Emergencies in continuous dialysis patients: diagnosis and management

The Diet and Haemodialysis Dyad: Three Eras, Four Open Questions and Four Paradoxes. A Narrative Review, Towards a Personalized, Patient-Centered Approach

The history of dialysis and diet can be viewed as a series of battles waged against potential threats to patients' lives. In the early years of dialysis, potassium was identified as "the killer", and the lists patients were given of forbidden foods included most plant-derived nourishment. As soon as dialysis became more efficient and survival increased, hyperphosphatemia, was identified as the enemy, generating an even longer list of banned aliments. Conversely, the "third era" finds us combating protein-energy wasting. This review discusses four questions and four paradoxes, regarding the diet-dialysis dyad: are the "magic numbers" of nutritional requirements (calories: 30-35 kcal/kg; proteins > 1.2 g/kg) still valid? Are the guidelines based on the metabolic needs of patients on "conventional" thrice-weekly bicarbonate dialysis applicable to different dialysis schedules, including daily dialysis or haemodiafiltration? The quantity of phosphate and potassium contained in processed and preserved foods may be significantly different from those in untreated foods: what are we eating? Is malnutrition one condition or a combination of conditions? The paradoxes: obesity is associated with higher survival in dialysis, losing weight is associated with mortality, but high BMI is a contraindication for kidney transplantation; it is difficult to limit phosphate intake when a patient is on a high-protein diet, such as the ones usually prescribed on dialysis; low serum albumin is associated with low dialysis efficiency and reduced survival, but on haemodiafiltration, high efficiency is coupled with albumin losses; banning plant derived food may limit consumption of "vascular healthy" food in a vulnerable population. Tailored approaches and agreed practices are needed so that we can identify attainable goals and pursue them in our fragile haemodialysis populations.

Hypercalcemia in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Severe hypercalcemia can be life-threatening. However, its incidence and the underlying causes in the emergency department (ED) have not been determined. In the present study, we investigated these issues and the impacts on renal function and patients' survival.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study to analyze the patients with hypercalcemia in the ED for 1 year. Serum total calcium level greater than 10.3 mg/dL was defined as hypercalcemia.

RESULTS

During the study period, 321 of 4293 patients (7.5%) were found to have hypercalcemia (serum calcium 11.7 +/- 1.6 mg/dL). Most of them had mild hypercalcemia (calcium level < 12.0 g/dL, 70.7%). Malignancy (36.4%) and uremia (32.4%) were the most common underlying causes. Normal renal function was observed in only 75 (23.4%) of all patients with hypercalcemia. The total mortality rate was 23.1%, and death was associated with male gender, higher calcium level, lower hemoglobin, and malignancy (all P < 0.05). Logistic analysis found that serum calcium and hemoglobin levels were independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe hypercalcemia is frequently and life-threatening in the ED. Therefore routine determination of serum calcium level is recommended, and immediate therapy should be initiated to treat the patients at high risk.

ED hemodialysis for treatment of renal failure emergencies

Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are at risk for unique medical emergencies, many of which require hemodialysis for their definitive treatment. This study describes the use of emergency department (ED) hemodialysis in the management of CRF patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent ED hemodialysis at a regional dialysis center between April 1994 and September 1996. Data were collected on presenting complaint, ED diagnosis, indication for hemodialysis, ED pharmacologic treatment, ED airway management, cardiovascular stability, and disposition. Fifty episodes of ED hemodialysis were identified in 37 different patients. Presenting complaints included: shortness of breath, 38 (69%); weakness, 8 (15%); chest pain, 3 (5%); and other, 6 (11%). ED diagnoses included: congestive heart failure, 36 (65%); hyperkalemia, 13 (24%); and other, 6 (11%). Indications for hemodialysis included: cardiovascular instability, 33 (38%); respiratory distress, 22 (26%); cardiac monitoring, 16 (19%), timing, 13 (15%); and other, 2 (2%). Predialysis stabilization included: nitroglycerin, 29 (26%); sublingual captopril, 17 (15%); calcium chloride, 13 (11%); sodium bicarbonate, 12 (11%); insulin/dextrose, 11 (10%); none, 12 (11%); and other, 18 (16%). Airway support included: noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV), 9 (18%); and endotracheal intubation, 6 (12%). NPSV was provided with a bilevel positive airway pressure system. Three of the endotracheal intubation patients were weaned to NPSV during dialysis, and all NPSV patients were weaned from respiratory support during their hemodialysis in the ED. Some patients had more than one problem. Sixteen patients (32%) were admitted, while 34 (68%) were discharged, including 3 NPSV patients and 22 initially unstable patients. ED hemodialysis in conjunction with additional medical care is a useful emergency medicine technique that can prevent hospital admission in patients with acute renal emergencies.

ED management of acute congestive heart failure in renal dialysis patients

This is a descriptive report of the management techniques used effectively in the emergency department (ED) treatment of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) in renal dialysis patients. Study design included a prospective case series of consecutive renal dialysis patients who presented to the ED of a regional dialysis center in acute CHF. Clinical presentation, ED management, and outcome were recorded. Forty-six patients (38 hemodialysis and 8 peritoneal dialysis) were included in this study. Presentation classifications for these patients were minimal distress (13 patients), moderate distress (16 patients), and severe distress (17 patients). In addition to supplemental oxygen, treatment focused on pharmacological preload and afterload reduction. Patients received sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) (30 patients), transdermal NTG (36 patients), captopril sublingual (10 patients) nifedipine oral (nine patients), nitroprusside (four patients), morphine sulfate (one patient), NTG infusion (one patient), and clonidine (one patient). There were no deaths in the study group, and 32 of the patients were able to be dialyzed and discharged, including seven patients in the severe group. Six patients required intubation, one of whom was extubated and discharged from the ED after dialysis. Intravascular access was obtained in 29 patients but was used in only six. All patients on nitroprusside drips were weaned during the course of their dialysis. Effective ED management of acute CHF in renal dialysis patients can be accomplished through preload reduction with nitrates and afterload reduction with captopril, nifedipine, and, in severe cases, nitroprusside.

Clinical Pharmacy Care in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) continues to grow as a treatment modality for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The high cost of care, multiplicity of drugs used by each patient, high cost of individual drugs, and high incidence of complications, make this patient population a challenging area for clinical pharmacy input. This article discusses the mechanics of CAPD, together with patient selection criteria, monitoring of the dialysis prescription, and infectious complications. The potential for research involving clinical pharmacists is discussed. Apart from studies on the pharmacokinetic disposition of drugs administered to CAPD patients, there remains a relative lack of information on many aspects of drug therapy. Recommendations for areas of continued study include the optimization of antibiotic therapy for peritonitis and exit-site infections, use of the intraperitoneal route for systemic effects of drugs, quality-of-life investigations, and stability studies of drugs in dialysate.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a review of its mechanics, advantages, complications, and areas of controversy

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this article is to review the mechanics, advantages, complications, pharmacokinetics, and future trends of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as they pertain to pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Pertinent articles were obtained from an English-language literature search using MEDLINE (1980-1991), Index Medicus (1987-1990), and bibliographic reviews of review articles. Indexing terms included peritoneal dialysis, pharmacokinetics, peritonitis, vancomycin, and fluoroquinolones.

DATA SYNTHESIS

All clinical studies comparing organism recovery methods and treatment of peritonitis have methodologic limitations (e.g., comparison of disparate patient groups, different definitions of peritonitis, lack of follow-up, lack of control for sterile cultures) that may affect the reported results.

CONCLUSIONS

CAPD is an alternative to hemodialysis for the treatment of endstage renal disease and has many complications, leading to significant morbidity. This indicates that CAPD is not appropriate for all patients. Using blood-culturing techniques to culture for dialysate is most productive, but also the most costly. There are few data to indicate exactly the drugs, doses, and durations of choice for peritonitis. Both intraperitoneal and oral administration appear to be appropriate.

Emergency department evaluation and management of dialysis patient complications

The number of dialysis patients in the United States has markedly increased in recent years to more than 100,000. An emergency physician is increasingly likely to be presented with the challenge of handling the emergent problems of the dialysis patient. This article is a review of the complications seen in the population of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, with recommendations for emergency department evaluation and management.

Emergency department presentation of renal dialysis patients: indications for EMS transport directly to dialysis centers

To determine the pattern of emergency department (ED) utilization by renal dialysis (RD) patients, a prospective study was conducted of dialysis patients presenting to the ED of a regional dialysis center. The most common presenting complaints were shortness of breath (SOB), chest pain, abdominal pain, and vomiting; the most common diagnoses were congestive heart failure, chest wall pain, and electrolyte abnormalities. Interventional dialysis (ID), defined as emergent dialysis required to treat the patient's presenting complaint, was required for 30 patients, with the most common presenting complaints of these patients being shortness of breath, weakness, and chest pain. Only SOB was statistically significant in predicting the need for ID (P less than 0.001), with a positive predictive value of 0.63 and a negative predictive value of 0.85. Prehospital implications of these data suggest that RD patients with a chief complaint of SOB should be transported directly to a facility capable of dialysis on an emergent basis.