Backache and epidural analgesia

Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether epidural analgesia during labour is associated with long term backache.

DESIGN

Follow up after randomised controlled trial. Analysis by intention to treat.

SETTING

Department of obstetrics and gynaecology at one NHS trust.

PARTICIPANTS

369 women: 184 randomised to epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 123) and 185 randomised to non-epidural group (treatment as allocated received by 133). In the follow up study 151 women were from the epidural group and 155 from the non-epidural group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self reported low back pain, disability, and limitation of movement assessed through one to one interviews with physiotherapist, questionnaire on back pain and disability, physical measurements of spinal mobility.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in demographic details or other key characteristics. The mean time interval from delivery to interview was 26 months. There were no significant differences in the onset or duration of low back pain, with nearly a third of women in each group reporting pain in the week before interview. There were no differences in self reported measures of disability in activities of daily living and no significant differences in measurements of spinal mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

After childbirth there are no differences in the incidence of long term low back pain, disability, or movement restriction between women who receive epidural pain relief and women who receive other forms of pain relief.

Is epidural anesthesia in labor associated with chronic low back pain? A prospective cohort study

The association between epidural anesthesia during labor and subsequent postpartum low back pain remains unclear. The objective of this follow-up cohort study was to determine whether epidural anesthesia was associated with chronic back pain 1 yr after delivery. We contacted 329 women by telephone and asked them to complete a standardized questionnaire 1 yr (+/-1 mo) after delivery. One hundred sixty-four women had received epidural analgesia for labor and delivery, and 165 had not. Subjects were asked to quantify their back pain (yes/no, numeric rating score, and interference with daily activities). Differences between the two groups were tested by using the chi2 test and the Mann-Whitney U-test, and logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables. The response rate was 244 of 329 (74%). Responders and nonresponders were similar in their demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the prevalence of back pain between women who had received epidural anesthesia (12 of 121, 10%) and those who had not (17 of 123, 14%). The adjusted relative risk of low back pain at 1 yr (epidural versus nonepidural) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.25, 1.56). There were also no differences between the two groups on numeric rating scores or level of interference with activities. This prospective follow-up study demonstrated no association between epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery and chronic back pain 1 yr after delivery.

IMPLICATIONS

We evaluated the presence of low back pain 1 yr after delivery in two groups of women-those who chose epidural analgesia for labor and those who did not. There was no increased risk of back pain in women who had used epidural analgesia. This finding is consistent with those of other North American studies.