Complications of interventional radiology: an imaging overview

A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Radiology

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compile and synthesize evidence regarding the effectiveness of quality improvement interventions in radiology and the experiences and perspectives of staff and patients.

METHODS

Databases searched for both published and unpublished studies were as follows: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Mednar, Trove, Google Gray, OCLC WorldCat, and Dissertations and Theses. This review included both qualitative and quantitative studies of patients undergoing radiological examinations and/or medical imaging health care professionals; a broad range of quality improvement interventions including introduction of health information technology, effects of training and education, improved reporting, safety programs, and medical devices; the experiences and perspectives of staff and patients; context of radiological setting; a broad range of outcomes including patient safety; and a result-based convergent synthesis design.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were selected from 4846 identified by a systematic literature search. Five groups of interventions were identified: health information technology (n = 6), training and education (n = 6), immediate and critical reporting (n = 3), safety programs (n = 2), and the introduction of mobile radiography (n = 1), with demonstrated improvements in outcomes, such as improved operational and workflow efficiency, report turnaround time, and teamwork and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings were constrained by the limited range of interventions and outcome measures. Further research should be conducted with study designs that might produce findings that are more generalizable, examine the other dimensions of quality, and address the issues of cost and risk versus benefit.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Conducting Meetings on Morbidity and Mortality

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It aims to assist Interventional Radiologists in their daily practice by providing best practices for conducting meetings on morbidity and mortality.

Effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for patient safety in radiology: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to find the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of quality improvement interventions in clinical radiology and the experiences and perspectives of staff and patients. More specifically, the review questions are.

Development of a model angiography informed consent form based on a multiinstitutional survey of current forms

PURPOSE

To develop an informative consent form for angiography that can be read and understood by a patient with an eighth-grade level of education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consent forms from 125 medical centers were evaluated with RightWriter 4.0 software. The readability index, a measure of educational grade level needed to understand a document, was determined for each form. Features of forms and discussion of complications were evaluated. A model consent form was developed.

RESULTS

Analysis of 27 consent forms revealed a mean readability index of 14.2; to adequately understand the documents, an average of 2.2 years of college were required. Alternatives to the procedure were listed in 14 forms (52%). All consent forms listed potential complications, but only 15 (56%) identified specific numeric risks, and attempts to classify complications according to severity were made in only five (18%).

CONCLUSION

An angiography consent form has been developed that can be understood with an eight-grade level of education. It should allow patients to more easily understand the procedure and its risks, benefits, and alternatives. It remains the obligation of the physician to tailor the discussion for each procedure to meet the needs of each patient.