Contemporary practice of coronary revascularization in U.S. hospitals and hospitals participating in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)

Incidental findings in CT imaging of coronary artery bypass grafts: results from a Canadian multicenter prospective cohort

Objective

To assess the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings identified during computed tomography imaging of coronary artery bypass grafts.

Results

This prospective study includes 144 patients undergoing coronary graft patency assessment using computed tomography. Incidental findings were classified as significant if they were considered to need an immediate action or treatment, short-term work-up or follow-up, or minor. A total of 211 incidental findings were present in 109 (75.7%) patients. Seventy-one incidental findings (33.6%) were cardiac and 140 (66.4%) were extracardiac. Most common cardiac incidental findings were atrial dilatation [39 patients, 48 incidental findings (67.6%)] and aortic valve calcifications (7 patients, 9.9%). Among the 140 extracardiac incidental findings, the most common were lung nodules (51 patients, 54 nodules, 38.6%), and emphysema (21 patients, 15%). Thirty-six (25.7%) extracardiac incidental findings were significant and notably, 23 (63.9%) were lung nodules. Follow-up was recommended in 37 cases, among which all patients with significant lung nodules (23 patients, 62.2%). In conclusion, most common computed tomography incidental findings in patients with coronary grafts were lung nodules and emphysema.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3168-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: The VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare the three-year survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in physician-directed and patient-choice registries with the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME) randomized trial results.

BACKGROUND

The AWESOME multicenter randomized trial and registry compared the long-term survival after PCI and CABG for the treatment of patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one additional risk factor for adverse outcome with CABG. The randomized trial demonstrated comparable three-year survival.

METHODS

Over a five-year period (1995 to 2000), 2,431 patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five risk factors (prior heart surgery, myocardial infarction within seven days, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35, age >70 years, intra-aortic balloon required to stabilize) were identified. By physician consensus, 1,650 patients formed a physician-directed registry assigned to CABG (692), PCI (651) or further medical therapy (307), and 781 were angiographically eligible for random allocation; 454 of these patients constitute the randomized trial, and the remaining 327 constitute a patient choice registry. Survival for CABG and PCI was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates for randomized patients were 79% and 80%, respectively. The CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates were both 76% for the physician-directed subgroup; comparable survival rates for the patient-choice subgroup were 80% and 89%, respectively. None of the global log-rank tests for survival demonstrated significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Both registries support the randomized trial conclusion: PCI is an alternative to CABG for some medically refractory high-risk patients.

Outcomes of noncardiac surgery after coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown that coronary artery bypass surgery reduces the risk of cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery. Whether coronary angioplasty provides equivalent protection is not known.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo cardiac artery bypass surgery or angioplasty as part of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation trial. All subsequent noncardiac surgeries during a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 7.7 years were recorded among participants in the ancillary Study of Economics and Quality of Life. Rates of mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction, length of stay, and hospital costs were compared by the original randomized assignment.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients had noncardiac surgery at a median of 29 months after their most recent coronary revascularization procedure. Mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction within 30 days of the first noncardiac surgery occurred in 4 of the 250 of the surgery-assigned patients and in 4 of the 251 of the angioplasty-assigned patients (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences in the mean length of hospital stay (6.3 +/- 6.7 versus 6.2 +/- 6.8 days; P = 0.47) or hospital cost ($8,920 +/- $11,511 versus $7,785 +/- $7,643; P = 0.33) between the surgery and angioplasty groups. Similar results were obtained when subsequent noncardiac procedures were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

Rates of myocardial infarction and death after noncardiac surgery are similarly low after contemporary bypass surgery or angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Clinical trials of revascularization therapy in diabetics

Diabetic patients are a high-risk group for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with poorer long-term outcomes, with or without revascularization, than non-diabetic patients. Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial, the largest randomized study of coronary revascularization strategies, showed that diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease who were undergoing an initial revascularization procedure had a significant long-term survival advantage with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The 8-year follow-up data from the Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST) study, the other major US trial of CABG versus PTCA, and results of other clinical trials that enrolled similar patients are consistent with an advantage for CABG in diabetic patients but not for nondiabetic patients. This benefit is entirely a result of improved cardiac mortality. It is limited to patients receiving an internal mammary artery (IMA) graft and is apparent earlier in insulin-treated patients. The benefit of CABG in diabetic patients may be significantly related to a protective effect on mortality after myocardial infarction, because CABG greatly reduced the risk of death after spontaneous Q-wave myocardial infarction in BARI-eligible diabetic patients (relative risk 0.09, P<0.001), an effect not seen in non-diabetic patients.

Predictors of mortality and mortality from cardiac causes in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) randomized trial and registry. For the BARI Investigators

BACKGROUND

The impact of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality rates in the presence of various demographic, clinical, and angiographic factors is uncertain in the population of patients suitable for both procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) randomized trial and registry, 3610 patients who were eligible to receive PTCA and CABG were revascularized between 1989 and 1992. Multivariate Cox models were used to identify factors associated with 5-year mortality and cardiac mortality, with particular attention to factors that interact with treatment. Diabetic patients receiving insulin had higher mortality and cardiac mortality rates with PTCA compared with CABG (relative risk [RR] 1.78 and 2.63, respectively, P<0.001), and patients with ST elevation had higher cardiac mortality rates with CABG than with PTCA (RR 4.08, P<0.001). Factors most strongly associated with high overall mortality rates were insulin-treated diabetes, congestive heart failure, kidney failure, and older age. Black race was also associated with higher mortality rates (RR 1.49, P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

A set of variables was identified that could be used to help select a revascularization procedure and to evaluate risk of long-term mortality in the population of patients considering revascularization.

Quality of life after coronary revascularization in the United States and Canada

Cardiac procedures are performed less frequently in Canada than in the United States (US), yet rates of cardiac death and myocardial infarction are similar. We therefore sought to compare long-term symptoms and quality of life in Canadian and American patients undergoing initial coronary revascularization. The 161 patients enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation at the Montreal Heart Institute were compared with 934 patients enrolled at 7 US sites. Patients' outcomes were documented for 5 years after random assignment to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Functional status was assessed using the Duke Activity Status Index. Canadian patients were significantly younger and had more angina at study entry. Death and nonfatal myocardial infarction were not significantly different between Canadian and US patients after adjustment for baseline risk. Canadian patients had significantly greater improvements in functional status at 1-year follow-up (Duke Activity Status Index score + 13.5 vs. + 6.0, p = 0.002), but this difference progressively narrowed over 5 years. Angina was equally prevalent in Canadian and US patients at 1 year (16% vs. 19%), but significantly more prevalent in Canadian patients at 5 years (36% vs. 16%, p = 0.001). Repeat revascularization procedures were performed less often over 5 years among Canadian patients (26% vs. 34%, p = 0.08), especially coronary artery bypass graft surgery after initial percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (18% vs. 32%, p = 0.03). These results suggest more anginal symptoms are required in Canada before coronary revascularization, but as a result Canadians receive greater improvements in quality of life after the procedure.

Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether immediate suture closure of 8F femoral arterial puncture sites can facilitate same-day discharge after coronary angioplasty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After coronary angioplasty, 100 patients were randomly assigned to immediate sheath removal with the double-suture Prostar-Plus device or delayed sheath removal with application of a c-clamp. After suture closure, mobilization at 4 hours after sheath removal and discharge 4 hours later were planned. Patients treated with the c-clamp had sheaths removed 4 hours after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, were mobilized 6 hours later, and discharged the following day. Patients were assessed for groin complications at 8, 24, and 72 hours. Overall, patients who received suture closure were mobilized at 7.1 +/- 5.3 hours and discharged 11. 15 +/- 6.22 hours after sheath removal versus 15.49 +/- 3.9 hours and 21.9 +/- 3.8 hours for patients with the c-clamp (P <.001). Initial failure of the suture device occurred in 5 patients, with 1 requiring surgery for an entrapped device. After the procedure, patients with suture closure more frequently had an ooze of blood (55% vs 24%, P <.001) and a trend to more overt external bleeding (10% vs 2%, P = not significant). Hematomas were reported by 20% of patients in both groups at 72 hours. Overall, patients preferred the suture closure method of sheath removal when assessed by a simple questionnaire. An economic analysis by cost minimization demonstrated potential hospital cost saving.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture closure of 8F arterial puncture sites can facilitate early mobilization and same-day discharge and is considered acceptable by more patients compared with application of the c-clamp. There is potential to realize cost savings with a strategy of same-day discharge.

Trends in coronary revascularization 1989 to 1997: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) survey of procedures

Use of catheter-based and surgical coronary revascularization has steadily increased in North America. Introduction of catheter-based "new devices," including intracoronary stents, has expanded the range of patients who can be treated with percutaneous approaches. We sought to address trends in the practice of catheter-based and surgical coronary revascularization during 1989 to 1997. The 17 North American institutions participating in the NHLBI Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) periodically completed a 5-working day survey of all surgical and catheter-based coronary revascularizations. Data collected included patient demographics, vessel disease, prior interventions, and use of new devices or minimally invasive surgical techniques. The proportion of all procedures that were catheter based (vs surgical) increased from 52.1% in 1989/1990 to 62.0% in 1997 (p <0.001). Among surgically treated patients, prevalence of prior bypass surgery decreased from 13.4% in 1989/1990 to 7.5% in 1997 (p <0.001). In 1997, 3% of surgical procedures used minimal incisions or were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Among patients undergoing catheter-based intervention, prevalence of left main disease increased from 2.2% to 5.7% (p <0.001), myocardial infarction within 24 hours increased from 2.4% to 9.7% (p <0.001), and prior bypass surgery increased from 16.2% to 20.8% (p = 0.056). Use of new devices increased from 11.6% of catheter-based procedures in 1990 to 67.0% in 1997 (p <0.001). Compared with the early 1990s, catheter-based revascularization is currently more commonly used for patients with acute myocardial infarction, prior bypass surgery, or severe left main narrowing. These trends are likely due to the proliferation of new devices, especially intracoronary stents, since the mid 1990s.

Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both effective intervention strategies for patients with coronary heart disease. We report comparative long-term clinical and health-service cost findings for these interventions in the first Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-1) trial.

METHODS

1011 patients with coronary heart disease (45% single-vessel, 55% multivessel) were randomly assigned initial treatment strategies of PTCA or CABG. Information on clinical events, subsequent intervention, symptomatic status, exercise testing, and use of health-care resources is available for a median 6.5 years of follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

The predefined primary endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 87 (17%) PTCA-group patients and 80 (16%) CABG-group patients (p=0.64). Similarly, there was no significant treatment difference in deaths alone (39 PTCA, 45 CABG), of which 46% were cardiac related. In both groups, the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was more than five times higher in the first year than in subsequent years of follow-up. 26% of patients assigned PTCA subsequently also had CABG, and a further 19% required additional nonrandomised PTCA. Most of these reinterventions occurred within a year of randomisation, and from 3 years onwards the reintervention rate averaged 4% per year. In the CABG group the reintervention rate averaged 2% per year. The prevalence of angina was consistently higher in the PTCA group, with an absolute average 10% excess compared with the CABG group (p<0.001). Total health-service costs over 5 years showed no significant difference between initial strategies of PTCA and CABG (mean difference pounds sterling 426 [95% Cl -pounds sterling 383 to pounds sterling 1235]; p=0.30). The clinical and cost comparisons showed similar patterns for patients with single-vessel and multivessel disease.

INTERPRETATION

Initial strategies of PTCA and CABG led to similar long-term results in terms of survival and avoidance of myocardial infarction and to similar long-term health-care costs. Choice of approach, therefore, rests on weighing the more invasive nature of CABG against the greater risk of recurrent angina and reintervention over many years after PTCA.

Better outcome for women compared with men undergoing coronary revascularization: a report from the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have shown that women undergoing coronary revascularization procedures do so at a higher risk for an adverse outcome compared with men. However, the impact of advances in technology and improvements in techniques on in-hospital and long-term outcome after revascularization in women is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 1829 patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease randomized to CABG or PTCA in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), of whom 27% were women. As expected, women were older (64.0 versus 60.5 years), with more congestive heart failure (14% versus 7%), hypertension (68% versus 42%), treated diabetes mellitus (31% versus 15%), and unstable angina (67% versus 61%) than men but had similar preservation of left ventricular function and extent of multivessel disease. Women assigned to surgery received the same number of total grafts but fewer internal mammary artery grafts (72% versus 85%, P<0. 01), and those assigned to angioplasty had more intended lesions (76% versus 71%, P<0.01) successfully dilated than men. At an average of 5.4 years' follow-up, crude mortality rates were similar in women (12.8%) and men (12.0%). The Cox regression model adjusting for baseline differences revealed that women had a significantly lower risk of death (relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0. 003) but not a significantly lower risk of death plus myocardial infarction (relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.07; P=0.16) than men.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the unadjusted mortality rate suggests that women and men undergoing CABG and PTCA have a similar 5-year mortality, women have higher risk profiles; consequently, contrary to previous reports, female sex is an independent predictor of improved 5-year survival after we control for multiple risk factors.

Twenty-two-year follow-up in the VA Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Stable Angina

We evaluated the 22-year results of initial coronary artery bypass surgery with saphenous vein grafts compared with initial medical therapy on survival, incidence of myocardial infarction, reoperation, and symptomatic status in 686 patients (average age 51) with stable angina in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Between 1972 and 1974, 354 patients were assigned to medical treatment and 332 to surgical revascularization. In the surgical cohort, 312 patients underwent operation (operative mortality 5.8%) and 25% subsequently underwent repeat operation (operative mortality 10.3%). In the medical cohort, 160 patients crossed over to surgery (operative mortality 4.4%) and 21% of these patients had reoperation (operative mortality 9.1%). Neither crossover nor reoperation was predictable by angiographic or clinical risk factors measured at baseline. The overall 22-year cumulative survival rates were 25% and 20% in the medical and surgical cohorts (p = 0.24). Corresponding rates in low-risk patients who had 1 or 2 vessels diseased, or 3 vessels diseased with normal left ventricular function were 31% and 24% (p = 0.024). Although significant at 10 years, there was also no long-term survival benefit for high-risk patients assigned to bypass surgery. The probabilities of remaining free of myocardial infarction and of being alive without infarction were significantly higher with initial medical therapy, 57% versus 41% (p = 0.02) and 18% versus 11% (p = 0.0031), respectively. This trial provides strong evidence that initial bypass surgery did not improve survival for low-risk patients, and that it did not reduce the overall risk of myocardial infarction. Although there was an early survival benefit with surgery in high-risk patients (up to a decade), long-term survival rates became comparable in both treatment groups. In total, there were twice as many bypass procedures performed in the group assigned to surgery without any long-term survival or symptomatic benefit.