Withdrawal of antiepileptic medications following epilepsy surgery

Prognostic Tests and Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal After Epilepsy Surgery

Approximately one in three patients with a successful epilepsy surgery will have seizure recurrence following antiepileptic drugs (AED) withdrawal. The value of postoperative testing for predicting seizure relapse after AED tapering is not clear. The purpose of this study was to review the literature for evidence on the use of postoperative investigations before AED discontinuation after successful epilepsy surgery. We were unable to identify studies on the prognostic value of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and AED blood levels. The literature review yielded seven studies on the predictive value of electroencephalography. Four studies found no association between interictal discharges (IED) and seizure relapse. These studies suffered from various limitations due to their retrospective design and generally small cohorts. Two of the three studies reporting a positive association were prospective and provided strong evidence of an increased risk of seizure recurrence with presence of postoperative IED in successfully operated patients undergoing AED withdrawal.

Survey of current practices among US epileptologists of antiepileptic drug withdrawal after epilepsy surgery

In order to identify the current practices of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after epilepsy surgery, a survey was administered to 204 adult and pediatric epileptologists. The responses from 58 epileptologists revealed wide variations regarding the time course and extent of AED withdrawal after successful epilepsy surgery. For most of the epileptologists, the likelihood of the surgery being successful is an important factor in determining whether or not AEDs are tapered. Most of the respondents started to taper AEDs more rapidly than suggested by previous reports. The majority of the epileptologists were able to stop all AEDs completely in a substantial number of patients. The most important factors considered when deciding to taper AEDs were the presence of ongoing auras and the occurrence of postoperative seizures prior to seizure remission. In the absence of data from well-designed prospective trials, such survey results can inform practice and, hopefully, aid in the design of future trials.

Significance of post-operative auras after temporal lobectomy: a surprising methodological trap

We aimed to examine post-operative auras/simple partial seizures and the associated risk of seizure recurrence after temporal lobectomy. Included were 159 patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy (1995-2006) at Austin Health, Australia. Initial analyses used Cox regression. Post-hoc, exploratory analyses of aura and seizure patterns were undertaken. Initial analyses indicated that post-operative auras were not associated with subsequent disabling seizures (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.4-1.1 p=0.08). However, post-hoc examination found data patterns that suggest that post-operative auras may have been under-reported when medical contact between these events was absent. These findings are relevant to current research, as similar methodology is commonly employed in post-operative outcome studies. Important implications include potential underestimation of seizure risk associated with auras. Carefully planned prospective studies are required to assess the risk associated with post-operative auras.

Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal after Successful Surgery for Intractable Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognosis related to antiepileptic drug (AED) discontinuation after successful surgery for intractable temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

The clinical courses after temporal lobectomies (TLs) were retrospectively analyzed in 88 consecutive patients. All the patients had TLs as the only surgical procedure, and they had been followed up for longer than 3 years. AED discontinuation was attempted if the patient had been seizure free without aura for >or=1 year during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Sixty-six (75%) patients achieved complete seizure freedom for >or=1 year; 28 patients were seizure free immediately after surgery (immediate success); and 38 patients became seizure free after some period of recurrent seizures (delayed success). AED discontinuation was attempted in 60 (91%) of 66 patients with a successful outcome. In 13 (22%) patients, seizure relapse developed during AED reduction (n=60), and in seven (12%) patients after discontinuation of AEDs (n=38). The seizure recurrence rate was not different between the immediate-and delayed-success groups. Among 20 patients with seizure relapse related to AED tapering, nine (45%) of them regained seizure freedom after reinstitution of AED treatment, and AEDs were eventually discontinued in six of them. Seizures that recurred after complete AED discontinuation had a better prognosis than did the seizures that recurred during AED reduction (seizure freedom in 86% vs. 23%). At the final assessment, 54 (61%) patients had been seizure free >or=1 year; 37 without AEDs and 17 with AEDs. The successful discontinuation of AEDs was more frequent for patients with a younger age at the time of surgery and for those patients with shorter disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that seizure freedom without aura at >or=1 year is a reasonable indication for the attempt at AED discontinuation. The subsequent control of recurrent seizures was excellent, especially if seizures relapsed after the complete discontinuation of AEDs. Younger age at the time of surgery and a shorter disease duration seem to affect successful AED discontinuation for a long-term period.

The chance of cure following surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. What do we know and do we need to revise our expectations?

Although surgery is often seen as a curative treatment for patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy, little information is available how many cases can be considered cured after surgery, i.e. are seizure-free for several years without taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In our review, 13 retrospective and five prospective clinical observations published since 1980 provided data on long-term seizure control off AEDs in a total of 1658 patients. No randomized studies were found. Following temporal lobe surgery, approximately one in four adult patients and approximately one in three children or adolescents can currently shown to be seizure-free for 5 years without AEDs (25%, mean of eight studies in adults, 95% CI: 21-30%, and 31%, mean of three studies in children, 95% CI: 20-41%). The rate of seizure control off AEDs seemed to be stable after 2 years of follow-up. However, as 55% of patients free of disabling seizures preferred not to discontinue their medication completely as late as 5 years after surgery, it is impossible to know if they are cured or not. No features predictive of surgical cure were detected except for better cure outcome in children versus adults with hippocampal sclerosis and in patients with typical versus atypical Ammonshorn's sclerosis or tumor in one small study each. In conclusion, the available evidence on seizure outcome off AEDs after temporal lobe surgery is based on non-randomized studies and, in part, data were collected retrospectively. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine if, in fact only one in three to four patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing surgery can be considered cured.

How effective is surgery to cure seizures in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy?

It is well recognized that two-thirds of patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy will be free of disabling seizures with continued medical treatment after temporal resection. Seizure recurrence has been noted during a five-year follow-up in approximately one-third of these seizure-free patients mostly but not exclusively following planned complete discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This leaves one-third of patients without disabling seizures and without AEDs several years after surgery. Despite improvements in seizure frequency or severity, seizures persist in another third of patients undergoing surgery. Although cure (five years without any seizures and off AEDs) is the ultimate aim of epilepsy surgery, the percentage of patients cured by surgery cannot be well defined at the moment. We need a long-term randomized controlled trial on AED discontinuation in seizure-free patients followed by long-term open extension to determine if only one in three adult patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy is cured by surgical intervention.

New horizons in the development of antiepileptic drugs

Significant advances have been made in the treatment of epilepsy over the past decades. However, despite the development of various novel antiepileptic drugs, about one third of patients with epilepsy is resistant to current pharmacotherapies. Even in patients in whom pharmacotherapy is efficacious, current antiepileptic drugs do not seem to affect the progression or underlying natural history of epilepsy. Furthermore, there is currently no drug available which prevents the development of epilepsy, e.g. after head trauma. Thus, there are at least three important goals for the future. (1) Better understanding of processes leading to epilepsy, thus allowing to create therapies aimed at the prevention of epilepsy in patients at risk; (2) improved understanding of biological mechanisms of pharmacoresistance, allowing to develop drugs for reversal or prevention of resistance; and (3) development of disease-modifying therapies, inhibiting the progression of epilepsy. The ultimate goal would be a drug combining these three properties, thus resulting in a complete cure for epilepsy. In this review, the current status of antiepileptic therapies is critically assessed, and innovative approaches for future therapies are highlighted.