Immunodiagnosis of Tumours

Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of free/total PSA Ratio by the IMMULITE® system

The role of free (F) and complexed serum PSA is now under investigation. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical significance of F-PSA and F/Total (T) PSA ratio in a preliminary series of samples from 88 patients with prostate cancer (PC), 113 with benign prostatic disease (BPD), and 98 with non-prostatic disease (NP). We used the F-PSA and third generation T-PSA (DPC, Los Angeles, USA) chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assays with the IMMULITE automated system. At the 10 ng/ml cutoff for T-PSA levels, we obtained a sensitivity of 83% with a specificity of 100% in NP and 80% in BPD. The addition of the FIT ratio –rather than F-PSA levels – was useful to better discriminate PC and BPD in the cases erroneously classified by T-PSA alone: 44/68 samples (65%) were correctly diagnosed. Moreover, the FIT ratio was particularly effective in the critical T-PSA range between 4.1-9.9 ng/ml; 26/40 cases (65%) were correctly evaluated. In conclusion, the FIT ratio seems to be an interesting auxiliary test to T-PSA, to be reserved for selected cases where additional diagnostic information is necessary.

Two Novel Monoclonal Antibodies against the MUC4 Tandem Repeat Reacting with an Antigen Overexpressed by Lung Cancer

In this study we investigated the immunochemical and cytochemical reactivity of two monoclonal antibodies against the 16-amino acid tandem repeat of MUC4 to demonstrate a possible variation of the mucin core peptide expression related to lung cancer. The immunocytochemical anti-MUC4 reactivity was analyzed in four lung cancer cell lines (Calu-1, Calu-3, H460, SKMES) and in other tumor cell lines, as well as in frozen materials from 21 lung adenocarcinomas (ACs), including five bronchioloalveolar carcinomas (BACs), and 11 squamous cell lung carcinomas (SqCCs). A weak fluorescence anti-MUC4 positivity (range: 10.3–16.2) was observed only in acetone-fixed lung cancer cell lines Calu-1, Calu-3 and H460. These three lung cancer cell lines also showed a cytoplasmic immunoperoxidase reactivity. The immunostaining in lung cancer tissues showed a granular cytoplasmic reactivity: 15/21 (71%) and 17/21 (80%) ACs were positive with BC-LuC18.2 and BC-LuCF12, respectively. All BACs were positive. Moderate to strong reactivity was present in well-differentiated ACs. In the normal lung parenchyma counterparts weak reactivity was found only in bronchiolar cells. All SqCCs were negative. Anti-MUC4 reactivity was also observed in the alveolar mucus. In conclusion, our anti-MUC4 MAbs detect a secretion product present in mucus and this product is elaborated by lung cancer cells and overexpressed in well-differentiated lung ACs.

Hormonal Regulation of MUC1 Expression

Several circulating mucinous markers, including CA 15.3, MCA, CA 459, CASA, and Truquant BR, are secreted products of the polymorphic MUC1 gene, and are used as diagnostic tools in patients with breast cancer. In clinical practice the measurement of the levels of these markers in the blood can give important information on the tumor's response to treatment and its biological behavior during disease monitoring. Since the marker levels reflect the activity of the tumor, it is important to know all factors influencing the production/secretion and the blood concentrations of MUC1 mucin. Recent findings suggest that MUC1 gene expression is regulated by steroid hormones and other substances present in the serum. Such observations are very important not only because of their biological significance but also for their clinical implications, as one approach to breast cancer therapy is based on chemical hormone manipulation. Nevertheless, we have preliminarily demonstrated that endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients does not influence the circulating CA 15.3 serum levels, so changes in marker levels are related only to the clinical evolution of the tumor.

Could the serial determination of Ca15.3 serum improve the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT?: results from small population with previous breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

A single value of tumor marker elevation is not used for the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) relapse, whereas the serial measurements which confirm a persistent Ca15.3 increase can represent an early signal of tumor relapse, even if described in asymptomatic patients without any other clinical or instrumental signs of cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serial measures of Ca15.3 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with already treated BC during follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 60 patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years) with previous history of BC, already treated with surgery and other treatments. Three serial measures of Ca15.3 were collected within 1 year before PET/CT examination, respectively, at 12-9 months (297 ± 30 days), 9-3 months (154 ± 51 days) and 3-0 months (46 ± 28 days). Clinical outcome or imaging follow-up data were used to define disease relapse. The increase in tumor marker value was compared with PET/CT results and disease relapse. Coefficient of variation (CV) and ROC curves were used. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

PET/CT was negative in 36 (60%) and positive in 24 (40%) patients. The median time between initial treatment and PET/CT was 3 years. CV of the Ca15.3 serial determinations was significantly higher in patients with positive than negative PET/CT (39 vs. 24%, p < 0.05). Disease relapse was found in 25 (42%) patients, of these 21 (88%) had positive PET/CT. ROC analyses showed that an increase of Ca15.3 between the 2nd and 3rd measures have better individuated positive PET/CT and disease relapse (AUC 0.65 and 0.64, respectively; p < 0.05). DFS was higher in patients with negative than positive PET/CT (65 vs. 15%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial increase of Ca15.3 could be considered optimal to address FDG PET/CT examination during BC patients follow-up. PET/CT performed just on time might allow, earlier and with higher diagnostic accuracy, the detection of disease relapse in BC patients.

Bony metastases from breast cancer - a study of foetal antigen 2 as a blood tumour marker

Background

Foetal antigen 2 (FA-2), first isolated in the amniotic fluid, was shown to be the circulating form of the aminopropeptide of the alpha 1 chain of procollagen type I. Serum concentrations of FA-2 appeared to be elevated in a number of disorders of bone metabolism. This paper is the first report of its role as a marker of bone metabolism in metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Serum FA-2 concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay in 153 women with different stages of breast cancer and in 34 normal controls.

Results

Serum FA-2 was significantly elevated in women with bony metastases (p < 0.015). Its levels were not significantly different among women with non-bony metastases, with non-metastatic disease, as well as among normal controls.

Conclusions

FA-2 is a promising blood marker of bone metabolism. Further studies to delineate its role in the diagnosis and management of bony metastases from breast cancer are required.

Diagnostic and prognostic tumor markers in the gastrointestinal tract

The gastrointestinal tract is the most common site of malignancies of any anatomic system in the body. An early detection of primary tumors of the bowel, pancreas, liver, stomach, and esophagus is often difficult in asymptomatic patients and for this reason these tumors are often detected at a relatively advanced stage, when symptoms lead to a diagnostic evaluation. Furthermore, gastrointestinal tract tumors have an extremely variable prognosis; thus, the identification of new prognostic parameters may be useful for selecting patients to more tailored therapies. In this work, the main molecular, genetic, tissular, and circulating tumor markers proposed for diagnosis and prognosis of gastrointestinal malignancies are reviewed and discussed.

Immune Responses to the MUC1 Mucin

MUC1 mucins are highly glycosylated glycoproteins expressed on the luminal surfaces of glandular epithelia. In breast and ovarian carcinomas, their expression is frequently upregulated and they may be secreted into the circulation of cancer patients. Early studies aimed at the production of anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibodies revealed that MUC1 was a potent immunogen in mice with many monoclonal antibodies raised defining epitopes within the protein core of MUC1. The immunogenicity of MUC1 has now been extended to human studies and it is apparent that patients with breast and ovarian malignant disease are able to mount immune responses against MUC1. These findings provide information on the mechanisms involved in the recognition of MUC1 expressing tumours. The utilisation of MUC1 related immunogens to stimulate immune responses to tumours could lead to the improved management of patients and the development of new immunotherapeutic strategies aimed at the eradication of MUC1 mucin expressing cancers.

Tumour marker measurements in the diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer

Elevation of established blood tumour markers correlates with the stage of breast cancer. The major role of current blood markers is therefore in the diagnosis and monitoring of metastatic disease. A combination of markers is better than a single marker with the most widely adopted combination being CEA and one MUC1 mucin, commonly detected as either CA15.3 or CA27.29. Tumour marker measurement is now used as a complementary test in the diagnosis of symptomatic metastases. In the monitoring of therapeutic response to both endocrine and cytotoxic therapies in advanced disease, biochemical assessment using blood markers not only correlates with conventional UICC criteria but has a lot of advantages which make it a potentially superior way of assessment. In this regard, CA15.3, CEA and ESR are the best validated combination. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the use of sequential blood tumour marker measurements in the follow-up of patients after treatment for their primary breast cancer, in terms of both early detection and early therapeutic intervention. Further randomized studies are also required to ascertain that marker-directed therapy is superior to the current practice for metastatic disease. In line with clinical studies, intensive laboratory work is being carried out to optimize the use of blood markers in advanced disease as well as to exploit their use in screening and diagnosis of early primary breast cancer.

Assessment of urinary gonadotropin in solid carcinomas other than gynecological tumors

To the already long list of existing tumor markers, a new marker has been recently added, the urinary gonadotropin peptide (UGP). This marker is determined in the urine of cancer patients and is considered to be particularly specific for ovarian carcinomas. The purpose of our study was to assess the specificity of UGP in a variety of malignancies other than ovarian carcinomas, e.g., breast, colonic, lung, and urogenital tumors (n = 50 each). The tumors were compared with benign lesions of the same organs. Urine samples of 50 healthy donors served as controls. The 450 urine samples were tested in duplicate using the UGP EIA-kit from Ciba Corning Diagnostics. All tumors were staged and histologically classified. For normalization in all samples, creatinine levels were determined. UGP was found in all tested tumors, however, with very low sensitivity of 20% in urogenital tumors, 46% in lung, and 30% or 27% in colon and breast carcinomas, respectively. The specificity of UGP was comprised between 100% (breast) and 88%. Clearly elevated UGP-concentrations were seen in postmenopausal women. A comparison of UGP with the optimal markers for each tumor system showed that UGP is not superior to these markers. However, we can confirm UGP as being an optimal marker for gynecological carcinomas.

CD66b, CD66c and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are independently regulated markers in sera of tumor patients

Non-specific cross-reacting antigens (NCA-95 = CD66b and NCA-50/90 = CD66c) are members of the CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen = CD66e) family. Analysis of mRNA levels of CD66c in colon tumors suggests that this antigen is strongly up-regulated compared to its normal counterpart and could, therefore, be of clinical interest. CD66c is also expressed in normal lung and spleen tissues and, above all, on granulocytes. The appearance of CD66b in serum, the only strictly granulocyte-specific antigen, could point to the involvement of granulocytes in disease. Specific sandwich ELISAs have been established to determine CEA, CD66b and CD66c levels in serum. Controls have been carried out by testing sera from patients with benign tumors or inflammatory diseases and from healthy individuals. In sera of most patients suffering from solid tumors, sensitivities for CD66c are comparable to or lower than those for CEA. CD66c showed a much higher sensitivity in early colon tumor stages. Sensitivities over 40% have been determined for CD66b in sera of patients with uterine and kidney carcinomas. CML patients revealed sensitivities of 84% for CD66c and 47% for CD66b. Investigations of sera from patients with inflammatory colon diseases which are negative for CEA showed high sensitivity for CD66c but not for the granulocyte-specific CD66b. Patients with mastopathy revealed sensitivities of over 40% for both CD66c and CD66b. CD66b, CD66c and CEA are independently regulated proteins in a high percentage of patients. The simultaneous determination of CEA and CD66b/c can increase the sensitivities for malignant tumors but high sensitivities of CD66b/c for benign diseases limit their usefulness as tumor markers. CD66b may be interesting as a marker for kidney and corpus carcinomas, for which good markers are not yet available.

Assessment of five serum marker assays in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate

This study concerns five different tumour marker assays examined in the context of 94 patients with advanced breast cancer treated in a prospectively randomised trial of different doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). MPA was administered at doses of 500 or 1000 mg daily and clinical evaluation of patients was carried out according to UICC criteria. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was selected as a standard marker, with three assays for MUC1 mucins (epithelial mucin core antigens (EMCA), EMCA2 and BR-MA immunoradiometric assay) differing in antibody specificities for different mucin epitopes. An additional novel assay for soluble cytokeratin was also evaluated as an example of an independent marker with a different nature and biology. Sensitivity of individual assays ranged between 44 (EMCA2) and 69% (cytokeratin) and the use of two assays in combination led to sensitivities as high as 84% (cytokeratin+BR-MA). The proportion of patients found to be assessable by each assay ranged between 51 (EMCA2) and 76% (cytokeratin). Of those patients whose marker changes were assessable, those receiving the higher dose of MPA displayed significant falls in marker levels after 12 weeks of treatment. This effect was not observed in patients receiving 500 mg. The change in cytokeratin levels in patients undergoing high dose MPA therapy proved to be most marked. Using the cytokeratin assay, 91% (of 23 patients) of patients with progressive disease showed at least a 25% rise in serum marker levels. Of these, 66% showed increases before disease progression was detected clinically with a mean lead time of 14 weeks. There was very little difference between the responses of the five tumour marker assays in patients with stable or responding disease, the proportion of these patients with stable or falling tumour marker levels ranging between 58% (CEA) and 77% (EMCA). We conclude that the cytokeratin assay has an application in monitoring response to therapy and predicting tumour progression in advanced breast cancer patients with assessable tumour marker profiles, especially if used in combination with a MUC1 mucin assay.

Expression of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens in fractions isolated from human breast carcinomas and patients' serum

The aim of this study was to examine tissue from patients with breast carcinoma or benign breast disease for the presence of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens, including the MUC1 mucin and carcinoembryonic antigen CEA. The tests were performed by sodium dodecyl sulphate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic separation of proteins, electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose membranes and immunostaining with the monoclonal antibodies. Some of the antigens identified are known to circulate at high levels in some but not necessarily all, breast carcinoma patients. Serum from a panel of ten breast cancer patients was subjected to a fractionation procedure designed to release antigen from immune complexes, and again these samples were analysed for the presence of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens. A high frequency of positive reactions was detected by the anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody C595 with both breast carcinoma subcellular membrane fractions as well as antigen fractions eluted from circulating immune complexes. No reactions were observed with equivalent materials from benign breast disease samples. The findings illustrate the variability in antigen expression between breast tumours. The data also indicate that a proportion of patients respond to their tumour by the production of antibodies that recognise the MUC1 antigen in their circulation.