Diltiazem overdose: case report and review

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for diltiazem removal: An in vitro study

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) vs continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Diltiazem poisoning was simulated in a central compartment consisting in a 5L dialysis solute spiked with diltiazem at two different toxic concentrations: 750 and 5000 µg/L. For CVVHDF, mean extraction coefficients (EC = (in concentration - out concentration)/in concentration) were concentration-dependent with a decrease all along the dialysis. At the end of the sessions the mean amounts remaining in the central compartment were 8% and 7% of the initial dose at 750 and 5000 µg/L, respectively. The mean cumulative amounts found in the effluent were 60% and 75% of the initial dose, respectively. The missing amounts accounted for 32% and 18% of the initial dose, respectively, corresponding to an adsorption to the dialysis membrane. In contrast, the different compartments of the MARS resulted in undetectable output concentration earlier that the end of the session. The mean concentrations of diltiazem remaining in the central compartment were <1 µg/L at the end of the sessions. Global ECs were around 50% all along the experiment at both concentrations, and the average charcoal cartridge ECs was 80% throughout the experiments.CVVHDF system in the developed model was efficient for diltiazem removal, mainly by diffusion, convection and to a lesser extent by adsorption to the dialysis membrane. In MARS system, resin cartridge and hemodialysis components are ineffective, charcoal cartridge is responsible for almost all drug removal.

Are vasopressors useful in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock?

OBJECTIVE

Overdoses with cardio-depressive medications can result in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock (TICS), a life-threatening condition characterized by severe hypotension and ineffective tissue perfusion. Vasopressors are often employed in the treatment of shock to increase heart rate and blood pressure. We sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of vasopressors in improving hemodynamic function and survival in the treatment of TICS.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, TOXLINE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies evaluating the use of vasopressors in humans or animals with TICS. We limited human study types to randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

Our search yielded 913 citations and 144 of these met our inclusion criteria. 130 were human case reports and 14 were animal studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Human case report data showed vasopressors were ineffective more often than they were partially or fully effective. In the majority of animal studies, vasopressor treatment failed to improve hemodynamic parameters and resulted in decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Human case reports and controlled animal experiments lead to different conclusions about vasopressors in TICS. Most animal studies indicate that vasopressors impair hemodynamic function and increase mortality. In contrast, human case reports suggest that vasopressors are often ineffective but not necessarily harmful.

Management of calcium channel blocker overdoses

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are some of the most commonly used medications in clinical practice to treat hypertension, angina, cardiac arrhythmias, and some cases of heart failure. Recent data show that CCBs are the most common of the cardiovascular medications noted in intentional or unintentional overdoses.(1) Novel treatment approaches in the form of glucagon, high-dose insulin therapy, and intravenous lipid emulsion therapies have been tried and have been successful. However, the evidence for these are limited to case reports and case series. We take this opportunity to review the various treatment options in the management of CCB overdoses with a special focus on high-dose insulin therapy as the emerging choice for initial therapy in severe overdoses.

Management of a mixed overdose of calcium channel blockers, β-blockers and statins

We describe a case of extreme mixed overdose of calcium channel blockers, β-blockers and statins. The patient was successfully treated with aggressive resuscitation including cardiac pacing and multiorgan support, glucagon and high-dose insulin for toxicity related to calcium channel blockade and β-blockade, and ubiquinone for treating severe presumed statin-induced rhabdomyolysis and muscle weakness.

Tarka® overdose in a young child

Tarka® is a combination antihypertensive medication composed of verapamil hydrochloride and trandolapril. A 3.5-year-old female was brought to our hospital due to a sleepy condition 7 hours after an accidental ingestion of six tablets of Tarka® containing 240 mg verapamil hydrochloride and 4 mg trandolapril in each tablet. Five hours after hospitalization, her condition deteriorated and arterial pressure progressively decreased despite the treatment. Finally, a temporary pacemaker was implanted, after which the vital findings began to return to normal values. The pacemaker was removed 13 hours after implantation as normal heart rhythm was observed. There are no reports of intoxication with fixed-dose combination products, especially Tarka®, in young children in the literature. Therefore, we believe that our report can provide an insight on the toxic dose of this drug in younger children. Clinicians should keep in mind that lethargy can be the first symptom of a possible clinical deterioration, even in normotensive and normorhythmic individuals.

Levosimendan as treatment option in severe verapamil intoxication: a case report and review of the literature

Cardiovascular shock due to verapamil intoxication is often refractory to standard resuscitation methods. Recommended therapy includes prevention of further absorption of the drug, inotropic therapy, calcium gluconate, and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. Often further measures are needed such as ventricular pacing or mechanical circulatory support. Still, mortality remains high. Levosimendan, an inotropic agent, that enhances myofilament response to calcium, increases myocardial contraction and could therefore be beneficial in verapamil intoxication. Here, we report the case of a 60-year-old patient with clinically severe verapamil poisoning who presented with shock, bradycardia, and sopor. Standard therapy including high-dose inotropes failed to ameliorate the signs of intoxication. But additional therapy with levosimendan led to rapid improvement. Based on this observation, the literature is reviewed focusing on utilization of levosimendan in the treatment of calcium channel blocker overdose. We suggest to consider levosimendan as additional treatment option in patients with cardiovascular shock due to verapamil intoxication that are refractory to standard management.

Calcium Channel Blocker Ingestion: An Evidence-Based Consensus Guideline for Out-of-Hospital Management

In 2003, U.S. poison control centers were consulted after 9650 ingestions of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), including 57 deaths. This represents more than one-third of the deaths reported to the American Association of Poison Control Centers' Toxic Exposure Surveillance System database that were associated with cardiovascular drugs and emphasizes the importance of developing a guideline for the out-of-hospital management of calcium channel blocker poisoning. The objective of this guideline is to assist poison center personnel in the appropriate out-of-hospital triage and initial management of patients with suspected ingestions of calcium channel blockers. An evidence-based expert consensus process was used to create this guideline. This guideline applies to ingestion of calcium channel blockers alone and is based on an assessment of current scientific and clinical information. The expert consensus panel recognizes that specific patient care decisions may be at variance with this guideline and are the prerogative of the patient and the health professionals providing care, considering all of the circumstances involved. The panel's recommendations follow. The grade of recommendation is in parentheses. 1) All patients with stated or suspected self-harm or the recipient of a potentially malicious administration of a CCB should be referred to an emergency department immediately regardless of the amount ingested (Grade D). 2) Asymptomatic patients are unlikely to develop symptoms if the interval between the ingestion and the call is greater than 6 hours for immediate-release products, 18 hours for modified-release products other than verapamil, and 24 hours for modified-release verapamil. These patients do not need referral or prolonged observation (Grade D). 3) Patients without evidence of self-harm should have further evaluation, including determination of the precise dose ingested, history of other medical conditions, and the presence of co-ingestants. Ingestion of either an amount that exceeds the usual maximum single therapeutic dose or an amount equal to or greater than the lowest reported toxic dose, whichever is lower (see Table 5), would warrant consideration of referral to an emergency department (Grade D). 4) Do not induce emesis (Grade D). 5) Consider the administration of activated charcoal orally if available and no contraindications are present. However, do not delay transportation in order to administer charcoal (Grade D). 6) For patients who merit evaluation in an emergency department, ambulance transportation is recommended because of the potential for life-threatening complications. Provide usual supportive care en route to the hospital, including intravenous fluids for hypotension. Consider use of intravenous calcium, glucagon, and epinephrine for severe hypotension during transport, if available (Grade D). 7) Depending on the specific circumstances, follow-up calls should be made to determine outcome at appropriate intervals based on the clinical judgment of the poison center staff (Grade D).

Lessons learnt in the pharmacokinetic analysis of the effect of haemoperfusion for acute overdose with sustained-release diltiazem

The effect of charcoal haemoperfusion on the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem is described in a patient with severe clinical toxicity following acute overdose. The patient presented within 3 h following acute ingestion of multiple medications including sustained-release diltiazem. Routine resuscitation and supportive care were administered, but hypotension did not resolve despite intravenous fluids and infusions of calcium, adrenaline, noradrenaline and vasopressin. Multiple-doses of activated charcoal, haemodialysis and charcoal haemoperfusion were prescribed to expedite the elimination of diltiazem. The maximum diltiazem concentration (577 microg.l(-1)) was recorded 7 h post ingestion which was followed by an erratic and prolonged elimination phase. The maximum clearance of diltiazem due to haemoperfusion was calculated to be 19.4 and 15.1 ml.min(-1) at different times, equating to removal of approximately 1.5 mg diltiazem during 4 h of haemoperfusion. Haemoperfusion did not appear to remove sufficient diltiazem to recommend its routine use in the treatment of patients with acute diltiazem overdose.

Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemia Therapy for Verapamil Poisoning: A Review

Treatment of patients with verapamil overdose remains challenging. Traditional decontamination and supportive measures with intravenous calcium and vasopressors are the mainstays in initial care. Recently, the successful use of rescue hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy has been described in multiple cases. Treatment resulted in improved hemodynamic parameters and increased metabolic efficiency in patients with a low-output, myocardial shock state. Information on clinical use of hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy in humans is limited to case reports and small case series; no controlled clinical trials have been done. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy should be considered for patients with calcium channel blocker overdose who do not respond to initial supportive therapy.

Management of beta-adrenergic blocker and calcium channel antagonist toxicity

State-of-the-art therapy for beta-adrenergic receptor blocker and calcium channel antagonist toxicity is reviewed in the light of new insights into drug-induced shock. A brief discussion of pathophysiology, including cardiac, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cardiac drug toxicity, provides a foundation for understanding the basis of therapy. The major focus of this review is a critical evaluation of antidotal use of calcium, glucagon, catecholamines, insulin-euglycemia, and other novel therapies based on investigational studies and cumulative clinical experience.

Pharmacology, Pathophysiology and Management of Calcium Channel Blocker and ??-Blocker Toxicity

Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and beta-blockers (BB) account for approximately 40% of cardiovascular drug exposures reported to the American Association of Poison Centers. However, these drugs represent >65% of deaths from cardiovascular medications. Yet, caring for patients poisoned with these medications can be extremely difficult. Severely poisoned patients may have profound bradycardia and hypotension that is refractory to standard medications used for circulatory support.Calcium plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular function. The flow of calcium across cell membranes is necessary for cardiac automaticity, conduction and contraction, as well as maintenance of vascular tone. Through differing mechanisms, CCB and BB interfere with calcium fluxes across cell membranes. CCB directly block calcium flow through L-type calcium channels found in the heart, vasculature and pancreas, whereas BB decrease calcium flow by modifying the channels via second messenger systems. Interruption of calcium fluxes leads to decreased intracellular calcium producing cardiovascular dysfunction that, in the most severe situations, results in cardiovascular collapse.Although, CCB and BB have different mechanisms of action, their physiological and toxic effects are similar. However, differences exist between these drug classes and between drugs in each class. Diltiazem and especially verapamil tend to produce the most hypotension, bradycardia, conduction disturbances and deaths of the CCB. Nifedipine and other dihydropyridines are generally less lethal and tend to produce sinus tachycardia instead of bradycardia with fewer conduction disturbances.BB have a wider array of properties influencing their toxicity compared with CCB. BB possessing membrane stabilising activity are associated with the largest proportion of fatalities from BB overdose. Sotalol overdoses, in addition to bradycardia and hypotension, can cause torsade de pointes. Although BB and CCB poisoning can present in a similar fashion with hypotension and bradycardia, CCB toxicity is often associated with significant hyperglycaemia and acidosis because of complex metabolic derangements related to these medications. Despite differences, treatment of poisoning is nearly identical for BB and CCB, with some additional considerations given to specific BB. Initial management of critically ill patients consists of supporting airway, breathing and circulation. However, maintenance of adequate circulation in poisoned patients often requires a multitude of simultaneous therapies including intravenous fluids, vasopressors, calcium, glucagon, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, high-dose insulin, a relatively new therapy, and mechanical devices. This article provides a detailed review of the pharmacology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment strategies for CCB and BB overdoses.

Unusual electrocardiographic changes with propranolol and diltiazem overdosage: a case report

The therapeutic efficacy and safety of beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking drugs has been well established in patients with angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertension and reducing the risk of mortality and nonfatal reinfarction on survival of acute myocardial infarction. The calcium antagonists are used for the treatment of patients with angina pectoris, long-term systemic hypertension, and the management of hypertensive emergencies and also for a multitude of other cardiovascular and noncardiovascular conditions. Because adverse cardiovascular effects can occur, however, patients being considered for combination treatment with propranolol and diltiazem must be selected carefully and observed closely. In this article, we present a suicidal case of drug overdose with propranolol and diltiazem with unusual electrocardiographic changes.

Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of massive diltiazem overdose with a good outcome achieved after early and aggressive supportive therapy.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Pediatric Critical Care Unit.

PATIENT

Sixteen-year-old adolescent girl.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 16-yr-old adolescent girl presented to the emergency department 6 hrs after the intentional ingestion of 40 300-mg sustained-release diltiazem tablets (12 g of Cardura CD). She was hypotensive and required a glucagon and epinephrine infusion despite initial fluid resuscitation with saline and intravenous calcium (1 g). Multiple asystolic cardiac arrests ensued which became increasingly refractory to high-dose epinephrine. Hemodynamic support was achieved with a 48-hr period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for atrial standstill. Severe multiorgan dysfunction ensued (cardiac, neurologic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, and metabolic). Plasma diltiazem and its metabolites were measured and its half-life was reported between 28 and 48 hrs. A sustained decline in plasma diltiazem levels and its metabolites was not observed after two periods of charcoal hemoperfusion. Recovery of organ function occurred with sinus rhythm noted on the ninth day. The patient made a full recovery and was discharged from the critical care unit after 15 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Although massive calcium channel blocker overdose can produce profound and prolonged cardiac or multiorgan dysfunction, its toxic effects may be reversible. Supportive therapy, particularly of the cardiovascular system, is the most important goal.

Severe atenolol and diltiazem overdose

CASE REPORT

A case of combined, massive overdose of both atenolol and diltiazem in an adult male is reported. Cardiac arrest ensued which was responsive to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Bradycardia, hypotension, and oliguria followed which were resistant to intravenous pacing and multiple pharmacologic interventions, including intravenous fluids, calcium, dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, prenalterol, and glucagon. Adequate mean arterial pressure and urine output were restored only after addition of phenylephrine to therapy with multiple agents and transvenous pacing. The patient survived until discharge after a hospital course complicated by nontransmural myocardial infarct on hospital day 4 and pneumonia. Laboratory testing subsequently revealed high serum levels of both atenolol and diltiazem. The atenolol level of 35 microg/mL in this patient is the highest reported associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates severe cardiovascular toxicity after overdose of both atenolol and diltiazem. Oliguria, which has previously been reported in severe atenolol overdose, was successfully treated without hemodialysis by the addition of phenylephrine to aggressive therapy with pacing, inotropic, and pressor support.

Lesson of the week. Unrecognised accidental overdose with diltiazem

Invasive haemodynamic monitoring should be considered when hypotension fails to respond to empirical treatments

Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in massive overdose

Several cases of poisoning with diltiazem have been described in the literature, but information about the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in overdose is sparse. The authors report pharmacokinetic and clinical observations in a patient who ingested 7.2 g of slow-release dilitiazem. Grave, persistent hypotension was the overriding clinical manifestation, but the patient eventually survived with aggressive cardiovascular support. No serious conduction abnormalities were seen. Blood samples were taken repeatedly for 2-3 days for analysis of serum diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem concentrations. The serum diltiazem concentration measured in the first sample taken (16.5 h postingestion), 3,171 ng/ml, is one of the highest concentrations reported in a patient who survived. The half-life was 13.3 h for diltiazem and 10.5 h for desacetyldiltiazem. Charcoal hemoperfusion had no apparent effect on the elimination of either compound. The relatively long half-life of diltiazem may have resulted from rate-limiting absorption and probably does not indicate saturation of diltiazem metabolism. The patient was discharged with no apparent neurological or cardiological deficits.

Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in an overdose situation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the elimination of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in an overdose situation.

CASE SUMMARY

An 18-year-old woman ingested controlled delivery diltiazem 14.94 g in a suicide attempt. After arriving at the hospital unresponsive and hypotensive, her condition progressed to complete heart block, cardiogenic shock, asystole, and acute renal failure. Supportive care consisted of vasopressors, intravenous calcium, intravenous glucagon, charcoal hemoperfusion, temporary transvenous pacing, and an intraaortic balloon pump. After 12 days in the hospital, the patient recovered fully.

DISCUSSION

We report a large, documented overdose of diltiazem and detail the pharmacokinetic profiles of both diltiazem and its active metabolite, desacetyldiltiazem. Nonlinear elimination of diltiazem appears to occur at higher concentrations. Although the patient improved clinically following charcoal hemoperfusion, no dramatic effects on diltiazem elimination were apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival following massive diltiazem overdose can be achieved with supportive care. Charcoal hemoperfusion had a limited effect on improving the clearance of diltiazem as evidenced by serial plasma concentrations.

Massive Overdose of Cardizem CD

Long-acting diltiazem preparations are currently frequently prescribed, and the potential for serious morbidity and mortality with an overdose can be significant. We present a case of Cardizem CD overdose in which a 22-year-old patient ingested 18.0 g, in an apparent suicide attempt. She presented within 5 hours of ingestion with a blood pressure of 80/30 mm Hg and a pulse of 80 beats/minute. Interventions included intravenous fluids, activated charcoal, atropine, calcium, dopamine, norepinephrine, glucagon, bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol, and placement of a temporary transvenous pacemaker. Diltiazem levels were obtained, and an elimination half-life was calculated. Unique side effects of this overdose are discussed, and a treatment approach is suggested. Early and aggressive treatment is essential, and preparation for anticipated side effects should be initiated as soon as possible.

Calcium channel blocker overdose

A case of diltiazem overdose with significant hemodynamic compromise is presented. Multiple therapeutic modalities were attempted with limited results. Control was finally achieved with a combination of norepinephrine, dobutamine, and cardiac pacing. Invasive pulmonary monitoring parameters are reported and were important in the management of this patient. The management of calcium channel blocker overdose and the various available therapeutic modalities are discussed.

Severe diltiazem poisoning with intestinal pseudo-obstruction: case report and toxicological data

This case report concerns a 30-year-old man who survived a 4.2 g diltiazem overdose. He sustained vasoplegic shock with a junctional escape rhythm which required high doses of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Among other complications, ileus with paralytic intestinal pseudo-obstruction developed on day three. Cecal distention was demonstrated by abdomen computed tomodensitometry. The ileus resolved on day seven following the poisoning. Diltiazem plasma concentrations were determined during the first three days. The possible role of other medications, activated charcoal and sufentanil, is noted.

Effects of calcium chloride on verapamil- and diltiazem-pretreated isolated rat hearts

The effects of calcium chloride on cardiac responses to verapamil and diltiazem were investigated using isolated and perfused rat hearts with a Langendorff technique. Ionized calcium concentrations were increased approximately from 0.5 mM to 2.2 mM when the hearts were pretreated with 0.2 mg/L of verapamil or 0.28 mg/L of diltiazem, or were untreated with calcium blockers. Calcium significantly counteracted the negative inotropic effect produced by diltiazem and verapamil. In contrast, the negative chronotropic effects of both diltiazem and verapamil were potentiated by increasing concentrations of ionized calcium, and this potentiation was not eliminated by 1.0 mg/L of atropine. An atrioventricular block was induced by both verapamil and diltiazem when ionized calcium concentrations were lower than normal. It is suggested from this study that, although calcium chloride counteracts the negative inotropic effects of verapamil and diltiazem, abruptly increased ionized calcium may cause severe bradycardia clinically.

Utility of glucagon in the emergency department

Glucagon is a pancreatic polypeptide hormone that has diverse utility as both a therapeutic and diagnostic agent. Many of its pharmacologic actions are pertinent to the practice of emergency medicine. The author reviews the literature supporting each potential use of the drug and the purported physiologic mechanisms by which glucagon exerts these actions. The indications and proper dosages for glucagon in the acute care setting are summarized.