Intraductal breast cancer: review of 183 consecutive cases

Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding adequacy of margins after mastectomy. To determine if pathological margin proximity is associated with local (LR) or distant recurrence after mastectomy for early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to 2019 and meta-analysis was conducted. Unpublished data were sought from authors (PROSPERO (CRD42019127541)). Thirty-four studies comprising 34,833 breast cancer patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eligible studies reported on patients undergoing curative mastectomy for cancer allowing estimation of outcomes in relation to margin status/width. The association between pathological margin status and local (LR) and distant recurrence was considered using random effects modelling. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Positive margins were associated with increased LR on multivariable analyses (HR, 2·64, (95%CI 2·01-3·46)) and LR was higher regardless of the distance of tumour from the margin defined as positive. After skin-sparing mastectomy, positive margins were associated with increased LR (HR 3·40, (95%CI 1·9-6·2)). In the 4 studies reporting distant recurrence, patients with involved margins had a higher risk (HR 1·53, (95%CI 1·03-2·25)).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve clear margins after mastectomy may increase the risks of local and distant recurrence. Adequate margin clearance should be recommended to minimize recurrence after mastectomy in National and International Guidelines.

Evaluating the efficacy of post-surgery adjuvant therapies used for ductal carcinoma in situ patients: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Post-surgery adjuvant therapies are very important for patients suffering from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this study we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of different post-surgery adjuvant therapies including tamoxifen, anastrozole and radiation therapy (RT) and their combinations (RT+ tamoxifen and RT+ anastrozole).

METHODS

We searched several databases, including Embase, MEDLINE / PUBMED, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index, for relevant studies. We then extracted the data from eligible studies in order to perform our NMA. We measured the comparative efficacy of each treatment option based on the calculated odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% credibility interval (95%CrI) for each treatment option. We calculated the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) in order to rank the therapies according to their different outcomes.

RESULTS

In this study, local recurrence (LC) was chosen as the primary outcome. Metastasis, contralateral-breast cancer (CBC), ipsilateral-breast cancer (IBC) and death were secondary outcomes. Patients treated with RT and RT + tamoxifen exhibited a lower risk of LC compared with control group (OR=0.54, 95%CrI: 0.40-0.73; OR=0.41, 95%CrI: 0.19-0.90). Patients treated by RT and RT + tamoxifen also exhibited a significantly lower risk of IBC compared with control group (OR=0.55, 95%CrI: 0.37-0.82; OR=0.42, 95%CrI: 0.18-0.99). Results from the SUCRA indicated that RT + anastrozole and RT + tamoxifen were potentially the best adjuvant treatments for patients with DCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the RT + anastrozole and RT + tamoxifen are recommended for their performance and effectiveness.

The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on adequate negative margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We systematically reviewed the evidence on margins in BCS for DCIS.

METHODS

A study-level meta-analysis of local recurrence (LR), microscopic margin status and threshold distance for negative margins. LR proportion was modeled using random-effects logistic meta-regression (frequentist) and network meta-analysis (Bayesian) that allows for multiple margin distances per study, adjusting for follow-up time.

RESULTS

Based on 20 studies (LR: 865 of 7883), odds of LR were associated with margin status [logistic: odds ratio (OR) 0.53 for negative vs. positive/close (p < 0.001); network: OR 0.45 for negative vs. positive]. In logistic meta-regression, relative to >0 or 1 mm, ORs for 2 mm (0.51), 3 or 5 mm (0.42) and 10 mm (0.60) showed comparable significant reductions in the odds of LR. In the network analysis, ORs relative to positive margins for 2 (0.32), 3 (0.30) and 10 mm (0.32) showed similar reductions in the odds of LR that were greater than for >0 or 1 mm (0.45). There was weak evidence of lower odds at 2 mm compared with >0 or 1 mm [relative OR (ROR) 0.72, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 0.47-1.08], and no evidence of a difference between 2 and 10 mm (ROR 0.99, 95 % CrI 0.61-1.64). Adjustment for covariates, and analyses based only on studies using whole-breast radiotherapy, did not change the findings.

CONCLUSION

Negative margins in BCS for DCIS reduce the odds of LR; however, minimum margin distances above 2 mm are not significantly associated with further reduced odds of LR in women receiving radiation.

Biology and treatment of ductal carcinomain situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is responsible for 25% of screen-detected breast cancers. Various prognostic classifications are in use, including the Van Nuys Prognostic Index and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer grading system (well, intermediate or poorly differentiated) based on cytonuclear pattern. This has been modified in screening programs to low, intermediate and high grade. In comparison with normal epithelium, DCIS has a tenfold increase in growth and 15-fold increase in apoptosis. Patients with extensive or multifocal DCIS need mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy, together with reconstruction, if requested. Microinvasion associated with DCIS is an indication for sentinel node biopsy. Randomized trials have confirmed the value of breast irradiation after wide excision, in terms of DCIS relapse and progression to invasive disease. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive DCIS benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery.

Is there a role for postmastectomy radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma in situ?

Background. DCIS treated by mastectomy ensures high local control rates. There is limited data on risk for relapse and lack of clear indication for adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). We report a retrospective review on a population of DCIS patients treated with mastectomy. The objective was to identify the overall incidence of relapse, risk factors for local recurrence, and accordingly for whom adjuvant postmastectomy RT may be considered. Methods. This is an IRB-approved retrospective study on a prospective breast cancer database. From 1997 to 2007, we identified 969 patients with diagnoses of DCIS, among them 211 breasts in 207 patients were treated with mastectomy and comprise the study group. Results. With a median followup of 55 months (4.6 years) the 10-year relapse-free survival is 97%. Two of 211 breasts (0.9%) treated with mastectomy developed a local-regional recurrence. Both the relapses were among patients defined as having <1 mm final mastectomy margin. Conclusions. The rare local relapse after mastectomy limits our ability to reliably identify risk factors for relapse. The consideration for postmastectomy RT should be based on an individualized risk evaluating surgical technique used, presence of BRCA mutation, grade and extent of tumor, and proximity of lesion to the margin of resection.

Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Negative margins are associated with reduced risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, there is no consensus about the best minimum margin width.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for studies of DCIS published in English between January 1970 and July 2010 and examined the relationship between IBTR and margin status after BCS for DCIS. Women with DCIS were stratified into two groups, BCS with or without radiotherapy. We used frequentist and Bayesian approaches to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of IBTR for groups with negative margins and positive margins. We further examined specific margin thresholds using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression techniques. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies published in 24 articles. A total of 1066 IBTR events occurred in 7564 patients, including BCS alone (565 IBTR events in 3098 patients) and BCS with radiotherapy (501 IBTR events in 4466 patients). Compared with positive margins, negative margins were associated with reduced risk of IBTR in patients with radiotherapy (OR = 0.46, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 0.35 to 0.59), and in patients without radiotherapy (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI = 0.24 to 0.47). Compared with patients with positive margins, the risk of IBTR for patients with negative margins was smaller (negative margin >0 mm, OR = 0.45, 95% CrI = 0.38 to 0.53; >2 mm, OR = 0.38, 95% CrI = 0.28 to 0.51; >5 mm, OR = 0.55, 95% CrI = 0.15 to 1.30; and >10 mm, OR = 0.17, 95% CrI = 0.12 to 0.24). Compared with a negative margin greater than 2 mm, a negative margin of at least 10 mm was associated with a lower risk of IBTR (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI = 0.29 to 0.69). We found a probability of .96 that a negative margin threshold greater than 10 mm is the best option compared with other margin thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative surgical margins should be obtained for DCIS patients after BCS regardless of radiotherapy. Within cosmetic constraint, surgeons should attempt to achieve negative margins as wide as possible in their first attempt. More studies are needed to understand whether margin thresholds greater than 10 mm are warranted.

Outcomes of screening-detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with wide excision alone

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is commonly identified on screening mammography. Standard treatment for localized DCIS is wide local excision (WLE) and adjuvant radiotherapy. This approach represents overtreatment in many cases, where the DCIS would never have become clinically significant, or where less intensive treatment would have been satisfactory. We reviewed the medium-term outcome of a cohort of screen detected DCIS patients treated mainly with WLE without radiotherapy.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with DCIS at NorthWestern BreastScreen between January 1994 and December 2005 were identified from a prospective database. Demographic, pathological, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Survival and local recurrence (LR) rates were determined, and associations between various factors and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 422 patients were diagnosed with DCIS. There were 400 patients treated with WLE, and 27 of these received adjuvant radiotherapy. The 5- and 8-year overall and breast cancer specific survival rates were 96.1 and 91.3%, and 99.6 and 99.3%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was 15.4 and 17.1% at 5 and 8 years. Of 56 local recurrences, 34 had WLE after recurrence, 16 of which had adjuvant radiotherapy. No single factor was statistically significantly associated with local recurrence, although combining factors revealed groups where the LR rate was less than 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer specific mortality was very low in this cohort of older patients with screen-detected DCIS. There was a moderate rate of local recurrence that could usually be salvaged with breast conservation. Decisions regarding adjuvant radiotherapy should take these findings into account.

Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ

We synthesized the evidence of the association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. We identified five randomized controlled clinical trials and 64 observational studies that were published in English from January 1970 to January 2009. Younger women with clinically presented ductal carcinoma in situ had higher risk of ipsilateral recurrent cancer. African Americans had higher mortality and greater rates of advanced recurrent cancer. Women with larger tumor size, comedo necrosis, worse pathological grading, positive surgical margins, and at a higher risk category, using a composite prognostic index, had worse outcomes. Inconsistent evidence suggested that positive HER2 receptor and negative estrogen receptor status were associated with worse outcomes. Synthesis of evidence was hampered by low statistical power to detect significant differences in predictor categories and inconsistent adjustment practices across the studies. Future research should address composite prediction indices among race groups for all outcomes.

Incorporating margin status information in treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a decision analysis

To integrate margin status information into the decision to undergo radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to project quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a hypothetical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a lifetime horizon treated with or without RT following BCS. We estimated the transition probabilities of local DCIS and invasive recurrences based on the margin status (free, close, or positive) from a systematic literature review. Other probability estimates and utilities were collected from the published literature. Using the conditions defined in this model, expected QALYs after BCS alone were better than those after BCS with RT under the free-margin scenario (15.72 vs. 15.58) and worse in the close-margin (15.44 vs. 15.50) and positive-margin scenarios (15.20 vs. 15.33). The probability of receiving a salvage mastectomy varied from 10 to 28%, depending on margin status and treatment. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the optimal treatment was sensitive to patients' preferences and RT side effects. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that BCS alone would be the best strategy in 54% of the cases under the free-margin scenario, 48% under the close-margin scenario, and 44% under the positive-margin scenario. This study illustrates that margin status is able to provide supplementary information on the decision of DCIS treatment. Our analyses also highlight the importance of patients' preferences in decision making. Our findings suggest that RT is not necessary for all patients with DCIS undergoing BCS.

Clinical presentation and surgical quality in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

To assess quality of surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to compare teaching and non-teaching hospitals that constitute the Comprehensive Cancer Centres of the Middle Netherlands (IKMN), we retrospectively reviewed 499 patients with 502 DCIS lesions treated in the period 1989-2002. In teaching hospitals fewer patients presented with clinical symptoms compared to non-teaching hospitals (15% versus 24.0%, p = 0.01). Finally, 65% of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and 35% of patients a mastectomy (no significant differences between the two types of hospitals). In teaching hospitals 19% of the patients had a disease-involved or unknown surgical margins versus 13% in non-teaching hospitals (p = 0.04). Twenty patients (4%) received radiation therapy postoperatively with no differences between teaching and non-teaching hospitals (p = 0.98). Quality of surgical treatment is the most important prognostic factor in treatment of DCIS. The quality of excisions should be improved and the exact status of margins should be recorded in pathology reports.

Effect of Margin Status on Local Recurrence After Breast Conservation and Radiation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Purpose

There is no consensus on what constitutes an adequate surgical margin in patients receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Inadequate margins may result in high local recurrence, and excessively large resections may lead to poor cosmetic outcome without oncologic benefit.

Methods

A comprehensive search for published trials that examined outcomes after adjuvant RT after BCS for DCIS was performed using MEDLINE and cross referencing available data. Reviews of each study were conducted, and data were extracted. Primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) related to surgical margins.

Results

A total of 4,660 patients were identified from trials examining BCS and RT for DCIS. Patients with negative margins were significantly less likely to experience recurrence than patients with positive margins after RT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.47). A negative margin significantly reduced the risk of IBTR when compared with a close (OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83) or unknown margin (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.87). When specific margin thresholds were examined, a 2-mm margin was superior to a margin less than 2 mm (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.96); however, we saw no significant difference in the rate of IBTR with margins between 2 mm and more than 5 mm (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 0.51 to 5.0; P > .05).

Conclusion

Surgical margins negative for DCIS should be obtained after BCS for DCIS. A margin threshold of 2 mm seems to be as good as a larger margin when BCS for DCIS is combined with RT.

National Breast Cancer Audit: ductal carcinoma in situ management in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a significant issue in Australia and New Zealand with rising incidence because of the implementation of mammographic screening. Current information on its natural history is unable to accurately predict progression to invasive cancer. In 2003, the National Breast Cancer Centre in Australia published recommendations for DCIS. In Australia and New Zealand, the National Breast Cancer Audit collects information on DCIS cases. This article will examine these recommendations and provide information from the audit on current DCIS management.

METHODS

Three thousand six hundred and twenty-nine cases of DCIS were entered by 274 breast surgeons between January 1998 and December 2004. Data items in the National Breast Cancer Audit database that were covered in the National Breast Cancer Centre recommendations were reviewed. Information was available on the following: diagnostic biopsy rates for all cases and mammographically positive cases and rates of breast conserving surgery (BCS), clear margins following BCS, postoperative radiotherapy following BCS for groups at high risk of recurrence as well as axillary procedures and tamoxifen prescription.

RESULTS

Close adherence was found in diagnostic biopsy, BCS and clear margin rates. Some high-risk groups received radiotherapy, although women with 'close' margins did not in 33% of cases. Axillary procedures were conducted in 23% of cases and most (81%) patients were not prescribed tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

There was predominantly close adherence to recommendations with three possible areas of improvement: fewer axillary procedures, an appraisal of radiotherapy practice following BCS and more investigation into tamoxifen prescription practices for DCIS.

Local Recurrences After Conservative Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ of the Breast Without Radiotherapy: The Effect of Age

BACKGROUND

The main goal in treatment of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) of the breast is to prevent local recurrences. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery has been shown to decrease the recurrence rate, although whether all patients should be treated with radiotherapy remains a topic of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the local recurrence rate after conservative surgical treatment of DCIS without radiotherapy and to identify risk factors for local recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 499 female patients with 502 DCIS lesions treated in the period 1989 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were tested by using the log-rank test. The association of variables with local recurrence was analyzed by using the chi2 test.

RESULTS

Treatment constituted of lumpectomy in 329 patients (65%). Thirty-eight patients (8%) had disease-positive margins, and for 41 patients (8%) the margin status was not known. Eighty tumors recurred, for a local recurrence rate of 13% after 4 years compared with 17% for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery only. Risk factors for ipsilateral recurrences were younger age (< 50 years), treatment with breast-conserving surgery only, and presence of disease-involved surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative treatment of DCIS results in high recurrences rates, and outcomes can be improved by performing more radical surgery. Because radiotherapy has been shown to be effective in preventing recurrent disease, and, to date, no subgroups have been identified in which radiation can be omitted, its use is recommended, especially in younger patients.

Defining Negative Margins in DCIS Patients Treated with Breast Conservation Therapy: The University of Chicago Experience

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been evolving and the majority of women are now being treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (i.e. breast conservation therapy [BCT]). Controversies still exist regarding the histologic features and margin status that are associated with local recurrence. The goal of this study was to review our institution's experience in patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCT to determine pathologic features that can predict local recurrence, with particular emphasis on the final surgical margin status. We analyzed 103 consecutive patients with DCIS who were treated with BCT between 1986 and 2000. The slides were reviewed to determine the final margin status, type of DCIS, size of DCIS, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis and calcification, and volume of excised specimen. Margins were considered positive when DCIS touched or was transected at an inked margin. Negative margins were further categorized as close (less than 1 mm), 1--5 mm, and more than 5 mm. The size of the DCIS was determined based on either the maximal dimension on a slide or from the number of consecutive slides containing DCIS. Morphology and immunohistochemical profiles of the recurrent DCIS cases were compared with original DCIS. All patients were treated uniformly with external beam radiation therapy to the entire breast (median dose 46 Gy) with a boost to the tumor bed (median dose 14 Gy). The median follow-up was 63 months (range 7--191 months). The actuarial 5-year local control rate was 89%. The median time to local recurrence was 55 months. There were 13 local recurrences, of which 9 recurred as pure DCIS and 4 as invasive ductal carcinomas. Univariate analysis showed a significant association with local recurrence for positive margin (p=0.008), high nuclear grade (p=0.02), and young age at diagnosis (p=0.03). If margins were negative, the 5-year local control was 93%, as compared to 69% if margins were positive. A multivariate analysis showed that early age at diagnosis, positive margin status, and high nuclear grade were independently associated with local recurrence. The morphology and immunohistochemical stains of all nine recurrent DCIS were similar to those of the original DCIS. Breast conservation can be achieved with excellent local control by obtaining microscopically negative margins as strictly defined by DCIS not touching the inked surgical margins, and postoperative radiation that includes boost therapy to the tumor bed.

Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a breast lesion that is diagnosed with increasing frequency, mainly due to the wide use of screening mammography. Today, DCIS comprises 15-25% of all breast cancers detected at population screening programs. Consequently, the concepts of properly managing such patients assume a greater importance in everyday practice. Mammographically detected microcalcifications are the most common presentation of DCIS. Despite recent technological advances (including Stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy), mammographically guided wire biopsy remains the "gold-standard" for obtaining a histological diagnosis in patients with non-palpable, mammographically detected DCIS. Management options include mastectomy, local excision combined with radiation therapy, and local excision alone. Given that DCIS is a heterogeneous group of lesions rather than a single entity, and because patients have a wide variety of personal needs that must be addressed during treatment selection, it is obvious that no single approach will be appropriate for all forms of DCIS or for all patients. Careful patient selection is of key importance in order to achieve the best results in the management of the individual patient with DCIS. Axillary lymph node dissection is unnecessary in the treatment of pure DCIS, but it is indicated when microinvasion is present. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy may be an excellent alternative. In the NSABP B-24 trial, tamoxifen reduced both the invasive and non-invasive breast cancer events in either breast by 37%. Nearly all patients who develop a non-invasive recurrence following breast-sparing surgery are cured with mastectomy, and approximately 75% of those with an invasive recurrence are salvaged. Selected patients initially treated by lumpectomy alone may also undergo breast-conservation therapy at the time of relapse according to the same strict guidelines of tumor margin clearance required for the primary lesion; radiation therapy should be given following local excision. The use of systemic therapy in patients with invasive recurrence should be based on standard criteria for invasive breast cancer.

Effects of patient selection on the applicability of results from a randomised clinical trial (EORTC 10853) investigating breast-conserving therapy for DCIS

Selection of patients for randomised clinical trials may have a large impact on the applicability of the study results to the general population presenting the same disorder. However, clinical characteristics and outcome data on non-entered patients are usually not available. The effects of patient selection for the EORTC 10853 trial investigating the role of radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ have been studied, in an analysis of all patients treated for ductal carcinoma in situ in five participating institutes. The reasons for not entering patients were evaluated and treatment results of the randomised patients were compared to those not entered. A total of 910 patients were treated for ductal carcinoma in situ. Of these, 477 (52%) were ineligible, with the size of the lesion being the main reason for ineligibility (30% of all ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 433 eligible patients, 278 (64%) were randomised into the trial. The main reasons for non-entry of eligible patients were either physicians' preference for one of the treatment arms (26%) or patients' refusal (9%). These percentages showed significant variation among the institutes. At 4 years follow-up, those patients not entered in the trial and treated with local excision and radiotherapy, had higher local recurrence rates than the patients randomised in the trial and treated with the same approach, (17 vs 2%, P=0.03). The patients treated with local excision alone had equal local recurrence rates (11% in both groups). Selection of patients may explain the differences in outcome of the randomised patients, and those not-entered. Thus, the results of this trial may not be applicable to all patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is an early, localized stage of carcinoma in the process of multistep breast carcinogenesis. The incidence of DCIS is increasing, mainly due to screening mammography, which results in diagnosing the disease in an increasing proportion of asymptomatic patients. Consequently, clinicians are being confronted with growing numbers of women who present with DCIS of the breast; thus, the concepts of managing such patients are assuming greater importance. The most common presentation is calcifications on mammography. DCIS is a biologically and morphologically heterogeneous disease. If left untreated, a significant proportion of these tumours will evolve into invasive cancer. However, when appropriately treated, the prognosis of DCIS is excellent. Optimal management of DCIS remains controversial. The goal in the treatment of patients with DCIS is to control local disease and prevent subsequent development of invasive cancer. For several decades, total mastectomy was the treatment of choice for DCIS and it should still be considered the standard of care, to which more conservative forms of treatment must be compared. Mastectomy is associated with a risk for chest wall recurrence of approximately 1%. Axillary lymph node dissection is not routinely recommended in the management of DCIS. However, mastectomy probably represents overtreatment in a substantial number of patients, especially those with small, mammographically detected lesions. Local excision alone has been suggested in carefully selected patients, whilst the rest of the patients undergoing breast-conservation surgery should be treated with breast irradiation. There is evidence that breast-conservation therapy is an effective option in the management of selected patients with DCIS. The use of radiotherapy after lumpectomy significantly decreases the rate of recurrence. Nuclear grade, presence of comedo necrosis, and margin involvement are the most commonly used predictors of the likelihood of recurrence. There is no role for adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The role of tamoxifen in the treatment of DCIS is not clearly defined; tamoxifen should be given only in patients enrolled in clinical trials. Following breast-conservation therapy, about 50% of the tumours recur as invasive cancer. Most patients with recurrent disease can be treated effectively, usually by salvage mastectomy, but also in selected cases by breast-conservation therapy.

Volume of resection in patients treated with breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is one of the most controversial issues in the management of breast cancer. Identification of factors that affect the risk of local recurrence is very important as the incidence of DCIS increases and the use of breast conservation becomes more widespread. Because the extent of resection may affect the relapse rate, we hypothesized that larger volumes of resection (VR) may account for the lower local recurrence rates we have previously found in elderly patients.

METHODS

Between 1978 and 1990, 173 cases of histologically confirmed DCIS were treated at MSKCC with breast conservation therapy. Of these, complete VR data were available for 126 cases. The VRs thus obtained were divided into two groups, <60 cm3 and > or =60 cm3, and were evaluated for correlating factors. The patients were divided into three groups by age at diagnosis: younger than 40 years, 40 to 69 years, and 70 years or older.

RESULTS

The eldest group had a significantly greater proportion of large VRs (30%) as compared to the middle group (11%) and the youngest group (9%) (P=.03, chi2). Although not statistically significant, the large VR group had a lower 6-year actuarial local recurrence rate (5.6%) than did the small VR group (21.3%) (P=.16, log-rank test). This trend was observed even though adjuvant radiotherapy was used less often in patients who had large VRs.

CONCLUSION

Breast conservation surgery for DCIS in elderly patients is more likely to employ a large VR. This may explain, at least in part, the observation that elderly patients have a lower local recurrence rate.

[Influence of locoregional irradiation on local control and survival in breast cancer]

Locoregional control is a crucial step in the achievement of breast cancer cure. In ductal carcinoma in situ, breast irradiation significantly reduces the rates of local recurrence whatever the histological subtypes, as demonstrated by the NSABP-B17 trial (25.8% of local recurrences without radiotherapy vs. 11.4% with radiotherapy). In infiltrating breast carcinomas, complementary breast irradiation has been shown to significantly improve the local control and slightly the overall survival in five randomized trials. Following mastectomy, locoregional irradiation clearly reduces the chest wall and nodal relapse rates, especially in case of lesions more than 5 cm or with nodal involvement and/or large lymphatic or vascular emboli. Two recent randomized trials confirmed the benefit of well-adapted locoregional irradiation in all subgroups, especially in patients with one to three axillary involved nodes. In the Danish trial (including premenopausal high-risk women), radiotherapy reduced locoregional relapses from 32 to 9% (p < 0.001) and increased the 10-year survival rate from 45 to 54% (p < 0.001). In the Canadian trial, locoregional relapse rate decreased from 25 to 13% and the 10-year survival rate increased from 56 to 65%. The meta-analysis published in 1995 by the EBCTCG showed only a modest benefit due to locoregional irradiation in breast cancer. However, when small or old trials were excluded due to imperfect methodology or inadequate irradiation techniques, the benefit of modern radiotherapy became much more evident in a population of 7,840 patients. Locoregional irradiation appears to be able to reduce the risk of metastatic evolution occurring after local or nodal relapse and must be integrated in a multidisciplinary strategy. Treatment toxicity (especially toxicity due to irradiation of internal mammary nodes) is of special concern, as anthracycline-based chemotherapy is prescribed more often. The use of a direct field, with at least 60% of the dose delivered by electrons alternating with photons is recommended to protect the heart and lungs.

Primary biliary cirrhosis in patients with breast cancer: studying the link

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by chronic nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis (CNSDC) of intrahepatic septal and interlobular bile ducts. It is generally defined as an autoimmune disease. Characteristically, patients with PBC have a cholestatic serum hepatic profile and circulating antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA). PBC is progressive and ultimately leads to biliary cirrhosis and liver failure. It occurs at least three times more often in women than in men and it is the most common indication for liver transplantation in women around the world. There is no known cure for PBC. Despite the remarkable progress elucidating the genetics of breast cancer, and the effort placed on breast cancer education and screening methods, the mortality of breast cancer remains unacceptably high. In this essay, we describe the similarities between breast cancer and PBC and how their pathogenesis may be related. The hypothesis stated herein has evolved from reports from the early 1980s that linked an increased risk for breast cancer with PBC, and from the author's clinical experience with patients who suffer from both diseases. The association between these two diseases in the USA merits further investigation. If it is confirmed, risk factors involved in their pathogenesis will be identified.

[Results of the conservative surgical and irradiation treatment of 132 nonpalpable ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast]

PURPOSE

Retrospective analysis of results of treatment of 132 subclinical ductal carcinomas in situ, non-palpable.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were treated with limited surgery and 70 Gy radiation therapy (70 Gy).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 7 years, the total recurrence rate was 6%, and the actuarial rate at 5 years 4% and at 10 years 13% at. These have no influence on recurrence on the specific actuarial survival rate which was 100% at 10 years. In spite of five infiltrating recurrences of seven, no metastasis appeared 48 months after the salvage surgery. The global rate of breast preservation was 92% at 7 years.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Therapeutic indications were developed taking into account the present analysis and a literature review (2,338 in situ ductal carcinomas, palpable or not, treated with conservative surgery, with or without adjuvant radio-therapy).

Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease

BACKGROUND

For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast who have been treated with breastconserving surgery, the usefulness of size and surgical margin status (i.e., presence or absence of disease at the point of excision) as prognostic factors for predicting residual disease has not been well established. This study was conducted to determine more clearly the relationship between size and margin status of mammary DCIS to residual disease.

METHODS

The pathology records of 232 consecutive patients with mammary DCIS who had been initially treated with lumpectomy at the University Hospitals of Cleveland were retrospectively reviewed. The size of the DCIS and the surgical margins of lumpectomy were analyzed. Residual disease was defined as the persistence of DCIS in the re-excision and/or mastectomy specimens.

RESULTS

Residual disease was found in 15 of 101 patients with DCIS of less than 1.0 cm in longest dimension, in 27 of 96 patients with DCIS of 1.0-2.4 cm in size, and in 24 of 35 patients with DCIS of greater than or equal to 2.5 cm in size (P<.001). Residual disease was found in 30 of 77 patients with DCIS and positive margins, in 11 of 59 patients with DCIS and close margins (< or =1mm), and in 10 of 73 patients with DCIS and negative margins (>1 mm) (P =.001). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of residual disease was associated with large tumor size (i.e., > or =2.5 cm) (odds ratio [OR] = 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.13-20.00; two-sided P = .0001) and with positive margin status (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.02-4.55; two-sided P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The size and margin status of DCIS each were found to be independent predictors of residual disease.

Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part 2: Treatment

Several dilemmas exist when treating a patient with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): the high rate of inter-observer variation for pathologists who must diagnose these tumours; the potential for over- and under-treatment; and the uncertainty about the best way to inform a patient who must often make a decision between breast conservation and mastectomy. Mastectomy is nearly 100% curative, is expedient, but may represent over-treatment for many women, particularly those with asymptomatic mammographically detected lesions. Axillary dissection is not recommended as a routine except for patients with lesions over 5 cm in whom the risk of micro-invasion and lymph node involvement increases. Conservative surgery (CS) alone is associated with a local recurrence rate of approximately 20%, and half of these recurrences (10% overall) are invasive, with a potential long-term cure rate of at least 90%. The addition of radiation to CS reduces the risk of local recurrence to approximately 10%, half of these recurrences (5%) are invasive for a potential long-term cure rate of 95%. Several randomized trials comparing CS with or without radiation therapy (RT) are in progress. The factors that increase the rate of local recurrence after CS alone for DCIS include close or involved margins, and the presence of necrosis or high-grade tumours. Patients with these features should have radiation therapy if breast conservation is preferred. Patients with low-grade tumours (without necrosis) up to 15 mm, with clear margins of at least 10 mm, who agree to be closely observed may be good candidates for CS alone. A critical review of the literature is presented.

pTNM Stage Distribution in Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey in Northern Italy

Aims and background

The role of distribution by stage at diagnosis in breast cancer has been considered in many studies, with particular regard to evaluation of prognosis, impact of screening programs and quality of care. Nevertheless, international comparisons of descriptive data can be hampered by lack of homogeneity in staging methods. The TNM is presently the most common staging system used all over the world, although some criticism have been raised recently against its pragmatic value. The present study reports a population-based survey of pathologic TNM distribution in incident cases of female breast cancer in the Verona province, a geographical area of northern Italy covered by cancer registration.

Methods

All histologically proven incident cases of breast cancer were identified in the study period 1988-1990 and classified as for tumor size and nodal involvement according to the pathological TNM criteria. The type of surgical treatment was also registered for all cases diagnosed in 1990.

Results

one thousand two hundreds and fifty-four invasive and in situ breast cancers were observed and pT1 cases accounted for 44.4%. Nodal involvement was present in 41.5% of invasive cancers. A surgical treatment was performed in 1213 patients (96.7%). Axillary dissection was reported in 1080 cases, 820 of them (76.6%) having 10 or more lymph nodes examined. Radical mastectomy accounted for 74% of the 458 breast cancers diagnosed in 1990 and 31.6% of the eligible cases were conservatively treated.

Conclusions

Cancer registries should be encouraged to report data on stage distribution in breast cancer (and in other malignancies). This practice could improve international comparisons and give an essential contribution to studies on survival, screening programs and quality of care.

Fine needle aspiration of the breast for diagnosis of preinvasive neoplasia

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the breast is a well-tolerated procedure used to evaluate palpable breast masses, has a reported mean specificity of 99%, and a reported sensitivity of 70-99%. The false positive rate varies from 0-0.4% in most larger series, with a reported false negative rate ranging from 0.7-22%; however, higher false negative rates have been reported in tumors under 2 cm in diameter. The FNA technique uses a fine, 20 gauge or less, needle and is not associated with a significant risk of tumor growing out the needle tract. FNA cytology is not effectively used if a breast mass cannot be palpated or distinguished from fibrous tissue within the breast. The procedure can be applied to nonpalpable masses detected by mammography by employing stereotactic techniques. The cytologic samples obtained from FNA can be used to distinguish atypical ductal hyperplasia from in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma; however, cytologic criteria to effectively distinguish ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from invasive adenocarcinoma are not definitive in many cases, and are dependent on variables related to the type of intraductal tumor, the size and character of the cell groups, and the presence of single or disaggregated tumor cells. Employing current cytologic criteria, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) may be distinguished from invasive lobular carcinoma in some cases; however, the individual LCIS cells are not morphologically distinct from lobular carcinoma cells. Atypical lobular hyperplasia has cellular features essentially the same as those seen in LCIS. Needle biopsy (NB) employs larger needles of 14-16 gauge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)