Changes in psychopathology and dyskinesia after neuroleptic withdrawal in a double-blind design

Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of valbenazine in Korean CYP2D6 normal and intermediate metabolizers

Valbenazine is a selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor approved for tardive dyskinesia treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration; its major active metabolite (NBI-98782) is a 45-fold more potent inhibitor of VMAT2 than the parent drug. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and tolerability and the effect of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotypes to the PKs after the administration of valbenazine in Korean participants. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male participants. The single-dose study was conducted for both 40 and 80 mg valbenazine and the multiple dose study was conducted for 40 mg. After a 1-week washout, the 40 mg dose group participants received valbenazine 40 mg or placebo once daily for 8 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 96 h postdose for PK analysis. The CYP2D6 genotypes of the participants were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 50 participants were randomized, and 43 and 20 participants completed the single- and multiple-dose phases of the study, respectively. After single doses, the PK characteristics of valbenazine and its metabolites were similar between the 40 and 80 mg dose groups. After multiple doses, the mean accumulation ratios of valbenazine and NBI-98782 were ~1.6 and 2.4, respectively. Plasma concentrations of valbenazine and NBI-98782 were similar between CYP2D6 normal and intermediate metabolizers. Valbenazine was well-tolerated in healthy Koreans, and its PK characteristics were similar to results previously reported in Americans.

A Method for Tapering Antipsychotic Treatment That May Minimize the Risk of Relapse

The process of stopping antipsychotics may be causally related to relapse, potentially linked to neuroadaptations that persist after cessation, including dopaminergic hypersensitivity. Therefore, the risk of relapse on cessation of antipsychotics may be minimized by more gradual tapering. There is converging evidence that suggests that adaptations to antipsychotic exposure can persist for months or years after stopping the medication-from animal studies, observation of tardive dyskinesia in patients, and the clustering of relapses in this time period after the cessation of antipsychotics. Furthermore, PET imaging demonstrates a hyperbolic relationship between doses of antipsychotic and D2 receptor blockade. We, therefore, suggest that when antipsychotics are reduced, it should be done gradually (over months or years) and in a hyperbolic manner (to reduce D2 blockade "evenly"): ie, reducing by one quarter (or one half) of the most recent dose of antipsychotic, equivalent approximately to a reduction of 5 (or 10) percentage points of its D2 blockade, sequentially (so that reductions become smaller and smaller in size as total dose decreases), at intervals of 3-6 months, titrated to individual tolerance. Some patients may prefer to taper at 10% or less of their most recent dose each month. This process might allow underlying adaptations time to resolve, possibly reducing the risk of relapse on discontinuation. Final doses before complete cessation may need to be as small as 1/40th a therapeutic dose to prevent a large decrease in D2 blockade when stopped. This proposal should be tested in randomized controlled trials.

Antipsychotic Withdrawal Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Avoiding withdrawal symptoms following antipsychotic discontinuation is an important factor when planning a safe therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis concerning occurrence of withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of antipsychotics.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the databases CENTRAL, Pubmed, and EMBASE with no restriction to the beginning of the searched time period and until October 1, 2019 (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019119148).

STUDY SELECTION

Of the 18,043 screened studies, controlled and cohort trials that assessed withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of oral antipsychotics were included in the random-effects model. Studies that did not implement placebo substitution were excluded from analyses. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with withdrawal symptoms after antipsychotic discontinuation. We compared a control group with continued antipsychotic treatment in the assessment of odds ratio and number needed to harm (NNH).

DATA EXTRACTION

We followed guidelines by the Cochrane Collaboration, PRISMA, and MOOSE.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 261 individuals were included. The primary outcome, proportion of individuals with withdrawal symptoms after antipsychotic discontinuation, was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.37-0.70; I² = 82.98%, P < 0.01). An odds ratio of 7.97 (95% CI, 2.39-26.58; I² = 82.7%, P = 0.003) and NNH of 3 was calculated for the occurrence of withdrawal symptoms after antipsychotic discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal symptoms appear to occur frequently after abrupt discontinuation of an oral antipsychotic. The lack of randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias on antipsychotic withdrawal symptoms highlights the need for further research.

Antipsychotic reduction and/or cessation and antipsychotics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Since the 1950s antipsychotic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have also been associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to antipsychotics. These strategies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and antipsychotic cessation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a reduction or cessation of antipsychotic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific antipsychotics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated previous searches of Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based Register of Trials including the registers of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established antipsychotic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic reduction (including intermittent strategies), (c) specific antipsychotics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention, and (d) specific antipsychotics versus other antipsychotics or versus any other drugs for the treatment of TD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from these trials and estimated risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs with 711 participants; eight of these studies were newly included in this 2017 update. One trial is ongoing.There was low-quality evidence of a clear difference on no clinically important improvement in TD favouring switch to risperidone compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (1 RCT, 42 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.23 to 0.89, low-quality evidence). Because evidence was of very low quality for antipsychotic dose reduction versus antipsychotic maintenance (2 RCTs, 17 people, RR 0.42 95% CI 0.17 to 1.04, very low-quality evidence), and for switch to a new antipsychotic versus switch to another new antipsychotic (5 comparisons, 5 RCTs, 140 people, no meta-analysis, effects for all comparisons equivocal), we are uncertain about these effects. There was low-quality evidence of a significant difference on extrapyramidal symptoms: use of antiparkinsonism medication favouring switch to quetiapine compared with switch to haloperidol (1 RCT, 45 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.21 to 0.96, low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference for switch to risperidone or haloperidol compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (RR 1 RCT, 48 people, RR 2.08 95% CI 0.74 to 5.86, low-quality evidence) and switch to risperidone compared with switch to haloperidol (RR 1 RCT, 37 people, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, very low-quality evidence).Trials also reported on secondary outcomes such as other TD symptom outcomes, other adverse events outcomes, mental state, and leaving the study early, but the quality of the evidence for all these outcomes was very low due mainly to small sample sizes, very wide 95% CIs, and risk of bias. No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, outcomes that we designated as being important to patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited data from small studies using antipsychotic reduction or specific antipsychotic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration to fully investigate this area.

Prior antipsychotic drug treatment prevents response to novel antipsychotic agent in the methylazoxymethanol acetate model of schizophrenia

Trials of novel compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia are typically tested in patients following brief withdrawal of ongoing medication despite known long-term changes in the dopamine (DA) system following chronic antipsychotic drug therapy. The present study explored the impact of withdrawal from repeated haloperidol (HAL) treatment, as well as the response to a novel α5 gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor positive allosteric modulator (α5PAM), on the activity of the DA system in the methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Electrophysiological recordings were conducted from DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area of MAM and saline (SAL) rats following 7-day withdrawal from repeated HAL (21 d, 0.6 mg/kg, orally). In separate animals, amphetamine-induced locomotion was measured to assess changes in DA behavioral sensitivity. SAL rats withdrawn from HAL demonstrated reduced spontaneous DA neuron activity along with an enhanced locomotor response to amphetamine, indicative of the development of DA supersensitivity. Both α5PAM treatment and ventral hippocampal (vHPC) inactivation reversed the DA neuron depolarization block following HAL withdrawal in SAL rats. In contrast, MAM rats withdrawn from HAL exhibited reduced spontaneous DA activity and enhanced locomotor response to amphetamine compared with untreated SAL rats; however, this condition was unresponsive to α5PAM treatment or vHPC inactivation. Withdrawal from prior HAL treatment interferes with the therapeutic actions of this novel treatment in the MAM model of schizophrenia. Consequently, testing novel compounds on chronically treated schizophrenia patients may be ineffective.

Antipsychotic discontinuation syndromes: a narrative review of the evidence and its integration into Australian mental health nursing textbooks

In light of the high number of people discontinuing antipsychotics each year, it is essential that nurses develop a robust understanding of all aspects of the discontinuation experience. While there is a large body of published work documenting post-discontinuation relapse rates, less is known about other aspects of the discontinuation experience. This paper presents the results of a narrative review of international studies of antipsychotic discontinuation syndromes and their relevance to nursing practice. Four key mental health nursing textbooks used in student nurse education in Australia are examined to assess how this evidence has been incorporated into clinical recommendations. This review finds that the evidence for discontinuation syndromes could be more widely disseminated and applied than it is at present. Strikingly, this evidence has not been incorporated into key mental health nursing textbooks in Australia at all. Slow integration into nursing published work may be influenced by a number of clinical and research uncertainties. We consider the impact of this silence on key nursing roles of psycho-education and adverse event monitoring during antipsychotic discontinuation periods. Further robust research should be conducted into discontinuation syndromes as a matter of urgency. Given the high number of consumers potentially impacted upon by discontinuation syndromes, nurse authors and educators should consider revising key nursing textbooks to include the currently available information about discontinuation syndromes.

Potential adverse effects of discontinuing psychotropic drugs. Part 3: Antipsychotic, dopaminergic, and mood-stabilizing drugs

Abrupt discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia is associated with earlier, and often more severe, illness episodes than are seen with gradual discontinuation. Antipsychotic drugs can cause various abnormal motor syndromes, but abruptly stopping them has been associated with the seemingly paradoxical development of similar motor syndromes, such as withdrawal dyskinesias, parkinsonian symptoms, dystonias, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Dopamine-releasing and dopamine-agonist drugs are used to treat some of the motor syndromes caused by antipsychotic drugs, but their abrupt discontinuation can also be associated with abnormal syndromes. When antipsychotic drugs, lithium, or certain anticonvulsant drugs are used for treatment of bipolar disorder, rapid versus gradual discontinuation is more likely to lead to greater mood instability and manic relapse. If necessary, these medications should be gradually tapered to minimize all types of adverse discontinuation effects. Patients should be educated about the possible adverse effects of abrupt medication discontinuation.

The effects of eicosapentaenoic acid in tardive dyskinesia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, conventional antipsychotic medication continues to be used extensively, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) remains a serious complication. The primary objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of EPA versus placebo in reducing symptoms of TD.

METHOD

This was a 12-week, double-blinded, randomized study of ethyl-EPA 2g/day versus placebo as supplemental medication, in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with established TD.

RESULTS

Eighty-four subjects were randomized, of whom 77 were included in the analysis. Both the EPA and placebo groups displayed significant baseline to endpoint improvements in Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale dyskinesia scores, but there were no significant between-group differences (p=0.4). Response rates (>or=30% improvement in TD symptoms) also did not differ significantly between EPA-treated subjects (45%) and placebo-treated subjects (32%) (p=0.6). However, a post-hoc linear mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance indicated an effect for treatment group and duration of TD. The EPA-treated patients had significantly greater mean reductions in dyskinesia scores initially, although this was not sustained beyond 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial failed to demonstrate an anti-dyskinetic effect for ethyl-EPA 2g/day on the primary efficacy measure. However, a modest and transient benefit is suggested in patients with more recent onset of TD. The lack of clear-cut efficacy could be explained on the basis of the dose of EPA being too low, the study being underpowered, TD being too chronic in the majority of cases, differences in dietary fatty acid intake, or that EPA lacks an anti-dyskinetic action.

Neuroleptic reduction and/or cessation and neuroleptics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Since the 1950s neuroleptic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have been also associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD). Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to neuroleptics. These studies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and neuroleptic cessation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a reduction or cessation of neuroleptic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD, for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific neuroleptics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (1997), Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), EMBASE (1980-1997), LILACS (1982-1996), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997), and SCISEARCH (1997) by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register (July 2003). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted the principal authors of trials for further unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established neuroleptic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) neuroleptic maintenance versus neuroleptic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) neuroleptic maintenance versus neuroleptic reduction (including intermittent strategies), and (c) specific neuroleptics for the treatment of TD versus, placebo or intervention. A post hoc decision was made to broaden comparison (c) to include specific neuroleptics versus other neuroleptics for the treatment of TD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We (KSW, JR) independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers, and re-inspected and quality assessed these and extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using random effects relative risk (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI). Where possible we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistic (NNH). We excluded continuous data if more than 50% of people were lost to follow up, but, where possible, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD). It was assumed that those leaving the study early showed no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials and excluded 102. One small two week study (n=18), reported on the 'masking' effects of molindone and haloperidol on TD, which favoured haloperidol (RR 3.44 CI 1.1 to 5.8). Two (total n=17) studies found no reduction in TD associated with neuroleptic reduction (RR 0.38 CI 0.1 to 1.0). One study (n=20) found no significant differences in oral dyskinesia (RR 2.45 CI 0.3 to 19.7) when neuroleptics were compared as a specific treatment for TD. Dyskinesia was found to be not significantly different (n=32, RR 0.62 CI 0.3 to 1.26) between quetiapine and haloperidol when these neuroleptics were used as specific treatments for TD, although the need for additional neuroleptics was significantly lower in the quetiapine group (n=47, RR 0.49 CI 0.2 to 1.0) than in those given haloperidol.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited data from small studies using neuroleptic reduction or specific neuroleptic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration in order to fully investigate this area.

Olanzapine treatment for tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia patients: a prospective clinical trial with patients randomized to blinded dose reduction periods

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially persistent and disabling abnormal involuntary movement disorder. The aim of this 8-month study was to determine if olanzapine treatment could lead to a significant and persistent reduction in preexisting TD.

METHODS

Eligible schizophrenia patients met restricted Research Diagnosis criteria of TD requiring, in part, a rating of at least moderate severity (score > or = 3) in one or more of seven body regions on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Patients received olanzapine, 5-20 mg/day, for 8 months. During this period, they underwent one to two dose reduction periods under blinded conditions. Concurrent changes in TD, psychopathology, parkinsonism and akathisia were assessed with the AIMS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Simpson-Angus and Barnes Akathisia Scales, respectively.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in mean AIMS total score was demonstrated at endpoint (n = 92; p < 0.001) as well as at each visit (p < 0.001) and as early as Week 1 on olanzapine. Approximately 70% of patients no longer met the restricted Research Diagnostic criteria for persistent TD (RD-TD) after 8 months of treatment. No statistically significant rebound worsening of TD was found during either blinded drug reduction period. Significant improvement in psychopathology (p = 0.001) and parkinsonism (p < 0.001) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in the severity of preexisting TD was achieved with olanzapine and persisted throughout the 8-month study and during each dose reduction period. Overall improvement in clinical status suggests that olanzapine may be effective for the long-term management of schizophrenia patients with preexisting TD.

Neuroleptic withdrawal in treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia: tardive dyskinesia is not associated with supersensitive psychosis

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether tardive dyskinesia (TD) represents a risk factor for supersensitive psychosis (SS) by assessing the effect of medication withdrawal on ratings of psychopathology for 30 days following discontinuation of antipsychotic medication in patients with and without TD. The subjects were 101 treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia who had been admitted to the inpatient service of Neuroscience Research Hospital (NRH), National Institute of Mental Health, between 1982 and 1994 to undergo studies involving discontinuation of antipsychotic medication. Patients were rated independently on a daily basis on the 22-item Psychiatric Symptom Assessment Scale (PSAS), an extended version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The overall frequency of TD was 35.6%. Tardive dyskinesia patients were older (p < 0.0006) and had suffered from schizophrenia for a longer time (p < 0.003) than No-TD patients. Repeated measure ANOVA revealed a "time" effect for all subgroups studied. The interaction TD x time, however, was not statistically significant for any of the clusters. Within-group analysis revealed significant differences against baseline for measures of positive symptoms, negative symptoms and abnormal involuntary movements in the No-TD group 3 and 4 weeks after antipsychotic withdrawal. In the TD group, however, the changes were observed only at 4 weeks following antipsychotic discontinuation in just two of the positive symptoms cluster. Between-group analyses revealed that, at baseline, the Mannerisms cluster (abnormal involuntary movements) was significantly higher in the TD group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between any of the remaining clusters at baseline or at different times following drug withdrawal. In conclusion, the relationship between SS and TD could not be confirmed in a cohort of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In the present study, patients with no TD seemed to deteriorate faster than patients with TD in terms of psychopathology and abnormal involuntary movements. It is possible that both group of patients may undergo supersensitive receptor changes, and that these changes may be more pronounced but potentially reversible in the group without TD.

Switching antipsychotic medications: general recommendations and switching to amisulpride

As more and more novel antipsychotic agents are introduced, the need for practical guidelines on switching these medications is becoming increasingly important. Indications for a switch include situations where the patient or his family/caregiver requests a change in medication, where the patient cannot tolerate current treatment, where they have comorbid physical or psychiatric conditions or where they have achieved only a partial remission, are refractory to treatment or have relapsed. Cross-tapering is generally the most acceptable method of switching, although abrupt withdrawal may be necessary in some cases, such as when a patient develops a severe or acute reaction to their current treatment. Possible problems of switching include the risk of discontinuation reactions and the re-emergence of psychotic symptoms. The pharmacological profile of amisulpride means it has a relatively low potential for interactions with other drugs and may be started while discontinuing the previous antipsychotic. It should be started at the target dose for the patient's current symptoms. A retrospective questionnaire among 60 patients switching to amisulpride treatment was undertaken to identify the characteristics of patients switching antipsychotics and their reasons. Patients were switched from a variety of antipsychotic medications, both traditional (42% of patients) and atypical (58%). Most patients (87%) had at least two reasons for changing medication, with lack of efficacy, adverse events and treatment optimisation before reintegration being the most common. Contrary to recommendations, 89% of patients were switched abruptly between medications. A total of 62% of patients received amisulpride doses in the range 400-800 mg/day and most (72%) required no dose adjustment. The great majority of patients (87%) switched to amisulpride without problems.

Switching to amisulpride

The introduction of atypical antipsychotics represents an important advance in the treatment of schizophrenia. As their therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety profiles are clearly superior to classical neuroleptics, atypical antipsychotic agents are considered to be the treatment of choice in first episode patients. In addition, an increasing number of patients are being switched from classical to atypical antipsychotic agents. Switching is especially relevant in patients with a poor therapeutic response to classical neuroleptics and persistent symptoms (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depressive syndromes, cognitive deficit); in patients with a psychotic relapse despite compliance; in patients with important side-effects (not only acute and tardive extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS] and general side-effects, but also dysphoria or neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome [NIDS]); and in patients who are non-compliant due to side-effects. Switching to atypical antipsychotics should be performed with extreme care in stabilised patients; or in patients who present a danger to themselves or others at relapse; or in patients who are on depot neuroleptics who were non-compliant to previous oral treatment. Switching requires careful planning to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects (neuroleptic withdrawal syndrome, cholinergic rebound, exacerbation of symptoms or relapse, rebound of parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia, dyskinesia), which may mask the beneficial effects and lead to early discontinuation of the new treatment. Patients, family and carers should be actively involved at all stages, and educated about the possible benefits and problems associated with switching therapy. Cross-tapering old and new treatment is the preferred method for switching and this involves tapering off the previous antipsychotic agent and any adjunctive treatment (sedatives, anticholinergic medication), while gradually titrating the new atypical antipsychotic agent to the established therapeutic dose. Switching patients to amisulpride treatment offers effective antipsychotic therapy, with a positive effect on negative and depressive symptoms. Amisulpride treatment also results in improved quality of life and social functioning in addition to fewer relapses and days of hospitalisation during long-term follow-up.

Effects of smoking during antipsychotic withdrawal in patients with chronic schizophrenia

A number of studies have shown that patients with schizophrenia smoke more than other psychiatric patients and more than the general population. Also, medicated schizophrenics who smoke present more positive symptoms of schizophrenia than non-smokers. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of smoking on ratings of psychopathology for 30 days following discontinuation of antipsychotic medication. The subjects were 101 treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia who had been admitted to the inpatient service of Neuroscience Research Hospital (NRH), National Institute of Mental Health, between 1982 and 1994 to undergo studies involving discontinuation of antipsychotic medication. Patients were rated independently on a daily basis on the 22-item Psychiatric Symptom Assessment Scale (PSAS), an extended version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). At baseline, ratings for Verbal Positive, Paranoia and Loss of Function were higher in smokers (n=65) than non-smokers (n=36), but a statistically significant difference was observed only for the Verbal Positive cluster. Analysis by gender revealed that male non-smokers had the lowest psychopathology ratings at baseline. There were no differences in Anxiety/depression, Behavior Positive, Deficit Symptoms or Mannerisms (a measure for abnormal involuntary movements). Following medication discontinuation, repeated-measure analysis demonstrated a 'time' effect for all the variables studied and a 'group' (smokers vs. non-smokers) effect for Verbal Positive, Paranoia, and Loss of Function. Post-hoc comparisons at individual time points showed significantly higher ratings for smokers at week 1 for Paranoia. No differences were observed at later time points. In conclusion, at baseline, smokers had more positive symptoms and were apparently more functionally impaired than non-smokers. This difference was no longer evident after a 30 day medication discontinuation period.

Neuroleptic reduction and/or cessation and neuroleptics as specific treatments for tardive dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Since the 1950s neuroleptic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have been also associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD). Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to neuroleptics. These studies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies, such as drug holidays, and neuroleptic cessation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether, for those people with both schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) and tardive dyskinesia (TD), a reduction or cessation of neuroleptic drugs was associated with reduction in TD symptoms. A secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific neuroleptics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for already established TD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (1997), EMBASE (1980-1997), LILACS (1982-1996), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997), and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. References of all identified studies were searched for further trial citations. Principal authors of trials were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Reports were included if they assessed the treatment of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and already established TD, who had been randomly allocated to (a) neuroleptic cessation (placebo or no intervention) versus neuroleptic maintenance; b. neuroleptic reduction (including intermittent strategies) versus neuroleptic maintenance; or c. specific neuroleptics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The reviewers extracted the data independently and the Odds Ratio (95% CI) or the average difference (95% CI) were estimated. The reviewers assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials were able to be included in this review. Sixty two were excluded and 16 are awaiting assessment. Seven trials are still pending classification. No randomised controlled trial-derived data were available to clarify the role of neuroleptics as treatments for TD. This includes the atypical antipsychotics including clozapine. Despite neuroleptic cessation being a frequently first-line recommendation, there were no RCT-derived data to support this. Two studies ( approximately approximately Cookson 1987 approximately approximately , approximately approximately Kane 1983 approximately approximately ) found a reduction in TD associated with neuroleptic reduction.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The lack of evidence to support the efficacy of neuroleptic cessation as a treatment for TD, combined with the accumulating evidence of an increased risk of relapse should antipsychotic drugs be reduced, makes this intervention a hazardous treatment for TD. Dose reduction may offer some benefit as a treatment for TD compared to standard levels of neuroleptic use. There is a need to evaluate the utility of clozapine and the 'atypical' antipsychotics as treatments for established TD.

Movement disorders associated with withdrawal from high-dose intravenous haloperidol therapy in delirious ICU patients

Intravenous haloperidol is recommended as the drug of choice to treat delirium in ICU patients. Movement disorders and other adverse events commonly occur with oral haloperidol use but are rarely seen with IV haloperidol use, and withdrawal symptoms have not been reported with short-term ICU use. We describe self-limited dyskinesia during withdrawal of high-dose continuous IV haloperidol therapy in five ICU patients.

The Maryland Psychiatric Research Center scale and the characterization of involuntary movements

The Maryland Psychiatric Research Center involuntary movement scale (MPRC scale) has been used in the evaluation of 1107 patients referred for drug-induced movement disorders. The scale has increased discrimination of body area and severity compared to other scales. Validity was examined using principal component analyses, pharmacologic response studies and associations with AIMS, global judgement and motor diagnosis. Reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between raters and test-retest measurements. The prevalence of dyskinetic and parkinsonian signs at several levels of severity are reported. Total dyskinesia was strongly correlated with AIMS score, r = 0.97. Inter-rater reliability was 0.81-0.90 for total dyskinesia score. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis shows a total dyskinesia score of 4 or above to predict tardive dyskinesia, consistent with RDC-TD criteria. Hand dyskinesia showed a high prevalence comparable to that of oral dyskinesias. The MPRC scale is a valid, sensitive and reliable instrument for the rating of neuroleptic-induced dyskinetic and parkinsonian syndromes and may offer advantages over other scales in neurophysiologic research and brain imaging with its ease of use, uniform structure and greater discrimination of anatomic place and severity in the rating of involuntary movements.

Changing antipsychotic medication: guidelines on the transition to treatment with risperidone. The Consensus Study Group on Risperidone Dosing

When treating patients with psychoses, clinicians must often consider changing their treatment from one antipsychotic agent to another. The transition may be necessary because the patient experiences serious side effects or because the existing therapy no longer controls the patient's symptoms. A principal problem in changing antipsychotic agents is the potential for withdrawal symptoms resulting from discontinuation of the existing therapy. These syndromes can manifest as reemergence or worsening of psychosis, rebound or unmasked dyskinesia, and cholinergic-rebound symptoms. Withdrawal signs and symptoms may include insomnia, nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and agitation. When switching a patient to the new antipsychotic agent risperidone, the clinician can keep withdrawal symptoms to a minimum by considering the patient's clinical history and current status. For some patients, abrupt withdrawal of the current antipsychotic may be possible. For others, the dose of the previous medication must be gradually reduced before risperidone is initiated. In many cases, the transition is best made by overlapping the existing therapy and risperidone.

Withdrawal-emergent dyskinesia in patients with schizophrenia during antipsychotic discontinuation

We examined whether patients exhibiting withdrawal-emergent dyskinesia (WE-D) represent a group vulnerable to subsequent development of tardive dyskinesia (TD). WE-D was defined as moderate abnormal movements during antipsychotic withdrawal in persons without persistent TD. We assessed patients with schizophrenia-spectrum illness participating in withdrawal from antipsychotic medication. Patients with WE-D were compared to those without dyskinesia and to those with persistent TD. Clinical measures included duration of illness and antipsychotic exposure, negative symptoms, and neurologic soft signs. We hypothesized that WE-D patients would not differ from persistent-TD patients across the above variables, but would differ from non-TD patients. Patients without TD significantly differed from persistent TD in duration of illness, medication exposure and neurologic soft signs. WE-D did not differ from TD across these measures. No-TD patients also showed less duration of medication exposure and neurologic soft signs than those with WE-D.