = 39) and dual (n = 43) site pacing at 50%-90% of VT cycle length (CL) with eight pulses per trial. Overall, we found six pulses that abruptly terminated VT. This occurred because the VT wavefront collided with the antidromic portion of the paced wavefront and the orthodromic portion of paced wavefront blocked in the VT's refractory region. When effective, dual site pacing that captured tissue at both leads simultaneously terminated the VT immediately, while single site pacing or dual site pacing that captured tissue at only one lead terminated the VT after resetting advanced the orthodromic wavefront. We found 12 pulses that induced polymorphic VT, with 11 of those pulses occurring during capture at only one lead. Expansion of the combined antidromic-VT wavefront around one or both ends of the arc of conduction block formed by the interaction of the orthodromic wavefront with the VT's refractory region initiated functional reentry. Six of these polymorphic VTs were nonsustained because the underlying wavefronts self-terminated. The wavefronts did persist for 4.2 +/- 3.5 cycles before self-terminating in these trials, and the post-pacing cycles presented a 146% increase in CL variability, compared with the variability prior to pacing. These temporal characteristics are similar to those of delayed termination in patients with ICDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The main difference between pulses that terminated abruptly and pulses that induced polymorphic VT was the effective separation of the antidromic and orthodromic portions of the paced wavefront from one another.

Comparison of conventional and biventricular antitachycardia pacing in a geometrically realistic model of the rabbit ventricle

INTRODUCTION

ICDs often are programmed with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) as the first response to ventricular tachycardia (VT). Many ICDs have an additional lead available for ventricular pacing. We hypothesized that using the additional lead for ATP would improve therapy by advancing the orthodromic wavefront, thereby reducing the size of the excitable gap and inducing block of all reentrant activity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Monomorphic VT was initiated in a thin-walled model of rabbit ventricular myocardium that included an apical infarct and anatomically realistic dimensions. ATP with up to eight pulses was delivered at 90% of VT cycle length to one (conventional) or two (biventricular) stimulation areas. Stimulation areas were adjusted from 0.017 cm2 to 0.169 cm2 to modulate interactions between the antidromic and VT wavefronts, and between the orthodromic wavefront and the VT's refractory region. During conventional ATP, we found that larger stimulation areas terminated the VT in three pulses. Continued pacing after termination caused VT reinitiation in the reversed direction in some instances. With smaller stimulation areas, conventional ATP simply reset the circuit. During biventricular ATP, larger stimulation areas terminated VT in one pulse. There were no instances of reinitiation with reversal. However, with smaller stimulation areas, prolongation of refractoriness near the additional stimulation area facilitated induction of functional reentry with pathways modified by continued pacing.

CONCLUSION

Our modeling suggests that biventricular ATP is superior to conventional ATP under conditions where the additional ventricular lead effectively advances the orthodromic wavefront. Failure to achieve this advancement poses a risk of VT acceleration.

Multiarm spirals in a two-dimensional cardiac substrate

A variety of chemical and biological nonlinear excitable media, including heart tissue, can support stable, self-organized waves of activity in a form of rotating single-arm spirals. In particular, heart tissue can support stationary and meandering spirals of electrical excitation, which have been shown to underlie different forms of cardiac arrhythmias. In contrast to single-arm spirals, stable multiarm spirals (multiple spiral waves that rotate in the same direction around a common organizing center) have not been demonstrated and studied yet in living excitable tissues. Here, we show that persistent multiarm spirals of electrical activity can be induced in monolayer cultures of neonatal rat heart cells by a short, rapid train of electrical point stimuli applied during single-arm-spiral activity. Stable formation is accomplished only in monolayers that show a relatively broad and steep dependence of impulse wavelength and propagation velocity on rate of excitation. The resulting multiarm spirals emit waves of electrical activity at rates faster than for single-arm spirals and exhibit two distinct behaviors, namely "arm-switching" and "tip-switching." The phenomenon of rate acceleration due to an increase in the number of spiral arms possibly may underlie the acceleration of functional reentrant tachycardias paced by a clinician or an antitachycardia device.

Interactions Between Extracellular Stimuli and Excitation Waves in an Atrial Reentrant Loop

Extracellular Stimuli in an Atrial Reentrant Loop.

INTRODUCTION

The interactions between extracellular stimuli and excitation waves propagating in a reentrant loop are a complex function of stimulus parameters, structural properties, membrane state, and timing. Here the goal was a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and frequencies of the major interactions between the advancing excitation wave and a single extracellular stimulus, separated from issues of anatomic or geometric complexity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A modernized computer model of a thin ring of uniform tissue that included a pair of extracellular stimulus electrodes (anode/cathode) was used to model one-dimensional cardiac reentry. Questions and results included the following: (1) What are the major interactions between a stimulus and the reentrant propagation wave, and are they induced near the cathode or near the anode; and, for each interaction, what are the initiating amplitude range and timing interval? At the cathode, the well-known mechanism of retrograde excitation terminated reentry; changes in timing or amplitude produced double-wave reentry or phase reset. At the anode, termination occurred at different cells depending on stimulus amplitude. (2) Relatively how often did termination occur at the anode? For most stimulus amplitudes, termination occurred more often at the anode than at the cathode, although not always at the same cell. (3) With random timing, what is the probability of terminating reentry? Stimulation for 5 msec terminated reentry with a probability from 0% to approximately 10%, as a function of increasing stimulus amplitude.

CONCLUSION

A single extracellular stimulus can initiate major changes in reentrant excitation via multiple mechanisms, even in a simple geometry. Termination of reentry, phase shifts, or double-wave reentry each occurs over well-defined ranges of stimulus amplitude and timing.

Mechanism of conversion of atypical right atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation

The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanisms of conversion from atypical atrial flutter (AFL) to atrial fibrillation (AF), and the long-term results of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 221 patients with typical AFL referred to our hospital for ablation. A total of 25 patients had atypical AFL, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 23 with isthmus-dependent atypical AFL, as well as in 180 patients with typical counterclockwise and/or clockwise AFL. In all, 13 spontaneous transitions from atypical AFL to AF were documented in 11 of 17 patients. Before AF, a pattern of lower loop reentry was observed in 11 of 13 patients (85%) and upper loop reentry in 3 (1 had both). Multiple early breaks along the tricuspid annulus during AFL were noted in 6 of 13 patients (46%). Among the 13 transitions, discrete atrial premature complexes before AF were found in 5 patients with lower loop reentry and in 1 with upper loop reentry (46%). In the remaining patients, a more rapid atrial rhythm was involved in the development of AF with a pulmonary venous focus in 2. In some cases, additional "breaks" in the functional line of block occurred before the development of AF. There was a significant increased incidence of AF (68%) in those with atypical AFL compared with those with typical AFL (38%) (p = 0.004). After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 9 months for the atypical group and 18 +/- 11 months for the typical group, the AF recurrence rate was similar (57% vs 48%, p = 0.4). Discrete atrial premature complexes or atrial tachycardia may initiate AF either directly or by producing further breaks in lines of functional block. Bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block is associated with cure or control of AF in approximately 50% of patients with AFL.

Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: is a cure at hand?

The mechanisms of atrial fibrillation relate to the presence of random reentry involving multiple interatrial circuits. Triggers for development of atrial fibrillation include rapidly discharging atrial foci (mainly from pulmonary veins) or degeneration of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia into fibrillation. Therapy for control of atrial fibrillation includes drugs, atrial pacing for those with sinus node dysfunction, or ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Therapeutic maneuvers for cure of atrial fibrillation include surgical or radiofrequency catheter induced linear lesions to reduce the atrial tissue and prevent the requisite number of reentrant wavelets. We need a much better understanding of basic mechanisms before a true cure is at hand.

Right atrial flutter due to lower loop reentry: mechanism and anatomic substrates

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of an atrial flutter (AFL) that is more rapid and at times more irregular than typical AFL are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with AFL were studied. Atrial electrograms were recorded from a 20-pole catheter placed against the tricuspid annulus (TA), with its distal electrodes lateral to the isthmus between the TA and the eustachian ridge (ER), and from the His bundle and coronary sinus catheters. Atrial extrastimuli were delivered in the TA-ER isthmus during typical AFL. Episodes of a right atrial flutter rhythm that was different from typical AFL were induced in 3 patients and occurred spontaneously in 3 patients. This sustained AFL, designated as lower-loop reentry (LLR), involved the lower right atrium (RA), as manifested by early breakthrough in the lower RA, wave-front collision in the high lateral RA or septum, and conduction through the TA-ER isthmus. Linear ablation resulting in bidirectional conduction block in the TA-ER isthmus terminated spontaneous LLR in 3 patients and rendered LLR noninducible in all patients. The cycle length of LLR was shorter than that of typical AFL (217+/-32 versus 272+/-40 ms, P<0. 01). Alternating LLR and typical AFL in 1 patient resulted in cycle length oscillation.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR is a subtype of right atrial flutter and depends on conduction through the TA-ER isthmus.

Double-wave reentry in orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia: paradoxical shortening of the tachycardia cycle length with development of ipsilateral bundle branch block

INTRODUCTION

Attempts to terminate reentrant tachyarrhythmias by rapid pacing may accelerate the tachycardia. One mechanism for acceleration is double-wave reentry, where two simultaneous wavefronts travel around the same circuit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report pacing acceleration of AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) due to double-wave reentry in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The patient had presented with atrial fibrillation and rapid conduction across a left lateral bypass tract. Intravenous procainamide was given during electrophysiologic study because of incessant atrial fibrillation and restored sinus rhythm. Orthodromic AVRT was induced and attempts to terminate the AVRT with right ventricular pacing initiated two alternate tachycardias, both with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. The first tachycardia, as expected for bundle branch block ipsilateral to the bypass tract, had a longer cycle length (CL) than the original tachycardia (366 msec compared to 297 msec). The second tachycardia had a paradoxically shorter CL, 238 msec compared to 297 msec. Electrogram analysis revealed that the circuit traversed by the accelerated LBBB tachycardia was the same as the slower LBBB tachycardia. The activation sequence revealed two independent wavefronts, traversing this common circuit. As described previously in experimental models, double-wave reentry was initiated when an antidromic-stimulated impulse blocked before colliding with the previous orthodromic impulse, thus allowing two orthodromic impulses to circulate within the circuit.

CONCLUSION

We speculate that conduction slowing by procainamide combined with the intrinsic AV nodal delay resulted in the necessary increase in the excitable gap required to develop double-wave reentry. This is the first description of sustained double-wave reentry in humans.

Acceleration of typical atrial flutter due to double-wave reentry induced by programmed electrical stimulation

BACKGROUND

Acceleration of reentrant tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation is a well-documented phenomenon, but the mechanisms remain poorly understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve patients with typical atrial flutter were studied. Activation sequence of the underlying reentrant circuit was recorded by multiple multipolar electrodes placed in the right atrium. In five patients, 27 episodes of atrial flutter acceleration were induced by single extrastimuli delivered in the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and eustachian ridge (TA-ER isthmus) and one by rapid overdrive atrial pacing. Analyses of the activation sequences, intracardiac electrograms, and 12-lead surface ECG P-wave morphology indicated that the acceleration was caused by two successive activation wave fronts circulating in the same direction along the same reentrant circuit (double-wave reentry, DWR). DWR was induced only within a narrow range of coupling interval, from 2 to 45 ms beyond the effective refractory period, and was associated with unidirectional antidromic block of the paced impulse. Patients with DWR had a shorter effective refractory period (138.8+/-13.4 versus 163.8+/-12.2 ms, P<.015) and larger excitable gap (124.0+/-22.6 versus 83.2+/-13.2 ms, P<.009) compared with patients without inducible DWR. All of the DWR episodes were transient. Most (78.6%) terminated after one of the double wave fronts was blocked in the TA-ER isthmus.

CONCLUSIONS

DWR is one of the mechanisms responsible for programmed electrical stimulation-induced atrial flutter acceleration in human subjects. Its induction requires a sufficient excitable gap and antidromic unidirectional block of the paced impulse in the TA-ER isthmus. In addition, the TA-ER isthmus is the usual site of DWR termination.