THE METABOLISM OF L-RHAMNOSE IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. 3. L-RHAMULOSE-PHOSPHATE ALDOLASE

Characterization of NADP+-specific L-rhamnose dehydrogenase from the thermoacidophilic Archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum

Thermoplasma acidophilum utilizes L-rhamnose as a sole carbon source. To determine the metabolic pathway of L-rhamnose in Archaea, we identified and characterized L-rhamnose dehydrogenase (RhaD) in T. acidophilum. Ta0747P gene, which encodes the putative T. acidophilum RhaD (Ta_RhaD) enzyme belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family, was expressed in E. coli as an active enzyme catalyzing the oxidation of L-rhamnose to L-rhamnono-1,4-lactone. Analysis of catalytic properties revealed that Ta_RhaD oxidized L-rhamnose, L-lyxose, and L-mannose using only NADP(+) as a cofactor, which is different from NAD(+)/NADP(+)-specific bacterial RhaDs and NAD(+)-specific eukaryal RhaDs. Ta_RhaD showed the highest activity toward L-rhamnose at 60 °C and pH 7. The K (m) and k (cat) values were 0.46 mM, 1,341.3 min(-1) for L-rhamnose and 0.1 mM, 1,027.2 min(-1) for NADP(+), respectively. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that branched lineages of archaeal RhaD are quite distinct from those of Bacteria and Eukarya. This is the first report on the identification and characterization of NADP(+)-specific RhaD.

Characterisation of the gene cluster for l-rhamnose catabolism in the yeast Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis

In Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis and related fungal species the genes for L-rhamnose catabolism RHA1, LRA2, LRA3 and LRA4 but not LADH are clustered. We find that located next to the cluster is a transcription factor, TRC1, which is conserved among related species. Our transcriptome analysis shows that all the catabolic genes and all genes of the cluster are up-regulated on L-rhamnose. Among genes that were also up-regulated on L-rhamnose were two transcription factors including the TRC1. In addition, in 16 out of the 32 analysed fungal species only RHA1, LRA2 and LRA3 are physically clustered. The clustering of RHA1, LRA3 and TRC1 is also conserved in species not closely related to S. stipitis. Since the LRA4 is often not part of the cluster and it has several paralogues in L-rhamnose utilising yeasts we analysed the function of one of the paralogues, LRA41 by heterologous expression and biochemical characterization. Lra41p has similar catalytic properties as the Lra4p but the transcript was not up-regulated on L-rhamnose. The RHA1, LRA2, LRA4 and LADH genes were previously characterised in S. stipitis. We expressed the L-rhamnonate dehydratase, Lra3p, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, estimated the kinetic constants of the protein and showed that it indeed has activity with L-rhamnonate.

Hexose/Pentose and Hexitol/Pentitol Metabolism

Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium exhibit a remarkable versatility in the usage of different sugars as the sole source of carbon and energy, reflecting their ability to make use of the digested meals of mammalia and of the ample offerings in the wild. Degradation of sugars starts with their energy-dependent uptake through the cytoplasmic membrane and is carried on further by specific enzymes in the cytoplasm, destined finally for degradation in central metabolic pathways. As variant as the different sugars are, the biochemical strategies to act on them are few. They include phosphorylation, keto-enol isomerization, oxido/reductions, and aldol cleavage. The catabolic repertoire for using carbohydrate sources is largely the same in E. coli and in serovar Typhimurium. Nonetheless, significant differences are found, even among the strains and substrains of each species. We have grouped the sugars to be discussed according to their first step in metabolism, which is their active transport, and follow their path to glycolysis, catalyzed by the sugar-specific enzymes. We will first discuss the phosphotransferase system (PTS) sugars, then the sugars transported by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, followed by those that are taken up via proton motive force (PMF)-dependent transporters. We have focused on the catabolism and pathway regulation of hexose and pentose monosaccharides as well as the corresponding sugar alcohols but have also included disaccharides and simple glycosides while excluding polysaccharide catabolism, except for maltodextrins.

A genetic locus necessary for rhamnose uptake and catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutants unable to catabolize the methyl-pentose rhamnose are unable to compete effectively for nodule occupancy. In this work we show that the locus responsible for the transport and catabolism of rhamnose spans 10,959 bp. Mutations in this region were generated by transposon mutagenesis, and representative mutants were characterized. The locus contains genes coding for an ABC-type transporter, a putative dehydrogenase, a probable isomerase, and a sugar kinase necessary for the transport and subsequent catabolism of rhamnose. The regulation of these genes, which are inducible by rhamnose, is carried out in part by a DeoR-type negative regulator (RhaR) that is encoded within the same transcript as the ABC-type transporter but is separated from the structural genes encoding the transporter by a terminator-like sequence. RNA dot blot analysis demonstrated that this terminator-like sequence is correlated with transcript attenuation only under noninducing conditions. Transport assays utilizing tritiated rhamnose demonstrated that uptake of rhamnose was inducible and dependent upon the presence of the ABC transporter at this locus. Phenotypic analyses of representative mutants from this locus provide genetic evidence that the catabolism of rhamnose differs from previously described methyl-pentose catabolic pathways.

Proton-linked L-rhamnose transport, and its comparison with L-fucose transport in Enterobacteriaceae

1. An alkaline pH change occurred when L-rhamnose, L-mannose or L-lyxose was added to L-rhamnose-grown energy-depleted suspensions of strains of Escherichia coli. This is diagnostic of sugar-H+ symport activity. 2. L-Rhamnose, L-mannose and L-lyxose were inducers of the sugar-H+ symport and of L-[14C]rhamnose transport activity. L-Rhamnose also induced the biochemically and genetically distinct L-fucose-H+ symport activity in strains competent for L-rhamnose metabolism. 3. Steady-state kinetic measurements showed that L-mannose and L-lyxose were competitive inhibitors (alternative substrates) for the L-rhamnose transport system, and that L-galactose and D-arabinose were competitive inhibitors (alternative substrates) for the L-fucose transport system. Additional measurements with other sugars of related structure defined the different substrate specificities of the two transport systems. 4. The relative rates of H+ symport and of sugar metabolism, and the relative values of their kinetic parameters, suggested that the physiological role of the transport activity was primarily for utilization of L-rhamnose, not for L-mannose or L-lyxose. 5. L-Rhamnose transport into subcellular vesicles of E. coli was dependent on respiration, was optimal at pH 7, and was inhibited by protonophores and ionophores. It was insensitive to N-ethylmaleimide or cytochalasin B. 6. L-Rhamnose, L-mannose and L-lyxose each elicited an alkaline pH change when added to energy-depleted suspensions of L-rhamnose-grown Salmonella typhimurium LT2, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Erwinia carotovora carotovora and Erwinia carotovora atroseptica. The relative rates of subsequent acidification varied, depending on both the organism and the sugar. L-Fucose promoted an alkaline pH change in all the L-rhamnose-induced organisms except the Erwinia species. No L-rhamnose-H+ symport occurred in any organism grown on L-fucose. 7. All these results showed that L-rhamnose transport into the micro-organisms occurred by a system different from that for L-fucose transport. Both systems are energized by the trans-membrane electrochemical gradient of protons. 8. Neither steady-state kinetic measurements nor binding-protein assays revealed the existence of a second L-rhamnose transport system in E. coli.

Cross-induction of the L-fucose system by L-rhamnose in Escherichia coli

Dissimilation of L-fucose as a carbon and energy source by Escherichia coli involves a permease, an isomerase, a kinase, and an aldolase encoded by the fuc regulon at minute 60.2. Utilization of L-rhamnose involves a similar set of proteins encoded by the rha operon at minute 87.7. Both pathways lead to the formation of L-lactaldehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. A common NAD-linked oxidoreductase encoded by fucO serves to reduce L-lactaldehyde to L-1,2-propanediol under anaerobic growth conditions, irrespective of whether the aldehyde is derived from fucose or rhamnose. In this study it was shown that anaerobic growth on rhamnose induces expression of not only the fucO gene but also the entire fuc regulon. Rhamnose is unable to induce the fuc genes in mutants defective in rhaA (encoding L-rhamnose isomerase), rhaB (encoding L-rhamnulose kinase), rhaD (encoding L-rhamnulose 1-phosphate aldolase), rhaR (encoding the positive regulator for the rha structural genes), or fucR (encoding the positive for the fuc regulon). Thus, cross-induction of the L-fucose enzymes by rhamnose requires formation of L-lactaldehyde; either the aldehyde itself or the L-fuculose 1-phosphate (known to be an effector) formed from it then interacts with the fucR-encoded protein to induce the fuc regulon.

Dual control of a common L-1,2-propanediol oxidoreductase by L-fucose and L-rhamnose in Escherichia coli

Anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli on L-fucose or L-rhamnose as the sole source of carbon and energy depends on the regeneration of NAD from NADH by disposing the intermediate L-lactaldehyde as L-1,2-propanediol. The two parallel pathways, with their own permeases and enzymes encoded by two widely separated gene clusters, appear to share a single enzyme that catalyzes the formation of L-1,2-propanediol. Although this oxidoreductase is encoded by a gene at the fuc locus, the enzyme is inducible by both L-fucose and L-rhamnose. The inducibility by L-rhamnose is controlled by a gene at the rha locus with no other known functions, since the aerobic growth rate on L-rhamnose remains normal. L-1,2-Propanediol oxidoreductase activity is inducible only anaerobically, and the effect of the two methylpentoses operates at different levels: L-fucose exerts its influence post-transcriptionally; L-rhamnose exerts its influence transcriptionally.